Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Agarwal, Vijay
- Corporate Governance Structure:Issues & Challenges – Cases of Tata Sons & Infosys
Abstract Views :334 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Manav Rachna International University, Faridabad, IN
1 Manav Rachna International University, Faridabad, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev., Vol 53, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 72-85Abstract
Companies incorporated under Companies Act are characterized by separation of ownership and management. Besides shareholders, stakeholders include banks/financial institutions, Board of Directors (BoD), employees, suppliers, customers and regulatory authorities. The company's operations are in its interest and are to mitigate conflict of interest of the stakeholders. This entails corporate governance, with the essential characteristics of transparency and accountability. Besides the meaning and significance of corporate governance, this paper discusses the legal aspects and practice relating to the system of BoD's functioning and the key tools of corporate governance. It also analyses the recent conflicting corporate governance experiences of two leading giant corporations in India viz. Tata Group and Infosys.
References
- Amrit Raj (2014), “Independent Directors Are Isolated”, Mint, Nov. 27:11
- Balakrishnan, Deepa (2017), “Narayana Murthy Slams Infosys COO Pay Rise, Blames Poor Governance Standards”, CNN-News 18, April 3
- Balasubramanyam, K R (2017), “Corporate Governance Badly Down at Infosys and Needs an Overhaul, N. R. Narayana Murthy”, Economic Times, February 10
- Barman, Arjit (2016), “Mystery Unsolved Over Why Board Said Tata to Mistry”, Economic Times, October 26: 10
- Damodaran, M. (2014), “I Do not See Institutional Investors Being Active Enough”, Mint, Nov. 28:11
- Dhameja, Nand (2003), “Audit Committees-Requisite for Good Governance: Indian Scenario”, Productivity, 43(4)
- Dhameja, Nand & Agarwal Vijay, (2014) “Gender Diversity on Boards: Global Experience and Measuress Initiated”, Indian Journal of Public Administration LX, (3), July – Sept: 456
- Dhameja, Nand (2016), “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives: Practices and Issues”, Indian Journal of Public Administration LXII, (4):761-80
- ICSI (August 2014), Board Committees – A Hand Book: The Companies Act, 2013 Series, Institute of Companies Secretaries of India, New Delhi 110003
- Kalesh, Baiju, Vijayraghavan, Kala & Barman, Arijit (2016), “Behind the Scenes - CYONARA Die was Cast Months Ago”, Economic Times, October 25: 1
- Karmali, Naazneen (2017), “Amid Typhoon Tata Nusli Wadia Backs Cyrus Mistry”, Forbes, January 16:
- Mahalingam T. V. (2015), “How India Inc. Can Fix Its Boards”, Economic Times, Corporate Dossier, January 23 – 29: 1
- Mandavia, Megha (2016), “Trust Deficit May Have Led to Tata Chairman’s Exit”, Economic Times, October: 27
- Marwah, Varun (2017), “Tata Mistry: Tata Strikes back (with a vengeance) in NCFT”, Bar & Bench, Legal Journalism, Jan. 11
- Mathur, Nandita (2017), “Indian Men Earn 25% More Than Women: Monster Salary Index for 2016", Mint, March 7
- Philipose, Mobis (2017), “Why Both Sikka, Murthy Need Corporate Governance Lessons”, Mint, February 13, Page 4
- Ramanatahn, Arundhati (Nov. 2014), “Firms Say Long Tenure Does Not Affect Directors’ Independence”, Mint Corporate News, Nov. 26: 12
- Raychaudhari, Manishi & Jain, Rajan (2014), Asia Strategy, BNP Paribus Report Sood, Varun (2017), “Infosys Promoters, Board at Odds over Pravin Rao’s Salary Hike”, Mint, April 30
- Upadhyay, Jayshree P. (2017) “Tata Trusts Asks NCLT to Dismiss Mistry Plea”, Mint, January 11.
- Vijayraghavan, Kala & Bhattacharayya, Rica (2015), “Ireena Vittal’s Exit from Axis Bank Sparks Conflict of Interest Debate: Some see Gender Bias”, The Economic Times, September 3:1