International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Literature Review on Demand Models in Retail Assortment Planning


     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A retailer assortment is defined as the mix of products carried by a retail store. Assortment planning (AP) is a process of selecting types and number of product to be kept from a given product line and also to determine the optimal level of inventory of these products. The assortment optimization problem in the literature varies because of the type of demand models considered by the authors or because of the context of the problem considered. Various authors have developed models in past that cater to various objectives associated with shelf-space allocation and assortment decisions. It has been observed that the demand estimation in any assortment planning problem mostly considered shelf-space and substitution parameters. In the current work, the assortment planning problem dealt by various researchers primarily with shelf-space and substitution effect consideration will be reviewed.

Keywords

Assortment Planning, Demand Models, Shelf-space, Substitution
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abbott, H. & Palekar, U. S. (2008). Retail replenishment models with display-space elastic demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 586-607.

  • Agrawal, N., Smith, S. A. & Tsay, A. A. (2002a). Multi vendor sourcing in a retial supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 11(2), 157-182.

  • Agrawal, N., Smith, S. A. & Tsay, A. A. (2002b). Multi vendor sourcing ina retail supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 11(2), 157-182.

  • Anderson, E. E. & Amato, H. N. (1974a). A mathematical model for simultaneously determining the optimal brand-collection and display-area allocation. Operations Research, 22(1), 13-21.

  • Anderson, E. E. & Amato, H. N. (1974b). A mathematical model for simultaneously determining the optimal brand-collection and display-area allocation. Operations Research, 22(1), 13-21.

  • Arkader, R. & Ferreira, C. F. (2004). Category management initiatives from the retailer perspective: A study in the Brazilian grocery retail industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10(1), 41-51.

  • Aydin, G. & Hausman, W. H. (2009). The role of slotting fees in the coordination of assortment decisions. Production and Operations Management, 18(6), 635-652.

  • Ayd?n, G. & Hausman, W. H. (2009). The role of slotting fees in the coordination of assortment decisions. Production and Operations Management, 18(6), 635-652.

  • Bai, R. & Kendall, G. (2005a). An investigation of automated planograms using a simulated annealing based hyper-heuristic. Metaheuristics: Progress as Real Problem Solvers, 32(3), 87-108.

  • Bai, R. & Kendall, G. (2005b). An investigation of automated planograms using a simulated annealing based hyper-heuristics. Metaheuristics: Progress as Real Problem Solver- Operations Research/Computer Science Interface Serices, 32(3), 87-108.

  • Baumol, W. J. & Ide, E. A. (1956). Variety in retailing. Management Science, 3(1), 93-101.

  • Bookbinder, J. H. & Zarour, F. H. (2001). Direct product profi tability and retail shelf space allocation models. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 183-208.

  • Borin, N. & Farris, P. (1995). A sensitivity analysis of retailer shelf management models. Journal of Retailing, 71(2), 153-171.

  • Borin, N., Farris, P. W. & Freeland, J. R. (1994). A model for determining retail product category assortment and shelf-space allocation. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 359-384.

  • Brown, W. & Tucker, W. (1961). The marketing center: Vanishing shelf space. Atlanta Economic Review, 11(10), 9-13.

  • Bultez, A. & Naert, P. (1988a). SH. ARP: Shelf allocation for retailers’ profi t. Marketing Science, 7(3), 211-231.

  • Bultez, A. & Naert, P. (1988b). SH.A.R.P. Shelf allocation for retailers’ profi t. Marketing Science, 7(3), 211-231.

  • Bultez, A., Naert, P., Gijsbrechts, E. & Abelle, P. V. (1989). Asymmetric cannibalism in retail assortments. Journal of Retailing, 65(2), 153-192.

  • Cachon, G. P. & Kök, A. G. (2007). Category management and coordination in retail assortment planning in the presence of basket shopping consumers. Management Science, 53(6), 934-951.

  • Cachon, G. P., Terwiesch, C. & Xu, Y. (2005). Retail assortment planning in the presence of consumer search. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 7(4), 330-346.

  • Cairns, J. P. (1963). Allocate space for maximum profi ts. Journal of Retailing, 39(2), 43-55.

  • Campo, K., Gijsbrechts, E., Goossens, T. & Verhetsel, A. (2000). The impact of location factors on the attractiveness and optimal space shares of product categories. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(4), 255-279.

  • Chen, Y. L., Chen, J. M. & Tung, C. W. (2006). A data mining approach for retail knowledge discovery with consideration of the effect of shelf-space adjacency on sales. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1503-1520.

  • Chong, J. K., Ho, T. H. & Tang, C. S. (2001). A modeling framework for category assortment planning. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 3(3), 191-210.

  • Corstjens, M. & Doyle, P. (1981). A model for optimizing retail space allocations. Management Science, 27(7), 822-833.

  • Corstjens, M. & Doyle, P. (1983). A dynamic model for strategically allocating retail space. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34(10), 943-951.

  • Cox, K. (1964). The responsiveness of food sales to shelf space changes in supermarkets. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(2), 63-67.

  • Cox, K. K. (1970). The effect of shelf space upon sales of branded products. Journal of Marketing Research, 7(1), 55-58.

  • Desmet, P. & Renaudin, V. (1998). Estimation of product category sales responsiveness to allocated shelf space. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(5), 443-457.

  • Dreze, X., Hoch, S. J. & Purk, M. E. (1995). Shelf management and space elasticity. Journal of Retailing, 70(4), 301-326.

  • Drèze, X., Hoch, S. J. & Purk, M. E. (1994). Shelf management and space elasticity. Journal of Retailing, 70(4), 301-326.

  • Europe, P. (1998). The POPAI Europe consumer buying habits study. Point-of-Purchase Advertising Institute. Co-ordination by Retail Marketing In-Store Services Limited. Watford, Herts: POPAI Europe.

  • Frank, R. E. & Massy, W. F. (1970). Shelf position and space effects on sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 7(1), 59-66.

  • Gajjar, H. K. & Adil, G. K. (2010). A piecewise linearization for retail shelf space allocation problem and a local search heuristic. [Article]. Annals of Operations Research, 179(1), 149-167.

  • Gaur, V. & Honhon, D. (2005). Assortment Planning and Inventory Decisions under a Locational Choice Model. Working Paper, New York University.

  • Gaur, V. & Honhon, D. (2006). Assortment planning and inventory decisions under a locational choice model. Management Science, 52(10), 1528-1543.

  • Goyal, V., Levi, R. & Segev, D. (2009). Near-Optimal Algorithms for the Assortment Planning Problem under Dynamic Substitution and Stochastic Demand.

  • Guadagni, P. M. & Little, J. D. C. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science, 2(3), 203-238.

  • Hansen, P. & Heinsbroek, H. (1979). Product selection and space allocation in supermarkets. European Journal of Operational Research, 3(6), 474-484.

  • Hariga, M. A., Al-Ahmari, A. & Mohamed, A. R. A. (2007). A joint optimisation model for inventory replenishment, product assortment, shelf space and display area allocation decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 239-251.

  • Irion, J., Al-Khayyal, F. & Lu, J. C. (2004). A Piecewise Linearization Framework for Retail Shelf Space Management Models. Retrieved from http://www.optimizationonline. org/DB_FILE/2004/10/967.pdf (accessed on May 6, 2006.)

  • Kok, A. G. & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Operations Research- Baltimore, 55(6), 1001-1021.

  • Kök, A. G. & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Operations Research, 55(6), 1001-1021.

  • Kök, A. G., Fisher, M. L. & Vaidyanathan, R. (2009). Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Retail Supply Chain Management, 1-55.

  • Kotzan, J. A. & Evanson, R. V. (1969). Responsiveness of drug store sales to shelf space allocations. Journal of Marketing Research, November, 6, 465-469.

  • Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157.

  • Lee, W. (1961). Space management in retail stores and implications to agriculture. Marketing Keys to Profi ts in the 1960’s, 523-533.

  • Li, Z. (2007a). A single period assortment optimization model. Production and Operations Management, 16(3), 369-380.

  • Li, Z. (2007b). A single period assortment optimization model. Production and Operations Management, 16(3), 369-380.

  • Mahajan, S. & Van Ryzin, G. (2001a). Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Operations Research, 49(3), 334-351.

  • Mahajan, S. & van Ryzin, G. (2001b). Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Operations research, 49(3), 334-351.

  • McFadden, D., University of California, B. I. O. U. & Development. (1973). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.

  • Miller, C. M., Smith, S. A., McIntyre, S. H. & Achabal, D. D. (2010). Optimizing and evaluating retail assortments for infrequently purchased products. Journal of Retailing, 86(2), 159-171.

  • Quelch, J. A. & Kenny, D. (1994). Extend profi ts, not product lines. Harvard Business Review, 72(5), 153-160.

  • Rajaram, K. (2001). Assortment planning in fashion retailing: Methodology, application and analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 186-208.

  • Ryzin, G. & Mahajan, S. (1999). On the relationship between inventory costs and variety benefi ts in retail assortments. Management Science, 45(11), 1496-1509.

  • Shah, J. & Avittathur, B. (2007). The retailer multiitem inventory problem with demand cannibalization and substitution. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(1), 104-114.

  • Smith, S. A. & Agrawal, N. (2000a). Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution. Operations Research, 48(1), 50-64.

  • Smith, S. A. & Agrawal, N. (2000b). Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution. Operations Research, 48(1), 50-64.

  • Taylor, C. G. (1970). Merchandise Assortment Planning: The Key to Retailing Profi t. Merchandising Division, National Retail Merchants Association.

  • Urban, T. L. (1998). An inventory-theoretic approach to product assortment and shelf-space allocation. Journal of Retailing, 74(1), 15-35.

  • Van Ryzin, G. & Mahajan, S. (1999). On the relationship between inventory costs and variety benefi ts in retail assortments. Management Science, 45(11), 1496-1509.

  • Yang, M. H. (2001). An effi cient algorithm to allocate shelf space. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(1), 107-118.

  • Yücel, E., Karaesmen, F., Salman, F. S. & Türkay, M. (2009). Optimizing product assortment under customer- driven demand substitution. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 759-768.

  • Zufryden, F. S. (1986). A dynamic programming approach for product selection and supermarket shelf-space allocation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 37(4), 413-422


Abstract Views: 895

PDF Views: 0




  • A Literature Review on Demand Models in Retail Assortment Planning

Abstract Views: 895  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Abstract


A retailer assortment is defined as the mix of products carried by a retail store. Assortment planning (AP) is a process of selecting types and number of product to be kept from a given product line and also to determine the optimal level of inventory of these products. The assortment optimization problem in the literature varies because of the type of demand models considered by the authors or because of the context of the problem considered. Various authors have developed models in past that cater to various objectives associated with shelf-space allocation and assortment decisions. It has been observed that the demand estimation in any assortment planning problem mostly considered shelf-space and substitution parameters. In the current work, the assortment planning problem dealt by various researchers primarily with shelf-space and substitution effect consideration will be reviewed.

Keywords


Assortment Planning, Demand Models, Shelf-space, Substitution

References