Open Access
Subscription Access
Predicting Trustworthiness of an E-Commerce Platform from the Consumer Perspective
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Internet shopping has become part and parcel of our day to day lives. Coupled with COVID-19 pandemic and the necessity to keep social distancing, many people have resorted to online shopping as a way of reducing potential exposure to the deadly virus. Online vendors have tried to follow the trends and put up online shops in unprecedented numbers. These myriad of alternatives have given room to unscrupulous vendors to also sneak in their products with an intention to defraud inexperienced online buyers. This massive number of online shops makes it impractical for an average user to assess with certainty which shop is trustworthy and which one is potentially fraudulent. In this study, we carry out a research to establish the indicators of trust in an e-commerce platform from the consumer perspective. We carry out a survey, focus group discussions and in-depth interview with a community within a public university to establish the factors they consider to conclude that an e-commerce platform is trustworthy or otherwise. We the use Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) as our data analysis procedures. For EFA, we obtain uniqueness, factor loadings, scree plot, Eigen values, parallel analysis, optimal coordinates, and acceleration factor. For PCA, we obtain PCA Importance of Components, Loadings, Scree Plot, and biplot. We also obtain a Cronbach’ alpha of 0.959 which indicates reliable data. Further research will involve creating a model from these results which can be used as a trust adjustment factor for autonomous use in artificial intelligence driven recommender system in ecommerce platforms.
Keywords
Decision Support, e-Commerce, Recommender Systems, Scale Development, Trust.
User
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
Font Size
Information
- S. McLeod, “Maslow's hierarchy of needs,” SimplyPsychology, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html
- S. Roman, “The ethics of online retailing: A scale development and validation from the consumers’ perspective,” J. Bus. Ethics, 72, pp. 131–148, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9161-y.
- C. Yin, J. Wang, and J. H. Park, “An improved recommendation algorithm for big data cloud service based on the trust in sociology,” Neurocomputing, vol. 256, pp. 49–55, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.07.079.
- J. Leskovec, ”Epinions social network,” Stanford Univ., 2003. [Online]. Available: https://snap.stanford.edu/data/soc-Epinions1.html
- R. Burke, M. P. O’Mahony, and N. J. Hurley, “Robust collaborative recommendation,” In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, P. Kantor, P. (eds) Recommender Syst. Handbook, 2011, Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_25.
- A. Yasmin, S. Tasneem, and K. Fatema, “Effectiveness of digital marketing in the challenging age: An empirical study,” Int. J. Manage. Sci. Bus. Admin., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 69–80, 2015, doi: 10.18775/IJMSBA.1849-5664-5419.2014.15.1006.
- A. D. Cornière, “Search advertising,” Amer. Econ. J.: Microeconomics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 156–188, 2016. [Online]. Available: ttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43948892
- S. Athey and D. Nekipelov, “A structural model of sponsored search advertising auctions,” Sixth Ad Auctions Workshop. New Haven: Yale Univ.,” pp. 1–72, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://eml.berkeley.edu//~nekipelov/pdf_papers/paper16.pdf
- S. Narayanan and K. Kalyanam, “Position effects in search advertising and their moderators: A regression discontinuity approach,” Marketing Sci., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 309–472, 2015, doi: 10.1287/mksc.2014.0893.
- G. Aggarwal, S. Muthukrishnan, D. Pál, and M., Pál, “General auction mechanism for search advertising,” In Proc. 18th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, pp. 241–250, 2009.
- A. Ghose and S. Yang, “An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets,” Manage. Sci., vol. 55, no. 10, 1605–1622, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1054
- Jumia. (March 29, 2021). Rate & review. Accessed: March 29, 2021 https://www.jumia.co.ke/customer/reviewsratings/detail/?sku=
- Best, S.J. and Krueger, B., “New approaches to assessing opinion: The prospects for electronic mail surveys,” Int. J. Public Opinion Res., no. 14, pp. 73–91, 2002. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/New-Approaches-to-Assessing-Opinion%3A-The-Prospects-Best-Krueger/431805dd74246bc58dc40818d60b18d305b4a222
- D. D. Suhr, “Principal Component Analysis vs. Exploratory Factor Analysis,” SUGI 30 Proc., 2009. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.456.4679
- The R project for statistical computing. R-Project. [Online]. Available: https://www.r-project.org/
- J. Ruscio and B. Roche, “Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 282–292, 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0025697.
- R. D. Ledesma, P. Valero-Mora, and G. Macbeth, “The scree test and the number of factors: A dynamic graphics approach,” Spanish J. Psychology, 1–10, 2015, doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.13.
Abstract Views: 205
PDF Views: 0