Indian Journal of Marketing

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Crop Diversification and Crop Disposition in India : An Inter - State Analysis


Affiliations
1 Prof ND Kapoor Marg, University of Delhi, Delhi - 110 007, India
2 Shri Ram College of Commerce, University of Delhi, Maurice Nagar, Delhi - 110 007, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Given the low productivity and earnings of Indian farmers, especially small and marginal landholders, it is pertinent to understand the constraints under which they operate and correspondingly address the same. Amongst several factors, farmers’ earnings can also improve through crop diversification and conducive crop disposition channels, which involve fewer middlemen. This way, farmers can capture a greater share of value addition in the supply chain from farm-gate to consumer. With this backdrop, the present paper analyzed two specific objectives. First, to estimate the degree of crop diversification and the prominent ways in which crop disposition takes place across states and union territories (UTs) in India, and second, to analyze the relationship between crop diversification and variants of crop disposition in India. Four crop diversification indices were calculated, namely Gibbs and Martin, Herfindal – Hirschman Index, Simpson Diversity Index, and Bhatia’s Index. The paper primarily used GM Index for further analysis. Channels of crop disposition were analyzed through six agencies, that is, local private agents, mandis, input dealers, co-operatives and government agencies, processors, and others. Our findings indicated the following : First, crop diversification remained ‘low’ to ‘moderate’ for most of the Indian states and UTs. Second, though crop diversification increased for several states and UTs during the two Rounds, the pace of improvement was slow. Third, crop disposition is generally undertaken through private agents. Fourth, the relationship between crop diversification and sale to ‘mandis’ was positive and significant, while that between crop diversification and ‘sale to local private agents’ was negative and significant.

Keywords

Crop Diversification, Crop Disposition, Agricultural Economics, Economic Policy, and Development, India.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Adjimoti, G. O., & Kwadzo, G. (2018). Crop diversification and household food security status: evidence from rural Benin. Agriculture & Food Security, 7(1), Article Number 82. DOI: 10.1186/s40066-018-0233-x

  • Asia and the Pacific Division, International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2011). Agriculture - Pathways to prosperity in Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/39135645/pathways.pdf/d87b6f4d-88cb-4c84-8b7e6a645d0f5ea0

  • Bandaru, R. (2019). e - national agriculture market in India : An effective implementation and farmers’ attraction path model. Indian Journal of Marketing,49(6),48–58. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i6/144699

  • Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2001). Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy, 26(4), 315 – 331.

  • Birthal, P. S., Hazrana, J., & Negi, D. S. (2020). Diversification in Indian agriculture towards high value crops: Multilevel determinants and policy implications. Land Use Policy, 91, 104427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104427

  • Birthal, P. S., Roy, D., & Negi, D. S. (2015). Assessing the impact of crop diversification on farm poverty in India. World Development, 72, 70 – 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.02.015

  • Biswas, R. K. (2016). An economic analysis of crop diversification under inorganic and organic farming in West Bengal. International Journal of Bioresource Science, 3(1), 33 – 38.

  • Bittinger, A. K. (2010). Crop diversification and technology adoption: The role of market isolation in Ethiopia (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Bozeman, Montana.

  • Cavatassi, R., Lipper, L., & Winters, P. (2012). Sowing the seeds of social relations : Social capital and agricultural diversity in Hararghe Ethiopia. Environment and Development Economics, 17(5), 547 – 578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000356

  • Chand, R. (2012). Development policies and agricultural markets. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(52), 53 – 63

  • Chhatre, A., Devalkar, S., & Seshadri, S. (2016). Crop diversification and risk management in Indian agriculture. Decision, 43(2), 167 – 179. DOI: 10.1007/s40622-016-0129-1

  • Das, B., & Mili, N. (2012). Pattern of crop diversification and disparities in agriculture: A case study of Dibrugarh district, Assam, India. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(2), 37 – 40.

  • De, U. K., & Chattopadhyay, M. (2010). Crop diversification by poor peasants and role of infrastructure: Evidence from West Bengal. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 2(10), 340 – 350.

  • Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare (2018). Agricultural statistics at a glance 2018. New Delhi : Government of India.

  • Dutta, P. K. (2011). Agricultural rural marketing in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 41(7), 9 – 19.

  • Ministry of Finance, Government of India. (2017). Economic Survey - State of food and agriculture in Indian economy. Retrieved from https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2016-2017/survey.asp

  • Gulati, A., Kapur, D., & Bouton, M. M. (2020). Reforming Indian agriculture. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(11), 35. Retrieved from https://www.epw.in/journal/2020/11/special-articles/reforming-indianagriculture.html Jadhav, S. K., & Deshmukh, K. V. (2014). Crop diversification in Marathwada region of Maharashtra : An economic analysis. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 27, 208 – 219.

  • Joshi, P. K., Gulati, A., Birthal, P., & Tewari, L. (2004). Agricultural diversification in South Asia : Patterns, determinants and policy implications. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(24), 52 – 58.

  • Kaur, S., Jha, S., & Mandal, R. (2014). Information, efficiency, and sustainability in Indian agricultural markets : E-Choupal, ITC’s private initiative. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2526061

  • Kulshrestha, D., & Agrawal, K. K. (2019). An econometric analysis of agricultural production and economic growth in India. Indian Journal of Marketing,49(11),56–65. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i11/148276

  • National Sample Survey Organization. (2005). Situation assessment survey of farmers: Income, expenditure and productive assets of farmer households. Report No 497, 59th Round. New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.

  • National Sample Survey Organization. (2013). Situation assessment survey of farmers: Income, expenditure and productive assets of farmer households. Report No 576, 70th Round. New Delhi : Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.

  • Negi, D. S., Birthal, P. S., Roy, D., & Khan, M. T. (2018). Farmers’ choice of market channels and producer prices in India: Role of transportation and communication networks. Food Policy, 81, 106 – 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.10.008

  • Rao, P., Birthal, P.S., & Joshi, P.K. (2006). Diversification towards high-value agriculture : Role of urbanization and infrastructure. Economic and Political Weekly, 41 (26), 2747 – 2753.

  • Stoeffler, Q. (2016). Crop portfolio choices in Burkina Faso. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(3), 261 – 285. DOI: 10.1353/jda.2016.0103

  • Sudhakar, V., & Gurupandi, M. (2008). Analysis of productivity and resource use efficiency of paddy. Indian Journal of Marketing, 38(11),48–54. Retrieved from http://indianjournalofmarketing.com/index.php/ijom/article/view/36875

  • Weinberger, K., & Lumpkin, T. A. (2007). Diversification into horticulture and poverty reduction : A research agenda. World Development, 35(8), 1464 – 1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.05.002

  • Xu, T. (2017). Income diversification and rural consumption – Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Sustainability, 9(6), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061014


Abstract Views: 318

PDF Views: 2




  • Crop Diversification and Crop Disposition in India : An Inter - State Analysis

Abstract Views: 318  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Cheshta Kapuria
Prof ND Kapoor Marg, University of Delhi, Delhi - 110 007, India
Simrit Kaur
Shri Ram College of Commerce, University of Delhi, Maurice Nagar, Delhi - 110 007, India

Abstract


Given the low productivity and earnings of Indian farmers, especially small and marginal landholders, it is pertinent to understand the constraints under which they operate and correspondingly address the same. Amongst several factors, farmers’ earnings can also improve through crop diversification and conducive crop disposition channels, which involve fewer middlemen. This way, farmers can capture a greater share of value addition in the supply chain from farm-gate to consumer. With this backdrop, the present paper analyzed two specific objectives. First, to estimate the degree of crop diversification and the prominent ways in which crop disposition takes place across states and union territories (UTs) in India, and second, to analyze the relationship between crop diversification and variants of crop disposition in India. Four crop diversification indices were calculated, namely Gibbs and Martin, Herfindal – Hirschman Index, Simpson Diversity Index, and Bhatia’s Index. The paper primarily used GM Index for further analysis. Channels of crop disposition were analyzed through six agencies, that is, local private agents, mandis, input dealers, co-operatives and government agencies, processors, and others. Our findings indicated the following : First, crop diversification remained ‘low’ to ‘moderate’ for most of the Indian states and UTs. Second, though crop diversification increased for several states and UTs during the two Rounds, the pace of improvement was slow. Third, crop disposition is generally undertaken through private agents. Fourth, the relationship between crop diversification and sale to ‘mandis’ was positive and significant, while that between crop diversification and ‘sale to local private agents’ was negative and significant.

Keywords


Crop Diversification, Crop Disposition, Agricultural Economics, Economic Policy, and Development, India.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom%2F2020%2Fv50%2Fi5-7%2F152117