Indian Journal of Marketing

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Does Social Media use Impact Small Agribusiness Exploitation and Exploration Capability? Perspectives and Recommendations from the UT of J&K


Affiliations
1 Research Scholar, The Business School, The University of Jammu, Baba Saheb Ambedkar Road, Gujarbasti, Jammu - 180 006, J&K., India
2 Professor, The Business School, University of Jammu, Baba Saheb Ambedkar Road, Gujarbasti, Jammu - 180 006, J&K.
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


For businesses functioning in complex environments where destabilizing factors are exacerbated, ambidexterity, or the ability of an organization to exploit and explore, becomes essential. Due to this, businesses are on the lookout for newer procedures that are practical both now and in the future. The utilization of digital and social media for marketing forms a subset of such practices that are contemporary yet pervasive. In fact, Whatsapp and Facebook have become the spearhead platforms for information dissemination, relationship building, and transaction handling for businesses around the globe. While considerable research provides insights into the adoption and acceptance of web technologies in different sectors, studies investigating the role of social media in developing dynamic capabilities for agribusinesses are scarce. Data inputs were drawn from 73 agribusinesses primarily using a quantitative approach and interpreted using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to address this issue. A qualitative inquiry through post-survey interviews was also used to strengthen the research outcomes. The findings pointed out that social media use results in greater exploitation over exploration capabilities in the study area. The possible reasons for this one-sided usage, such as lack of awareness and technical and human incapacities are explored, and a suggestion for developing ambidexterity is presented. The study’s outcome can help small business owners, employees, and the government capitalize on the different social technology tools to their most significant advantage.

Keywords

Social media, agribusinesses, exploration capacity, exploitation capacity, ambidexterity, PLS-SEM

Paper Submission Date : July 30, 2021 ; Paper sent back for Revision : May 16, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : June 20, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : October 15, 2022

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Appiah, E. K. (2021). Ambidextrous learning and survival of early international firms - The role of social media usage. In, Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2021.337

  • Arena, M., Cross, R., Sims, J., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2017). How to catalyze innovation in your organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(4), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11858.003.0004

  • Arief, M., & Paryono, H. Y. (2015). Social technology adoption and organizational ambidexterity in Indonesia. Advanced Science Letters, 21(4), 1000–1004. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.5964

  • Asha Vijay, T., & Raju, M. S. (2019). Marketing and exchange of farm products in Facebook groups: A case study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(10), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i10/147565

  • Ashurst, C., Freer, A., Ekdahl, J., & Gibbons, C. (2012). Exploring IT-enabled innovation: A new paradigm. International Journal of Information Management, 32(4), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.05.006

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02723327

  • Bahattin, C., Parseker, Z., Akpinar Bayizit, A., & Turhan, S. (2008). Using e-commerce as an information technique in agri-food industry. AgEcon Search, 553–562. http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.43404

  • Bedi, H. S. (2018). A contingency approach to proactiveness - Business performance relationship. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(12), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i12/139555

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0167

  • Bowen, R., & Morris, W. (2019). The digital divide: Implications for agribusiness and entrepreneurship. Lessons from Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, 72, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.031

  • Brodie, R. J., Winklhofer, H., Coviello, N. E., & Johnston, W. J. (2007). Is e-marketing coming of age? An examination of the penetration of e-marketing and firm performance. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20071

  • Carr, J., Decreton, L., Qin, W., Rojas, B., Rossochacki, T., & wen Yang, Y. (2015). Social media in product development. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.04.001

  • Caspin-Wagner, K., Ellis, S., & Tishler, A. (2012). Balancing exploration and exploitation for firm's superior performance: The role of the environment. In, Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2012, No. 1, 17177). https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2012.17177abstract

  • Davis, G. T. (2017). An examination of social media as a marketing tool for Tennessee small farmers (Doctoral dissertation). Tennessee State University. ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis Global. https://www.proquest.com/openview/5581594efe21298d4ac7fc84f7cb352e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

  • De Castro, M. M., & Depositario, D. P. (2020). An innovative ambidexterity typology of Filipino agripreneurs and its implications for regional development policies. UP CIDS Policy Brief 2020 - 04. https://cids.up.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/UP-CIDS-Policy-Brief-2020-04.pdf

  • Derham, R., Cragg, P., & Morrish, S. (2011). Creating value: An SME and social media. PACIS 2011 Proceedings, 53. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2011/53

  • Elghannam, A., Mesias, F. J., Escribano, M., Fouad, L., Horrillo, A., & Escribano, A. J. (2019). Consumers' perspectives on alternative short food supply chains based on social media: A focus group study in Spain. Foods, 9(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010022

  • Eze, P., & Obikeze, C. O. (2017). The extent of utilization of e-marketing application by small and medium enterprises in South Eastern States of Nigeria. Management Studies and Economic Systems (MSES), 3(4), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.12816/0046762

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980

  • Garrido-Moreno, A., García-Morales, V., King, S., & Lockett, N. (2020). Social media use and value creation in the digital landscape: A dynamic-capabilities perspective. Journal of Service Management, 31(3), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-09-2018-0286

  • Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008

  • Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-04-2016-0130

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I – method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094

  • He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078

  • Helfat, C. E., & Winter, S. G. (2011). Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N) ever‐changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.955

  • Hilal, M. I. (2019). Market orientation and innovation capabilities : Does it impact the performance of small businesses? Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i4/142975

  • Huang, J., Baptista, J., & Newell, S. (2015).

  • Communicational ambidexterity as a new capability to manage social media communication within organizations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(2), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.03.002

  • Joshi, K. D., Chi, L., Datta, A., & Han, S. (2010). Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 472–495. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0298

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

  • Khasawneh, R. T. (2017). Social media as a new emerging tool of marketing. In, W. Al-Rabayah, R. Khasawneh, R. Abu-shamaa, & I. Alsmadi (eds.), Strategic uses of social media for improved customer retention (pp. 1–10). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1686-6.ch001

  • Kiran, R., & Bose, S. C. (2020). Stimulating business incubation performance: Role of networking, university linkage and facilities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(12), 1407–1421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1772967

  • Kitapçi, H., & Çelik, V. (2014). The relationship between ambidexterity, organizational learning capacity and firm quality performance: An empirical study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.549

  • Kosasi, S., Vedyanto, & Yuliani, I. D. (2017). Improving organizational agility of micro, small, and medium enterprises through digital marketing strategy. In, 2017 2nd International Conferences on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE) (pp. 68–72). https://doi.org/10.1109/icitisee.2017.8285561

  • Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416521003691287

  • Li, C. (2013). How top management team diversity fosters organizational ambidexterity: The role of social capital among top executives. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(5), 874–896. https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-06-2012-0075

  • Lin, J., Luo, Z., Benitez, J., Luo, X., & Popovič, A. (2021). Why do organizations leverage social media to create business value? An external factor-centric empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 151, 113628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113628

  • Lipaj, D., & Davidavičienė, V. (2013). Influence of information systems on business performance. Mokslas–Lietuvos Ateitis/Science–Future of Lithuania, 5(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2013.06

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712

  • Mardi, M., Arief, M., Furinto, A., & Kumaradjaja, R. (2018). Sustaining organizational performance through organizational ambidexterity by adapting social technology. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9, 1049–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0385-5

  • Mention, A.-L., Barlatier, P.-J., & Josserand, E. (2019). Using social media to leverage and develop dynamic capabilities for innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.003

  • Miller, M., Marks, A., DeCoulode, M., Hagel, J., Brown, J. S., Kulasooriya, D. (2011). Social software for business performance the missing link in social software: Measurable business performance improvements. Deloitte Center for the Edge. http://www.sapientmetrics.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/us_tmt_-Social-Software-for-Business_031011.pdf

  • Minh, T. T., & Hjortsø, C. N. (2015). How institutions influence SME innovation and networking practices: The case of Vietnamese Agribusiness. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(S1), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12189

  • Neirotti, P., Raguseo, E., & Paolucci, E. (2018). How SMEs develop ICT-based capabilities in response to their environment: Past evidence and implications for the uptake of the new ICT paradigm. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(1), 10–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2016-0158

  • Ngammoh, N., Mumi, A., Popaitoon, S., & Issarapaibool, A. (2021). Enabling social media as a strategic capability for SMEs through organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2021.1980682

  • O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025

  • Odoom, R., Anning-Dorson, T., & Acheampong, G. (2017). Antecedents of social media usage and performance benefits in small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-04-2016-0088

  • Owen, M.-J. (2021, April 15). The benefits of social media for business can't be denied! Asset Digital Communications. https://assetdigitalcom.com/social-media-and-small-business-latest-statistics/

  • Özşahin, M. (2019). Ambidexterity in the context of micro and small firms. In, J. Carvalho, & E. Sabino (eds.), Strategy and superior performance of micro and small businesses in volatile economies (pp. 303–332). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7888-8.ch018

  • Peng, H. (2019). Organizational ambidexterity in public non-profit organizations: Interest and limits. Management Decision, 57(1), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-01-2017-0086

  • Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2018). A joint analysis of determinants and performance consequences of ambidexterity. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(2), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.03.001

  • Pillania, R. K. (2020). COVID-19: A huge opportunity for innovation in marketing. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(8–9), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i8-9/154693

  • Riedl, B. C., Hainzlmaier, A., & Picot, A. (2013). Social network structure's influence on organizational ambidexterity. In, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 759–770). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2013.642

  • Roberts, D. L., Piller, F. T., & Lüttgens, D. (2016). Mapping the impact of social media for innovation: The role of social media in explaining innovation performance in the PDMA comparative performance assessment study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(S1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12341

  • Sarangi, S., & Pattnaik, S. (2018). Targeting emerging and untapped markets: Rethinking market intelligence decision framework. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 11(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i1/120822

  • Scuotto, V., Del Giudice, M., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017). The effect of social networking sites and absorptive capacity on SMES' innovation performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9517-0

  • Shimpi, S. S. (2018). Social media as an effective marketing tool : An empirical study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(7), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i7/129725

  • Siji, S. (2021). Social commerce of Indian customers : Role of social media usage. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(8), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i8/165760

  • Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: A study in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0448

  • Tan, F. T., Pan, S. L., & Liu, J. Y. (2016). Towards a self-organizing digital business ecosystem: Examining IT-enabled boundary spanning practice of China's LeEco. CORE. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301370211.pdf

  • Teubner, R. A., & Stockhinger, J. (2020). Literature review: Understanding information systems strategy in the digital age. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(4), Article 101642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101642

  • Tomar, J. S. (2017). State of IT adoption in SMEs in India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 10(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i1/109102

  • Tourani, N. (2022). Thriving in a shifting landscape: Role of social media in support of the business strategy. Asia Pacific Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.11.001

  • Tzempelikos, N., Kooli, K., & Lichtenthal, J. D. (2019). Innovation in business-to-business marketing. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 26(3–4), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712x.2019.1611068

  • Yadav, M. (2017). Social media as a marketing tool: Opportunities and challenges. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i3/111420


Abstract Views: 259

PDF Views: 2




  • Does Social Media use Impact Small Agribusiness Exploitation and Exploration Capability? Perspectives and Recommendations from the UT of J&K

Abstract Views: 259  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Avantika Bakshi
Research Scholar, The Business School, The University of Jammu, Baba Saheb Ambedkar Road, Gujarbasti, Jammu - 180 006, J&K., India
Vinay Chauhan
Professor, The Business School, University of Jammu, Baba Saheb Ambedkar Road, Gujarbasti, Jammu - 180 006, J&K.

Abstract


For businesses functioning in complex environments where destabilizing factors are exacerbated, ambidexterity, or the ability of an organization to exploit and explore, becomes essential. Due to this, businesses are on the lookout for newer procedures that are practical both now and in the future. The utilization of digital and social media for marketing forms a subset of such practices that are contemporary yet pervasive. In fact, Whatsapp and Facebook have become the spearhead platforms for information dissemination, relationship building, and transaction handling for businesses around the globe. While considerable research provides insights into the adoption and acceptance of web technologies in different sectors, studies investigating the role of social media in developing dynamic capabilities for agribusinesses are scarce. Data inputs were drawn from 73 agribusinesses primarily using a quantitative approach and interpreted using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to address this issue. A qualitative inquiry through post-survey interviews was also used to strengthen the research outcomes. The findings pointed out that social media use results in greater exploitation over exploration capabilities in the study area. The possible reasons for this one-sided usage, such as lack of awareness and technical and human incapacities are explored, and a suggestion for developing ambidexterity is presented. The study’s outcome can help small business owners, employees, and the government capitalize on the different social technology tools to their most significant advantage.

Keywords


Social media, agribusinesses, exploration capacity, exploitation capacity, ambidexterity, PLS-SEM

Paper Submission Date : July 30, 2021 ; Paper sent back for Revision : May 16, 2022 ; Paper Acceptance Date : June 20, 2022 ; Paper Published Online : October 15, 2022


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom%2F2022%2Fv52%2Fi10%2F172344