Indian Journal of Marketing

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Sustainable Consumption : Consumer Behavior When Purchasing Sustainability-Labeled Food Products


Affiliations
1 Ph.D. Scholar (Corresponding Author), Department of Food Business Management & Entrepreneurship Development, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM), Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana - 131 028, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Food Business Management & Entrepreneurship Development, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM), Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana - 131 028, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Purpose : With growing concern about sustainability, consumers are trying to make sustainable purchase decisions. Sustainability labels are visual communicators of sustainability product information differentiating between conventional and sustainable products. Various studies reported positive consumer behavior toward sustainable consumption. This paper aimed to identify the factors influencing consumers’ behavior while purchasing sustainability-labeled food products and the moderating effect of the income variable.

Methodology : For the study, five hypotheses were developed from relevant literature support to form a conceptual framework. Atotal of 498 Indian consumers participated in the survey. The variables selected for the study were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. The proposed model was examined using structural equation modeling. The correlation between constructs correlation was measured, and the overall model fit was validated. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate the variables selected for the study. Structural equation modeling was used to test the proposed model. Correlation among constructs was measured. Analysis of moment structure was used to assess the overall model fit.

Findings : The study revealed that the five constructs, namely, purchase intention, awareness, environmental consciousness, moral obligations, and subjective norms, significantly influenced consumer behavior. Further, it was substantiated with a good model fit with consumer income as the moderating factor. The study supported the applicability of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior.

Practical Implications : The study’s findings will affect the food processing industry and third-party certification agencies. This study will guide policymakers by providing significant insights into consumer behavior toward sustainability-labeled food products. The study also provided suggestions to promote sustainability labels that are currently voluntary.

Value : The proposed model in the study helped understand the Indian consumer behavior toward sustainability-labeled food products and promote sustainable consumption and production among various stakeholders of the food processing industry.


Keywords

Sustainable Consumption, Consumer Behavior, Sustainability Label Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).

Paper Submission Date : September 15, 2022 ; Paper sent back for Revision : April 10, 2023 ; Paper Acceptance Date : June 15, 2023 ; Paper Published Online : August 16, 2023

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

  • Asif, M., Xuhui, W., Nasiri, A., & Ayyub, S. (2018). Determinant factors influencing organic food purchase intention and the moderating role of awareness: A comparative analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 63, 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.08.006

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

  • Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002

  • Bhatti, K. K., & Negi, A. (2018). Determinants of green marketing leading to sustainable competitive advantage for retailers within the Delhi region. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(8), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i8/130540

  • Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (1st ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644

  • Cai, Z., Xie, Y., & Aguilar, F. X. (2017). Eco-label credibility and retailer effects on green product purchasing intentions. Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.001

  • Chan, R. Y., & Lau, L. B. (2002). Explaining green purchasing behavior: A cross-cultural study on American and Chinese consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14(2–3), 9–40. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v14n02_02

  • Chau, P. Y., & Hu, P. J.-H. (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management, 39(4), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00098-2

  • Chi, N. T. (2022). Ethical consumption behavior towards eco-friendly plastic products: Implication for cleaner production. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 5, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLRC.2022.100055

  • Cosmina, M., Gallenti, G., Marangon, F., & Troiano, S. (2016). Consumers' preferences for ethical attributes of coffee: A choice experiment in the Italian market. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 71(1), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.13128/rea-18650

  • De Andrade Silva, A. R., Bioto, A. S., Efraim, P., & de Castilho Queiroz, G. (2017). Impact of sustainability labeling in the perception of sensory quality and purchase intention of chocolate consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.024

  • Dowd, K., & Burke, K. J. (2013). The influence of ethical values and food choice motivations on intentions to purchase sustainably sourced foods. Appetite, 69, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.05.024

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313

  • Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(8), 1597–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015

  • Gandhi, M., & Kaushik, N. (2016). Socially responsive consumption behavior – An Indian perspective. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2014-0110

  • Ghose, A., & Chandra, B. (2020). Models for predicting sustainable durable products consumption behavior : A review article. Vision, 24(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919860962

  • Giri, A., Biswas, W., & Salo, J. (2022). 'Buy Luxury': Adapting the SHIFT framework to explore the psychological facets enabling consumers for sustainable luxury consumption. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(6), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i6/169836

  • Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 44, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001

  • Jaiswal, D., & Kant, R. (2018). Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008

  • Janßen, D., & Langen, N. (2017). The bunch of sustainability labels – Do consumers differentiate? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 1233–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.171

  • Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2017). Investigating the determinants of consumers' sustainable purchase behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 10, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2017.02.002

  • Jürkenbeck, K., Spiller, A., & Schulze, M. (2021). Climate change awareness of the young generation and its impact on their diet. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLRC.2021.100041

  • Kimura, A., Wada, Y., Kamada, A., Masuda, T., Okamoto, M., Goto, S.-I., Tsuzuki, D., Cai, D., Oka, T., & Dan, I. (2010). Interactive effects of carbon footprint information and its accessibility on value and subjective qualities of food products. Appetite, 55(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.013

  • Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1199

  • Krasnowska, G., & Salejda, A. (2011). Consumer knowledge about food product labelling. ŻYWNOŚĆ - Nauka Technologia Jakość, 18, 173–189.

  • Kumar, B. (2012). Theory of planned behaviour approach to understand the purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products (IIMA Working Paper No. WP 2012-12-08). Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.

  • Ma, Y. J., Gam, H. J., & Banning, J. (2017). Perceived ease of use and usefulness of sustainability labels on apparel products: Application of the technology acceptance model. Fashion and Textiles, 4, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-017-0093-1

  • Marette, S., Messéan, A., & Millet, G. (2012). Consumers' willingness to pay for eco-friendly apples under different labels: Evidences from a lab experiment. Food Policy, 37(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.12.001

  • Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2011). National voluntary guidelines on social, environmental & economic responsibilities of business. https://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/National_Voluntary_Guidelines_2011_12jul2011.pdf

  • Minton, E. A., Spielmann, N., Kahle, L. R., & Kim, C.-H. (2018). The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration. Journal of Business Research, 82, 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.031

  • Mohamed, Z., Kit Teng, P., Rezai, G., & Sharifuddin, J. (2014). Malaysian consumers' willingness-to-pay toward eco-labeled food products in Klang Valley. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 20(Sup1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2014.921876

  • Nielsen. (2013). New wealth, new world: How and why we shop around the globe. http://es.nielsen.com/site/documents/NielsenGlobalConsumerReportJuly2013.pdf

  • Nikolaou, I. E., & Tsalis, T. (2018). A framework to evaluate eco- and social-labels for designing a sustainability consumption label to measure strong sustainability impact of firms/products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.042

  • Pohjolainen, P., Tapio, P., Vinnari, M., Jokinen, P., & Räsänen, P. (2016). Consumer consciousness on meat and the environment — Exploring differences. Appetite, 101, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.012

  • Prakash, G., & Pathak, P. (2017). Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India : A study on developing nation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.116

  • Quoquab, F., & Mohammad, J. (2016). Sustainable consumption: Sacrificing for the future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.449

  • Ramirez, E. (2013). Consumer-defined sustainably-oriented firms and factors influencing adoption. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2202–2209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.012

  • Rausser, G., Zilberman, D., & Kahn, G. (2015). An alternative paradigm for food production, distribution, and consumption: A noneconomist's perspective. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 7(1), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012549

  • Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(4), 369–379.https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540052

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In, Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5

  • Severo, E. A., De Guimarães, J. C., & Dellarmelin, M. L. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on environmental awareness, sustainable consumption and social responsibility: Evidence from generations in Brazil and Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124947

  • Shetty, S., Chaudhuri, M. S., & Shetty, A. (2022). The nexus of corporate social responsibility and consumer perception: Systematic review of the evidence. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(7), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i7/170537

  • Singh, A., & Verma, P. (2017). Factors influencing Indian consumers' actual buying behaviour towards organic food products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.106

  • Sogari, G., Mora, C., & Menozzi, D. (2016). Factors driving sustainable choice: The case of wine. British Food Journal, 118(3), 632–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2015-0131

  • Sörqvist, P., Hedblom, D., Holmgren, M., Haga, A., Langeborg, L., Nöstl, A., & Kågström, J. (2013). Who needs cream and sugar when there is eco-labeling? Taste and willingness to pay for “eco-friendly” coffee. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e80719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080719

  • Stone, G., Barnes, J. H., & Montgomery, C. (1995). Ecoscale: A scale for the measurement of environmentally responsible consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 12(7), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220120704

  • Tait, P., Saunders, C., Guenther, M., & Rutherford, P. (2016). Emerging versus developed economy consumer willingness to pay for environmentally sustainable food production: A choice experiment approach comparing Indian, Chinese and United Kingdom lamb consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.088

  • Tanner, C., & Kast, S. W. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 20(10), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10101

  • Taufique, K. M., Siwar, C. B., Talib, B. B., & Chamhuri, N. (2014). Modelling consumers' environmental responsibility and understanding of eco-labels: A conceptual framework for empirical research in Malaysia. International Journal of Green Economics, 8(3–4), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijge.2014.067722

  • Taufique, K. M., Siwar, C., Talib, B., Sarah, F. H., & Chamhuri, N. (2014). Synthesis of constructs for modeling consumers' understanding and perception of eco-labels. Sustainability, 6(4), 2176–2200. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6042176

  • Tinsley, H. E., & Tinsley, D. J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(4), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.414

  • Van Loo, E. J., Caputo, V., Nayga Jr., R. M., & Verbeke, W. (2014). Consumers' valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy, 49(Part 1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.07.002

  • Verain, M. C., Dagevos, H., & Antonides, G. (2015). Sustainable food consumption. Product choice or curtailment? Appetite, 91, 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.055

  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007

  • Vertinsky, I., & Zhou, D. (2000). Product and process certification – Systems, regulations and international marketing strategies. International Marketing Review, 17(3), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330010331606

  • Wang, P., Liu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2014). Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: A survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.007

  • Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2017). Determinants of consumers' green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecological Economics, 134, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019

  • Yu, X., Gao, Z., & Zeng, Y. (2014). Willingness to pay for the “Green Food” in China. Food Policy, 45, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.01.003

  • Zhao, R., Geng, Y., Liu, Y., Tao, X., & Xue, B. (2018). Consumers' perception, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for carbon-labeled products: A case study of Chengdu in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1664–1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.143


Abstract Views: 186

PDF Views: 0




  • Sustainable Consumption : Consumer Behavior When Purchasing Sustainability-Labeled Food Products

Abstract Views: 186  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Zainab Sharief
Ph.D. Scholar (Corresponding Author), Department of Food Business Management & Entrepreneurship Development, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM), Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana - 131 028, India
Anupama Panghal
Assistant Professor, Department of Food Business Management & Entrepreneurship Development, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM), Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana - 131 028, India

Abstract


Purpose : With growing concern about sustainability, consumers are trying to make sustainable purchase decisions. Sustainability labels are visual communicators of sustainability product information differentiating between conventional and sustainable products. Various studies reported positive consumer behavior toward sustainable consumption. This paper aimed to identify the factors influencing consumers’ behavior while purchasing sustainability-labeled food products and the moderating effect of the income variable.

Methodology : For the study, five hypotheses were developed from relevant literature support to form a conceptual framework. Atotal of 498 Indian consumers participated in the survey. The variables selected for the study were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. The proposed model was examined using structural equation modeling. The correlation between constructs correlation was measured, and the overall model fit was validated. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate the variables selected for the study. Structural equation modeling was used to test the proposed model. Correlation among constructs was measured. Analysis of moment structure was used to assess the overall model fit.

Findings : The study revealed that the five constructs, namely, purchase intention, awareness, environmental consciousness, moral obligations, and subjective norms, significantly influenced consumer behavior. Further, it was substantiated with a good model fit with consumer income as the moderating factor. The study supported the applicability of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior.

Practical Implications : The study’s findings will affect the food processing industry and third-party certification agencies. This study will guide policymakers by providing significant insights into consumer behavior toward sustainability-labeled food products. The study also provided suggestions to promote sustainability labels that are currently voluntary.

Value : The proposed model in the study helped understand the Indian consumer behavior toward sustainability-labeled food products and promote sustainable consumption and production among various stakeholders of the food processing industry.


Keywords


Sustainable Consumption, Consumer Behavior, Sustainability Label Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).

Paper Submission Date : September 15, 2022 ; Paper sent back for Revision : April 10, 2023 ; Paper Acceptance Date : June 15, 2023 ; Paper Published Online : August 16, 2023


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom%2F2023%2Fv53%2Fi8%2F172975