Abstract Views :554 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Reader, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, IN
2 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SJM Dental College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, IN
3 Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, ITS Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, IN
4 Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, IN
5 Reader, Dept of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, IN
6 Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 11, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 284-288
Abstract
Context: The aim of this study is to compare the one year clinical performance of three bulk fill restorative materials in posterior class I occlusal restorations. 20 patients received three class I with one of three bulkfill restorative resins. Sonicfill, Tetric Evoceram and Filtek bulkfill. All restorations were evaluated at baseline, at three, six, nine months, and one year after placement. Two calibrated examiners other than the operator were evaluated each restoration. Modified USPHS criteria was used to evaluate the restorations. The results were statistically insignificant. More studies need to be carried out and for a long period of time.
Keywords
Resin Based Composites, Bulkfill Composites, Clinical Performance.
