Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Study of Post-operative Pulmonary Mechanics between Subcostal and Midline Laparotomy


Affiliations
1 Dr D.Y. Patil Institute of Physiotherapy, Navi Mumbai, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background

Commonly two incisions are used in Upper Abdominal Surgeries (UAS): Midline and Subcostal. Following either of the surgeries patients develop significant alteration in breathing pattern due to the restrictive type of pulmonary dysfunction.

Aims & Objectives

To compare the effects of both the incisions on pulmonary mechanics, assess which of the two incisions affect the pulmonary mechanics more than the other and to accordingly modify the post-operative Chest Physiotherapy treatment plan.

Materials and methods 10 subjects in each group (subcostal and midline incision) were selected. Parameters like diaphragm excursion on U.S.G., Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) and chest expansion at three levels were measured pre-operatively, post-operatively on the 3rd and 7th day.

Results

There was a decrease in the diaphragm excursion, PEFR and chest expansion at umbilical level on post-operative day 3 but the decrease was much more in the midline group than the subcostal group. The above parameters improved on post-operative day 7 as compared to post-operative day 3 in both the groups but the improvement was much more in the subcostal group than the midline group. Both the results were statistically significant.

Conclusion

The study shows that the pulmonary mechanics are affected post-operatively in both the groups, the affection being more in the midline group than in the subcostal group. Also the return of function to the pre-operative values was earlier in the subcostal group as compared to the midline group. Hence administration of Chest Physiotherapy postoperatively should be modified accordingly to improve the function especially in the midline group.


Keywords

Upper Abdominal Surgery, Median Laparotomy, Subcostal Laparotomy, Diaphragm, Pefr, Chest Expansion
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Duruiel B, Cantineau J. P., Desmonts J. M., “Effects of upper or lower abdominal surgery on diaphragmatic function” Br. Jr of Anesthesia 1987; 59; 1230-1235

  • Cynthia Zadai, Pulmonary Management in Physical Therapy

  • Barbara Webber, The Bromptom Hospital Guide to Chest Physiotherapy

  • Kappandji, The physiology of Joints (Vol 3)

  • Simmoneau G., Vivien A., Satene R., Kustlinger F., Samii K., Naziant Y., Duroux P., “Diaphragm dysfunction induced by upper abdominal surgery”. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 1983; 128; 899-903

  • Letwin E., George R. B., Weill H., Adriani J., “The experimental healing of soft tissues” J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb. 1967; 12; 121-132

  • Duruiel B., Vires n., Cantineau J.P., Marty C., Aubier M., Desmonts J. M., “Diaphragmatic contractility after upper abdominal surgery”

  • Halasz N. A., Torrance, Calif “Vertical versus horizontal laparotomies” Archives of surgery, 1964; 88; 911-914

  • Ali J., Ali Khan T. “The comparative effects of muscle transaction and median upper abdominal surgery on post-operative pulmonary function” Surg., Gynec., Obst., 1979; 148; 863-866

  • Sloan G.A., “Newer upper abdominal incisions” Surg., Gynec., Obst., 1927; 45; 678

  • Prabhakar N.R., Marek W., Loeschcke H.H., “Altered breathing patterns elicited by stimulation of abdominal visceral afferents” Jr. of Applied Physiology, 1989; 58; 1755-1760

  • Okinaka A. “Post-operative patterns of breathing and compliance” Archives of Surgery, 1966; 92; 887-891

  • Latiner R. G., Dickman M., day W. C., Gunn M.L., Schmidt C.D. “Ventilatory patterns and pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery determined by pre-operative and post-operative computerized spirometry and blood gas analysis.

  • Garcia-Valdecasas J.C., Almenara R., Cabrer C., Lacy A.M., Sust M., Fuster J., “Subcostal incision versus midline laparotomy in gallstone surgery: a prospective and randomized trial” Brit. Jr. Surg. 1988; 75; 473-4754

  • Weisel R.D., Layug A.B., Kripke B.J., Hectan H.B., “ Consequences of post-operative alterations in respiratory mechanics” Am. Jr. Surg., 1974; 128; 376

  • Tahir A. H., George R.B., Weill H., Adriani J. “Effects of abdominal surgery opun diaphragm function and regional ventilation” Int. Surg. 1973; 58; 337-340


Abstract Views: 365

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparative Study of Post-operative Pulmonary Mechanics between Subcostal and Midline Laparotomy

Abstract Views: 365  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Anuprita Thakur
Dr D.Y. Patil Institute of Physiotherapy, Navi Mumbai, India
Sujata Yardi
Dr D.Y. Patil Institute of Physiotherapy, Navi Mumbai, India

Abstract


Background

Commonly two incisions are used in Upper Abdominal Surgeries (UAS): Midline and Subcostal. Following either of the surgeries patients develop significant alteration in breathing pattern due to the restrictive type of pulmonary dysfunction.

Aims & Objectives

To compare the effects of both the incisions on pulmonary mechanics, assess which of the two incisions affect the pulmonary mechanics more than the other and to accordingly modify the post-operative Chest Physiotherapy treatment plan.

Materials and methods 10 subjects in each group (subcostal and midline incision) were selected. Parameters like diaphragm excursion on U.S.G., Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) and chest expansion at three levels were measured pre-operatively, post-operatively on the 3rd and 7th day.

Results

There was a decrease in the diaphragm excursion, PEFR and chest expansion at umbilical level on post-operative day 3 but the decrease was much more in the midline group than the subcostal group. The above parameters improved on post-operative day 7 as compared to post-operative day 3 in both the groups but the improvement was much more in the subcostal group than the midline group. Both the results were statistically significant.

Conclusion

The study shows that the pulmonary mechanics are affected post-operatively in both the groups, the affection being more in the midline group than in the subcostal group. Also the return of function to the pre-operative values was earlier in the subcostal group as compared to the midline group. Hence administration of Chest Physiotherapy postoperatively should be modified accordingly to improve the function especially in the midline group.


Keywords


Upper Abdominal Surgery, Median Laparotomy, Subcostal Laparotomy, Diaphragm, Pefr, Chest Expansion

References