Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison between Low Level Laser Therapy and Exercise for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain


Affiliations
1 Universiti Sains Malaysia, USM, Penang, Malaysia 11800, Malaysia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background

Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem with enormous economic and social costs. The toll that bears on individuals, families and society make the successful management of this is common. Despite its widespread use, the effectiveness of low level laser therapy (LLLT) is still controversial. Traditional treatments include drugs, physical treatment, back exercises and education, but they are not always completely helpful. Many people seek alternative treatments, such as LLLT. Therefore main goal of this study is to determine the effect of LLLT on the intensity of chronic LBP.

Method

80 patients who had low back pain for at least 12 weeks were irradiated with low level laser. One group received laser therapy alone, one received laser therapy and exercise, and the third group received placebo laser therapy and exercise. Laser therapy was performed twice a week for 4 weeks.

Results

72% of the active treatment group returned to work compared to 41% of the sham group. This 31% difference between the groups was significant. While the study's findings showed better results on some outcomes following active treatment, the report does not indicate the number of patients available at follow-up. In addition, the study reports only the percentage of patients who improved without clearly reporting the extent of improvement.


Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Sakurai Y, Yamaguchi M, Abiko Y (2000) Inhibitory effect of low-level laser irradiation on LPS-stimulated prostaglandin E2 production and cyclooxygenase-2 in human gingival fibroblasts. European Journal of Oral Sciences 108: 29–34.

  • Ferreira DM, Zangaro RA, Villaverde AB, Cury Y, Frigo L, Piccolo G, Longo I, Barbosa DG (2005) Analgesic effect of He-Ne (632.8 nm) low-level laser therapy on acute inflammatory pain. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery 23: 177–181.

  • Andersson GB (1999) Epidemiological features of chronic lowback pain. Lancet 354: 581–585.

  • Coderre TJ, Katz J, Vaccarino AL, Melzack R (1993) Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological pain: review of clinical and experimental evidence. Pain 52: 259–285.

  • Gam AN, Thorsen H, Lonnberg F (1993) The effect of low-level laser therapy on musculoskeletal pain: a meta-analysis. Pain 52: 63–66.

  • Carati CJ, Anderson SN, Gannon BJ, Piller NB (2003) Treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema with lowlevel laser therapy: a double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cancer98: 1114–1122. Klein RG, Eek BC (1990) Low-energy laser treatment and exercise for chronic low back pain: Double-blind controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 71:34–37

  • Klein RG, Eek BC (1990) Low-energy laser treatment and exercise for chronic low back pain: Double-blind controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 71:34–37.


Abstract Views: 375

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparison between Low Level Laser Therapy and Exercise for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

Abstract Views: 375  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Zahra Al Timimi
Universiti Sains Malaysia, USM, Penang, Malaysia 11800, Malaysia
Jaafar Mohamad Suhaimi
Universiti Sains Malaysia, USM, Penang, Malaysia 11800, Malaysia
Jafri Mohd Zubir Mat
Universiti Sains Malaysia, USM, Penang, Malaysia 11800, Malaysia

Abstract


Background

Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem with enormous economic and social costs. The toll that bears on individuals, families and society make the successful management of this is common. Despite its widespread use, the effectiveness of low level laser therapy (LLLT) is still controversial. Traditional treatments include drugs, physical treatment, back exercises and education, but they are not always completely helpful. Many people seek alternative treatments, such as LLLT. Therefore main goal of this study is to determine the effect of LLLT on the intensity of chronic LBP.

Method

80 patients who had low back pain for at least 12 weeks were irradiated with low level laser. One group received laser therapy alone, one received laser therapy and exercise, and the third group received placebo laser therapy and exercise. Laser therapy was performed twice a week for 4 weeks.

Results

72% of the active treatment group returned to work compared to 41% of the sham group. This 31% difference between the groups was significant. While the study's findings showed better results on some outcomes following active treatment, the report does not indicate the number of patients available at follow-up. In addition, the study reports only the percentage of patients who improved without clearly reporting the extent of improvement.


References