Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Scientometric Portrait of the Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research Based on Papers Published during 2001–2020


Affiliations
1 CSIR-National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research, Dr K S Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
 

This study is carried out to understand dynamics of the journal using scientometric indicators. In this regard an analysis of 2,623 records published in Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research during 2001–2020 found that the share of articles published was highest (90%) followed by reviews (5%) and proceeding papers (1.9%). The chronological pattern of output indicates that the number of papers published declined after 2011. The total output was contributed by 47 countries located in different parts of the globe. Of these, India contributed about 38% papers followed by Turkey and China. Among all the prolific countries, Portugal had the highest value of Citation per Paper (CPP). The share of papers not cited (PnC) was highest for Saudi Arabia. Among the highly productive institutions, Anna University (Chennai) topped the list with 99 papers. Among the 26 highly productive institutions, CPP is highest (25.7) for CSIR-Central Leather Research Institute (Chennai). Highest share of PnC was for Andhra University. Most of the highly productive authors were located at highly productive institutions. Among the prolific authors, highest value of CPP was for P Vasudevan of the Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi. Pattern of citation indicates that about 18% papers were not cited and 2% papers were cited more than 50 times. Of the 14 most cited papers, three papers were contributed by authors from Taiwan (2) and Portugal (1) and remaining 11 papers were contributed by Indian authors. Four highly cited papers were written in domestic collaboration and one in international collaboration. Highest share of papers published in the journal are multi-authored.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis, Citation Indicators, JSIR.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Narang A, Indian journal of pure and applied mathematics: A bibliometric study, Ann Libr Inf Stud, 51(1) (2004) 28–38.
  • Jena K L, A bibliometric analysis of the journal “Indian journal of fibre and textile research, 1996–2004”, Ann Libr Inf Stud, 53(1) (2006) 22–30.
  • Vijay K R & Raghvan I R, Journal of food science and technology: A bibliometric study, Ann Libr Inf Stud, 54(4) (2007) 207–12.
  • Garg K C, Sharma P & Kumar S, Scientometric profile of the journal Mausam, Ann Libr Inf Stud, 55(1) (2008) 76–80.
  • Kumar A, Prakashan E R, Kalyane V L, Kumar & Pramana V, A journal of physics: A scientometric analysis, Ann Libr Inf Stud, 55(1) (2008) 52–61.
  • Nishy P, Parvatharajan P & Prathap G, Visibility and impact of the Indian journal of chemistry, Section B during 2005–2009 using scientometric techniques, Indian J Chem Sect B, 51B (2012) 269–284.
  • Garg K C & Singh R K, Indian journal of traditional knowledge: A bibliometric study, Library Herald, 55(4) (2017) 488–502.
  • Bala M & Singh M P, A scientometric study of journal of biochemistry and biophysics (IJBB), Libr Philos Pract (e-journal), (2014) 1168.
  • Kalita D, The scientometrics of Nature, J Scientometric Res, 5(2) (2016) 123–134.
  • Das D, Bibliometric study of journal of chemical sciences: 1987–1996, Eur J Mol Clin Med, 7(9) (2020) 2055–2063.
  • Dalai B K & Ramesh D B, Publication pattern in scientific and industrial research in India-A bibliometric study, Ann Libr Inf Stud, 42(1) (1995) 35–38.
  • Rajendran P, Jeyshankar R & Elango B, Scientometric analysis of contributions to journal of scientific and industrial research, Int J Digit Library Serv, 1(2) (2011) 79–89.
  • May Robert M, The scientific wealth of nations, Science, 275(5301) (1997) 793–796, doi: 10.1126/science.275.5301. 793.
  • Garfield E, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science, 178(4060) (1972) 471–479. http://www.garfield. library.upenn.edu/essays/V1p527y1962-73.pdf
  • Garg K C & Tripathi H K, Addendum to bibliometrics and scientometrics in India during 1995–2014: An overview of studies during 1995–2014, Ann Libr Inf Stud, 64(3) (2017) 204–208, https://www.niscair.res.in/jinfo/ALIS/ALIS%2064 (3)%20 (Addendum).pdf

Abstract Views: 72

PDF Views: 61




  • Scientometric Portrait of the Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research Based on Papers Published during 2001–2020

Abstract Views: 72  |  PDF Views: 61

Authors

Suresh Kumar
CSIR-National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research, Dr K S Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
Kashmiri Lal
CSIR-National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research, Dr K S Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
K C Garg
CSIR-National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research, Dr K S Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India

Abstract


This study is carried out to understand dynamics of the journal using scientometric indicators. In this regard an analysis of 2,623 records published in Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research during 2001–2020 found that the share of articles published was highest (90%) followed by reviews (5%) and proceeding papers (1.9%). The chronological pattern of output indicates that the number of papers published declined after 2011. The total output was contributed by 47 countries located in different parts of the globe. Of these, India contributed about 38% papers followed by Turkey and China. Among all the prolific countries, Portugal had the highest value of Citation per Paper (CPP). The share of papers not cited (PnC) was highest for Saudi Arabia. Among the highly productive institutions, Anna University (Chennai) topped the list with 99 papers. Among the 26 highly productive institutions, CPP is highest (25.7) for CSIR-Central Leather Research Institute (Chennai). Highest share of PnC was for Andhra University. Most of the highly productive authors were located at highly productive institutions. Among the prolific authors, highest value of CPP was for P Vasudevan of the Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi. Pattern of citation indicates that about 18% papers were not cited and 2% papers were cited more than 50 times. Of the 14 most cited papers, three papers were contributed by authors from Taiwan (2) and Portugal (1) and remaining 11 papers were contributed by Indian authors. Four highly cited papers were written in domestic collaboration and one in international collaboration. Highest share of papers published in the journal are multi-authored.

Keywords


Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis, Citation Indicators, JSIR.

References