Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Design and Implementation of Iterative Learning Control for an Electro-Hydraulic Servo System


Affiliations
1 Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode 638 060, Tamil Nadu, India., India
2 Department of Mechatronics Engineering, KCG College of Technology, Chennai 600 097, Tamil Nadu, India., India
 

In order to produce an accurate movement of double-acting hydraulic cylinder of the Electro-Hydraulic Servo System (EHSS), an Iterative Learning Controller (ILC) approach is implemented in this work. Nonlinearity and imprecision occurs in the hydraulic systems because of friction. Traditional controllers are incapable of providing effective control performance throughout the entire operating range and insufficient to handle repetitive task. To manage the repetitive task, a memory-based learning control analysis is suitable.This research focuses to construct the ILC for governing the servo spool valve, which is responsible for the hydraulic cylinder displacement. The proposed ILC consists of learning filter, learning gain and robustness filter. Proportional, Integral and Derivative (PID) controller is devised to validate the outcome of ILC. Controllers are constructed based on the system modelling. The effectiveness of the suggested controller is shown through simulation and experimentalfindings. ILC provides an average of 50% minimal overshoot and settles 7 sec before the PID controller is designed. Due to model uncertainty, PID controller results 0.2 sec better rise time than ILC. In ILC's architecture objective function is designed to achieve minimal overshoot and quick settling of hydraulic cylinder. So, no consideration is given to the error indices. These findings will help hydraulic stamping application, which requires the accurate displacement of piston to avoid damage of work piece. These results show that the proposed controller achieves desired outcome displacement of hydraulic cylinder.

Keywords

Closed Loop Control, Double Acting Hydraulic Cylinder, Position Control, Proportional Integral Derivative Controller, Servo Spool Valve.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Tony T A, Parameshwaran R, Sathiyavathi S & Vimala S A, Improved position tracking performance of electro hydraulic actuator using PID and sliding mode controller, IETE J Res, 68(3)(2019) 1683–1695.
  • Lee C, Jeon C W, Han X, Kim J H & Kim H J, Application of electrohydraulic proportional valve for steering improvement of an autonomous tractor,J Biosyst Eng, 47 (2022) 167–180.
  • Rodriguez G D, Favela C A, Beltrann C F, Sotelo C & Sotelo D, An MPC-LQR-LPV controller with quadratic stability conditions for a nonlinear half-car active suspension system with electro-hydraulic actuators,Mach, 10(2)(2022) 137.
  • Zhang Z, Wang B, Ma T & Ai B, Fuzzy decoupling predictive functional control for nonlinear hydro-turbine governing systems with mechanical time delay of the hydraulic servo system,J Vibrat Control, 29(5–6)(2022) 1292–1306, https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463211062332.
  • Zheng J M, Zhao S D & Wei S G, Fuzzy iterative learning control of electro-hydraulic servo system for SRM direct-drive volume control hydraulic press,J Cent South Univ Technol, 17(2) (2010) 316–322.
  • Dwyer O A, Handbook of PI and PID controller tuning rules (World Scientific) 2009.
  • Wang X J, Li J Y, Wu B & Shao J P, Continuous rotary motor electro-hydraulic servo system based on the zero phase error tracking controller, Appl Mech Mater, 121(2012) 3205–3209.
  • Di G E, Santelia M, Bruni S & Zolotas A, A simple active carbody roll scheme for hydraulically actuated railway vehicles using internal model control,ISA Trans, 120(2022) 55–69.
  • Shi Q & He L, A model predictive control approach for electro-hydraulic braking by wire,IEEE Trans Ind Info, 19(2)(2022) 1380–1388.
  • Dalwadi N, Deb D & Muyeen S M, Adaptive backstepping controller design of quadrotor biplane for payload delivery, IET Intell Transp Syst, 6(12)(2022) 1738–1752.
  • Shaojuan Y & Junjun S, Iterative learning control of double servo valve controlled electro hydraulic servo system,7 th Int Conf Comput Intell Secur(Sanya, China) 2011, 278–282, doi: 10.1109/CIS.2011.69.
  • Moonumca P, Depaiwa N & Yamamoto Y, Tuning PID controller using genetic algorithms for electro-hydraulic system with tracking force control, Adv Mater Res, 931 (2014) 1318–1322.
  • Dahunsi O, Pedro J & NyandoroO, System identification and neural network based PID control of servo-hydraulic vehicle suspension system, SAIEE Afr Res J, 101(3)(2010) 93–105.
  • Moon B Y, Study of parameter identification using hybrid neural-genetic algorithm in electro-hydraulic servo system, ICMIT 2005 Cont Syst Robot(International Society for Optics and Photonics) 2006, 60422G-1.
  • Aly A A, PID parameters optimization using genetic algorithm technique for electrohydraulic servo control system,Intell Cont Autom, 2(02)(2011) 69.
  • Guo Q, Shi G, Wang D, He C, Hu J & Wang W, Iterative learning based output feedback control for electro-hydraulic loading system of a gait simulator, Mechatron, 54(2018) 110–120.
  • Shen D, Iterative learning control with incomplete information,IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin, 5(5)(2018) 885–901.
  • Zhuang Z, Tao H, Chen Y, Stojanovic V & Paszke W, Iterative learning control for repetitive tasks with randomly varying trial lengths using successive projection,Int J Adapt Control Signal Process, 36(5)(2022) 1196–1215.
  • Bristow D A, Tharayil M & Alleyne A G, A survey of iterative learning control, IEEE Control Syst Mag, 26(3) (2006) 96–114.
  • Freeman C T, Hughes A M, Burridge J H, Chappell P H, Lewin P L & Rogers E, Iterative learning control of FES applied to the upper extremity for rehabilitation,Control Eng Pract, 17(3)(2009) 368–381.
  • Lim I, Hoelzle D J & Barton K L, A multi-objective iterative learning control approach for additive manufacturing applications, Cont Eng Pract, 64(2017) 74–87.
  • Dong-I1 Kim M & Sungkwun Kim, An iterative learning control method with application for CNC machine tools, IEEE Trans Ind Appl, 32(1)(1996) 66–72.
  • Pandit M, Buchheit K H, Furong Gaoa & Yi Yanga C S, Optimizing iterative learning control of cyclic production processes with application to extruders,IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech, 7(3) (1999) 7025–7034.
  • Cheng Peng L S, Wenlong Zhang & Masayoshi Tomizuka, Optimization-based constrained iterative learning control with application to building temperature control systems,IEEE Int Conf Adv Intell Mechatron, (IEEE) 2016, 709–715.
  • Mezghani M, Roux G, Cabassud M, Le Lann M V, Dahhou B & Casamatta G, Application of iterative learning control to an exothermic semibatch chemical reactor,IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech, 10(6)(2002) 822–834.
  • Sahoo S K, Panda S K & Xu J X, Iterative learning-based high-performance current controller for switched reluctance motors,IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst, 19(3)(2004) 491–498.
  • Zhao S, Wang J, Wang L, Hua C & He Y, Iterative learning control of electro-hydraulic proportional feeding system in slotting machine for metal bar cropping, Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 45(7–8)(2005) 923–931.
  • Ratcliffe J D, Lewin P L, RogersE, Hatonen J J & Owens D H, Norm-Optimal iterative learning control applied to gantry robots for automation applications,IEEE Trans Rob, 22(6) (2006) 1303–1307.
  • Boudjedir C E, Bouri M & Boukhetala D, Model-free iterative learning control with nonrepetitive trajectories for second-order MIMO nonlinear systems-Application to a delta robot,IEEE Trans Ind Electron Control Instrum, 68(8) (2020) 7433–7443.
  • Jin X, Fault-tolerant iterative learning control for mobile robots non-repetitive trajectory tracking with output constraints, Autom, 94(2018) 63–71.
  • Yu S, Bai J, Xiong S & Han R,A new iterative learning controller for electro-pneumatic servo system, 8 th Int Conf Intell Syst Design Appl, 3 (2008) 101–105.
  • Sandipan M J C & Tomizuka M, Precision positioning of wafer scanners segmented iterative learning control for nonrepetitive disturbances, IEEE Control Syst Mag, 27(4) (2007) 20–25.
  • Li X D, Lv M M & Ho J K L, Adaptive ILC algorithms of nonlinear continuous systems with non-parametric uncertainties for non-repetitive trajectory tracking,Int J Syst Sci, 47(10)(2015) 2279–2289.
  • Astrom K J & Hagglund T, New tuning methods for PID controllers, in European Control Conf1995.
  • Arrieta O, Tuning of PI & PID Controllers using a Multi Criteria Performance Index, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Costa Rica, 2006.

Abstract Views: 50

PDF Views: 59




  • Design and Implementation of Iterative Learning Control for an Electro-Hydraulic Servo System

Abstract Views: 50  |  PDF Views: 59

Authors

Naveen C
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode 638 060, Tamil Nadu, India., India
Sathiyavathi S
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode 638 060, Tamil Nadu, India., India
Tony Thomas A
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, KCG College of Technology, Chennai 600 097, Tamil Nadu, India., India
Meenakshipriya B
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Erode 638 060, Tamil Nadu, India., India

Abstract


In order to produce an accurate movement of double-acting hydraulic cylinder of the Electro-Hydraulic Servo System (EHSS), an Iterative Learning Controller (ILC) approach is implemented in this work. Nonlinearity and imprecision occurs in the hydraulic systems because of friction. Traditional controllers are incapable of providing effective control performance throughout the entire operating range and insufficient to handle repetitive task. To manage the repetitive task, a memory-based learning control analysis is suitable.This research focuses to construct the ILC for governing the servo spool valve, which is responsible for the hydraulic cylinder displacement. The proposed ILC consists of learning filter, learning gain and robustness filter. Proportional, Integral and Derivative (PID) controller is devised to validate the outcome of ILC. Controllers are constructed based on the system modelling. The effectiveness of the suggested controller is shown through simulation and experimentalfindings. ILC provides an average of 50% minimal overshoot and settles 7 sec before the PID controller is designed. Due to model uncertainty, PID controller results 0.2 sec better rise time than ILC. In ILC's architecture objective function is designed to achieve minimal overshoot and quick settling of hydraulic cylinder. So, no consideration is given to the error indices. These findings will help hydraulic stamping application, which requires the accurate displacement of piston to avoid damage of work piece. These results show that the proposed controller achieves desired outcome displacement of hydraulic cylinder.

Keywords


Closed Loop Control, Double Acting Hydraulic Cylinder, Position Control, Proportional Integral Derivative Controller, Servo Spool Valve.

References