Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Integrating NDWI, MNDWI, and Erosion Modeling to Analyze Wetland Changes and Impacts of Land Use Activities in Ropar Wetland, India


Affiliations
1 Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab, 140 413, India
 

The Ropar Wetland is a significant freshwater ecosystem located in Punjab, India. In the recent years, this wetland has witnessed significant changes owing to anthropogenic and natural factors. In this study, the land use and land cover changes are analyzed around the Ropar Wetland using remote sensing techniques by utilizing Landsat images and GIS software. The results showed a significant increase in agricultural land from 19% in 2000 to 37% in 2010, followed by a decrease to 28% in 2020. Barren, urban, and fallow land also showed a continuous increase from 20% in 2000 to 44% in 2020. The forest cover decreased from 47% in 2000 to 17% in 2020 and water bodies decreased slightly from 14% in 2000 to 10% in both 2010 and 2020. The pictorial representation of LULC (Land Use Land Change) changes over the years, including the area of the Ropar Wetland, provided insight into the shifting patterns of land use and cover. Results from NDWI (Normalized Difference Water Index) show a small decrease in water body area in the wetland over the years, with some fluctuations in the total area. MNDWI (Modified Normalized Difference Water Index) shows the sparse water area around the wetland. Natural processes including erosion and accretion have affected the wetland region around the river, causing a net loss of 55 hectares of land, over the past two decades. The findings of this study suggest that there is a need to implement effective management practices that recognize the complex interrelationships between land use, hydrology, and ecological processes to protect the Ropar Wetland's ecological and hydrological functions. Ongoing monitoring and assessing land use and cover changes are crucial for conserving wetland ecosystems.

Keywords

Freshwater ecosystem, Geo sensing, LANDSAT, LULC change, Remote sensing.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ramsar, About the Convention on Wetlands: Ramsar, (2014) [https://ramsar.org/about-the-convention-on-wetlands-0] Accessed on 10 April 2023
  • Silvius M J, Oneka M & Verhagen A, Wetlands: Lifeline for people at the edge, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans Atmos, 25 (2000) 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1464—1909(00)00079—4
  • Ramachandra T V & Ahalya N, Conservation and Management of Wetland Ecosystems in Karnataka, (2000) PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
  • Akhter S & Brraich O S, Physico - Chemical analysis of fresh water of ropar wetland (Ramsar site), India, Curr World Environ, 15 (2020) 117–126, https://doi.org/10.12944/ cwe.15.1.15
  • Ladhar S, Ropar Wetland, Punjab State Council for Science and Technology (2005) Chandigarh.
  • Forest Department, Punjab, Flora & Fauna, (2023) Retrieved on April 10, 2023, from [https://forest.punjab. gov.in/en/forest/flora/]
  • Kumar G & Singh K K, Mapping and monitoring the selected wetlands of Punjab, India, using geospatial techniques, J Indian Soc Remote Sens, 48 (2020)
  • –625, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01104-9
  • Lal R, Carbon sequestration, Philos Trans R Soc B, 363 (2007) 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2185
  • Philip A, Reejo R J & Jayalekshmi V K, Impact of urbanization on natural heritage with special reference to wetland depletion in Thiruvananthapuram City, Kerala, Int J Sci Res 9(7) (2020) 442–446, https://doi.org/10.21275/ v9i7.NOV192368
  • Xiu Y & Gang W, The strategy for conservation and sustainable utilization of biodiversity in Changbaishan Biosphere Reserve, J For Res, 9 (1998) 217–222, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02910074
  • Abebe Y D & Geheb K (eds), Wetlands of Ethiopia, Proc Seminar Resources Status Ethiopia’s Wetlands, (2003)
  • Pearce D W, The economic value of forest ecosystems, Ecosyst Health, 7 (2001) 284–296, https://doi.org/10.1046/ j.1526-0992.2001.01037.x
  • Brogna D, Dufrêne M, Michez A, Latli A, Jacobs S, Vincke C & Dendoncker N, Forest cover correlates with good biological water quality, Insights from a regional study (Wallonia, Belgium), J Environ Manag, 211 (2018) 9–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.017
  • Behera D K, Saxena M R & Ravi Shankar G, Decadal landuse and landcover change dynamics in east coast of India-case study on Chilika lake, Indian Geogr J, 92 (2017) 73—82.
  • Kuenzer C, Bluemel A, Gebhardt S & Quoc T V, Dech S, Remote sensing of mangrove ecosystems: A review, Remote Sens-Basel, 3 (2011) 878–928, https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs3050878
  • Ladhar S S, Inventory and Ecological Status of Wetlands and Lake Ecosystems of Punjab, (1995), PSCST Document.
  • NRI Punjab About District Roopnagar (2013), [http://nripunjab.gov.in/rupnagar-about.htm] [Accessed 21 Apr. 2023].
  • Administration R, 'Demography Climate and Rainfall Roopnagar (2023) [https://rupnagar.nic.in/demography/] (Accessed: 21 April 2023). 19 Singh J, Health hazards of water pollution and its legal control with special reference to state of Punjab, IUP J Environ Healthcar Law 9 (2010).
  • Ropar, Retrieved from Ramsar Sites Information Service, [https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1161], (2002)
  • USGS USGS EROS Archive - Landsat Archives - Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus Collection 2 Level-1 Data, US Geological Survey, (2020) [https://www.usgs.gov/centers/eros/ science/usgs-eros-archive-landsat-archives-landsat-7-enhanced-thematic-mapper-plus]
  • USGS Landsat 8, US Geological Survey, (2023) [https://www.usgs.gov/landsat-missions/landsat-8]
  • Mann K, ArcGIS 10.4 is here, ESRI, (2016) [ https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/3d-gis/3d-gis/arcgis-10-4-is-here/]
  • Özelkan E, Water body detection analysis using NDWI indices, derived from Landsat-8 OLI, Pol J Environ Stud, 29 (2020) 1759–1769, https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/110447
  • Du Y, Zhang Y, Ling F, Wang Q, Li W & Li X, Water bodies’ mapping from sentinel-2 imagery with modified normalized difference water index at 10-m spatial resolution produced by sharpening the SWIR band, Remote Sens-Basel, 8 (2016) 354, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8040354
  • Chun X, Qin F, Zhou H, Dan D, Xia Y & Ulambadrakh K, Effects of climate variability and land use/land cover change on the Daihai wetland of central Inner Mongolia over the past decades, J Mt Sci, 17 (2020) 3070–3084, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6108-1
  • Mozumder C, Tripathi N K & Tipdecho T, Ecosystem evaluation (1989–2012) of Ramsar wetland Deepor Beel using satellite-derived indices, Environ Monit Assess 186 (2014) 7909–7927, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3976-2
  • Kibet R, Olatubara C O, Ikporukpo C O & Jebiwott A, Land use land cover changes and encroachment issues in Kapkatet wetland, Kenya, Open J Ecol, 11 (2021) 493–506, https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2021.117032
  • Koscica M, Agropolis: the role of urban agriculture in addressing food insecurity in developing cities, J Int Aff, 11 (2014) 177—186.
  • Gulati A, Roy R & Hussain S, Performance of agriculture in Punjab, in Revitalizing Indian Agriculture and Boosting Farmer Incomes, India Studies in Business and Economics edited by A Gulati, R Roy, S Saini (Springer, Singapore) 2021, 77–112, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9335-2_4
  • Vepraskas M J & Craft C B, Wetland Soils: Genesis, Hydrology, Landscapes, and Classification, (CRC Press) 2016.
  • Dahl T E, Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 2004 to 2009, US Department of the Interior, (US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fisheries and Habitat Conservation) 2011.
  • Gandhi V P & Zhou Z, Food demand and the food security challenge with rapid economic growth in the emerging economies of India and China, Food Res Int, 63 (2014) 108–124.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.03.015
  • Mabwoga S O & Thukral A K, Characterization of change in the Harike wetland, a Ramsar site in India, using Landsat satellite data, Springer Plus 3 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-576
  • Bassi N, Kumar M D, Sharma A & Pardha-Saradhi P, Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies, J Hydrol Reg Stud 2 (2014) 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001
  • Kushwaha S, Sinha D K, Yadav A & Ahmad N, Changes in land use pattern in Uttar Pradesh: A zone-wise analysis, Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci, 9 (2020) 1689–1699, https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.901.186
  • Danso G K, Takyi S A, Amponsah O, Yeboah A S & Owusu R O, Exploring the effects of rapid urbanization on wetlands: insights from the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area, Ghana, S N Soc Sci, 1 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00218-2
  • Darnell R M, Impacts of construction activities in wetlands of the United States (No. 3143), US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory (1976).
  • Zhong P, Yang Z F & Cui B S, Advance on ecological effects of highway construction on wetland and its reactions, Wetl Sci 7(1) (2009) 89–98.
  • Wu G, Gao Y, Wang Y, Wang Y & Xu D, Land-use/land cover changes and their driving forces around wetlands in Shangri-La County, Yunnan Province, China, Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol, 22 (2014) 110–116, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13504509.2014.915894
  • Rostami S, He J & Hassan Q, Riverine water quality response to precipitation and its change, Environments, 5 (2018) 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5010008
  • Vijay R, Pinto S M, Kushwaha V K, Pal S & Nandy T A, Multi-temporal analysis for change assessment and estimation of algal bloom in Sambhar Lake, Rajasthan, India, Environ Monit Assess, 188 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10661-016-5509-7
  • Belsoy J, Korir J & Yego J, Environmental impacts of tourism in protected areas, J Environ Ear Sci, 2 (2012) 64—73.
  • Chopra G, Tyor A K, Kumari S & Rai D, Status and conservation of avian fauna of Sultanpur National Park Gurgaon, Haryana (India), J Appl Natl Sci, 4 (2012) 207–213, https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v4i2.251
  • Mishra H, Kumar V & Kumar A, Population structure and habitat utilization of migratory birds at bakhira bird sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh, India, Pak J Zool, 52 (2019) https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2020.52.1.247.254
  • Rather H A, Shrivastava P, Gautam V, Ganie N A, Dar R A & Hurra W A, Effects of anthropogenic activities on bird diversity in an urban waterbody (Bhoj Wetland), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, Int J Fauna Biol Stud, 9 (2022) 21–24, https://doi.org/10.22271/23940522. 2022.v9.i2a.886
  • Pattanaik C & Reddy C S, Need for the conservation of wetland ecosystems: A case study of Ansupa Lake (Orissa, India) using remote sensing-based data, Natl Acad Sci Lett, 30 (2007) 161.
  • Mishra S, Sharma M P & Kumar A, Assessment of water quality in Surha Lake based on physiochemical parameters, India, J Mater Environ Sci, 6 (2015) 2446–2452.
  • Krishnan J U, Saroja Devi S, Jithine J R, Ajesh G & Lekshmi N R, Pollution status of Ashtamudi lake, Kerala, India and its impact on some key stone mangrove species-A case study, Int J Innov Stud Aquat Biol Fish, 1(2) (2015) 17—22.
  • Lekshmiprasad S & Mophin K, Water quality assessment of Ashtamudi lake using NSFWQI, Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 7(1) (2017).
  • Liu K, Li X & Long X, Trends in groundwater changes driven by precipitation and anthropogenic activities on the southeast side of the Hu Line, Environ Res Lett, 16 (2021) 094032, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1ed8.
  • Ashok A, Rani H P & Jayakumar K V, Monitoring of dynamic wetland changes using NDVI and NDWI based landsat imagery, Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ, 23 (2021) 100547, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100547
  • Alsdorf D E, Rodríguez E & Lettenmaier D P, Measuring surface water from space, Rev Geophys 45 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1029/2006rg000197.

Abstract Views: 32

PDF Views: 25




  • Integrating NDWI, MNDWI, and Erosion Modeling to Analyze Wetland Changes and Impacts of Land Use Activities in Ropar Wetland, India

Abstract Views: 32  |  PDF Views: 25

Authors

Anuvesh Pandey
Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab, 140 413, India
Kanwarpreet Singh
Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab, 140 413, India
Ashita Sharma
Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, Punjab, 140 413, India

Abstract


The Ropar Wetland is a significant freshwater ecosystem located in Punjab, India. In the recent years, this wetland has witnessed significant changes owing to anthropogenic and natural factors. In this study, the land use and land cover changes are analyzed around the Ropar Wetland using remote sensing techniques by utilizing Landsat images and GIS software. The results showed a significant increase in agricultural land from 19% in 2000 to 37% in 2010, followed by a decrease to 28% in 2020. Barren, urban, and fallow land also showed a continuous increase from 20% in 2000 to 44% in 2020. The forest cover decreased from 47% in 2000 to 17% in 2020 and water bodies decreased slightly from 14% in 2000 to 10% in both 2010 and 2020. The pictorial representation of LULC (Land Use Land Change) changes over the years, including the area of the Ropar Wetland, provided insight into the shifting patterns of land use and cover. Results from NDWI (Normalized Difference Water Index) show a small decrease in water body area in the wetland over the years, with some fluctuations in the total area. MNDWI (Modified Normalized Difference Water Index) shows the sparse water area around the wetland. Natural processes including erosion and accretion have affected the wetland region around the river, causing a net loss of 55 hectares of land, over the past two decades. The findings of this study suggest that there is a need to implement effective management practices that recognize the complex interrelationships between land use, hydrology, and ecological processes to protect the Ropar Wetland's ecological and hydrological functions. Ongoing monitoring and assessing land use and cover changes are crucial for conserving wetland ecosystems.

Keywords


Freshwater ecosystem, Geo sensing, LANDSAT, LULC change, Remote sensing.

References