Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Understanding Successful Transfers of Rapid-Composting Technology Using Qualitative Content Analysis for Interpretation


Affiliations
1 Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushakthinagar, Mumbai 400 094, Maharashtra, India
2 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, Maharashtra, India
3 S. J. Mehta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, Maharashtra, India
 

This study focuses on the transfer of technology of rapid composting of bio-waste from a Public-funded Mission-oriented Research Organization (PMRO) in India. The PMRO is engaged in developing nuclear power technologies, and applications of nuclear technologies to non-power areas such as agriculture, bioscience, health care, and industry. It also develops technologies for applications in many areas including electronics, computers, LASERs, and accelerators. The organisation encourages the transfer of spin-off technologies for commercialization as well as for scaling up under incubation on a non-exclusive basis. The technology under study has attracted a large clientele of over 50 transferee firms in 5 years. This paper explores motivations behind a large clientele. While academic literature substantially covers the technology transfers from universities, the PMROs, especially those in emerging economies have not received much attention from academics. This paper inter alia addresses this gap. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the actors namely scientists, tech-transfer managers, and executives of transferee firms. Qualitative content analysis was carried out to arrive at the success-enabling factors, success-inhibiting factors, unique processes, and special roles of actors. Also, the paper brings out the strength of qualitative content analysis as a concept interpretation method in case study research. The paper highlights the synergistic interactions between the industry and the laboratory and provides useful tips for scientists, Tech-transfer Managers, and executives of transferee firms for making success in tech-transfers of societal and environmental technologies.

Keywords

Proactive technology seeker, Public-funded mission-oriented research organizations (PMRO), Social capital, Technology transfer.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Solow R, Technical change and the aggregate production function, Rev Econ Stat, 39(3) (1957) 312–320.

  • Samuelson Paul A & Nordhaus William D, Economics (McGraw Hill International Edition) 2010.

  • Grover R B, Integrating the function of a university to a workplace to promote post-academic research, Curr Sci, 117(7) (2019) 1140–1147.

  • BARC, Entrepreneurship Corner, [www.barc.gov.in (25 March 2023)].

  • Grover R B, Technology management by the Department of Atomic Energy, in National Seminar on Technology Management (Indian National Academy of Engineering) 12–13 October 2001.

  • Chen K, Zhang C, Feng Z, Zhang Y & Ning L, Technology transfer systems and modes of national research institutes: Evidence from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Res Policy, 51(3) (2022) 104471, doi: org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104471.

  • Klein P G, Joseph T, Mahoney, Anita M, Mc Gahan & Christos N P, Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations, Strateg Entrep J, 7 (2013) 70–91. doi: 10.1002/sej.1147.

  • Thurner T W, Transfer revenues of research and technology organizations (RTOs) in times of economic crisis, Int J Innov Manag, 2(2) (2017) 17500177, doi: 10.1142/S1363919617500177.

  • Forbes N, India’s National Innovation System: Transformed or half-formed, Working Paper (Centre for Technology, Innovation and Economic Research, Pune, India) 2016, [www.ctier.org/pdf-event/2106-09-India-NIS-Forbes-Working-Paper.pdf (02 June 2021)].

  • Bozeman B, Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory, Res Policy, 29 (2000) 627–655.

  • Bozeman B, Heather R & Jan Y, The evolving state-of-theart in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model, Res Policy, 44 (2015) 34–49, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008.

  • Carnes C M, Gilstrap F E, Hitt M A, Ireland R D, Matz J W & Woodman R W, Transforming a traditional research organization through public entrepreneurship, Bus Hor, 62 (2019) 437–449, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.02.002.

  • Carr R K, Doing technology transfer in federal laboratories (Part1), J Technol Transf, 17 (1992) 8–23.

  • Carr R K, Menu of best practices in technology transfer (Part 2), J Technol Transf, 17 (1992) 24–33.

  • Grover R B, The relationship between science and technology and evolution in methods of knowledge production, Indian J Hist Sci, 54(1) (2019) 50–68, doi: 10.16943/ijhs/2019/v54i1/49597.

  • Mohan S R & Rao A R, Early identification of innovative and market identifiable technologies - A Model for improving technology transfer capabilities of public research institutes, J Sci Ind Res (India), 62 (2003) 865–875.

  • Audretsch D B, Bozeman B, Combs K L, Feldman M, Link A N, Siegel D S, Stephan P, Tassey G & Wessner C, The economics of science and technology, J Technol Transf, 27 (2002) 155–203, doi: 10.1023/A:1014382532639. Source:RePEc.

  • Mukherjee P, Darshana S & Mukherjee P K, Rapid Composting Technology for Decomposition of Biodegradable Wastes (BARC, Mumbai) 2020, [www.barc.gov.in/barc_nl/2020/20200506.pdf (17 April, 2022)].

  • Sangjae L, Wanki K, Min K Y & Ohb K J, Using AHP to determine intangible priority factors for technology transfer adoption, Expert Syst Appl, 39 (2012) 6388–6395, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.030.

  • O'Reilly P & Henchion M, An appraisal of the optimal conditions for successful technology transfer to a low technology industry: The case of publicly funded food research in Ireland, in Annual Conference, (Technology Transfer Society, Washington DC) 12–13 November 2010.

  • Zakay Bar S, A technology transfer model, Technol Forecast Soc Change, 2 (1971) 321–337.

  • Khalil T & Ravi S, Management of Technology: The key to Competitiveness and Wealth Creation (Tata McGraw Hill, India) 2013.

  • TPS, Technology Policy Statement of 1983 (Government of India) 1983 [www.thesciencepolicyforum.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/05/TPS-1983.pdf (22 August 2021)].

  • Suri B M, Scientific Research and Manufacturing: Potential India Growth Story, (Nova Science Publishers, New York) 2019.

  • Chaabane H K, Camargo M V Boly & Yannou B, Modeling technology transfer process: Proposition of a qualitative and quantitative observation approach, in Third European Conf Manag Technol, Industry-University Collaborations in Techno Parks, Euro MOT 2008 (CERAM Business School, Nice, France) 17–19 September 2008.

  • Diana-Maria C & Emil C, A framework for technology transfer success factors: Validation for the Graphene4 Life project, J Sci Technol Policy Manag, 11(2) (2020) 217–245, doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-06-2019-0066.

  • Cooper R G & Kleinschmidt E J, Success factors in product innovation, Ind Mark Manag, 16 (1987) 215–223.

  • Fukugawa N, Determinants of licensing activities of local public technology centers in Japan, Technovation, 29 (2009) 885–892, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.017.

  • West J & Bogers M, Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation, J Prod Innov Manag, 31(4) (2014) 814-831, doi: 10.1111/jpim.12125.

  • Cohen W & Levinthal D, Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Adm Sci Q, 35(1) (1990) 128–152.

  • Navid K, Rasta S & Senina A A, Identifying main influential elements in technology transfer process: A conceptual model, Procedia Soc, 40, (2012) 417–423, doi: 10.1016./j/sbspro.2012.03.209.

  • Bonfim L R, Segatto A P & Gonçalves S A, A conical-helix model of technology transfer and public-private partnerships for technological development in Brazilian public health, Technol Soc, 53 (2018) 110–123, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.006.

  • Malik K, Aiding the technology manager: A conceptual model for intra-firm technology transfer’, Technovation, 22 (2002) 427–436.

  • Thursby J G & Thursby M C, Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing, Working Paper No. 7718 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.) 2000 [www.nber.org/system/files/working papers/w7718/w7718.pdf (24 July 2021)].

  • Yin R K, The case study crisis: some answers, Adm Sci Q, 26(1) (1981) 58–65.

  • Mathew M B & Michael H A, An Expanded Sourcebook of Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage Publications) 1994.

  • Garcia M, Gava R, Tonelli D & Brito V, Actor-network theory: Opening the black box of the reasons for the involvement of researchers in the technology transfer process, J Innov Manag, 6(4) (2018) 49–72, doi: https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_006.004_0005.

  • Glaser B G & Strauss A L, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick) 1967.

  • Heslop L A, McGregor E & Griffith M, Development of a technology readiness assessment measure: The cloverleaf model of technology transfer, J Technol Transf, 26(4) (2001) 369–384.

  • Sancho-Zamora R, Gutiérrez-Broncano S, Hernández- Perlines F & Peña-García I, A multidimensional study of absorptive capacity and innovation capacity and their impact on business performance, Front Psychol, 12 (2021) 1–12, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751997.

  • Klein P G, Mahoney J T, McGahan A M & Pitelis C N, Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship, Eur Manag Rev, 7(2010) 1–15, doi: 10.1057/emr.2010.1.


Abstract Views: 28

PDF Views: 24




  • Understanding Successful Transfers of Rapid-Composting Technology Using Qualitative Content Analysis for Interpretation

Abstract Views: 28  |  PDF Views: 24

Authors

Thyagaraju H. Ponangi
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushakthinagar, Mumbai 400 094, Maharashtra, India
Poulomi Mukherjee
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, Maharashtra, India
Karuna Jain
S. J. Mehta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, Maharashtra, India
R. B. Grover
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushakthinagar, Mumbai 400 094, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


This study focuses on the transfer of technology of rapid composting of bio-waste from a Public-funded Mission-oriented Research Organization (PMRO) in India. The PMRO is engaged in developing nuclear power technologies, and applications of nuclear technologies to non-power areas such as agriculture, bioscience, health care, and industry. It also develops technologies for applications in many areas including electronics, computers, LASERs, and accelerators. The organisation encourages the transfer of spin-off technologies for commercialization as well as for scaling up under incubation on a non-exclusive basis. The technology under study has attracted a large clientele of over 50 transferee firms in 5 years. This paper explores motivations behind a large clientele. While academic literature substantially covers the technology transfers from universities, the PMROs, especially those in emerging economies have not received much attention from academics. This paper inter alia addresses this gap. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the actors namely scientists, tech-transfer managers, and executives of transferee firms. Qualitative content analysis was carried out to arrive at the success-enabling factors, success-inhibiting factors, unique processes, and special roles of actors. Also, the paper brings out the strength of qualitative content analysis as a concept interpretation method in case study research. The paper highlights the synergistic interactions between the industry and the laboratory and provides useful tips for scientists, Tech-transfer Managers, and executives of transferee firms for making success in tech-transfers of societal and environmental technologies.

Keywords


Proactive technology seeker, Public-funded mission-oriented research organizations (PMRO), Social capital, Technology transfer.

References