Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Design and Implementation of Cognitive Assessment Tool for Working Memory and Attention based on PGI Memory Scale


Affiliations
1 Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Chitkara University Institute of Engineering Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab 140 401, India
3 Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160 012, India
 

Cognitive function is one of the most fundamental psychological functions that play a significant role in person’s daily life. Impairment in cognitive function can impacts the daily functioning and overall performance of the person. A digital application could be an accessible and convenient method for the effective evaluation of cognition. The proposed Cognitive Assessment Digital Smart Tool (CADST) evaluates the Attention (ATT) and Working Memory (WM) parameters of cognition. The outcome measures of CADST were evaluated against PGI Memory Scale (PGIMS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Usability testing for the CADST tool was performed using the Post‒Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). A total of 30 healthy participants were recruited (women = 12, men = 18; age (M ± SD) = 35.6 ± 10.63 y. o.). The feasibility study analysis revealed a significant moderate to strong correlation between the total scores of CADST and PGIMS (r = 0.75; p < 0.001) and a low to moderate correlation between the total scores of CADST and MoCA (r = 0.44; p < 0.001). Subtests of CADST and PGIMS showed strong correlation for ATT (r = 0.81; p < 0.001) and moderate correlation for WM (r = 0.51; p < 0.001). Similarly, subtests of CADST and MoCA showed moderate correlation for ATT (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and low correlation for WM (r = 0.24; p = 1.82). CADST showed a high correlation with PGIMS for evaluating ATT and WM symptoms of cognition provide evidence of convergent validity. CADST is the first digital smart screening tool based on PGIMS for ATT and WM using web‒based technology. The overall usability ratings showed high acceptance for system usage, interface and information quality.

Keywords

Cognition, Digital screening, Evaluation, Memory, Mobile application.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Khalil M, Hollander P, Raucher‒Chene D, Lepage M & Lavigne K M, Structural brain correlates of cognitive function in schizophrenia: A meta‒analysis, Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 132 (2022) 37‒49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev. 2021.11.034.
  • Zoupa E, Bogiatzidou O, Siokas V, Liampas I, Tzeferakos G, Mavreas V, Stylianidis S & Dardiotis E, Cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia–associated cognitive impairment: A review, Neurol Int, 15(1) (2022) 12‒23, https:// doi.org/10.3390/neurolint15010002.
  • Song D, Yu D S, Li PW, He G & Sun Q, Correlates of health‒related quality of life among Chinese older adults with mild cognitive impairment, Clin Interv Aging, 16 (2019) 2205‒2212, https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S227767.
  • Tiwari S C, Tripathi R K & Kumar A, Applicability of the Mini‒Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Hindi Mental State Examination (HMSE) to the urban elderly in India: A pilot study, Int Psychogeriatr, 21(1) (2009) 123‒128, https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198610000-00005.
  • Julayanont P, Phillips N, Chertkow H & Nasreddine Z, in Cognitive screening instruments, 2nd edn, edited by Larner A J, (Springer) 2017.
  • Borson S, Scanlan J M, Chen P & Ganguli M, The Mini‒Cog as a screen for dementia: Validation in a population‒based sample, J Am Geriatr Soc, 51(10) (2003) 1451‒1454, https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51465.x.
  • Strobach T & Huestegge L, Evaluating the effectiveness of commercial brain game training with working‒memory tasks, J Cogn Enhanc, 1(4) (2017) 539‒558, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0053-0.
  • Berg J L, Durant J, Leger G C, Cummings J L, Nasreddine Z & Miller J B, Comparing the electronic and standard versions of the Montreal cognitive assessment in an outpatient memory disorders clinic: A validation study, J Alzheimers Dis: JAD, 62(1) (2018) 93–97, https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170896.
  • Mielke M M, Machulda M M, Hagen C E, Edwards K K, Roberts R O, Pankratz V S, Knopman D S, Jack C R & Petersen R C, Performance of the CogState computerized battery in the Mayo Clinic Study on Aging, Alzheimers Dement, 11(11) (2015) 1367‒1376, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jalz.2015.01.008.
  • Melgar M I, Ramos Jr M A, Cuadro C K, Yusay C T, King E K & Maramba D H, A translating COGNISTAT and the use of the cognitive interview approach: Observations and challenges, Madridge J Behav Soc Sci, 5(1) (2022) 89–95.
  • Srinivasan S, The concise cognitive test for dementia screening: Reliability and effects of demographic variables as compared to the mini mental state examination, Neurol India, 58(5) (2010) 702–707, https://doi.org/10.4103/0028- 3886.72167.
  • Rosli R, Tan M P, Gray W K, Subramanian P & Chin A V, Cognitive assessment tools in Asia: A systematic review, Int Psychogeriatr, 28(2) (2016) 189–210, https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1041610215001635.
  • Ng K P, Chiew H J, Lim L, Rosa–Neto P, Kandiah N & Gauthier S, The influence of language and culture on cognitive assessment tools in the diagnosis of early cognitive impairment and dementia, Expert Rev Neurother, 18(11) (2018) 859‒69, https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2018.1532792.
  • Chopra S, Kaur H, Pandey R M & Nehra A, Development of neuropsychological evaluation screening tool: An education‒free cognitive screening instrument, Neurol India, 66(2) (2018) 391‒399, https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886. 227304.
  • Porrselvi A P & Shankar V, Status of cognitive testing of adults in India, Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 20(4) (2017) 334‒340, https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_107_17.
  • Karim M & Venkatachalam J, A randomized pilot study of a cognitive intervention for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment, ECS Trans, 107(1) (2022) 8383, https://doi.org/ 10.1149/10701.8383ecst.
  • Botta R, Keshav K J, Kutty B, Mahadevan A, Pal P K & Yadav R, NIMHANS Neuropsychological battery for elderly in parkinson’s disease patients: Validation and diagnosis using MDS PD-MCI task force criteria in Indian population, Ann Indian Acad Neurol, 26(3) (2023) 247‒255, https://doi. org/10.4103/aian.aian_903_22.
  • Roy R R, Manjhi A & Mahto J, A comparative study on receptive speech among patients suffering from schizophrenia with AIIMS comprehensive neuropsychological battery, Indian J Health Wellbeing, 7(1) (2016) 113‒116.
  • Halder S & Mahato A, Identifying multiple domain memory impairment in high–risk group for Alzheimer's disorder, J Geriatr Ment Health, 6(1) (2019) 14‒18, https://doi. org/10.4103/jgmh.jgmh_4_19.
  • Serrano C M, Sorbara M, Minond A, Finlay J B, Arizaga R L, Iturry M, Martinez P, Heinemann G, Gagliardi C, Serra A & Magliano F C, Validation of the Argentine version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MOCA): A screening tool for mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia in elderly. Dement Neuropsychol, 14(2) (2020) 145‒152, https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1980-57642020dn14-020007.
  • Caili W, Paul D & Carmen M, A pilot study to measure cognitive impairment in patients with severe schizophrenia with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Schizophr Res, 158(1) (2014) 151–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres. 2014.07.006.
  • https://developer.android.com/studio/intro (11 August 2021).
  • Pyae A, A usability evaluation of the Google Home with non– native English speakers using the system usability scale, Int J Netw Virtual Organ, 26(3) (2022) 172‒194, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2022.122849.
  • Bakkour N, Samp J, Akhras, K, El Hammi E, Soussi I, Zahra F, Duru G, Kooli A & Toumi M, Systematic review of appropriate cognitive assessment instruments used in clinical trials of schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder, Psychiatry Res, 216(3) (2014) 291–302, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.014.
  • Kang K W, Choi S M, Shin M H, Kweon S S, Park H C, Dong‒Chan O, Choi M J, Lee M H, Kim D E, Choi K H & Baek S J, Cognitive function and activities of daily living in people affected by leprosy: A cross‒sectional, population‒based, case‒control study, Neurol India, 64(4) (2016) 656–660, https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.185410.
  • Das D, Biswas A, Roy A, Sauerbier A & Bhattacharyya K B, Cognitive impairment in idiopathic Parkinson's disease, Neurol India, 64(3) (2016) 419–427, https://doi.org/10.4103/0028- 3886.181533.
  • Krishnan S, Justus S, Meluveettil R, Menon R N, Sharma S P & Kishore A, Validity of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in non‒English speaking patients with Parkinson's disease, Neurol India, 63(1) (2015), 63–67, https://doi.org/10.4103/0028- 3886.152637.
  • Jacinto A F, Brucki S M D, Porto C S, Martins M A, Citero V A & Nitrini R, Suggested instruments for general practitioners in countries with low schooling to screen for cognitive impairment in the elderly, Int Psychogeriatr, 26(7) (2014) 1121–1125, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610214000325.

Abstract Views: 30

PDF Views: 24




  • Design and Implementation of Cognitive Assessment Tool for Working Memory and Attention based on PGI Memory Scale

Abstract Views: 30  |  PDF Views: 24

Authors

Shilpa Walia
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
Neelesh Kumar
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
Praveen Kumar Khosla
Chitkara University Institute of Engineering Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab 140 401, India
Sandeep Grover
Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160 012, India

Abstract


Cognitive function is one of the most fundamental psychological functions that play a significant role in person’s daily life. Impairment in cognitive function can impacts the daily functioning and overall performance of the person. A digital application could be an accessible and convenient method for the effective evaluation of cognition. The proposed Cognitive Assessment Digital Smart Tool (CADST) evaluates the Attention (ATT) and Working Memory (WM) parameters of cognition. The outcome measures of CADST were evaluated against PGI Memory Scale (PGIMS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Usability testing for the CADST tool was performed using the Post‒Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). A total of 30 healthy participants were recruited (women = 12, men = 18; age (M ± SD) = 35.6 ± 10.63 y. o.). The feasibility study analysis revealed a significant moderate to strong correlation between the total scores of CADST and PGIMS (r = 0.75; p < 0.001) and a low to moderate correlation between the total scores of CADST and MoCA (r = 0.44; p < 0.001). Subtests of CADST and PGIMS showed strong correlation for ATT (r = 0.81; p < 0.001) and moderate correlation for WM (r = 0.51; p < 0.001). Similarly, subtests of CADST and MoCA showed moderate correlation for ATT (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and low correlation for WM (r = 0.24; p = 1.82). CADST showed a high correlation with PGIMS for evaluating ATT and WM symptoms of cognition provide evidence of convergent validity. CADST is the first digital smart screening tool based on PGIMS for ATT and WM using web‒based technology. The overall usability ratings showed high acceptance for system usage, interface and information quality.

Keywords


Cognition, Digital screening, Evaluation, Memory, Mobile application.

References