Refine your search
Co-Authors
- T. S. Thind
- A. K. Bakhshi
- A. K. Saxena
- A. K. Sharma
- A. S. Khera
- P. K. Srivastava
- Jagmohan Singh
- Astha
- Parvinder Singh
- Sukhjinderjit Singh
- Gurdarshan Singh
- A. P. S. Brar
- Tilak Raj
- S. Datta
- P. L. Gautam
- J. L. Karihaloo
- M. Mahadevappa
- C. D. Mayee
- G. Padmanaban
- A. Parida
- R. S. Paroda
- M. Sharma
- T. R. Sharma
- N. K. Singh
- R. B. Singh
- R. V. Sonti
- A. K. Tyagi
- A. Varma
- K. Veluthambi
- O. P. Yadav
- D. V. Singh
- T. Mohapatra
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Dhillon, B. S.
- Citation of Papers Vis-a-Vis Quality of Research in Agricultural Sciences
Abstract Views :203 |
PDF Views:38
Authors
B. S. Dhillon
1,
T. S. Thind
1
Affiliations
1 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, IN
1 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 3 (2016), Pagination: 286-287Abstract
No Abstract.- Effect of Storage of Winter Maize on Quality
Abstract Views :132 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Breeding, PAU, Ludhiana, IN
1 Department of Plant Breeding, PAU, Ludhiana, IN
Source
The Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol 24, No 10 (1987), Pagination: 325-330Abstract
Maize (Zea Mays L) is the third most important cereal crop of the world. In India, it ranks fourth in terms of area and production. Over 90 per cent of maize produced in India is consumed as food. Maize flour is most commonly consumed in the form of chapatis in the northern part of the country.- Front Line Demonstration-An Effective Tool for Increasing the Productivity of Summer Moong in Amritsar District of Punjab
Abstract Views :104 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Soil Science, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (P.A.U.), Amritsar (Punjab), IN
2 Department of Plant Protection, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (P.A.U.), Amritsar (Punjab), IN
3 Department of Horticulture, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (P.A.U.), Amritsar (Punjab), IN
1 Department of Soil Science, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (P.A.U.), Amritsar (Punjab), IN
2 Department of Plant Protection, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (P.A.U.), Amritsar (Punjab), IN
3 Department of Horticulture, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, (P.A.U.), Amritsar (Punjab), IN
Source
An Asian Journal of Soil Science, Vol 7, No 2 (2012), Pagination: 315-318Abstract
The productivity of pulse crops continues to be quite low due to technological gaps in adoption of pulse technologies and other factors also. The yield of pulses could be increased by demonstrating their cultivation technologies at the farmer's fields under the supervision of scientists working in the operational area. The present study was conducted across 19 villages in Amritsar district of Punjab. Sixty front line demonstrations were conducted by KVK Amritsar from the year 2006 to 2010 during the Kharif seasons. The results of the study revealed that the average yield of summer moong in FLD plots sown after potato crop was highest (12.37q/ha) followed by summer moong sown after pea crop (11.61 q/ha). The least yield of 9.14 q/ha was obtained in the summer moong sown after wheat crop. Similarly the average yield of summer moong in farmer practice sown after potato crop was highest (10.81q/ha) followed by summer moong sown after pea crop (10.27 q/ha). The least yield of 7.93 q/ha was obtained in the summer moong sown after wheat crop. The increment in yield of moong crop after different crops is due to different sowing time and different fertility status of soil under these crops. The higher yields in front line demonstrations were due to dissemination of improved and latest technology viz., HYV, recommended seed rate, fertilization and plant protection measures.Keywords
Front Line Demonstrations, Technological Gaps, Adoption, Moong.- Constraints as Perceived by the Respondents in Adoption of Recommended Kitchen Gardening Techniques in District Amritsar, Punjab
Abstract Views :191 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amritsar (Punjab), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Amritsar (Punjab), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 12, No 3 (2017), Pagination: 347-350Abstract
Vegetables help to combat malnutrition and diversify diets. Kitchen gardening may prove to be a boon for rural people to meet their daily requirements of vegetables and fruits. Most of the farm families having kitchen garden are interested to improve the practice of growing vegetables for their own use but they are facing various constraints. The present study was conducted with the objective to study the perceived constraints in adoption of kitchen gardening by the rural masses. Four villages were selected from different blocks of district Amritsar. Twenty five (25) farm families who were already practicing kitchen gardening were randomly selected from each village, consisting the total sample of 100 respondents (one from each family). The data were collected from each respondent through personal interview method with the help of structured schedule. The constraints as perceived by respondents scored on the basis of magnitude of the problem. The study highlighted that input constraint was most serious constraint followed by general constraints, technical constraints, socio-cultural constraints and post-harvest constraints. Non - availability of quality planting material and seeds of HYVs of vegetables, lack of knowledge about improved varieties, seed rate and, sowing time, seed treatment, major pests and diseases, continuous use of traditional practices for growing vegetables and lack of interest among rural youth towards farming were considered the major constraints in successful adoption of kitchen gardening.Keywords
Kitchen Garden, Constraints, Adoption.References
- Biswas, P.K. and Jamir, S. (2015). Constraints faced by farmers in adoption of kitchen gardening techniques in Mokokchung district, Nagaland. Int. J. Farm Sci., 5(3) : 207-211
- Kanbid, B.R. and Sharma, D.D. (1994). Adoption constraints of scientific horticultural technology. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 30 (1&2): 119-122.
- Meena, S.R. and Sisodia, S.S. (2004). Constraints as perceived by the respondents of recommended guava production technology. Rajasthan J. Ext. Edu., 12-13 : 146-153.
- Sethy, S., Sarkar, S. and Kumar, M. (2010). Constraints in adoption of improved techniques of kitchen gardening. Indian Res. J. Ext. Edu., 10 : 89-92
- Sharma, Karamjit, Singh, Gurdarshan, Dhaliwal, N.S. and Yadav, V.P.S. (2011). Constraints in adoption of recommended kitchen gardening techniques. J. Commu. Mobili. & Sustain. Dev., 6(1) : 96-99.
- Warde, P.N., Bhople, R.S. and Chaudhary, D.P. (1991). Adoption of dry land horticulture technology. Maharashtra J. Ext. Edu., 10 (2): 108.
- Seed Yield, Incidence of Yellow Vein Mosaic Virus and Economic Viability of Okra Seed Crop as Influenced by Staggered Sowing in South-Western Punjab
Abstract Views :140 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Faridkot (Punjab), IN
2 Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Faridkot (Punjab), IN
2 Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 13, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 365-370Abstract
Investigations were carried out in South-western district of Punjab in Indo-Gangetic plain region during four consecutive years to work out the most suitable sowing time to achieve higher seed yield and comparatively less incidence of yellow vein mosaic virus (YVMV) in okra. The sowing of okra was staggered from May 1 to June 15 at fortnightly interval. The results revealed that seed yield differed significantly with different sowing dates. The highest seed yield was observed in crop sown on May 1, followed by crop sown on May 15 but further delay in sowing to June 15 through May 30 resulted in progressive and significant reduction in seed yield of okra. The higher seed yield under earlier sowing can be ascribed to less incidence of YVMV, which was higher under late sown conditions. The income per rupee investment of okra seed crop was found to be the maximum (5.31) when sown on May 1.Keywords
Okra, Sowing Dates, Seed Yield, YVMV.References
- Adamou, H., Sanjeet, K. and Sokona, D. (2010). Okra (Abelmoschus spp.) in west and central Africa: potential and progress on its improvement. Afr. J. agric. Res., 5:3590-3598.
- Akinyele, B.O. and Osekita, O.S. (2006). Correlation and path co-efficient analyses of seed yield attributes in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 5: 1330-1336.
- Aykroud, W.R. (1963). I.C.M.R. Special Report Series, 42pp.
- Butani, D.K. and Verma, S. (1976). Pests of vegetable and their control. Brinjal. Pest., 10 (2) : 32-35.
- Channabasavanna, G.P. (1981). Contributions to Acarology Society of India. Bangalore, 256 pp.
- Chauhan, D.V.S. (1972). Vegetable production in India. 3rd Ed., Pub. Ram Prasad and Sons, Agra (U.P.) INDIA.
- Dilruba, S.S., Hassanuzamman, M., Karim, R. and Nahar, K. (2009). Yield response of okra to different sowing time and application of growth hormones. J. Hort. Sci. Ornamental Plants, 1: 10-14.
- Farinde, A.J., Owolarafe, O.K. and Ogungbemi, O.I. (2007). An overview of production, processing, marketing and utilisation of okra in egbedore local government area of Osun State, Nigeria. Agric. Eng., 4:1-17.
- Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd Ed.). John Wiley and Sons. New York, U.S.A., 680 pp.
- Gopalan, C., Sastri, S.B.V. and Balasubramanian, S. (2007). Nutritive value of Indian foods. National Institute of Nutrition (NIN), ICMR, India.
- Hegde, M., Srinivasa, M., Biradar, D.P., Udikeri, S.S. and Khadi, B.M. (2004). Seasonal incidence of key insect pests and their natural enemies on cotton at Siruguppa paper presented. Int. Symp. Strat. Sust. Cotton Prodn. - A Global vision. Karnataka, India. pp. 23-25.
- Holser, R.A. and Bost, G. (2004). Hybrid Hibiscus seed oil compositions. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 81: 795-797.
- Kochhar, S.L. (1986). Tropical crops. A text book of economic botany. Macmillan Indian Ltd., pp. 263-264.
- Krishnaiah, K. (1980).Methodology for assessing crop losses due to pests of vegetable. Assessment of crop losses due to pests and diseases. Proc. of Workshop held from Sept, 19-30, 1977 at U.A.S., Bangalore. pp. 259-267.
- Kumar, M. and Singh, A.K. (2002). Varietal resistance of okra against cotton jassid, Amrasca biguttula biguttula under field conditions. Ann. Pl. Prot. Sci., 10 (2) : 365-410.
- Moniruzzaman, M., Uddin, M.Z. and Choudhury, A.K. (2007). Response of okra seed crop to sowing time and plant spacing in south eastern hilly region of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res., 32(3): 393-402.
- Narangalkar, A.L. (2003). Population dynamics and management of pest complex of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]. Ph.D. Thesis, Gajarat Agriucultual University, Sardarkrushinagar, GUJARAT (INDIA).
- Nonnecke, I.L. (1989). Vegetable production. Van Nostrand Reinhold AVI Publishing, pp. 608-609.
- Ozgur, A.F., Sekeroglu, E., Ohnesorge, B. and Gocmen, H. (1990).Studies on host plant changes, migration and population dynamics of the cotton whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) in Cukurova (Turkey). Mitte-der. Deutsch. Gesell. Fur., Allg. Und-Ang. Ent., 7 (4-6) : 653-656.
- Preetha, G. and Nadarajan, L. (2007). Validation of IPM modules against sucking pests of okra in Karaikal. Indian J. Entomol., 69 (3) : 210-214.
- Rao, N.V., Reddy, A.S. and Rao, K.T. (1989). Natural enemies of cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius in relation to host population and weather factors. J. Biol. Control, 3 (1) : 10-12.
- Rawat, R.R. and Sadu, H.R. (1973). Estimation of losses in growth and yield of okra due to Empoasca devastans (dist). and Erias spp. Indian J. Ent., 35 : 252-254.
- Saifullah, M. and Rabbani, M.G. (2009). Evaluation and characterization of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.] genotypes. SAARC J. Agric., 7: 92-99.
- Sastry, K.S.K. and Singh, S.J. (1974). Effect of yellow vein mosaic virus infection on growth and yield of okra crop. Indian Phytopath., 27: 294-297.
- Senapati, B. and Khan, S.R. (1978). A note on population fluctuation of Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) on okra at Bubaneshwar. Indian J. Agric. Res., 12 : 97-98.
- Singh, J., Singh, R.K., Mukherjee, I.N., Singh, R.N. and Agarwal, L. (1987). Mites of agricultural importance and their management in India. In: Recent advances in entomology (Ed. Mathur, Y.K., Bhattacharya, A.K., Pandey N.D., Upadhyay, K.D. and Srivastava, J.P.) Gopal Prakashan. Kanpur, pp. 170-185.
- Srinivasa, R. and Rajendran, R. (2003). Joint action potential of Neem with other plant extracts against the leaf hopper Amrasca devastance (Distant) on okra. Pest Manage. Econ. Zool., 10 : 131-136.
- Thomson, H.C. and Kelly, W.C. (1979). Vegetables crops. McGraw Hill Co. New York, U.S.A., pp. 562.
- Threhan, K.N. (1944). Distribution of whitefly in the Punjab. Indian Farming, 5 : 514-515.
- Tindall, H.D. (1983). Vegetables in the tropics. McMillan AVI., pp. 325-327.
- Yadav, S.K. and Dhankar, B.S. (2001). Seed production and quality of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] as affected by sowing time and position of fruit on plant. Seed Res., 29 (1) : 47-51.
- Zeven, A.C. and Zhukovsky, P.M. (1975). Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centres of diversity. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 210.
- India Needs Genetic Modification Technology in Agriculture
Abstract Views :148 |
PDF Views:31
Authors
S. Datta
1,
B. S. Dhillon
2,
P. L. Gautam
3,
J. L. Karihaloo
4,
M. Mahadevappa
5,
C. D. Mayee
6,
G. Padmanaban
7,
A. Parida
8,
R. S. Paroda
9,
M. Sharma
10,
T. R. Sharma
11,
N. K. Singh
12,
R. B. Singh
13,
R. V. Sonti
14,
A. K. Tyagi
15,
A. Varma
16,
K. Veluthambi
17
Affiliations
1 Department of Botany, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700 019, IN
2 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, IN
3 Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Right Authority, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Societies Block, NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
4 Agrasen Apartment, Plot 10, Sector 7, Dwarka, New Delhi 110 075, IN
5 Division of Rural Development, JSS Mahavidyapeetha, Mysuru 570 004, IN
6 Raviram Residency, 13/1 Chitale Marg, Dhantoli, Nagpur 440 012, IN
7 Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
8 Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar 751 023, IN
9 Trust for Advancement of Agricultural Sciences, Avenue II, Pusa Campus, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012,, IN
10 Indian Institute of Advanced Research, Koba Institutional Area, Gandhinagar 382 007, IN
11 National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Knowledge City, Mohali 140 306,, IN
12 ICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnolgy, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, IN
13 National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, NASC Complex, Dev Prakash Shastri Marg, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, IN
14 National Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110 067, IN
15 Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi, South Campus, New Delhi 110 021, IN
16 Advanced Centre for Plant Virology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
17 School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai 625 021, IN
1 Department of Botany, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700 019, IN
2 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, IN
3 Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Right Authority, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Societies Block, NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110 012, IN
4 Agrasen Apartment, Plot 10, Sector 7, Dwarka, New Delhi 110 075, IN
5 Division of Rural Development, JSS Mahavidyapeetha, Mysuru 570 004, IN
6 Raviram Residency, 13/1 Chitale Marg, Dhantoli, Nagpur 440 012, IN
7 Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
8 Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar 751 023, IN
9 Trust for Advancement of Agricultural Sciences, Avenue II, Pusa Campus, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012,, IN
10 Indian Institute of Advanced Research, Koba Institutional Area, Gandhinagar 382 007, IN
11 National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Knowledge City, Mohali 140 306,, IN
12 ICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnolgy, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, IN
13 National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, NASC Complex, Dev Prakash Shastri Marg, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, IN
14 National Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110 067, IN
15 Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi, South Campus, New Delhi 110 021, IN
16 Advanced Centre for Plant Virology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
17 School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai 625 021, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 3 (2019), Pagination: 390-394Abstract
India does not have a clear stand on the release and consumption of genetically modified crops (food). The only approved crop is Bt-cotton, which has put India on the global map as a cotton exporting country. Even so, Bt-brinjal is under moratorium and GM mustard is prevented from undergoing commercial trial. All these decisions are not based on sound scientific principles. Activism against has successfully prevented exploitation of a powerful technology that can contribute to India’s food and nutrition security. This article attempts to give a balanced perspective of genetic modification technology as one of the serious options to be considered on case to case basis. Ambivalence will seriously affect India’s food security in the future.Keywords
Bt-Cotton, Food Security, Gene Editing, Genetically Modified Crops, Mustard.References
- Kesavan, P. C. and Swaminathan, M. S., Modern technologies for sustainable food and nutrition security. Curr. Sci., 2018, 115, 1876–1883.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects, The National Academy Press, 2016; https://doi.org/10.17226/23395.
- European Commission, a decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001–2010), 2010; ec, europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/a_decade_of_eu-funded_gmo_reserach.pdf.).
- Klumper, W. and Qaim, M. A., Meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9, e111629; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111629.
- Eenennaam, A. L. and Young, A. E., Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations. J. Anim. Sci., 2014, 92, 4255–4278.
- Cotton Corporation of India – Statistics, Government of India undertaking; https://cotcorp.org.in/statistics.aspx
- Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P., Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996–2016. GM Crops Food, 2018, 9, 1–31.
- Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P., Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2016: impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops Food, 2018, 9, 109–139.
- Krishna, V. and Qaim, M. B., Bt-cotton and sustainability of pesticide reduction in India. Agric. Syst., 2012, 107, 47–55.
- Plewis, I., Indian farmer suicides – is GM cotton to blame? Significance, 2014, 11, 14–18.
- Plewis, I., Hard evidence: does GM cotton lead to farmer suicide in India? In The Conversation, 2014; Theconversation.com.hard.evidence-does-gm-cotton-lead-to-farmer-suicide-in-india-24045.
- Shukla, K. A., et al., Expression of an insecticidal fern protein protects against white fly. Nature Biotechnol., 2016, 34, 1046– 1051.
- Lynas, M., Seeds of Science, Bloomsbury Sigma. United Kingdom, 2018, pp. 118–123.
- Shelton, A. M. et al., Bt eggplant project in Bangladesh: history, present status and future direction. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 2018; https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00106.
- Food Standards Australia/New Zealand (FSANZ). Response to Seralini paper, October 2016.
- Glyphosate: EFSA updates toxicological profile, 2015; www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/151112.
- Alberts, B. et al., Standing up for GMOs. Science, 2013, 341, 1320.
- Kaur, N. et al., CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient editing in phytoene desaturase (PDS) demonstrates precise manipulation in banana cv. Rasthali genome. Funct. Integr. Genomics, 2018, 18, 89–99; doi.org/10.1007/s10142-017-0577-5.
- Kumar, S., Bhatnagar, R. K., Kranthi, K. R. and Datta, S., The legal battle over field trials of GM crops. Nature India, 2014; doi:10.1038/nindia.2014.
- National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Policy brief: to accelerate utilization of GE technology for food and nutrition security and improving farmers’ income, NAAS, New Delhi, 2016.
- India’s Evergreen Revolution in Cereals
Abstract Views :168 |
PDF Views:31
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, IN
2 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, IN
3 Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 014, IN
1 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 003, IN
2 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, IN
3 Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 014, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 116, No 11 (2019), Pagination: 1805-1808Abstract
The term ‘Green Revolution’ (GR) is used to highlight an unprecedented increase in wheat production in India during 1968–72. The critics of GR allege that there is technology fatigue, especially after 1980s. The present study was undertaken to analyse the trends in productivity of major cereals and compare yield gains during the GR era and post-GR era. The period of 68 years since 1950 was divided in four phases: pre-GR era (1950–66) referred to as phase I, GR era (1967–83) as phase II, post-GR era of 1984–2000 as phase III and post-GR era of 2001–17 as phase IV. The annual rate of gain in productivity (kg/ha/yr) in each phase was estimated by linear regression. The annual gain in wheat productivity in phase III (53.1 kg/ha) was 30% higher than that in the GR era (41.0 kg/ha). In rice, the productivity gains increased consistently: annual gain in phase III (32.3 kg/ha) and phase IV (41.6 kg/ha) was 68% to 117% respectively, higher than that in the GR era (19.2 kg/ha). The rate of gain in productivity of maize and pearl millet in phases III and IV was 188–530% higher in comparison to the GR phase. The progress can largely be attributed to development and adoption of improved cultivars with higher yield potential and crop management technologies. The analysis provided conclusive evidence of India experiencing evergreen revolution in major cereals.Keywords
Cereals, Crop Productivity, Green Revolution, Improved Cultivars.References
- Byerlee, D., Modern varieties, productivity and sustainability: recent experience and emerging challenges. World Dev., 1996, 24, 697– 718.
- Singh, I. J., Rai, K. N. and Karwasrea, J. C., Regional variations in agricultural performance in India. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 1997, 52, 374–386.
- Pingali, P. L., Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 2012, 109, 12302–12308.
- Narayanamoorthy, A., Deceleration in agricultural growth: technology fatigue or policy fatigue? Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2007, 42, 2375– 2377.
- Singh, S. K., Saxena, R., Porwal, A., Neetu and Ray, S. S., Assessment of hailstorm damage in wheat crop using remote sensing. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112, 2095–2100.
- Richaria, R. H. and Mishro, B., The Japonica × Indica hybridization project in rice – an attempt for increased rice production. J. Biol. Sci., 1959, 2, 35–47.
- Dhillon, B. S. and Malhi, N. S., Maize breeding in India – retrospective analysis and prospects. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2006, 19, 327–345.
- Yadav, O. P. et al., Genetic improvement of maize in India – retrospect and prospects. Agric. Res., 2015, 4, 325–338.
- Yadav, O. P. and Rai, K. N., Genetic improvement of pearl millet in India. Agric. Res., 2013, 2, 275–292.