Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Xu, Jiajun
- Implementation of Student Presentation-Based Active Learning (SPAL) Approach in Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum
Abstract Views :219 |
PDF Views:4
Authors
Jiajun Xu
1,
Devdas Shetty
2
Affiliations
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of the District of Columbia, DC 20008, US
2 School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of the District of Columbia, DC 20008, US
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of the District of Columbia, DC 20008, US
2 School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of the District of Columbia, DC 20008, US
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 31, No 4 (2018), Pagination: 22-27Abstract
Active learning approaches require lots of time investment in student activities and engagement during the class period, which often leads to incomplete coverage of the course syllabus. Furthermore, it requires significant amount of time for the instructor to design and implement. To address these widely recognized inhibiting factors, we recently implemented a new student active learning approach, namely "student presentation-based active learning (SPAL)". Under this approach, students are given a reading assignment to prepare a PowerPoint presentation on well-defined conceptual topics, questions, or chapter modules. Reading assignments on a topic are administered 1-2 weeks before covering them in the class. This allows reasonable time for the self-comprehension of the suggested material for presentation preparation. Students were expected to rehearse the presentation and be prepared to complete it in the suggested time duration. During each lecture, one group of students would present the assigned topic to the class, and their presentations were graded according to the rubric focusing on the coverage of suggested topics, quality of presentation, and after presentation discussions. Peers and instructor provided feedback about the students' presentation and unclear concepts. To understand the efficacy of this approach, it was implemented in Mechanical Engineering Senior Capstone Project course in Fall 2016. Here the responses and insights garnered from this practice were presented, and discussion on the advantages and challenges associated with the adaptation of this approach in teaching engineering courses as compared to lecture based classroom education system.Keywords
Learning Objectives, Student Presentation, Active Learning.
References
- Hake, R. R., 1998, "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,"American Journal of Physics, 66(1), pp. 64-74.
- Prince,M., 2004, "Does active learning work?A review of the research," Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), pp. 223-231.
- Crouch, C. H., and Mazur, E., 2001, "Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results," American Journal of Physics, 69(9), pp. 970977.
- Thacker, B., Kim, E., Trefz, K., and Lea, S. M., 1994, "COMPARING PROBLEM-SOLVING PERFORMANCE OF PHYSICS STUDENTS IN INQUIRY-BASED AND TRADITIONAL INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS COURSES," American Journal of Physics, 62(7), pp. 627633.
- Hufnagel, B., 2011, "Innovative Strategies for Empowering Your Students to Become Active, Responsible Learners," Proc. 122nd Annual Meeting of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (ASP), pp. 405-409.
- Bell, A., 2014, "What the best college students d o, " Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), pp. 175-176.
- Lozano, G. I. R., 2012, "What the best college teacher do. The president and the fellows of Harvard College, 2004," Innovar-Revista De Ciencias Administrativ as YSociales, 22(46), pp. 178-179.
- Alters, B. J., and Nelson, C. E., 2002, "Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education," Evolution, 56(10), pp. 1891-1901.
- Rover, D. T., 2004, "Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning," Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), pp. 3-4.
- DeZure, D., 2004, "Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice," Review of Higher Education, 27(2), pp. 271-272.
- Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., and Ball, N., 2013, "Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course," Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), pp. 563-580.
- McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L.M., Esserman,D.A., and Mumper, R. J., 2014, "The Flipped Classroom: A Course Redesign to Foster Learning and Engagement in a Health Professions School," Academic Medicine, 89(2), pp. 236-243.
- Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., and Gosselin, K., 2013, "Flipping the Classroom to Improve Student Performance and Satisfaction," Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), pp. 597599.
- O'Flaherty, J., and Phillips, C., 2015, "The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review," Internet and Higher Education, 25, pp. 85-95.