Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Mangalam, Madhur
- Why not be an Early-Bird Researcher?
Abstract Views :281 |
PDF Views:80
Authors
Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune 411 008, IN
2 University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, US
3 University of Mysore, Mysuru 570 006, IN
1 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune 411 008, IN
2 University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, US
3 University of Mysore, Mysuru 570 006, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 108, No 6 (2015), Pagination: 1027-1028Abstract
No Abstract.- Patterns of Dominance Relationships among the Females of a Captive Femaleonly Group of Lion-Tailed Macaques (Macaca silenus) during the Course of the Introduction of a New Adult Male
Abstract Views :205 |
PDF Views:84
Authors
Affiliations
1 Institute of Experimental Neurogeneration, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, AT
2 Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30502, US
3 LTM Research and Conservation, 37130 Gleichen, DE
4 Biopsychology Laboratory, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, IN
5 Wels Zoo, 4600 Wels, AT
1 Institute of Experimental Neurogeneration, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, AT
2 Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30502, US
3 LTM Research and Conservation, 37130 Gleichen, DE
4 Biopsychology Laboratory, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, IN
5 Wels Zoo, 4600 Wels, AT
Source
Current Science, Vol 109, No 4 (2015), Pagination: 803-807Abstract
Lion-tailed macaques are generally considered to have more despotic than egalitarian dominance relationships; however, research lacks any conclusive evidence. In the present study, we examined dominance relationships among the females (of which the genealogical relationships were known) of a captive female-only group of lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) during the course of introduction of a new adult male to the group at the Wels Zoo, Wels, Austria. We determined the structure of dominance hierarchy and the corresponding changes in dominance relationships, possibly mediated by an increase in sexual competition among the females. When the females were housed together without any adult male for over four months following the death of the former breeding male, the dominance hierarchy almost followed the principle of youngest ascendency. When a new male was housed for 26 days in an enclosure adjacent to that of the females (such that the females and the new male could interact with each other through a wire mesh between their enclosures), changes in dominance hierarchy were observed. During this phase, there was a temporary change in the dominance hierarchy, leading to a higher degree of aggression of the nursing female and an increase in its dominance rank. This is corroborated by the fact that when the new male was housed together with the females in the same enclosure, it resulted in infanticide and subsequently, the nursing mother lost the higher rank. We consider the implications of the present study in the captive management and breeding of long-tailed macaque.Keywords
Captive Management, Dominance, Hierarchy, Lion-Tailed Macaque, Rank Instability.- Division of Labour:A Democratic Approach towards Understanding Manual Asymmetries in Non-Human Primates
Abstract Views :293 |
PDF Views:90
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, US
2 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune 411 008, IN
3 Biopsychology Laboratory, and Institute of Excellence, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, IN
1 Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, US
2 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune 411 008, IN
3 Biopsychology Laboratory, and Institute of Excellence, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 9 (2016), Pagination: 1630-1638Abstract
A consequence of the 'gold rush'-like hunch for human-like handedness in non-human primates has been that researchers have been continually analysing observations at the level of the population, ignoring the analysis at the level of an individual and, consequently, have potentially missed revelations on the forms and functions of manual asymmetries. Recently, consecutive studies on manual asymmetries in bonnet macaques, Macaca radiata revealed both the functional and adaptive significance of manual asymmetries respectively, and pointed towards the division of labour as being the general principle underlying the observed hand-usage patterns. We review the studies on manual asymmetries in capuchin monkeys, Cebus spp. and argue that the observed hand-usage patterns might reflect specialization of the two hands for accomplishing tasks that require different dexterity types (i.e. manoeuvring in three-dimensional space or physical strength). To this end, we do a step-by-step analysis of the various tasks used in the studies on manual asymmetries in capuchin monkeys. We then describe the division of labour as a general principle underlying manual asymmetries in non-human primates and propose experimental designs that would elaborate the forms and functions of manual asymmetries in non-human primates and the associated adaptive value.Keywords
Division of Labour, Hand Performance and Preference, Laterality, Manual Asymmetry, Non-Human Primates.References
- Mangalam, M., Desai, N. and Singh, M., Division of labor in hand usage in free-ranging bonnet macaques, Macaca radiata. Am. J. Primatol., 2014, 76, 576–585.
- Mangalam, M., Desai, N. and Singh, M., Division of labor in hand usage is associated with higher hand performance in free-ranging bonnet macaques, Macaca radiata. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10, e0119337.
- Bradshaw, J. and Rogers, L. J., The Evolution of Lateral Asymmetries, Language, Tool Use and Intellect, Academic Press, San Diego, 1993.
- Papademetriou, E., Sheu, C. F. and Michel, G. F., A meta-analysis of primate hand preferences, particularly for reaching. J. Comp. Psychol., 2005, 119, 33–38.
- Ward, J. P. and Hopkins, W. D., Primate Laterality: Current Behavioral Evidence of Primate Asymmetries, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1993.
- MacNeilage, P. F., Studdert-Kennedy, M. J. and Lindblom, B., Primate handedness reconsidered. Behav. Brain Sci., 1987, 10, 247–263.
- McGrew, W. C. and Marchant, L. F., On the other hand: current issues in and meta-analysis of the behavioral laterality of hand function in nonhuman primates. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol., 1997, 40, 201–232.
- Fagot, J. and Vauclair, J., Manual laterality in nonhuman primates: a distinction between handedness and manual specialization. Psychol. Bull., 1991, 109, 76–89.
- Mangalam, M. and Singh, M., Flexibility in food extraction techniques in urban free-ranging bonnet macaques, Macaca radiata. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8, e85497.
- Witelson, S. F., Hand preference: basis or reflection of hemispheric specialization? Behav. Brain Sci., 1988, 11, 735–736.
- Fragaszy, D. M. and Mitchell, S. R., Hand preference and performance on unimanual and bimanual tasks in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J. Comp. Psychol., 1990, 104, 275–282.
- Lilak, A. L. and Phillips, K. A., Consistency of hand preference across low‐level and high‐level tasks in Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Am. J. Primatol., 2008, 70, 254–260.
- Meunier, H. and Vauclair, J., Hand preferences on unimanual and bimanual tasks in white‐faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Am. J. Primatol., 2007, 69, 1064–1069.
- Spinozzi, G., Castorina, M. G. and Truppa, V., Hand preferences in unimanual and coordinated-bimanual tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J. Comp. Psychol., 1998, 112, 183–191.
- Westergaard, G. C., Kuhn, H. E., Lundquist, A. L. and Suomi, S. J., Posture and reaching in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). Laterality, 1997, 2, 65–74.
- Parr, L. A., Hopkins, W. D. and de Waal, F. B. M., Haptic discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): evidence of manual specialization. Neuropsychologia, 1996, 35, 143–152.
- Garber, P. A., Gomes, D. F. and Bicca-Marques, J. C., Experimental field study of hand preference in wild black-horned (Cebus nigritus) and white-faced (Cebus capucinus) capuchins: evidence for individual and species differences. Anim. Cogn., 2008, 11, 401–411.
- Westergaard, G. C., Kuhn, H. E. and Suomi, S. J., Effects of upright posture on hand preference for reaching vs the use of probing tools by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). Am. J. Primatol., 1998, 44, 147–153.
- Westergaard, G. C. and Suomi, S. J., Hand preference in capuchin monkeys varies with age. Primates, 1993, 34, 295–299.
- Spinozzi, G., Truppa, V. and Lagana, T., Grasping behavior in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): grip types and manual laterality for picking up a small food item. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 2004, 125, 30–41.
- Westergaard, G. C. and Suomi, S. J., Capuchin monkey (Cebus apella) grips for the use of stone tools. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1997, 103, 131–135.
- Westergaard, G. C. and Suomi, S. J., Hand preference for a bimanual task in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J. Comp. Psychol., 1998, 110, 406–411.
- Spinozzi, G., Lagana, T. and Truppa, V., Hand use by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) to extract a small food item from a tube: digit movements, hand preference, and performance. Am. J. Primatol., 2007, 69, 336–352.
- Spinozzi, G. and Truppa, V., Problem-solving strategies and hand preferences for a multicomponent task by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). Int. J. Primatol., 2002, 23, 621–638.
- Spinozzi, G. and Cacchiarelli, B., Manual laterality in haptic and visual reaching tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): an association between hand preference and hand accuracy for food discrimination. Neuropsychologia, 2000, 38, 1685–1692.
- Lacreuse, A. and Fragaszy, D. M., Manual exploratory procedures and asymmetries for a haptic search task: a comparison between capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and humans. Laterality, 1997, 2, 247–266.
- Lacreuse, A. and Fragaszy, D. M., Hand preferences for a haptic searching task by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). Int. J. Primatol., 1996, 17, 613–632.
- Lacreuse, A., Left hand preferences in capuchins (Cebus apella): role of spatial demands in manual activity. Laterality, 1999, 4, 65–78.
- Wilson, M., Tactual discrimination learning in monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 1965, 3, 353–361.
- Westergaard, G. C. and Suomi, S. J., The use of probing tools by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella): evidence for increased right-hand preference with age. Int. J. Primatol., 1994, 15, 521–529.
- Westergaard, G. C., Kuhn, H. E. and Suomi, S. J., Laterality of hand function in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): comparison between tool use actions and spontaneous non‐tool actions. Ethology, 1998, 104, 119–125.
- Westergaard, G. C. and Suomi, S. J., Asymmetrical manipulation in the use of tools by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Folia Primatol., 1994, 63, 96–98.
- Anderson, J. R., Degiorgio, C., Lamarque, C. and Fagot, J., A multi-task assessment of hand lateralization in capuchins (Cebus apella). Primates, 1996, 37, 97–103.
- Westergaard, G. C., Hand preference in the use and manufacture of tools by tufted capuchin (Cebus apella) and lion-tailed macaque (Macaca silenus) monkeys. J. Comp. Psychol., 1991, 105, 172–176.
- Westergaard, G. C. and Suomi, S. J., Hand preference in the use of nut-cracking tools by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Folia Primatol., 1993, 61, 38–42.
- Westergaard, G. C. and Suomi, S. J., Hand preference for stone artefact production and tool-use by monkeys: possible implications for the evolution of right-handedness in hominids. J. Hum. Evol., 1996, 30, 291–298.
- Panger, M. A. and Wolfe, L. D., Carrying and hand-use patterns in Panamanian white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Primates, 2000, 41, 407–411.
- Westergaard, G. C., Haynie, M. K., Lundquist, A. L. and Suomi, S. J., Carrying, sharing, and hand preference in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). Int. J. Primatol., 1999, 20, 153–162.
- Hopkins, W. D., Laterality in maternal cradling and infant positional biases: implications for the development and evolution of hand preferences in nonhuman primates. Int. J. Primatol., 2004, 25, 1243–1265.
- Porter, R., The corticomotoneuronal component of the pyramidal tract: corticomotoneuronal connections and functions in primates. Brain Res., 1985, 1, 1–26.
- Elliott, D. and Chua, R., Manual asymmetries in goal-directed movement. In Manual Asymmetries in Motor Performance (eds Elliott, D. and Roy, E. A.), CRC Press, New York, NY, 1996, pp. 143–157.
- Healey, J. M., Liederman, J. and Geschwind, N., Handedness is not a unidimensional trait. Cortex, 1986, 22, 33–53.
- Steenhuis, R. E., Hand preference and performance in skilled and unskilled activities. In Manual Asymmetries in Motor Performance (eds Elliott, D. and Roy, E. A.), CRC Press, New York, NY, 1996, pp. 123–142.
- Steenhuis, R. E. and Bryden, M. P., Different dimensions of hand preference that relate to skilled and unskilled activities. Cortex, 1989, 25, 289–304.
- Sfar, N., Mangalam, M., Kaumanns, W. and Singh, M., A comparative assessment of hand preference in captive red howler monkeys, Alouatta seniculus and yellow-breasted capuchin monkeys, Sapajus xanthosternos. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9, e107838.
- Napier, J. R., The prehensile movements of the human hand. J. Bone Joint Surg., 1956, 38, 902–913.
- Napier, J. R. and Napier, P. H., A Handbook of Living Primates, Academic Press, London, UK, 1967.
- Bishop, A., Use of the hand in lower primates. In Evolutionary and Genetic Biology of the Primates (ed. Buettner, J. J.), Academic Press, New York, NY, 1964, pp. 133–225.
- Napier, J. R., Hands, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1993.
- Fragaszy, D. M., Time budgets and foraging behavior in wedgecapped capuchins (Cebus olivaceus): age and sex differences. In Current Perspectives in Primate Social Dynamics (eds Taub, D. and King, F.), van Rostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1990, pp. 159–174.
- Panger, M. A., Object-use in free-ranging white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Costa Rica. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1988, 106, 311–321.
- Costello, M. B. and Fragaszy, D. M., Prehension in Cebus and Saimiri: I. Grip type and hand preference. Am. J. Primatol., 1988, 15, 235–245.
- Christel, M. I. and Fragaszy, D. M., Manual function in Cebus apella. Digital mobility, preshaping, and endurance in repetitive grasping. Int. J. Primatol., 2000, 21, 697–719.
- Muir, R. B. and Lemon, R. N., Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip. Brain Res., 1983, 261, 312–316.
- Kuypers, H. G. J. M., Anatomy of the descending pathways. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System II (eds Brookhart, V. B. V. and Mountcastle, J. M.), American Physiology Society, Bethesda, MD, 1981, pp. 597–666.
- Lemon, R. N., Cortical control of the primate hand. Exp. Physiol., 1993, 78, 263–301.
- Shinoda, Y., Yokota, J. L. and Futami, T., Divergent projection of individual corticospinal axons to motoneurons of multiple muscles in the monkey. Neurosci. Lett., 1981, 23, 7–21.
- Bortoff, G. A. and Strick, P. L., Corticospinal terminations in two New-World primates: further evidence that corticoneuronal connections provide part of the neural substrate for manual dexterity. J. Neurosci., 1993, 13, 5105–5118.
- Phillips, K. A. and Hopkins, W. D., Exploring the relationship between cerebellar asymmetry and handedness in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and capuchins (Cebus apella). Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45, 2333–2339.
- Phillips, K. A. and Sherwood, C. C., Primary motor cortex asymmetry is correlated with handedness in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav. Neurosci., 2005, 119, 1701–1704.
- Phillips, K. A., Sherwood, C. C. and Lilak, A. L., Corpus callosum morphology in capuchin monkeys is influenced by sex and handedness. PLoS ONE, 2007, 2, e792.
- Phillips, K. A. and Sherwood, C. C., Cerebral petalias and their relationship to handedness in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Neuropsychologia, 2007, 45, 2398–2401.
- Vallortigara, G. and Rogers, L. J., Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav. Brain Sci., 2005, 28, 575–588.
- Trehub, S. E., Manual specialization and the developing brain: an overview. In Manual Specialization and the Developing Brain (eds Young, G. et al.), Academic Press, New York, NY, 1983, pp. 257–274.
- Fission-Fusion Species under Restricted Living Conditions:A Comparative Study of Dyadic Interactions and Physical Proximity in Captive Bonobos and Bornean Orangutans
Abstract Views :278 |
PDF Views:73
Authors
Affiliations
1 Haidhauser Str. 16, 81675 Muenchen, DE
2 Tiergarten Ulm (Zoological Garden Ulm), Friedrichsau 40, 89073 Ulm, DE
3 Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, US
4 LTM Research and Conservation, Eschenweg 5, 37130, Gleichen, DE
5 Biopsychology Laboratory, and Institute of Excellence, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, IN
1 Haidhauser Str. 16, 81675 Muenchen, DE
2 Tiergarten Ulm (Zoological Garden Ulm), Friedrichsau 40, 89073 Ulm, DE
3 Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, US
4 LTM Research and Conservation, Eschenweg 5, 37130, Gleichen, DE
5 Biopsychology Laboratory, and Institute of Excellence, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 5 (2016), Pagination: 839-850Abstract
The present study investigates how the 'fission-fusion-adapted' bonobos and Bornean orangutans manage social relationships when kept under permanent group-living conditions. Our results showed that the bonobos and orangutans did not differ in the overall frequency of dyadic interactions. The orangutans evidently realized a potential to interact with partners, which on a surface did not differ from what was found in the bonobos. However, the bonobos spent more time on sociopositive interactions, especially on grooming and sit in contact, whereas the orangutans agonistically interacted with each other more often. Though frequencies of approaching were similar between the two species, orangutans actively left the proximity to a partner more often than the bonobos, which in turn were more often in spatial proximity. The three groups of bonobos housed under different conditions differed from each other for sociopositive and agonistic interactions. The orangutans differed for agonistic but not for sociopositive interactions. As a striking difference between the species, it appeared that between subadult/adult orangutans, behaviours which required prolonged body contact occurred only rarely and briefly. Differences in bonding patterns have been discussed as a possible explanatory factor. The 'short and distant nature' of interactions between adult orangutans suggests the existence of social relationships, the management of which requires less 'servicing behaviours'. Subadult/adult orangutans may be less attracted by each other than individuals in more gregarious species: they may have the cognitive skills to interact, but may not be motivated to stay together for long.Keywords
Bonobo, Orangutan, Dyadic Interactions, Fission–Fusion Species, Spatial Proximity.- How Capuchin Monkeys Use Their Semi-Prehensile Tails
Abstract Views :174 |
PDF Views:96
Authors
Madhur Mangalam
1,
Callum F. Ross
2,
Patrícia Izar
3,
Elisabetta Visalberghi
4,
Dorothy M. Fragaszy
5
Affiliations
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, US
2 Department of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, US
3 Department of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-020, BR
4 Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, 44-00185 Rome, IT
5 Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, US
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, US
2 Department of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, US
3 Department of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-020, BR
4 Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, 44-00185 Rome, IT
5 Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, US
Source
Current Science, Vol 122, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 195-200Abstract
Among primates, prehensile/semi-prehensile tails have evolved independently in the families Atelidae and Cebidae of the infraorder Platyrrhini (Neotropical monkeys). They facilitate maintaining stability during locomotion on thin, flexible branches and while reaching for food on challenging substrates. How a prehensile/semi-prehensile tail is coordinated with the hind limbs to facilitate controlled, flexible adoption of postures remains unknown. In an experimental set-up in the wild, we induced capuchin monkeys to adopt a tail-assisted, head-down tripodal posture to reach for food, documenting from slow-motion video recordings (120 fps) both qualitative changes in the monkeys’ positional behaviour – the relative orientation of their limbs and semi-prehensile tail – and quantitative changes in the left knee angle. The monkeys coordinated their tail and hind limbs in an online manner by preparing to anchor the tail over a substrate when beginning to adopt a tail-assisted, head-down, tripodal posture, but anchoring it only at the moment when they extended their hand to grasp the food. Coordination of their semi-prehensile tail with their limbs enables these capuchin monkeys to adjust their posture more flexibly compared to anchoring their tail over a substrate in anticipation and subsequently changing posture.Keywords
Left Knee Angle, Locomotion, Prehensility, Sapajus libidinosus, Tail Cantilever Length, Tropodal Posture.References
- Rosenberger, A. L., Tale of tails: parallelism and prehensility. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1983, 60, 103–107.
- Emmons, L. H. and Gentry, A. H., Tropical forest structure and the distribution of gliding and prehensile-tailed vertebrates. Am. Nat., 1983, 121, 513–524.
- Nowak, R. M. and Walker, E. P., Walker’s Mammals of the World, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1999.
- Larson, S. G. and Stern Jr, J. T., Maintenance of above-branch balance during primate arboreal quadrupedalism: coordinated use of forearm rotators and tail motion. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 2006, 129, 71–81.
- Meldrum, D. J., Tail-assisted hind limb suspension as a transitional behaviour in the evolution of the platyrrhine prehensile tail. In Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances (eds Strasser, E. et al.), Springer US, Boston, MA, USA, 1998, pp. 145–156.
- Youlatos, D. and Meldrum, J., Locomotor diversification in New World monkeys: running, climbing, or clawing along evolutionary branches. Anat. Rec., 2011, 294, 1991–2012.
- Lemelin, P., Comparative and functional myology of the prehensile tail in New World monkeys. J. Morphol., 1995, 224, 351–368.
- German, R. Z., The functional morphology of caudal vertebrae in New World monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1982, 58, 453–459.
- Organ, J. M., Structure and function of platyrrhine caudal vertebrae. Anat. Rec., 2010, 293, 730–745.
- Organ, J. M., Teaford, M. F. and Taylor, A. B., Functional correlates of fiber architecture of the lateral caudal musculature in prehensile and nonprehensile tails of the Platyrrhini (primates) and Procyonidae (carnivora). Anat. Rec., 2009, 292, 827–841.
- Grand, T. I., Body weight: its relation to tissue composition, segment distribution, and motor function. I. Interspecific comparisons. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1977, 47, 211–239.
- Organ, J. M., Muchlinski, M. N. and Deane, A. S., Mechanoreceptivity of prehensile tail skin varies between ateline and cebine primates. Anat. Rec., 2011, 294, 2064–2072.
- Bergeson, D. J., Patterns of suspensory feeding in Alouatta palliata, Ateles geoffroyi, and Cebus capucinus. In Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances (eds Strasser, E. et al.), Springer US, Boston, MA, 1998, pp. 45–60.
- Lawler, R. R. and Stamps, C., The relationship between tail use and positional behaviour in Alouatta palliata. Primates, 2002, 43, 147–152.
- Schmitt, D., Rose, M. D., Turnquist, J. E. and Lemelin, P., Role of the prehensile tail during ateline locomotion: experimental and osteological evidence. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 2005, 126, 435–446.
- Turnquist, J. E., Schmitt, D., Rose, M. D. and Cant, J. G. H., Pendular motion in the brachiation of captive Lagothrix and Ateles. Am. J. Primatol., 1999, 48, 263–281.
- Youlatos, D., Positional behavior of black spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus) in French Guiana. Int. J. Primatol., 2002, 23, 1071– 1093.
- Bezanson, M., The ontogeny of prehensile-tail use in Cebus capucinus and Alouatta palliata. Am. J. Primatol., 2012, 74, 770–782.
- Garber, P. A., Primate locomotor positional behaviour and ecology.
- In Primates in Perspective (eds Campbell, C. J. et al.), Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 2011, pp. 548–563.
- Garber, P. A. and Rehg, J. A., The ecological role of the prehensile tail in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1999, 110, 325–339.
- Russo, G. A. and Young, J. W., Tail growth tracks the ontogeny of prehensile tail use in capuchin monkeys (Cebus albifrons and C. apella). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 2011, 146, 465–473.
- Youlatos, D., Tail use in capuchin monkeys. Neotrop. Primates, 1999, 7, 16–20.
- Mangalam, M. and Fragaszy, D. M., Wild bearded capuchin monkeys crack nuts dexterously. Curr. Biol., 2015, 25, 1334–1339.
- Mangalam, M., Izar, P., Visalberghi, E. and Fragaszy, D. M., Taskspecific temporal organization of percussive movements in wild bearded capuchin monkeys. Anim. Behav., 2016, 114, 129–137.
- Mangalam, M., Pacheco, M. M., Izar, P., Visalberghi, E. and Fragaszy, D. M., Unique perceptuomotor control of stone hammers in wild monkeys. Biol. Lett., 2018, 14, 20170587.
- Mangalam, M., Rein, R. and Fragaszy, D. M., Bearded capuchin monkeys use joint synergies to stabilize the hammer trajectory while cracking nuts in bipedal stance. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2018, 285, 20181797.
- Johnson, K. O., The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 2001, 11, 455–461.