Refine your search
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Singh, Man
- The Steady-state Solution of Serial Channel with Feedback and Balking Connected with Non-serial Queuing Processes with Reneging and Balking
Abstract Views :270 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Satyabir Singh
1,
Man Singh
2
Affiliations
1 Assoc. Prof. R.K.S.D (P.G )College, Kaithal-136027(Haryana)
2 Prof. of Mathematics (Retd.), Deptt. of Mathematics & Statistics, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar – 125004 (Haryana), IN
1 Assoc. Prof. R.K.S.D (P.G )College, Kaithal-136027(Haryana)
2 Prof. of Mathematics (Retd.), Deptt. of Mathematics & Statistics, CCS, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar – 125004 (Haryana), IN
Source
Global Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics Sciences, Vol 2, No 1 (2012), Pagination: 1-11Abstract
O'Brien (1954), Jackson (1954) and Hunt (1955) studied the problems of serial queues in the steady state with Poisson assumptions. In these studies, it is assumed that the unit must go through each service channel without leaving the system. Barrer (1955) obtained the steady-state solution of a single channel queuing model having Poisson input, exponential holding time, random selection where impatient customers leave the service facility after a wait of certain time. Finch (1959) studied simple queues with customers at random for service at a number of service stations in series where the arrival from outside was considered at the initial stage. Feedback is permitted either from the terminal server or from each server of the series to the queue waiting for service at that stage by imposing an upper limit on the number of customers in the system at any time. Singh (1984) studied the problem of serial queues introducing the concept of reneging. Singh and Umed (1994) worked on the network of queuing processes with impatient customers. Punam, Singh and Ashok (2011) found the steady-state solution of serial queuing processes where feedback is not permitted.Keywords
Steady-state, Difference-differential, Waiting Space, Serial, Nonserial, Random Selection, Poisson Arrivals, Exponential Service, Feedback, Balking, Reneging, Marginal Probabilities And Mean Queue LengthReferences
- Barrer, D.Y. (1955): A Waiting line problem characterized by impatient customers and indifferent clerk. Journal of Operation Research Society of America. Vol. 3, 360
- Finch, P.D (1959): Cyclic queues. Opns. Res. Quart, Vol. 9, No. 1.
- Jackson, R.R. P(1954): Queuing system with phase type service. operat. Res. Quart.Vol.5, No. 2. 109-120.
- Hunt, G.C. (1955): Sequential arrays of waiting lines. opps. Res. Vol. 4, No. 674-683
- Kelly, F.P (1979): Reversibility and stochastic networks. Wiley, New York.
- O’Brien, G.G. (1954): The solution of some queuing problems. J.Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. Vol. 2, 132-142.
- Singh.M. (1984): Steady-state behaviour of serial queuing processes with impatient customers. Math. operations forsch, U.statist. Ser. Statist. Vol. 15.No 2, 289-298
- Singh, M and Singh, Umed (1994): Network of serial and non-serial queuing processes with impatient customers. JISSOR Vol. 15, (1-4) 81-96
- Punam; Singh.M; and Ashok (2011): The Steady-State solution of serial queuing processes with reneging due to long queue and urgent message. Applied science periodical Vol. XII, No. 1
- Viscosities and Surface Tension of N, N' Methylureas in Aqueous Solutions Measured with Survismeter, a Novel Instrument
Abstract Views :218 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Chemistry Research Laboratory, Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, IN
1 Chemistry Research Laboratory, Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, IN
Source
Journal of Surface Science and Technology, Vol 23, No 3-4 (2007), Pagination: 149-160Abstract
Viscosities (η, ± 0.06 × 10-5 N s m-2), surface tension (γ ± 0.05 × 10-3 N m-1) and densities (ρ ± 1 × 10-2 kg m-3) for 0.005 to 0.25 mol kg-1 1-methylurea (MU), 1, 3-dimethylurea (DMU) and 1, 1, 3, 3-tetramethylurea (TMU) as N, N' methylureas at interval of 0.005 mol kg-1 were measured at pH 7.99 to 7.01 and 293.15, 298.15 and 303.15 K temperatures. Intrinsic viscosities [η] and limiting surface tension γ0 are obtained from regression with molality, m. Contributions of -CH3 (methyl) groups are derived from differences in [η] and γ0 values individually between their subsequent ureas. The [η] and γ0 values infer weakening of hydrophilic interactions with -CH3 and strengthening of hydrophobic, and TMU shows structure making effect. As compared to measurements of viscosities and surface tension individually with viscometer and stalagmometer, the Survismeter minimizes 2/3rd of materials, human efforts and infrastructure with better accuracies. It prevents evaporation of liquids during surface tension measurements.Keywords
Survismeter, Surface Tension, Viscosity, Intrinsic Viscosities, Tetramethylurea, Structure Breaking/Making Interactions.- Assessment of Water Yield and Evapotranspiration over 1985 to 2010 in the Gomti River Basin in India Using the SWAT Model
Abstract Views :252 |
PDF Views:104
Authors
N. S. Abeysingha
1,
Man Singh
1,
V. K. Sehgal
2,
Manoj Khanna
1,
Himanshu Pathak
3,
Priyantha Jayakody
4,
Raghavan Srinivasan
5
Affiliations
1 Water Technology Center, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 Division of Agricultural Physics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 Division of Environmental Science, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
4 Allegro Recruitment Consulting, Melbourne, Victoria, AU
5 Spatial Sciences Lab, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, US
1 Water Technology Center, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 Division of Agricultural Physics, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 Division of Environmental Science, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
4 Allegro Recruitment Consulting, Melbourne, Victoria, AU
5 Spatial Sciences Lab, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, US