Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Agarwal, Mukesh
- Functional Outcome of Instrumentation and Interbody Cage Fusion in Cases of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Abstract Views :100 |
PDF Views:57
Authors
Mukesh Agarwal
1,
Sandeep Pangavane
2,
Nimesh Nebhani
3,
Ameya Kulkarni
3,
Nitish Agarwal
3,
Yogesh Rathod
3
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
2 Professor and Head, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
3 Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
2 Professor and Head, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
3 Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 8, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 86-93Abstract
Background: Primary lumbar vertebral instability or “spondylolisthesis” is perhaps one of the commonest radiological sign associated with lumbo-sacral pain after the third decade of life. Aims and Objectives: To find out the functional outcome in terms of clinical improvement in cases of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis by bone grafting and interbody cage fusion and pedicle screw fixation after decompression of neural elements. Materials and Methods: All the patients were evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the lumbosacral spine centered at the appropriate level. In all cases flexion and extension views were taken to assess the instability. More than 4 to 5 mm of sagittal translation and 10 degrees of rotation were considered as instability. All cases were evaluated further by MRI to evaluate facet joint pathology, sacralization/lumbarisation and to find the associated disc changes and the nerve root involvement. All patients were treated by decompression and interbody fusion with cage and bone graft by either Transforaminal or Posterior approach and instrumentation done with pedicle screws. Post operatively all patients were assessed for the functional outcome using the Oswestry Disability Index at 1 month, 3 month and 6 months Results: There is statistically significant difference in ODI Scores (Oswestry Disability Index) post operatively at 1 month, 3 month and 6 months. Conclusion: In agreement with good results, found in our study, we strongly believe that this technique of fusion and instrumentation is very useful in management of lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, this study should further be extended to a wider sample of patients with a longer follow-up.Keywords
Back Pain, Interbody Cage fusion, ODI Score, SpondylolisthesisReferences
- Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, et al. The global burden of low back pain: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014; 73:968–74. PMid: 24665116. https://doi.org/10.1136/ annrheumdis-2013-204428
- Morgan FP, King T. Primary instability of lumbar vertebrae as a common cause of low back pain. Bone and JointJournal. Feb 1957 Feb; 39-B(1):6–22. PMid: 13405944. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.39B1.6
- Parker SL, Godil SS, Mendenhall SK, Zuckerman SL, Shau DN, McGirt MJ. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis or disc herniation): A value analysis of cost, pain, disability and quality of life. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 21:143–9. PMid: 24785973. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.3.SPINE1320
- Spratt KF, Weinstein JN, Lehmann TR, Wooody J, Sayre H. Efficacy of flexion and extension treatments incorpoatin braces for low-back pain patients with rerodiplacement, spondylolisthesis, or normal sagittal translation. SPINE. 1993 Oct; 18(13):1839–49. PMid: 8235870. https://doi. org/10.1097/00007632-199310000-00020
- Metkar U, Shepard N, Cho W, Sharan A. Conservative management of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Seminars in Spine Surgery. 2014; 26(4):225–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semss.2014.09.004
- Friedman BW, Dym AA, Davitt M, Holden L, Solorzano C, Esses D, Bijur PE, Gallagher EJ. Naproxen with cyclobenzaprine, oxycodone/acetaminophen or placebo for treating acute low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2015 Oct; 314(15):1572–80. PMid: 26501533. https:// doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.13043
- Vibert BT, Sliva CD, Herkowitz HN. Treatment of instability and spondylolisthesis: Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006 Feb; 443:222–7. PMid: 16462445. https:// doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000200233.99436.ea
- Lee M, Scott-Young M. Highly selective epidural steroid injection for the treatment of radicular pain arising from spondylolisthesis. In Orthopaedic Proceedings. 2004 Apr; 86(SUPP IV):456.
- Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Eismont FJ, Bell GR, Balderston RA. Rothman-Simeone The Spine E-Book: Expert Consult. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2011 Feb 10.
- Buck JE. Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Bone and Joint Journal. 1970 Aug; 52(3):432–7. https://doi. org/10.1302/0301-620X.52B3.432
- Nicol RO, Scott JH. Lytic spondylolysis: Repair by Wiring. Spine. 1986 Dec; 11(10):1027–30. PMid: 3554554. https:// doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198612000-00011
- Endler P, Ekman P, Moller H, Gerdhem P. Outcomes of posterolateral fusion with and without instrumentation and of interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis: A prospective study. JBJS. 2017 May; 99(9):743–52. PMid: 28463918. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00679
- Samuel AM, Moore HG, Cunningham ME. Treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: Current concepts and new evidence. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2017 Oct; 10(4):521–9.
- Samuel AM, Moore HG, Cunningham ME. Treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: current concepts and new evidence. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2017 Oct; 10(4):521-9.
- Eismont FJ, Norton RP, Hirsch BP. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2014 Apr 1; 22(4):203–13. PMid: 24668350. https://doi.org/10.5435/ JAAOS-22-04-203
- Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000 Nov; 25(22):2940–53. PMid: 11074683. https:// doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
- Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Eismont FJ, Bell GR, Balderston RA. Rothman-Simeone The Spine E-Book: Expert Consult. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011 Feb 10.
- Kilian HF. Schilderungen neuer Beckenformen und ihres Verhaltens im Leben. Bassermann and Mathy; 1854.
- Wiltse LL. Spondylolisthesis: Classification and Etiology in: Symposium on the spine, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The CV Mosby Co, St. Marchetti PG, Bartolozzi P (1997) Classification of Spondylolisthesis as a guideline for Treatment. Bridwell KH and Dewald RL (E–ds). The Textbook of Spinal Surgery, 2nd Edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1969. p. 1211-54.
- Wiltse L, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; 117:23–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086- 197606000-00003
- Ganju A. Isthmic spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Focus. 2002; 13:E1. PMid: 15916408. https://doi.org/10.3171/ foc.2002.13.1.2
- Lasanianos N, Triantafyllopoulos GK, Pneumaticos SG. Spondylolisthesis grades. Trauma and Orthopaedic Classifications, Part IV. London: Springer; 2015. p. 239–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6572-9_53
- Khalil JG, Fischgrund JS, Roberts RV. Surgical management of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Essentials of Spinal Stabilization. Springer, Cham. 2017. p. 299–320. PMid: 27967219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59713-3_24
- Kee-Yong H, Cheong-Ho C, Ki-Won K, et al. Expression of estrogen receptor of the facet joints in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2005; 30:562–6. PMid: 15738791. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000154674.16708.af
- Donnally III CJ, Dulebohn SC. Lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.
- Zhong ZM, Deviren V, Tay B, Burch S, Berven SH. Adjacent segment disease after instrumented fusion for adult lumbar spondylolisthesis: Incidence and risk factors. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2017 May; 156:29–34. PMid: 28288396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.02.020
- Wiltse LL, et al. Spondylolisthesis: Classification and Etiology - symposium of the Spine. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1969; 143–5.
- Study of Functional Outcome of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique with Implant in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis at L4 and L5 Lev
Abstract Views :117 |
PDF Views:54
Authors
Vishal Gautam Harkar
1,
Mukesh Agarwal
2,
Kaustubh Satish Devasthali
1,
Vishwesh Devendrasinh Chudasama
1,
Shubham Siddheshwar Zade Siddheshwar Zade
1
Affiliations
1 Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
1 Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 8, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 313–318Abstract
Background: Lumbar interbody fusion is the most reliable fusion technique currently available for the lumbar spine as these constructs are biomechanically stronger, provide axial support with less graft subsidence or collapse comparing to those with posterolateral arthrodesis, and produce a better biologic fusion in lordotic alignment1, 2 . Aims and Objectives: To study functional outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique with implant in degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4 and L5 level. Materials and Methods: The study was carried on 34 patients enlisting in the casualty or inpatient department of orthopaedics at a medical college and tertiary health care centre. Only those patients satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. All the patients were explained about the surgical procedure, the purpose of the study and Informed consent was taken. Results: As per Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Normal results were observed in none of the cases while grade I, II and III was observed in 73.5%, 20.6% and 5.9% cases. Post-op results were observed as normal in 64.7% while Grade I, II and III was observed in 32.4% and 2.9% cases respectively (p<0.01). Conclusion: Present study concluded that although, long-term role of deformity correction and restoration of lumbar spinal balance in cases of spondylolisthesis is yet to be determined, the current study appears to indicate that satisfactory radiological correction of degenerative focal sagittal deformity can be achieved with the insert and-rotate PLIF technique. There appeared to be high levels of patient satisfaction in this relatively short-term study and low levels of complications. Longer-term and comparative clinical outcome studies are required.Keywords
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique, Japanese Orthopaedic Association ScoreReferences
- Modabber MR, Jupiter JB. Operative management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus-plate versus nail.
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998; 347:93104. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199802000-00012
- Campochiaro G, Baudi P, Loschi R, Serafin F, Catani F. Complex fractures of the humeral shaft treated with antegrade locked intramedullary nail: Clinical experience and long-term results. Acta Bio MedicaAtenei Parmensis.
- ; 86:69-76.
- Abel SM. Biocultural variation of skeletal trauma in contemporary Greeks. University of Florida; 2004
- Chaudhary P, Karn NK, Shrestha BP, Khanal GP, Paneru S, Kalawar RPS. Dynamic compression plate versus
- intramedullary interlocking nail for managemaent of humeral shaft fractures. Nepal Orthopaedic Association Journal. 2014; 3:10-3. https://doi.org/10.3126/noaj.
- v3i2.9513
- Stern P, Mattingly D, Pomeroy D, Zenni E, Kreig J.
- Intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1984; 66:639-46.
- https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198466050-00001
- PMid:6725312
- Buckholz RW, Heckman JD, Rockwood, Green’s. Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015. p.129:1294
- Ghosh S, Halder TC, Chaudhuri A, Datta S, Dasgupta S, Mitra UK. Comparative study of operative treatment of mid shaft fracture of humerus by locking plate versus intramedullary interlocking nail. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2013; 6:390-4 https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.118282
- Partap Singh, Vikas Gandhi, Deepak Bansal. Comparative study of compression plating vs interlocking nail in fracture shaft of humerus. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2016; 3(11):3385-3388
- Jolly A, Bansal R. Shaft humerus fractures treated with interlocking nails vs. locking compression plates: A comparative study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2017; 3(2):117-23.
- Singisetti KK, Swarna S, Loknadh L, Ambedkar M.
- Comparative study of management of fracture shaft of humerus by interlocking nailing versus plating. In Orthopaedic Proceedings. The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2018 Jan. p. 12-12.
- Naga RG, Kolati SR, Bonda Y. Comparative study of functional outcome of dynamic compression plating with interlocking nailing for fracture shaft humerus in adults.
- IAIM. 2019; 6(8):102-116.
- Saroj DK, Nagaich A, Gupta P. Comparative study of results of ORIF with plating vs. CRIF with nailing in fracture midshaft humerus. International Journal of Orthopaedics.
- ; 6(1):01-4. https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2020.
- v6.i1a.1822
- Rabari YB, Prasad DV, Somanni AM, Kumar P. Comparative study of functional outcome of dynamic compression plating with intramedullary interlocking nailing in close fracture shaft of humerus in adults. Int J Res Orthop.
- ; 3:828-32. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.
- IntJResOrthop20172881