Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Singh, Satnam
- Fitness Cost Associated with Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1ac Toxin in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)
Abstract Views :329 |
PDF Views:138
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, IN
1 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 26, No 4 (2012), Pagination: 314-320Abstract
Transgenic cotton producing a Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry1Ac toxin is widely used for controlling the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. The lessons learnt from the usage of insecticides suggest deployment of effective resistance management strategies to preserve the long-term utility of Bt-cotton. Consequently, it is important to understand the interaction of Cry1Ac toxin with distinct populations of the resistant alleles (homozygote resistant RR, susceptible SS and heterozygote RS or SR) keeping in mind the fitness cost associated with resistance. The present studies were under taken to understand the in vitro response of all such allelic populations. A critical analysis on the effects of Bt-toxin on different development stages shows that irrespective of the allelic genotype, the toxin exerts inhibitory influence on all the developmental stages. This effect is visualized as an enormous decrease in larval, pupal and adult weight, wing expanse of adults, adult life span and sex-ratio that was coupled with increase in time taken to pupate, pupal duration and total developmental period. Majority of the emerged adults possessed different types of abnormalities (wingless, deformed wings). They did not mate to lay eggs and if eggs were laid, they normally did not hatch, thus resulting in total loss of population(s). Cry1Ac toxin exerts a high cost of fitness on H. armigera and in this context susceptible and heterozygous genotypes were the most affected.Keywords
American Bollworm, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bt Toxin, Fitness Cost, Resistance, Transgenic Cotton.References
- Andow DA, Olson DM, Hellmich RL, Alstad DN, Hutchisson WD. 2000. Frequency of resistance alleles to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin in an Iowa population of European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). J Econ Entomol. 93: 26–30.
- Bentur JS, Andow DA, Cohen MB, Romena AM, Gould F. 2000. Frequency of alleles conferring resistance to a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin in a Philippine population of Scripophaga incertulas (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Econ Entomol. 93: 1515– 1521.
- Burd AD, Gould F, Bradley R, Duyn JWV, Moar WJ. 2003. Estimated frequency of non-recessive Bt resistance genes in bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Eastern North Carolina. J Econ Entomol. 96: 137–142.
- Caprio MA. 1998. Evaluating resistance management strategies for multiple toxins in the presence of external refuges. J Econ Entomol. 91: 1021–1031.
- Carrière Y, Kirk CE, Liu YB, Sims MA, Patin AL, Dennehy TJ, Tabashnik BE. 2001. Fitness costs and maternal effects associated with resistance to transgenic cotton in the pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J Econ Entomol. 94: 1571–1576.
- Carrière Y, Tabashnik BE. 2001. Reversing insect adaptation to transgenic insecticidal plants. Proc R Soc London B. 268: 1475–1480.
- Finney DJ. 1971. Probit Analysis. 333pp. Cambridge University Press, NY.
- Gould F. 1994. Potential and problems with high-dose strategies for pesticidal engineered crops. Bio Sci Tech. 4: 451–461.
- Gould F. 1998. Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Ann Rev Entomol. 43: 701–726.
- Groeters FR, Tabashnik BE, Finson N, Johnson MW. 1994. Fitness costs of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in the diamondback moth (Plutella xyllostella). Evolution 48: 197–201.
- Jouanin L, Bonadè-Bottino M, Girara C, Marrot G, Giband M. 1998. Transgenic plants for insect resistance. Plant Sci. 131: 1–11.
- Kaur P, Dilawari VK. 2011. Inheritance of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera : Noctuidae ) from India. Pest Mgmt Sci. 67: 1294–1302.
- Konasale JA, Moar WJ. 2007. Fitness costs of Bt Cry1Ac resistance in cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie). Annual Meeting, 10th December, 2007, Auburn University, Entomology and Plant Pathology, 301 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL.
- Kranthi KR, Jadhav DR, Wanjari RR, Shakir A, Russell D. 2001. Carbonate and organophosphate resistance in cotton pests in India, 1995 to 1999. Bull Ent Res. 91: 37–46.
- Kranthi KR, Kranthi NR. 2004. Modelling adaptability of cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) to Bt-cotton in India. Curr Sci. 87: 1096–1107.
- Lenormand T, Raymond M. 1998. Resistance management: the stable zone strategy. Proc Royal Soc London B. 265: 1985–1990.
- Moar WJ. 2005. Production and characterization of Bt resistance in cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa zea. Albama cotton comm.. FY, 4th Quarterly Report.
- Ramasubramanyam T. 2004. Magnitude, mechanism and management of pyrethroids resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in India. J Econ Entomol. 97: 6–11.
- Shirai Y, Tanaka H, Miyasono M, Kuno E. 1998. Low intrinsic rate of natural increase in Bt-resistant population of diamondback moth, Plutella xyllostella (L.) (Lepidoptera : Yponomeutidae). Japanese J Appl Entomol Zool. 42: 59–64.
- Tabashnik BE. 1994. Evolution of resistance to Bacillius thuringiensis. Ann Rev Entomol. 39: 47–79.
- Tabashnik BE, Patin AL, Dennehy TJ, Liu YB, Carrière Y, Sims MA, Antilla L. 2000. Frequency of resistance to Bacilllus thuringiensis in field populations of pink bollworm. Proc Nat Acad Sci. USA, 97: 12980–12984.
- Wu K, Guo YLN, Greenplate JT, Deaton R. 2002. Resistance monitoring of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein in China. J Econ Entomol. 95: 826–831.
- Evaluation of Different Strains of Trichogramma chilonis Ishii for the Suppression of Sugarcane Early Shoot Borer, Chilo infuscatellus Snellen
Abstract Views :239 |
PDF Views:151
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141004, Punjab, IN
2 Project Directorate of Biological Control, Post Box No.2491, H. A. Farm Post, Hebbal, Bangalore - 560024, IN
1 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana - 141004, Punjab, IN
2 Project Directorate of Biological Control, Post Box No.2491, H. A. Farm Post, Hebbal, Bangalore - 560024, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 21, No 2 (2007), Pagination: 247-253Abstract
The efficacy of high temperature tolerant (PDBC strain) and Ludhiana (Punjab) strain of Trichogramma chilouis Ishii against early shoot borer Chilo infuscatellus Snellen was evaluated in farmers' field during 2004 and 2005. The PDBC strain was released from April to June @ 50000, 40000 and 30000 parasitoids/ha. and the Ludhiana strain @ 50000 parasitoids/ha. Nine releases of PDBC strain and Ludhiana strain @ 50000 parasitoids/ha were as effective as application of cartap hydrochloride (Padan 4G) @ 25 kg/ha in reducing the incidence of C. infuscatellus by 52.7 and 50.5% over untreated control, respectively. At lower two doses, the reduction was 29.03 and 34.7 per cent over untreated control and was significantly better as compared to untreated control and mechanical control (removal of dead hearts). The maximum parasitoid recovery (10.71% parasitization) was recorded with PDBC strain @ 50,000 parasitoids/ha and was on par with Ludhiana strain (9.88% parasitization) and significantly higher than that with lower doses of PDBC strain and control. Based on reduced pest incidence, higher parasitism and yield, the releases of T. chilonis (PDBC strain/Ludhiana) @ 50000 parasitoids/ha at 10 days interval from April to June can be successfully used for the suppression of early shoot borer.Keywords
Chilo infuscatellus, Efficacy, Strains, Trichogramma chilonis.- Impact of Insecticides Recommended for Sugarcane on Parasitization and Emergence of High Temperature Tolerant and Ludhiana Strains of Trichogramma chilonis Ishii
Abstract Views :231 |
PDF Views:135
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141 004, Punjab, IN
2 Project Directorate of Biological Control, Post Bag No. 2491, H. A. Farm Post, Hebbal, Bangalore, 560 024, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 141 004, Punjab, IN
2 Project Directorate of Biological Control, Post Bag No. 2491, H. A. Farm Post, Hebbal, Bangalore, 560 024, Karnataka, IN