Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Gunasekaran, Subbiah
- The Impact Factors of Open Access and Subscription Journals across Fields
Abstract Views :259 |
PDF Views:91
Authors
Affiliations
1 Knowledge Resource Centre, CSIRCentral Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 623 302, IN
2 Centre for Internet and Society, 194, 2nd C Cross, Domlur 2nd Stage, Bangalore 560 071, IN
1 Knowledge Resource Centre, CSIRCentral Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 623 302, IN
2 Centre for Internet and Society, 194, 2nd C Cross, Domlur 2nd Stage, Bangalore 560 071, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 107, No 3 (2014), Pagination: 380-388Abstract
We have compared the 2-year and 5-year impact factors (IFs), normalized impact factors (NIFs) and rank normalized impact factors (RNIFs) of open access (OA) and subscription journals across the 22 major fields delineated in Essential Science Indicators. Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2012 has assigned 2-year IF to 1,073 OA and 7,290 subscription journals and 5-year IF to 811 OA and 6,705 subscription journals. Overall 12.8% of journals listed in JCR are OA, but a higher percentage of journals are OA in 9 fields, including multidisciplinary (31%), agriculture (19.1%) and microbiology (19.1). Overall 2-year IF is higher than 5-year IF in about 31.5% journals in both OA and subscription journals. But among physics journals, two-thirds of OA journals and 58% of subscription journals have a higher 2-year IF. For multidisciplinary journals the mean RNIF is higher for OA journals than subscription journals. Higher proportion of subscription journals had mean RNIF above 0.5: 361 of 1,073 OA journals (33.6%) and 3,857 of 7,280 subscription journals (52.9%) had a 2-year mean RNIF above 0.5 and 277 of 811 OA journals (34.2%) and 3,453 of 6705 (51.5%) subscription journals had a 5-year mean RINF above 0.5. Moving to OA has proven to be advantageous to developing country journals; it has helped a large number of Latin American and many Indian journals improve their IF.Keywords
Impact Factor, Normalized Impact Factor, Open Access Journals, Rank Normalized Impact Factor, Subscription Journals.Full Text
- Assessing Researchers Based on Membership of Journal Editorial Boards
Abstract Views :276 |
PDF Views:87
Authors
Affiliations
1 Knowledge Resource Centre, CSIR-Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 630 006, IN
1 Knowledge Resource Centre, CSIR-Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 630 006, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 106, No 9 (2014), Pagination: 1173-1174Abstract
No Abstract.Full Text
- Should Indian Researchers Pay to Get their Work Published?
Abstract Views :273 |
PDF Views:95
Authors
Affiliations
1 DST Centre for Policy Research, Archives and Publication Cell, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
2 Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, Sangareddy 502 285, IN
3 Knowledge Resources Centre, Central Elecrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 630 003, IN
1 DST Centre for Policy Research, Archives and Publication Cell, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
2 Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, Sangareddy 502 285, IN
3 Knowledge Resources Centre, Central Elecrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 630 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 04 (2017), Pagination: 703-713Abstract
Paying to publish is an ethical issue. During 2010-14 Indian researchers have used 488 open access (OA) journals levying article processing charge (APC), ranging from US$ 7.5 to 5,000, to publish about 15,400 papers. Use of OA journals levying APC has increased from 242 journals and 2,557 papers in 2010 to 328 journals and 3,634 papers in 2014. We estimate that India is potentially spending about US$ 2.4 million annually on APCs paid to OA journals and the amount would be much more if we add APCs paid to make papers published in hybrid journals open access. It would be prudent for Indian authors to make their work freely available through interoperable repositories, a trend that is growing in Latin America and China, especially when funding is scarce. Scientists are ready to pay APC as long as institutions pay for it and funding agencies are not ready to insist that grants provided for research should not be used for paying APC.Full Text
- Should Indian Researchers Pay to Get their Work Published?
Abstract Views :222 |
PDF Views:83
Authors
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 06 (2017), Pagination: 1239-1239Abstract
We inadvertently missed to present the total number of papers written by Indian researchers in the first sentence under the Discussion section (page 707). Please read the sentence as 'Over 14.4% (or 37,122) of the 256,822 papers from India as seen from SCIE have been published in OA journals'.Full Text
- Chemistry Research in India:Making Progress, but not Rapidly
Abstract Views :265 |
PDF Views:82
Authors
Affiliations
1 DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
2 Knowledge Resources Centre, Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 630 003, IN
1 DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
2 Knowledge Resources Centre, Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi 630 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 07 (2017), Pagination: 1330-1339Abstract
Against the backdrop of comments on chemistry research in India made in three recent reports prepared by Nature Index, Elsevier and Thomson Reuters, we have made a scientometric analysis of contributions from India in leading multidisciplinary chemistry journals over the 25-year period 1991-2015. We have compared India's performance with that of China as a benchmark. Overall, the number of chemistry papers from India increased steadily between 2007 and 2014. The threeyear moving average of number of papers during the period grew at a compound annual growth rate of 8.9%, and the overall increase in papers was accompanied by a more than proportionate increase in the leading journals. Also, the average number of cites received by papers with at least one author from India in Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.) and Accounts of Chemical Research was higher than the world average. Despite its huge share of the world's population (~17%), India continues to be poorly represented in the top journals: the country's share of papers in the Journal of the American Chemical Society is 0.7% compared to 58.4% for USA, 7.6% for Germany and 5.1% for China, and its share in Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. is 1.2% compared to 28% for Germany, 25.3% for USA and 9.9% for China. This could be due to the fact that till recently Indian universities did not encourage mobility across disciplines. That only a small number of Indian researchers and institutions publish in leading journals is also a matter for concern. India accounts for only a small number of papers in the top one percentile of the most highly cited chemistry papers, whereas China leads the world. Only 2.3% of the 2234 papers published in 2014 that are in the top one percentile is from India compared to 38% from China.Keywords
Chemistry Research, International Collaboration, Multidisciplinary Journals, Scientometric Analysis.Full Text
References
- Arunan, E., Brakaspathy, R., Desiraju, G. R. and Sivaram, S., Chemistry in India: unlocking the potential. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 114–117; doi:10.1002/anie.201206960.
- Kogleck, L., Priyadarshini, S., Pincock, S., Bocquet, A. and Gilloch, C., Indian Science Ascending – A Nature Index Analysis, Springer Nature, 2015; https://www.natureindex.com/pdf/news/ indian-science-ascending.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Phillips, N., Rising stars. Nature, 2016, 535, S49; doi:10.1038/ 535S49a.
- Nature Index, 2013 tables: countries – chemistry; http://www.natureindex.com/annual-tables/2013/country/chemistry (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Nature Index, 2016 tables: countries – chemistry; http://www.natureindex.com/annual-tables/2016/country/chemistry (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Huggett, S., Gurney, T. and Jumelet, A., International comparative performance of India’s research base (2009–14): a bibliometric analysis by Elsevier. Department of Science and Technology (DST), India, 2016; http://nstmis-dst.org/PDF/Elsevier.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Huggett, S., Gurney, T. and Jumelet, A., International comparative performance of India’s research base (2009–14): a bibliometric analysis by Elsevier, DST, India, 2015.
- India’s research output and collaboration (2005–14): a bibliometric study (phase-II), by Thomson Reuters, DST, India, 2015; http://nstmis-dst.org/PDF/Thomson.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Ray, P. C., On the conjugated sulphates of the copper–magnesium group, Proc. R. Soc Edinburg, 1889, 15, 267–283; doi:10.1017/ S0370164600005502.
- Dhar, N., Dissociation constant of weak acids and bases from solubility data. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1913, 35, 800–802; doi: 10.1021/ ja02195a019.
- Srikantan, B. S. and Rengachari, S., Verwertung von Unkraut, I.Vergasung der Feigendistel (Opuntia Dillinii), Angew. Chem., 1937, 50, 249–250; doi:10.1002/ange.19370501304.
- Palit, S. R., End group estimation in polymer compounds using dyes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1962, 1, 603; doi: 10.1002/anie.196206031.
- Wiberg, N., Vasisht, S. K. and Fischer, G., Bis(trimethylgermyl) diimine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1976, 15, 236–237; doi:10.1002/anie.197602361.
- Arunachalam, S. and Madhan, M., Adopting ORCID as a unique identifier will benefit all involved in scholarly communication. Natl. Med. J. India, 2016, 29(4), 227–234.
- Science (journal): history; http://america.pink/science-journal_ 3946247.html (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Interview with Dr Peter Goelitz, Editor-in-chief of Angewandte Chemie, CHEMCOS, 2014; http://chemistry.iitd.ac.in/chemcos/ chemcos/present%20issue/9%20Personalities.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- India’s performance in research is impressive in recent years says Dr Harsh Vardhan, Minister for Science & Technology and Earth Sciences, Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, 2016; http://pib.nic.in/newsite/ PrintRelease.aspx?relid=137602 (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Feng, D. H., Opening comment to 2007–2009 Taiwan – Israel Joint Final Report Workshop, Huaren E-Magazine, 2009; http://www.huaren.org/Text/uploadedFiles/1259274908902-8521.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Balaram, P., Rankings and records. Curr. Sci., 2003, 84, 1279– 1280; http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/may252003/1279.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Desiraju, G. R., Science in a changing world. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 5590–5591; doi:10.1002/anie.201102495.
- Vale, R. D. and Dell, K., Aiming high for the future. J. Cell Biol., 2009, 184, 342–353; doi: 10.1083/jcb.200812123.
- Research fronts 2014: 100 top ranked specialties in the sciences and social sciences. The National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Thomson Reuters IP & Science, 2014; http://sciencewatch.com/sites/sw/files/sw-article/media/researchfronts2014.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Science and research today: highlights of the OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard. OECD, 2015; http://www.oecdorg/ sti/Science-brief-scoreboard.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Van Noorden, R., China by the numbers: research capacity has grown rapidly, and now quality is on the rise. Nature, 2016, 534, 452–453; http://www.nature.com/news/china-by-the-numbers1.20122 (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Balaram, P., Chemists and chemistry, Curr. Sci., 2011, 100, 5–6; http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/100/01/0005.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2016).
- Balaram, P., Where has chemistry gone? Curr. Sci., 2000, 79, 927–928.
- Top 100 chemists, 2000–2010: special report on high-impact chemists, Science Watch, 2011; http://archive.sciencewatch.com/ dr/sci/misc/Top100Chemists2000-10/ (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Ganesh, K. N., Connect research with education. Nature, 2015, 521, 154; http://www.nature.com/news/research-managementprioritiesfor-science-in-india-1.17509#/ganesh (accessed on 5 August 2016).
- Desiraju, G. R., Science education and research in India, Econ.Polit. Wkly, 2008, 43, 37–43; http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 40277564 (accessed on 1 September 2016).