Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Luan, Tao
- Progress in Study of NOx Removal from Flue Gas by Non-Thermal Plasma
Abstract Views :313 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, Shandong Province, CN
1 School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, Shandong Province, CN
Source
Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, Vol 16, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 205-208Abstract
Tests for removal of nitrous oxides are performed by simulating flue gas using self-designed and selfdeveloped plasma generator in this experiment; research and analysis show that there is a direct and linear relationship between the efficiency of denitration and the input power of plasma at normal temperature. The plasma generator begins to discharge at an input power of 15w to remove the nitrous oxides; the removal efficiency improves continually with the increase of plasma input power; then, it maintains the efficiency of over 80% when the input power is 35w, displaying a weak relation between the two factors. From the aspects of technology and economics, removal efficiency can be improved by high input power, but it is of huge energy consumption, being not economically feasible. Meanwhile, brief experimental analysis on removal efficiency is performed by adding sulphur dioxide into the mixed gas.Keywords
Non-Thermal Plasma, Generator, Denitration, Desulfurization, Energy Consumption.References
- Gao,Y., Luan, T., Xu, H.M., et al. 2013. Effect of calcinations temperature and reduction catalyst characterization and activity for selective catalytic. Proceedings of the CSEE, 32: 143-149.
- Kulikovsk, Andrei A. 1997. Product ion of chemically active species in the air by a single positive streamer in a non-uniform field. IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science, 25(3): 439-446.
- Liu, Q., Liu, Z., Huang, Z., et al. 2004. A honeycomb catalyst for simultaneous NO and SO2 removal from flue gas, preparation and evaluation. Catalysis Today, 93-95: 833-837.
- Liu, X. and Wang, S.D. 2006. Effect of non thermal plasma flue gas denitrification of sulfur dioxide, ammonia and temperature. CIESC Journal, 57(10): 2411-2415.
- Mok, Y. S., Ham, S.W. and Nam, I. S. 1998. Evaluation of energy utilization efficiencies for SO2 and NO removal by pulsed corona discharge process. Plasma Chem. Plasma Proc., 18(4): 535-550.
- Svachula, J., Ferlazzo, N., Forzatti, P., et al. 1993. Selective reduction of NOx by NH3 over honeycomb DeNOxing catalysts. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 32(6): 1053-1060.
- Wei, P.P., Dong, L.M. and Yang, J.X. 2001. Study on nitrogen removal by pulse coronaplasma desulfurization. Natural Science Journal of Harbin Normal University, 17(6): 68-73.
- Yan, G.Q., Pan, L.L. and Huang, X.H., et al. 2005. Pulse corona discharge flue gas desulfurization and denitration technology. Environmental Technology, 1-3.
- Zhao, Q.S., Xiang, J., Shi, J.M., et al. 2007a. Experimental research of alumina supported copperoxide sorbent for flue gas denitration. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 28(S2): 225-228.
- Zhao, Y.H., Liu, Z.Y. et al., 2007b. The recovery in H2 regeneration adsorbent SO2CuO/γ-Al2O3 and sulfur. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 7(6): 1071-1076.
- Zhu,Y.M. and Wang, N.H. 1998. Optimization off pulsed corona discharged for flue gas treatment. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Electrostatic Precipitation, 207-211.