Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rathod, Yogesh
- An Efficient Gait Recognition Approach for Human Identification
Abstract Views :178 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Huma Khan
1,
Yogesh Rathod
2
Affiliations
1 Raipur Institute of Technology, Mandir Hasod, Raipur, IN
2 Dept. of Computer Science Engineering, Raipur Institute of Technology, Mandir Hasod, Raipur, IN
1 Raipur Institute of Technology, Mandir Hasod, Raipur, IN
2 Dept. of Computer Science Engineering, Raipur Institute of Technology, Mandir Hasod, Raipur, IN
Source
International Journal of Technology, Vol 1, No 2 (2011), Pagination: 137-142Abstract
Gait shows a particular way or manner of moving on foot and gait recognition is the process of identifying an individual by the manner in which they walk. Gait is less unobtrusive biometric, which offers the possibility to identify people at a distance, without any interaction or co-operation from the subject; this is the property which makes it so attractive. This paper proposed new method for gait recognition. In this method, firstly binary silhouette of a walking person is detected from each frame. Secondly, feature from each frame is extracted using image processing operation. Here center of mass, step size length, and cycle length are talking as key feature. At last neural network is used for training and testing purpose. We have created different model of neural network based on hidden layer, selection of training algorithm and setting the different parameter for training. Here all experiments are done on CASIA gait database. Different groups of training and testing dataset give different results. The best recognition result for our method is 96.32%.Gait recognition is one kind of biometric technology that can be used to monitor people without their cooperation. Controlled environments such as banks, military installations and even airports need to be able to quickly detect threats and provide differing levels of access to different user groups.Keywords
Center of Mass, Feature Extraction, Gait Recognition, Human Identification, Neural Network.- Functional Outcome of Distal End Radius Fracture Treated by Ligamentotaxis by External Fixator with or without K Wire Augmentation
Abstract Views :169 |
PDF Views:71
Authors
Brijbhushan S. Mahajan
1,
Vishal Patil
1,
Yogesh Rathod
1,
Ameya Kulkarni
1,
Nimesh Nebhani
1,
Bhalchandra Prabhakar Bhalerao
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital & RC, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital & RC, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 5, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 178-184Abstract
Background: One of the most common injuries encountered in orthopedic practice are Distal Radius fractures. This comprises of 8%−15% of all fractures in adults1. The reason for comminuted DER fractures is high-energy trauma in young and low-energytrauma in elderly. They present as shear and impacted fractures involving the articular surface of the distal radius with displacement of the fragments2-7. External fixation for distal radius fracture relies on the principle of Ligamentotaxisin which, a distraction force applied to the carpus aligns the fragments by means of intact ligaments. The length and alignment of fracture fragment is guided by pull and counter pull which are otherwise difficult to control8. Objective: To study functional outcome of distal end radius fracture treated by ligamentotaxis with evaluation of functional results according to Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score system. Material and Methods: We included 30 patients (Male 24 and Female 6) treated for distal end radius fracture during a period from 2015 to 2017. Patients were evaluated clinically by subjective assessment using DASH Scoring system. Result: After functional evaluation of patients according to the scheduled follow up with mean DASH Score of 76.08 at 1st month, 62.92 at 3rd month and 42.60 at 6th month, and was found to be Highly Significant (p<0.001) among all the compared groups. Conclusion: We concluded that external fixation and ligamentotaxis applied to complex distal radius fractures, when added with augmented K-wire fixation can provide direct augmentation of fracture stability and a good wrist function.Keywords
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score, Ligamentotaxis, Radius Fracture.References
- Pogue DJ, Vegas SF, Patterson RM, Peterson PD, Jenkins DK, Sweo TD, et al. Effects of distal radius malunion on wrist joint mechanics, J Hand Surg Am. 1990; 15:721–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-5023(90)90143-F.
- Lozano-Calderon SA, Doornberg J, Ring D. Fractures of the dorsal articular margin of the distal part of the radius with dorsal radiocarpal subluxation, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006; 88:1486–93. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200607000-00009, https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00930. PMid: 16818974.
- Mehta JA, Bain GI, Heptinstall RJ. Anatomical reduction of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: An arthroscopically-assisted approach, J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Jan; 82(1):79-86. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.82B1.10101, https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.82B1.0820079. PMid: 10697319.
- Melone CP Jr. Distal radius fractures: patterns of articular fragmentation, Orthop Clin North Am. 1993 Apr; 24(2):239-53. PMid: 8479722.
- Ring D, Prommersberger K, Jupiter JB. Combined dorsal and volar plate fixation of complex fractures of the distal part of the radius, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Aug; 86-A(8):1646-52. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200408000-00007. PMid: 15292411.
- Rogachefsky RA, Lipson SR, Applegate B, Ouellette EA, Savenor AM, McAuliffe JA. Treatment of severely comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius by open reduction and combined internal and external fixation, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Apr; 83-A(4):509-19. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200104000-00005. PMid: 11315779.
- Ruch DS, Weiland AJ, Wolfe SW, Geissler WB, Cohen MS, Jupiter JB. Current concepts in the treatment of distal radial fractures, Instr Course Lect. 2004; 53:389-401. PMid: 15116629.
- Simic PM, Weiland AJ. Fractures of the distal aspect of the radius: changes in treatment over the past two decades, Instr Course Lect. 2003; 52:185-95. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200303000-00026.
- Simic PM., Weiland AJ. Fractures of the distal aspect of the Radius: Changes in Treatment Over the past two decades, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A: 552-564. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200303000-00026.
- Fernando Deigo L, Jesse, Library of Congress, Fractures of Distal Radius: A Practical Approach to Management, 2nd edition.
- Neal C. Chen, Jupiter JB. Current concepts review: Management of distal radial fractures, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89:2051-62. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200709000-00025, https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00020. PMid: 17768207.
- Cui Z, Pan J, Yu B, Zhang K, Xiong X. Internal versus external fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: An up-to-date meta-analysis, Int Orthop. 2011; 35(9):1333-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1300-0. PMid: 21698429, PMCid: PMC3167461.
- Cole JM, Obletz BE. Comminuted fractures of the distal end of the radius treated by skeletal transfixion in plaster cast: An end-result study of thirty-three cases, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1966; 48:931-45. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196648050-00011.
- Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy – The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st ed.: Amsterdam Elsevier Churchill Livingstone Publication; 2015.
- Kaempfee FA, Walker KM. External fixation for distal radius fractures: Effect of distraction on outcome, Clin Orthop Related Res. 2000; 380:220-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200011000-00030.
- Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity, J Hand Ther. 2001; 14(2):128-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80043-0.
- Beaton DE, Davis AM, Hudak P, McConnell S. The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure: What do we know about it now? British Journal of Hand Therapy. 2001; 6(4):109-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/175899830100600401.
- Horesh et al. The surgical treatment of severe comminuted fractures with the small AO external fixation device, Clin. Orthop. 1991; 263:147–53. PMid: 1993369.
- Jakim I, Pieterse HS, Sweet MBE. External fixation for intra articular fracture of distal radius, JBJS. (Br) 1991; 73:302. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.73B2.2005161.
- Margaliot Z, Haase SC, Kotsis SV, Kim HM, Chung KC. A meta-analysis of outcomes of external fixation versus plate osteosynthesis for unstable distal radius fractures. J. Hand Surg Am. 2005 Nov;30(6):1185-99. Review. PubMed PMID:16344176.
- Anvekar MA, Nimbargi SS, Srinath SR, Nelivigi AS. Treatment of intra-articular fracture of distal radius with static external fixators ligamentotaxis: A prospective study, JEMDS. 2013; 2(32):6026-38. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/1093.
- Jakim I, Pieterse HS, Sweet MB. External fixation for intraarticular fractures of the distal radius. J. Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73(2):302-6.
- Boparai RPS, Boparai RS, Kapilar R, et al. Role of ligamentotaxis in management of comminuted intra/juxta articular fractures. IJO 2006; 40(3):185- 187.
- Functional Outcome of Burk Schaffer’s Approach for PCL Tibial Avulsion Fracture Fixed with Cancellous Screw
Abstract Views :275 |
PDF Views:72
Authors
Satyen Joshi
1,
Nikhil Challawar
2,
Nitish Agrawal
3,
Bhalchandra Prabhakar Bhalerao
3,
Ameya Kulkarni
3,
Yogesh Rathod
3
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Adgaon, Nashik − 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Adgaon, Nashik − 422003, Maharashtra, IN
3 P.G. Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Adgaon, Nashik − 422003, Maharashtra, IN
1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Adgaon, Nashik − 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Adgaon, Nashik − 422003, Maharashtra, IN
3 P.G. Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Adgaon, Nashik − 422003, Maharashtra, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 6, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 183-188Abstract
Background: Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) is the main posterior stabilizer of the knee. Injuries of the PCL are rare. Isolated PCL disruption most commonly occurs as avulsion at its tibial insertion as compared with its femoral origin or as a mid-substance tear. In PCL bony avulsion, fixation of the avulsed fragment with cancellous screw is a recommended procedure. Objective: To evaluate efficacy of Burk Schaffer’s approach in treatment of PCL tibial avulsion fracture with cancellous screw and evaluation of functional results according to Tegner Lysholm score. Material and Methods: We included 30 patients (Male 26 and Female 4) operated for isolated PCL avulsion from tibia during the period from 2015 to 2017. Patients were evaluated clinically by posterior drawer test, radiologically by X-ray and using functional scale of Tegner-Lysholm. MRI was advised for suspected other ligaments and meniscal injuries. All cases were operated with 4mm cannulated screw fixation by Burk and Schaffer approach. Results: Mean Tegner Lysholm score of 30 patients was 95.37 after 6 months of surgery, which was excellent. After 3 months 75% has grade 0 posterior drawer test, 12.5% has grade 1 and 12.5% has grade 2 laxity. Conclusion: Approach by Burk and Schaffer is safer and easier than the classical one. Open reduction and fixation with cannulated screw for tibial avulsion of PCL gives good functional outcome.Keywords
Burk and Schaffer’s Approach, Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Avulsion Fractures, Tegner Lysholm Score.References
- Deehan DJ, Pinczewski LA. Arthroscopic reattachment of an avulsion fracture of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17:422-25. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2001.21841. PMid: 11288019.
- Hughston JC. The posterior cruciate ligament in knee joint stability. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1954; 54:1045-46.
- Miyasaka KC, Daniel DM, Stone ML. The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population. Am. J. Knee Surg. 1991; 4:3-8.
- Griffith JF, Antonio GE, Tong CW, Ming CK. Cruciate ligament avulsion fractures. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20:803-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(04)00592-4.
- Wind WM Jr, Bergfeld JA, Parker RD. Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: Revisited. Am. J. Sports Med. 2004; 32:1765-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504270481. PMid: 15494347.
- Janousek AT, Jones DG, Clatworthy M, Higgins LD, Fu FH. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee joint. Sports Med. 1999; 28:429-41. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256199928060-00005. PMid: 10623985.
- Schulz MS, Russe K, Weiler A, Eichhorn HJ, Strobel MJ. Epidemiology of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2003; 123:186-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-002-0471-y. PMid: 12734718.
- Hughston JC, Bowden JA, Andrews JR, Norwood LA. Acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament - Results of operative treatment. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1980; 62(3):438-50. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198062030-00014. PMid: 7364815.
- Zhao J, He Y, Wang J. Arthroscopic treatment of acute tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament with suture fixation technique through Y-shaped bone tunnels. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22:172-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.020. PMid: 16458803.
- Torisu T. Isolated avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1977; 59:6872. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197759010-00011. PMid: 833178.
- Abbott LC, Carpenter WF. Surgical approaches to the knee joint. J. Bone Joint Surg.1945; 27:277-310.
- Torisu T. Isolated avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1977; 59-A:68-72. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197759010-00011.
- Ogata K. Posterior cruciate reconstruction using iliotibial band - Preliminary report of a new procedure. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 1980; 51:547.
- McCormick WC, Bagg RJ, Kennedy CW, Leukins CA. Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament; Preliminary report of a new procedure. Clin. Orthop. 1976; 118:30-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197607000-00007.
- Boynton MD, Tietjens BR. Longterm follow up of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament. deficient knee. Am. J. Sports Med. 1996; 24:306-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659602400310. PMid: 8734880.
- Meyers MH. Isolated avulsion of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg.Am. 1975; 57(5):669-72. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197557050-00015. PMid: 1150710.
- Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1985; (198):43-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007.
- Dhillon MS, Singh HP, Nagi ON. Posterior cruciate ligament avulsion from the tibia: fixation by a posteromedial approach. Acta Orthop Belg. 2003; 69(2): 162-7.
- Nicandri GT, Klineberg EO, Wahl CJ, Mills WJ. Treatment of posterior cruciate ligament tibialavulsion fractures through a modified open posterior approach: Operative technique and 12- to 48-month outcomes. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2008; 22:31724. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817279d1. PMid: 18448985.
- O’Donoghue DH. Surgical treatment of fresh injuries tothe major ligaments of the knee. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1950; 32:721-38. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-195032040-00001.
- William M, Wind Jr, John Bergfeld A, Richard Parker D. Clinical sports medicine update: Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Revisited Am. J. Sports Med. 2004: (32):1765-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504270481. PMid: 15494347.
- David J, Deehan MD, Leo A, Pinczewski FRACS. Arthroscopic reattachment of an avulsion fracture of thetibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery. 2001; 17(4):422-25. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2001.21841. PMid: 11288019.
- Hughston JC. The posterior cruciate ligament in knee joint stability. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1954; 54:1045-46.
- Seitz H, Schlenz I, Pajenda G, Vécsei V. Tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament: K-wire or screw fixation? A retrospective study of 26 patients. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 1997; 116:275-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390052. PMid: 9177803.
- Dhillon MS, Singh HP, Nagi ON. Posterior cruciate ligament avulsion from the tibia: Fixation by a posteromedial approach. Acta. Orthop. Belg. 2003; 69:162-67.
- Veselko M, Saciri V. Posterior approach for arthroscopic reduction and antegrade fixation of avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament from the tibia with cannulated screw and washer. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19:916-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(03)00748-5.
- Fu YP, Hang CM, Fam HQ. Treatment of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fracture using anchor system combined with cannulated screw. J. Pract. Orthop. 2011; 17:73-4.
- Chen W, Tang D, Kang L, Ding Z, Sha M, Hong J. Effects of micro endoscopy-assisted reduction and screw fixation through a single mini-incision on posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fracture. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2012; 132:429-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1426-y. PMid: 22080931.
- Li Q, Song K, Sun Y, Zhang H, Chen D, Jiang Q. Severe cartilage damage from a broken absorbable screw head after fixation of an avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95:e5180. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005180. PMid: 27787373, PMCid: PMC5089102.
- Khatri K, Sharma V, Lakhotia D, Bhalla R, Farooque K. Posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion treated with open reduction and internal fixation through the burks and schaffer approach. Malays. Orthop. J. 2015; 9:2-8. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1507.004. PMid: 28435601, PMCid: PMC5333651.
- Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament with 5 Strand Hamstring Autograft
Abstract Views :171 |
PDF Views:57
Authors
Nitin Wagh
1,
Brijbhushan Mahajan
2,
Bhalchandra Prabhakar Bhalerao
3,
Nitish Agrawal
3,
Nimesh Nebhani
3,
Yogesh Rathod
3
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
3 Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
3 Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Nashik – 422003, Maharashtra, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 7, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 78-85Abstract
Background: Most commonly reconstructed ligament of knee is Anterior Cruciate Ligament that aims to halt or minimise the number of instability episodes 1. Testing with biomechanical parameters has shown that there is correlation between graft cross-sectional area and maximum load to failure 2. This study attempts to analyse the functional outcome of ACL reconstruction with 5 strands of hamstring autograft. Aims and Objectives: This study is based on hypothesis that larger graft will be stronger, stiffer providing better functional outcome. Materials & Methods: 35 Patients having ACL injury were treated at a tertiary care hospital; using a 5-strand hamstring graft, fixed with suspensory fixation at femoral side and aperture fixation at the tibial side. Cases were diagnosed with ACL on clinical examination & MRI. Tegner-lyshom score and International Knee Documentation Committee - Orthopaedic Scores (IKDC) is used post-operatively to grade the functional outcome of an ACL reconstruction. Results: Male predominance was observed in study subjects than female with left side slightly more commonly involved than right. Laterality didn’t influenced outcome. Graft diameter observed is 9mm in 68.6%, 8 mm and 10 mm was observed in 11.4% and 20% respectively. Lysholm score at baseline was 41.63 which increased progressively to 93.45 at the end of 9 months. The IKDC score at baseline was 32.5 which increased progressively to 83.45 at the end of 12 months. Superficial infections was seen in 8.6% while complaint of knee pain was given by 2.9% cases. Lachman test was positive in 2 (5.7%) cases. Conclusion: Five-strand graft offers very high strength and more length than the 4ST. It is useful in patients with ligamentous laxity, small tendons, or other stability risk factors.Keywords
ACL, Autograft, Graft Diameter, 5 StrandReferences
- Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: How the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 471–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508326709
- Hamner D.L., Brown C.H., Jr., Steiner M.E., Hecker A.T., Hayes W.C. Hamstring tendon grafts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: Biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81: 549–557. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199904000-00013
- Wilson T.W., Zafuta M.P., Zobitz M. A biomechanical analysis of matched bone-patellar tendon-bone and double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27: 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465990270021501
- Sajovic M., Strahovnik A., Dernovsek M.Z., Skaza K. Quality of life and clinical outcome comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An 11-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 2161–2169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511411702
- Prodromos CC, Joyce B. 5-Strand Hamstring ACL Reconstruction: A New Technique with Better Long-Term Stability Versus 4-Strand (SS-13). Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2006 Jun 30; 22(6): e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.015
- Lavery KP, Rasmussen JF, Dhawan A. Five-Strand Hamstring Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2014; 3(4): e423–e426. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2014.01.013.
- Mei Y, Ao YF, Wang JQ, Ma Y, Zhang X, Wang JN, Zhu JX. Clinical characteristics of 4355 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Chin Med J. Dec 2013; 126(23): 4487–92.
- Kim MK, Lee BC, Park JH. Anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by the two anteromedial portal method: the comparison of transportal and transtibial techniques. Knee surgery & related research. 1 Dec 2011; 23(4): 213–9. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.2011.23.4.213
- Haitao Z. The investigation on students sports tastes and their choices of events. Sports Sci 1999; 20: 63–64.
- Wagh N et al. Functional outcome of Arthroscopic reconstruction of single bundle anterior cruciate ligament using 5 strand hamstring graft. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 2015; 14(12): 59–62
- Figueroa F, Calvo R, Figueroa D, Vaisman A, Arellano S. Five-Strand Hamstrings Autograft Versus Quadruple Hamstrings Autograft, with Graft Diameters 8.0 Millimeters or More, in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes with a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 1 Oct 2017; 33(10): e142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.175
- Lee RJ, Ganley TJ. The 5-strand hamstring graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy techniques. 31Oct 2014; 3(5): e627–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2014.07.002
- Sideris, A., Hamze, A., Bertollo, N., Broe, D. and Walsh, W. (2017) Five Strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provides No Benefit over the Gold Standard Four Strand Repair for Anterior Stability of the Knee: A Prospective Cohort Study. Open J Orthop., 7, 156–172. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojo.2017.76018
- Functional Outcome of Instrumentation and Interbody Cage Fusion in Cases of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Abstract Views :100 |
PDF Views:57
Authors
Mukesh Agarwal
1,
Sandeep Pangavane
2,
Nimesh Nebhani
3,
Ameya Kulkarni
3,
Nitish Agarwal
3,
Yogesh Rathod
3
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
2 Professor and Head, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
3 Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
1 Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
2 Professor and Head, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
3 Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 8, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 86-93Abstract
Background: Primary lumbar vertebral instability or “spondylolisthesis” is perhaps one of the commonest radiological sign associated with lumbo-sacral pain after the third decade of life. Aims and Objectives: To find out the functional outcome in terms of clinical improvement in cases of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis by bone grafting and interbody cage fusion and pedicle screw fixation after decompression of neural elements. Materials and Methods: All the patients were evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the lumbosacral spine centered at the appropriate level. In all cases flexion and extension views were taken to assess the instability. More than 4 to 5 mm of sagittal translation and 10 degrees of rotation were considered as instability. All cases were evaluated further by MRI to evaluate facet joint pathology, sacralization/lumbarisation and to find the associated disc changes and the nerve root involvement. All patients were treated by decompression and interbody fusion with cage and bone graft by either Transforaminal or Posterior approach and instrumentation done with pedicle screws. Post operatively all patients were assessed for the functional outcome using the Oswestry Disability Index at 1 month, 3 month and 6 months Results: There is statistically significant difference in ODI Scores (Oswestry Disability Index) post operatively at 1 month, 3 month and 6 months. Conclusion: In agreement with good results, found in our study, we strongly believe that this technique of fusion and instrumentation is very useful in management of lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, this study should further be extended to a wider sample of patients with a longer follow-up.Keywords
Back Pain, Interbody Cage fusion, ODI Score, SpondylolisthesisReferences
- Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, et al. The global burden of low back pain: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014; 73:968–74. PMid: 24665116. https://doi.org/10.1136/ annrheumdis-2013-204428
- Morgan FP, King T. Primary instability of lumbar vertebrae as a common cause of low back pain. Bone and JointJournal. Feb 1957 Feb; 39-B(1):6–22. PMid: 13405944. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.39B1.6
- Parker SL, Godil SS, Mendenhall SK, Zuckerman SL, Shau DN, McGirt MJ. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis or disc herniation): A value analysis of cost, pain, disability and quality of life. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 21:143–9. PMid: 24785973. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.3.SPINE1320
- Spratt KF, Weinstein JN, Lehmann TR, Wooody J, Sayre H. Efficacy of flexion and extension treatments incorpoatin braces for low-back pain patients with rerodiplacement, spondylolisthesis, or normal sagittal translation. SPINE. 1993 Oct; 18(13):1839–49. PMid: 8235870. https://doi. org/10.1097/00007632-199310000-00020
- Metkar U, Shepard N, Cho W, Sharan A. Conservative management of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Seminars in Spine Surgery. 2014; 26(4):225–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semss.2014.09.004
- Friedman BW, Dym AA, Davitt M, Holden L, Solorzano C, Esses D, Bijur PE, Gallagher EJ. Naproxen with cyclobenzaprine, oxycodone/acetaminophen or placebo for treating acute low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2015 Oct; 314(15):1572–80. PMid: 26501533. https:// doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.13043
- Vibert BT, Sliva CD, Herkowitz HN. Treatment of instability and spondylolisthesis: Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006 Feb; 443:222–7. PMid: 16462445. https:// doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000200233.99436.ea
- Lee M, Scott-Young M. Highly selective epidural steroid injection for the treatment of radicular pain arising from spondylolisthesis. In Orthopaedic Proceedings. 2004 Apr; 86(SUPP IV):456.
- Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Eismont FJ, Bell GR, Balderston RA. Rothman-Simeone The Spine E-Book: Expert Consult. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2011 Feb 10.
- Buck JE. Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Bone and Joint Journal. 1970 Aug; 52(3):432–7. https://doi. org/10.1302/0301-620X.52B3.432
- Nicol RO, Scott JH. Lytic spondylolysis: Repair by Wiring. Spine. 1986 Dec; 11(10):1027–30. PMid: 3554554. https:// doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198612000-00011
- Endler P, Ekman P, Moller H, Gerdhem P. Outcomes of posterolateral fusion with and without instrumentation and of interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis: A prospective study. JBJS. 2017 May; 99(9):743–52. PMid: 28463918. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00679
- Samuel AM, Moore HG, Cunningham ME. Treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: Current concepts and new evidence. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2017 Oct; 10(4):521–9.
- Samuel AM, Moore HG, Cunningham ME. Treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: current concepts and new evidence. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2017 Oct; 10(4):521-9.
- Eismont FJ, Norton RP, Hirsch BP. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2014 Apr 1; 22(4):203–13. PMid: 24668350. https://doi.org/10.5435/ JAAOS-22-04-203
- Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000 Nov; 25(22):2940–53. PMid: 11074683. https:// doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
- Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Eismont FJ, Bell GR, Balderston RA. Rothman-Simeone The Spine E-Book: Expert Consult. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011 Feb 10.
- Kilian HF. Schilderungen neuer Beckenformen und ihres Verhaltens im Leben. Bassermann and Mathy; 1854.
- Wiltse LL. Spondylolisthesis: Classification and Etiology in: Symposium on the spine, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The CV Mosby Co, St. Marchetti PG, Bartolozzi P (1997) Classification of Spondylolisthesis as a guideline for Treatment. Bridwell KH and Dewald RL (E–ds). The Textbook of Spinal Surgery, 2nd Edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1969. p. 1211-54.
- Wiltse L, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; 117:23–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086- 197606000-00003
- Ganju A. Isthmic spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Focus. 2002; 13:E1. PMid: 15916408. https://doi.org/10.3171/ foc.2002.13.1.2
- Lasanianos N, Triantafyllopoulos GK, Pneumaticos SG. Spondylolisthesis grades. Trauma and Orthopaedic Classifications, Part IV. London: Springer; 2015. p. 239–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6572-9_53
- Khalil JG, Fischgrund JS, Roberts RV. Surgical management of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Essentials of Spinal Stabilization. Springer, Cham. 2017. p. 299–320. PMid: 27967219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59713-3_24
- Kee-Yong H, Cheong-Ho C, Ki-Won K, et al. Expression of estrogen receptor of the facet joints in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2005; 30:562–6. PMid: 15738791. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000154674.16708.af
- Donnally III CJ, Dulebohn SC. Lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.
- Zhong ZM, Deviren V, Tay B, Burch S, Berven SH. Adjacent segment disease after instrumented fusion for adult lumbar spondylolisthesis: Incidence and risk factors. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2017 May; 156:29–34. PMid: 28288396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.02.020
- Wiltse LL, et al. Spondylolisthesis: Classification and Etiology - symposium of the Spine. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1969; 143–5.