Refine your search
Collections
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Karkheiran, Azam
- Determination of Stress Orientation in Sabzevar Ophiolite Zone in (khorasan Razavi Province, Iran)
Abstract Views :399 |
PDF Views:101
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Geology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hesarak, Tehran, IR
2 Department of Geology, North Tehran Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran
1 Department of Geology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hesarak, Tehran, IR
2 Department of Geology, North Tehran Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 5, No 10 (2012), Pagination: 3500-3505Abstract
Sabzevar ophiolite zone (SOZ) is in north of Central Iran that separated Kop-e-Dagh Sedimentary basin (in north) from the Central Iran plateau (in South). The evolution and replace time of this ophiolite complex has been respectively in upper Cretaceous and Middle Campanian to Upper Mastrishtian. This ophiolite belt contains a large amount of ultramafic rocks, small masses of Gabbro and thick sequence of submarine basaltic lavas. This study surveys the brittle structures that developed during the mountain building process to decipher the history of polyphase deformation. Analytic inversion techniques enabled us to determine and separate different brittle tectonic regimes in terms of stress tensors. Results indicate that oldest generation of stress on the area after the adoption of the ophiolite (Middle Campanian to Late Mastrishtian), is the tensile stress regime. Average direction of σ1 stress axis in this regime is 251/81. This tension is Because of subsidence of ophiolites after the adoption (located) on ground surface. Middle generation of stress has been strike slip regime and average direction of σ2 stress axis in this regime is 323/62. Finally, the newest generation of stress is compressional regime with an average direction of σ3 stress axis 308/81. In this regime σ1 direction is 183/05 that has caused re activity of main pre-existing structures with N121 direction. Our reconstruction of stress fields suggests an anticlockwise reorientation of the horizontal s1 axis since the located of ophiolites on the ground and a significant change in vertical stress from σ1 to σ3 since the late stage of thrusting. Transition from tension to compression has been strike slip movement. Ratio of elliptical stress in any of the regimes, respectively, from old to new is 0.63, 0.75 and 0.62 that due to overcome of shear regimes, average form of stress elliptical in area, is intermediate between the prolate and oblate forms.Keywords
Compressive Tectonic, Analytic Inversion, Stress Tensor, Ophiolite ComplexFull Text
References
- Anderson EM (1951) The dynamics of faulting and dyke formation with application to Britain. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.
- Angelier J (1990) Inversion of field data in fault tectonics to obtain the regional stress. III. A new rapid direct inversion method by analytical means. Geophys. J. Int. 103, 363–376.
- Angelier J (1989). From orientation to magnitudes in paleostress determinations using fault slip data, J. Struct.Geol. 11 (1/2), 37–50.
- Angelier J (2002) Inversion of earthquake focal mechanisms to obtainthe seismotectonic stress: a new method free of choice amongnodal planes. Geophys. J. Int. 150 (3), 588–609.
- Angelier J and Mechler P (1977) Sur une method graphique derecherche des contraintes principales egalement utilisable en tectoniqueet en seismologie: la methode des diedresdroits. Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr. 7, XIX (6),1309–1318.
- Bahroudi, A., Omrani, j., (1999). Geological Map of Bashtin. Geological Survey of Iran, 1:100000.
- Carey E and Brunier B (1974) Analyse theoriqueetnumerique dun model emecanique elementaire applique letude dune populationde failles. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris D 279, 891–894.
- Gauthier B and Angelier J (1985) Fault tectonics and deformation: a method of quantification using field data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 74,137–148.
- Lacombe O, Mouthereau F, Kargar Sh. and Meyer B (2006) Late Cenozoic and modern stress fields in the western Fars (Iran): implications for the tectonic and kinematic evolution of central Zagros. Tectonics 25, TC1003. doi:10.1029/2005TC001831.
- McQuarrie N, M. Stock J, Verdel C and Wernicke BP (2003) Cenozoic evolution of Neotethys and implications for the causes of plate motions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 (20).
- Mirzeinali SH (2012) Stress orientation in Sabzevar Ophiolite Zone. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geology, Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran (In Farsi).
- Navabpour P, Angelier J and Barrier E (2007) Cenozoic post- collisional brittle tectonic history and stress reorientation in the High Zagros Belt (Iran, Fars Province).Tectonophysics. 432, 101–131.
- Stampfli G and Borel GD (2002) A plate tectonic model for the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic constrained by dynamic plate boundariesand restored synthetic oceanic isochrones. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.196,17–33.
- Stocklin J (1968) Structural history and tectonics of Iran, a review. Am. Assoc Petrol. Geol. Bull. 52,1229-1258.
- Nabavi M (1976) An introduction to the Iranian geology. Geological Survey of Iran, (in Farsi).
- Vahidinia M and Ariae A (1999) Determine Age of the Sabzevar ophiolite melange based on paleontology and its comparison with radiometry data. Third Conf. of the Geological Soc. of Iran.
- Vernant Ph, Nilfroushan F, Hatzfeld D, Abbassi MR, Vigny C, Masson F, Nanakali H, Ashtiani A, Bayer R, Tavakoli F and Chery J (2004) Contemporary crustal deformation and plate kinematics in Middle East constrained by GPS measurements in Iran and northern Oman. Geophys. J. Int. 81, 398.