Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kardan, Mohammad Reza
- Evaluation of Image Quality and Patient Dose in Conventional Radiography Examinations in Radiology Centers in Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran and Comparing with that of International Guidelines Levels
Abstract Views :423 |
PDF Views:118
Authors
Mohammad Javad Keikhai Farzaneh
1,
Mahdi Shirin Shandiz
1,
Mojtaba Vardian
2,
Mohammad Reza Deevband
3,
Mohammad Reza Kardan
3
Affiliations
1 Zahedan Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR
2 Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, IR
3 National Radiation Protection Department, Tehran, IR
1 Zahedan Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR
2 Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, IR
3 National Radiation Protection Department, Tehran, IR
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 4, No 11 (2011), Pagination: 1429-1433Abstract
The major means of exposure to man-made sources of radiation is due to diagnostic examinations with X-ray. In the current research, for making practical the programs of reducing the patient's absorbed dose and increasing the quality of radiographic images in Sistan and Baluchestan hospitals, the patients surface dose and image quality were evaluated. In the first stage of experiment, the image quality and the cause of low quality of images was evaluated for a period of one month, and the patient dose for 10 adults in 7 projection were calculated in this study. Then the quality control tests were conducted to determine the equipment failures and provide appropriate corrective actions. Subsequently in the second stage of study, the image quality and patients dose were compared with the first stage of experimental data. The ESAK mean for all the centers, before and after implementing the quality control program was achieved as 0.48±0.30 and 0.37±0.20 for chest (anterior-posterior), 3.4±1.67 and 3.13±1.25 for lumbar spine (anteriorposterior), 8.81±7.72 and 7.56 ±5.99 for lumbar spine (lateral), 3.56±1.85 and 3.34±1.74 for the abdomen (anteriorposterior), 2.79±1.40 and 2.71 ±1.24 for pelvis (anterior-posterior), 2.27±1.43 and 2.1±1.25 for the skull (anteriorposterior) and 1.50±0.87 and 1.43±0.76 for the skull (lateral), respectively.(the data are based on mGy). The radiographic images quality was also increased between 0 to 10% after implementing quality control program. Results obtained show that a quality control program to reduce patient dose and increase radiographic image quality is necessary to ensure that all radiological examinations are performed under the terms of less received dose for the patients and the received images have good quality.Keywords
Radiology, Radiography, X-ray, ESAK, Patient Dose, Quality Control, Hospital, Sistan And BaluchestanReferences
- UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: Report to the General Assembly, annex D, medical radiation exposures. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UN, NY.
- Mettler FA (2001) Radiological risks associated with the various uses of radiation in medicine within the context of their associated benefits. In: International Atomic Energy Agency. Proce. Intl. conf. pp: 26-30, March 2001, Malaga. Vienna, Austria: Intl. Atomic Energy Agency. pp: 119 -127.
- Rehani MM (1995) Diagnostic imaging: quality assurance. New Delhi, India. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publ. 95, 14-23; 43.
- Rehani MM, Kaul R, Kumar P and Berry M (1995) Does bridging the gap between knowledge and practice help? Example of patient dose reduction in radiology. Med Phys. 20, 18 -22.
- Rehani MM, Arun Kumar LS and Berry M (1992) Quality assurance in diagnostic radiology. Ind. J. Radiol. 2, 259- 263.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labor Organization, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Pan American Health Organization and World Health Organization. (1996) International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources: safety series no. 115. Vienna, Austria: IAEA.
- Carmichael JHE (1996) European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. EUR 16260 EN.
- International Atomic Energy Agency (2004) Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing radiography, fluoroscopy and computed tomography, IAEA-TECDOC-1423, Vienna.
- Servomaa A (2001) Current level of radiation dose to patients. In: International Atomic Energy Agency. Proceedings of the international conference 26-30 March2001, Malaga. Vienna, Austria: Intl. Atomic Energy Agency. pp: 129-143.
- ICRP (1990) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Annals of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP, 21 (1-3), Publ. 60. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
- European Commission (1996) European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Publication EUR 16260 EN. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
- Shrimpton PC, Wall BF and Jones DG (1986) A national survey of doses in patients undergoing an election of routine x-ray examinations in English hospitals. NRPBR200. Oxfordshire, United Kingdom: National Radiological Protection Board.
- Veit R, Bauer B, Bernhardt HJ and Lechel U (1998) Proposed procedures for the establishment of diagnostic reference levels in Germany. Radiat prot dosim. 80, 117 -120.
- Aroua A, Besancon A and Buchillier-Decka I (2004) Adult reference levels in diagnostic and interventional radiology for temporary use in Switzerland. Radiat Prot Dosim.111, 289-295.
- Havukainen R and Pirinen M (1993) Patient dose and image quality in five standard x-ray examinations. Med Phys. 20, 813 -817.
- Gray JE, Archer BR and Butler PF (2005) Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiol. 235, 354-358.
- Spelic DC, Kaczmarek RV and Suleiman OH (2004) Nationwide evaluation of X-ray trends survey of abdomen and iumbosacral spine radiography. Radiol. 232, 115-125.
- Hart D and Wall BF (1990) A study of causes of variation in doses to patients from x-ray examinations: a report to the Department of Health. NRPB M212. Oxfordshire, United Kingdom: National Radiological Protect. Board.
- Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. (CRCPD), Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration. Patient exposure and dose guide - 2003. CRCPD publication E-03-2205. Frankfort, KY: CRCPD.
- Initial Results From IAEA. Projects Patient Doses in Radiographic Examinations in 12 Countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe. Wilbroad E. Muhogora; Nada A. Ahmed; Aziz Almosabihi; Jamila S, 10.2214/AJR.07.3039 AJR June 2008.190(6), 1453-1461.
- International Commission for Radiation Units and Measurements (2005) Patient dosimetry for X-rays used in medical imaging. J ICRU. 5, 4-6.
- Institute of physical sciences in medicine (IPSM) National radiological protection board (NRPB), college of radiographers. National protocol for patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. Oxfordshire, United Kingdom: NRPB, 1992.
- Hart D and Shrimpton PC (1991) The significance of patient weight when comparing x-ray performance against guideline levels of dose. Br. J. Radiol. 64, 771- 772
- The Quality Control of Diagnostic Radiology Devices in Hospitals of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran
Abstract Views :383 |
PDF Views:105
Authors
Mohammad Javad Keikhai Farzaneh
1,
Mahdi Shirin Shandiz
1,
Mojtaba Vardian
2,
Mohammad Reza Deevband
3,
Mohammad Reza Kardan
4
Affiliations
1 Zahedan Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR
2 Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, IR
3 National Radiation Protection Department, Tehran, Iran, IR
4 National Radiation Protection Department, Tehran, IR
1 Zahedan Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR
2 Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, IR
3 National Radiation Protection Department, Tehran, Iran, IR
4 National Radiation Protection Department, Tehran, IR
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 4, No 11 (2011), Pagination: 1458-1459Abstract
One of the most significant factors in decreasing the radiation exposure dose is quality control and making sure of the quality of radiological devices. The aim of this study is to consider the quality control of nine radiological device in nine hospitals in Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran, so that the question can be answered whether radiological devices are in the best efficiency conditions or not and to assure about their appropriate function. This study was performed cross-sectional in the year 2009, and the DIAVOLT and the dosimeter device named DIADOSE made by PTW's company were used for conduction quality control experiment. For making this experiment practical, various parameters of quality control programs as output repeatability of X-ray tube, time accuracy, time repeatability, output linearity with mA, voltage accuracy, adapting the optical field with radiation field, being vertical of radiation field on the film and the filtration of the concerned devices based on the analyzable standards are implemented. Our finding reveals that six out of the nine devices have not the required standards for voltage accuracy and need mending. In addition, all the nine devices have defects concerning adaptation with optical field and radiation field and one of the devices has not also sufficient filtration. The quality control of the utilized radiological devices should be performed periodically and regularly and the defects of the devices should be removed in order to be assured of the appropriate function of the devices. Unfortunately, all the devices need mending because of lack of implementing the quality control program regularly, which indicates that the quality control programs should be extended regularly.Keywords
X-ray, Radiology, Quality Control, Patient Dose, Radiation Protection, Sistan and BaluchestanReferences
- Darby SC (1997) The genetically significance dose from diagnostic radiology in Great Britain in 1997. NRPB. pp: 106.
- Gari C, Beffi G, Calvango S and Capaccioli L (1995) Quality control in the radiological departments of the Folrence general hospital. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 57(1-4), 315-316.
- Godechal D, Delhove J, Mambour C and Coomans J (1995) A quality assurance program for medical X-ray diagnostic units carried out in Belgium. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 94(1-2), 309-313.
- Gustafsson M and Motensson W (1983) Radiation exposure and estimate of rate effect of chest roentgen examination in children. Acta Radial Design. 24(4), 309-314.
- ICRP (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. 21(60), 1-3.
- Mettler FA (2001) Radiological risks associated with the various uses of radiation in medicine within the contexts of their associated benefits. In: Proc. Intl. Conf. March 26-30, Malaga, Vienna, IAEA. pp: 119-127.
- Mohammad Javad Keikhai Farzaneh, Mahdi Shirin Shandiz, Mohammad Reza Deevband, Mohammad Reza Kardan and Mohammad Mojtaba Keikhai Farzaneh (2011) Evaluation of image quality and patient dose in conventional radiography examinations in radiology centers in Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran and comparing with that of international guidelines levels. Indian J.Sci.Technol. 4(11) , 1429-1433.
- Mustafa AA, Sabol J and Janeczek J (1985) Doses from occupational exposure, a study of radiation doses to workers in Kuwait over a four-year period. Health Phys. 49(6), 1197-204.
- Oritz P, Maccia C, Padovani R and Vano E (1995) Results of the IAEA-CEC coordinate research program on radiation doses in diagnostic radiology and methods for reduction. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 57(1-4), 95-99.
- Sohrabi M (1990) Radiation protection infrastructure in Iran. In: Proc. IAEA Intl. Symp. on radiation protection infrastructure. IAEA. 7 (11), 245-255.
- Stewart A (1992) The effects of low-level radiation on human life. Solzbur. 27(2), 166-174.
- United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: report to the general assembly, Annex D, medical radiation exposures. UN, NY.