International Journal of Education and Management Studies

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Social Loafing Impairs Team Performance? A Study of Engineering Students from South India


Affiliations
1 Student, Department of Business Management Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Rajagiri P. O., Kalamassery, Kochi, Kerala, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology Rajagiri College of Social Sciences (Autonomous), Rajagiri P. O. Kalamassery, Kochi, Kerala, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Team performance plays a prominent role in the current scenario for both educational and corporate institutions. One of the threats to team efficiency is social loafing. This study looks into the antecedents and consequences of social loafing within a group task context. The study aimed to understand how such antecedents can impact group work efficiency. It can help the instructors to identify the social loafing problem and can motivate the group to learn effectively. Two hundred ninety-five PG and UG students were surveyed from a well-known Engineering college in South India. A 22-item instrument to measure the various components of social loafing (loafer's apathy, disconnect, disruptive behaviour and poor quality work) and its consequences (poor team performance, extra work done by other team members) was used for the study. The data collected was then analyzed and hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling analysis. It was found that loafer's apathy and loafer's disconnect with other team members contributed significantly to the team's poor performance. The extra effort put in by the other team members had a strong mediating effect on the relationship between loafer's poor quality work and the team's performance

Keywords

Social Loafing, Team Performance, Loafers Apathy, Loafer Disruptive Behavior, Work Quality
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aggarwal, P., & O'Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255-264

  • Barr, T. F., Dixon, A. L., & Gassenheimer, J. B. (2005). Exploring the “Lone Wolf” phenomenon in student teams. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1), 81-90.

  • Clark, J., & Baker, T. (2011). It's not fair: Cultural attitudes to social loafing in ethnically diverse groups. Intercultural Communication Studies, 20(1), 124-140.

  • Comer, D. R. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48(6), 647-667.

  • De Vita, G. (2001). The use of group work in large and diverse management classes: Some critical issues. The International Journal of Management Education, 1(3), 2634.

  • Deeter-Schmelz, D. R., Kennedy, K. N., & Ramsey, R. P. (2002). Enriching our understanding of student team effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(2), 114-124

  • Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2001). Effective strategies for cooperative learning. Journal of Cooperation and Collaboration in College Teaching, 10(2), 69-75

  • Guerin, B. (1999). Social behaviors as determined by different arrangements of social consequences: Social loafing, social facilitation, deindividuation, and a modified social loafing. The Psychological Record, 49(4), 565-577.

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  • Hoon, H., & Tan, T. M. L. (2008). Organizational citizenship behavior and social loafing: The role of personality, motives, and contextual factors. The Journal of Psychology, 142(1), 89-108. https://doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.1.89-112.

  • Jassawalla, A., Sashittal, H., & Malshe, A. (2009). Students' perceptions of social loafing: Its antecedents and consequences in undergraduate business classroom teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 42-54.

  • Karau, S., & Williams, K.D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681706.

  • Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822-832

  • McCorkle, D. E., Reardon, J., Alexander, J. F., Kling, N. D., Harris, R. C., & Iyer, R. V. (1999). Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly? Journal of Marketing Education, 21, 106-117. Doi:10.1177/0273475399212004

  • Meyer, B., Glenz, A., Antino, M., Rico, R., & Gonzalez-Roma, V. (2014). Fault lines and subgroups: A meta-review and measurement guide. Small Group Research, 45, 633670. Doi:10.1177/1046496414552195

  • Michaelsen, L.K.., Fink, L. D., & Knight, A. (1997). Designing effective group activities: Lessons for classroom teaching and faculty development. In D. Dezure (Ed.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional and organizational development. Stillwater, OK: New Forums

  • North, A C., Linley, P. A., & Hargreaves (2000). Social loafing in a cooperative classroom task. Educational Psychology, 20, 389-392.

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Oakley, B. (2003). It takes two to tango. Journal of Student Centred Learning, 1(1), 1928

  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2007). Organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

  • Schippers, M. C. (2014). Social loafing tendencies and team performance: The compensating effect of agreeableness and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13(1), 62-81

  • Skilton, P.F., Forsyth, D., & White, O.J. (2008). Interdependence and integration learning in student project teams: Do team project assignments achieve what we want them to? Journal of Marketing Education, 30(1), 57-65. Doi:10.1177/0273475307312198

  • Tan, H. H., & Tan. M. L. (2008). Organizational citizenship behavior and social loafing:The role of personality, motives, and contextual factors. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142, 89-108. http://doi.org/d84phj

  • Tubbs, S., & Moss, S. (2008). Human communication: Principles and contexts. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill

  • What about India?, Hofstede Insight, https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/india/#:~:text=India%2C%20with%20a%20rather%20intermediate,in%2Dgroup(s).

  • Ying, X., Li, H., Jiang, S., Peng, F., & Lin, Z. (2014). Group laziness: The effect of social loafing on group performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 42(3), 465-472.

  • Yamane, D. (1996). Collaboration and its discontents: Steps toward overcoming barriers to successful group projects. Teaching Sociology, 24(4),378-383.


Abstract Views: 139

PDF Views: 0




  • Social Loafing Impairs Team Performance? A Study of Engineering Students from South India

Abstract Views: 139  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Bettina Lisbath
Student, Department of Business Management Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Rajagiri P. O., Kalamassery, Kochi, Kerala, India
Jessy Fenn
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology Rajagiri College of Social Sciences (Autonomous), Rajagiri P. O. Kalamassery, Kochi, Kerala, India

Abstract


Team performance plays a prominent role in the current scenario for both educational and corporate institutions. One of the threats to team efficiency is social loafing. This study looks into the antecedents and consequences of social loafing within a group task context. The study aimed to understand how such antecedents can impact group work efficiency. It can help the instructors to identify the social loafing problem and can motivate the group to learn effectively. Two hundred ninety-five PG and UG students were surveyed from a well-known Engineering college in South India. A 22-item instrument to measure the various components of social loafing (loafer's apathy, disconnect, disruptive behaviour and poor quality work) and its consequences (poor team performance, extra work done by other team members) was used for the study. The data collected was then analyzed and hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling analysis. It was found that loafer's apathy and loafer's disconnect with other team members contributed significantly to the team's poor performance. The extra effort put in by the other team members had a strong mediating effect on the relationship between loafer's poor quality work and the team's performance

Keywords


Social Loafing, Team Performance, Loafers Apathy, Loafer Disruptive Behavior, Work Quality

References