Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Food Preference of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Winged and Wingless Forms of Aphis fabae and Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae)


Affiliations
1 Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, University of Adıyaman, Turkey
2 Institute of Science, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Uşak, Uşak, Turkey
 

Prey preference of natural enemies is an important parameter used in studies on their efficiency. Feeding preferences of individuals of Coccinella septempunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) for the essential prey items, winged and wingless Aphis fabae (Scopoli) and Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) were evaluated in the laboratory using Manly’s preference index. For the C. septempunctata prey preference experiment, equal number of winged and wingless A. fabae and M. persicae were offered to the predator adult stage. The experiment was conducted with 10 replicates. The number of aphids consumed was counted and recorded for every three hours. Two-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the interaction between the consumed aphid and time. In the statistical grouping, the highest consumption was in the first three hours in the wingless individuals, while the lowest consumption was in the 24th winged group. In addition, preferred prey experiments indicated that C. septempunctata consumed the wingless ones more than the winged ones. Index values > 0.5 represents preference for wingless while those < 0.5 represent non-preference for aphid species.

Keywords

Coccinella septempunctata, Aphis fabae, Myzus persicae, Preference, Winged and Wingless.
User
Notifications

  • Ali M, Perveen R, Siddique NY, Hussain R. 2012. Redescription of three species of the genus Coccinella(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) from Sindh, Pakistan. Pak Entomol. 34(2): 167-171.
  • Ashfaque M, Ullah F, Rafi MA. 2013. Genus Coccinella(Coccinellidae: Coleoptera) from Gilgit-Baltistan with two new records from Pakistan. Sarhad J Agric. 29(2): 241-247.
  • Bilashini Y, Singh TK. 2009. Studies on population dynamics and feeding potential of Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus in relation to Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) on cabbage. Indian J Appl Entomol. 23: 99-103.
  • Blackman R, Eastop V. 2000. Aphids on the World’s crops an identification and ınformation guide; Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Blackman RL, Eastop VF. 2007. TTaxonomic issues. pp. 1-30. In: Van Emden HF, Harrington R, (Eds.). Aphids as Crop Pests. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
  • Dawson G, Griffiths D, Merritt L, Mudd A, Pickett J, Wadhams L, Woodcock C. 1990. Aphid semiochemicals-A review, and recent advances on the sex pheromone. J Chem Ecol. 16: 3019-3030. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979609 PMid:24263293
  • Dedryver C-A, Le Ralec A, Fabre F. 2010. The conflicting relationships between aphids and men: A review of aphid damage and control strategies. C R Biol. 333: 539-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.03.009 PMid:20541165
  • Devonshire AL, Field LM, Foster SP, Moores GD, Williamson MS, Blackman RL. 1998. The evolution of insecticide resistance in the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol. Sci. 353: 16771684. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0318 PMCid: PMC1692396
  • Dixon AFG, Hemptınne JL. 2001. Body size distribution in predatory ladybird beetles reflects that of their prey. Ecology 82: 1847-1856. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1847:BSDIPL]2.0.CO;2
  • Dong M, Zhang D, Du X. 2011. The relationship between aphids and their natural enemies and the ecological management. Acta Phytophylacica Sin. 38: 327-332.
  • Emden H, Eastop V, Hughes R, Way M. 1969. The ecology of Myzus persicae. Annu Rev Entomol. 14: 197-270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.14.010169.001213
  • Foster SP, Harrington R, Dewar AM, Denholm I, Devonshire AL. 2002. Temporal and spatial Dynamics of insecticide resistance in Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Pest Manag Sci. 58: 895-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.553 PMid:12233179
  • Harris J, Dent DR. 2000. Priorities in Biopesticide Research and Development in Developing Countries; Wallingford, UK: CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994796.0000
  • Hodek I, Honek A. 1996. Ecology of Coccinellidae. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 464 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1349-8 PMid:8651689
  • Inayatullah M, Hayat A, Rafi MA. 2005. Species composition, distribution and seasonal occurrence of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) in District Poonch, Azad Kashmir with new records. Sarhad J Agric. 21: 97-100.
  • Jindal VK, Malik K. 2006. Feeding potential of Coccinella septempunctata Linn. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kalt and potato peach aphid, Myzus persicae Sulzer. J Entomol Res. 30: 291293.
  • Kapur AP. 1958. Coccinellidae of Nepal. Records of the Indian Museum. 53: 309-338.
  • Keshavarz M, Seıedy M, Allahyarı H. 2015. Preference of two populations of Propylea quatuordecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) for Aphis fabae and Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae). Eur J Entomol. 112(3): 560-563. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2015.065
  • Kuznetsov VN. 1997. Lady beetles of the Russian Far East. Memoir No. 1. The Sand hill Crane Press, Inc.
  • Gainesville, Finland.
  • Majerus MEN. 2006. The impact of male-killing bacteria on the evolution of aphidophagous coccinellids. Eur J Entomol. 103: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2006.001
  • Manly B. 1974. A model for certain types selection experiments. Biometrics 30: 281-294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529649
  • Nedved O, Salvucci S. 2008. Ladybird Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) prefers toxic prey in laboratory choice experiment. Eur J Entomol. 105: 431-436. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2008.055
  • Rafi MA, Irshad M, Inaytullah M. 2005. Predatory Lady bird beetles of Pakistan. Rohani Art Press, Blue Area, Islamabad, Pakistan. 105p.
  • Ragsdale DW, McCornack B, Venette R, Potter B, MacRae IV, Hodgson EW, O’Neal ME, Johnson KD, O’neil R, DiFonzo C. 2007. Economic threshold for soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphicide). J Econ Entomol. 100: 1258-1267. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/100.4.1258 PMid:17849878
  • Rousselin A, Bevacqua D, Sauge M-H, Lescourret F, Mody K, Jordan M-O. 2017. Harnessing the aphid life cycle to reduce insecticide reliance in apple and peach orchards. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 37: 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0444-8
  • Singh K, Singh NN. 2013. Preying capacity of different established predators of the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) infesting rapeseed-mustard crop in laboratory conditions. Pl Protect Sci., 49: 84-88. https://doi.org/10.17221/66/2011PPS
  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR. 1986: Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 247 pp.
  • Summers CG. 2001. Key to common alfalfa and cotton aphids in California. UC Plant Protect Quart. 11(3): 8-10.
  • Triltsch H. 1999. Foodremains in theguts of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) adults and larvae. Eur J Entomol. 96: 355-364.
  • Yano E. 2006. Ecological considerations for biological control of aphids in protected culture. Popul Ecol. 48: 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-006-0008-2

Abstract Views: 257

PDF Views: 196




  • Food Preference of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Winged and Wingless Forms of Aphis fabae and Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Abstract Views: 257  |  PDF Views: 196

Authors

Mahmut Islamoglu
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, University of Adıyaman, Turkey
Ceylan Alkan
Institute of Science, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Uşak, Uşak, Turkey

Abstract


Prey preference of natural enemies is an important parameter used in studies on their efficiency. Feeding preferences of individuals of Coccinella septempunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) for the essential prey items, winged and wingless Aphis fabae (Scopoli) and Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) were evaluated in the laboratory using Manly’s preference index. For the C. septempunctata prey preference experiment, equal number of winged and wingless A. fabae and M. persicae were offered to the predator adult stage. The experiment was conducted with 10 replicates. The number of aphids consumed was counted and recorded for every three hours. Two-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the interaction between the consumed aphid and time. In the statistical grouping, the highest consumption was in the first three hours in the wingless individuals, while the lowest consumption was in the 24th winged group. In addition, preferred prey experiments indicated that C. septempunctata consumed the wingless ones more than the winged ones. Index values > 0.5 represents preference for wingless while those < 0.5 represent non-preference for aphid species.

Keywords


Coccinella septempunctata, Aphis fabae, Myzus persicae, Preference, Winged and Wingless.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc%2F2019%2F23197