Journal of Biological Control

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Biological Approach for Management of Greater Wax Moth, Galleria mellonella L. Using Bacillus thuringiensis


Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra (GKVK), Bangalore 560 065, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Apiculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore 560 065, India
3 Bureau of Indian Standards, Parwanoo, Solan 173 220, India
 

Bee keeping has taken a shape of promising enterprise and also becoming popular as one of the components in mixed farming systems. Galleria mellonella L. damage is the major biological constraint in the beekeeping industry. Microbial agent Bacillus thuringiensis and its products have been tried widely against G. mellonella. Our previous study has detected six potential bacterial isolates viz., C7, A3, A7, N12, F2 and M2 active against G. mellonella. The effectiveness of these isolates on the stored honey combs against the G. mellonella was evaluated and the safety of these potential bacterial isolates was tested against honey bees and silk worms. The protection range provided by the isolates varied from 89.5-44.3 per cent and the isolate M2 (89.52%) and standard HD-1 (88.89%) rendered very good protection to the combs from wax moth damage. All the six isolates tested were found safe to honey bee adults and also to larvae indicating that the isolates can be safely deployed under field conditions. Two of the six isolates tested viz., M2 and N12 were toxic to silk worms. The study demonstrated the potentiality of Bt isolates against G. mellonella and their safety to the honey bees and silkworms.

Keywords

Galleria Mellonella, Bacillus thuringiensis, Silk Worms, Honey Bees.
User
Notifications

  • Abbott WS. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Ent. 18: 265–267.

  • Bernhard K, Jarrett P, Meadows M, Butt J, Ellis DJ, Roberts GM, Pauli S, Rodgers P. Burges HD. 1997. Natural isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis: Worldwide distribution, characterization, and activity against insect pests. J Inv Pathol. 70: 59–68.

  • Burges HD. 1981. Control of wax moths: Physical and biological methods. Bee World 59: 129–139.

  • Burges HD, Thomson EM, Latchford. 1976. Importance of spores and “–endotoxin” protein crystals of Bacillus thuringiensis in Galleria mellonella J Inv Pathol. 27: 87–94.

  • Cantwell GE, Shieh TA. 1981. Certan@- A new bacterial insecticide against greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella L. Am Bee J. 121: 424–426.

  • Cantwell GE, Knox DA, Michael, AS. 1964. Mortality of honey bees, Apis mellifera L. fed exotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis Berliner. J Insect Pathol. 6: 532–536.

  • Cantwell GE, Knox DA, Lehnert T, Michael AS. 1966. Mortality of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, in colonies treated with certain biological insecticides. J Inv Pathol. 8: 228–233.

  • Frankenhuyzen KV, Gringorten JL, Gauthier D, Milne RE, Masson L, Peferoen M. 1993. Toxicity of activated Cry1 protien from Bacillus thuringiensis to six forest Lepidoptera and Bombyx mori. J Inv Pathol. 62:295–301.

  • Ignoffo CM, Garcia C. 1978. UV–photo inactivation of cells and spores of Bacillus thuringiensis and effects of peroxidase on inactivation. Environ Ent. 7: 270–272.

  • Krieg A. 1973. About toxic effects of cultures of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis on honey bees (Apis mellifera). Z Pflanzenkrank Pflanzen. 80: 483–486.

  • Malone LA, Burgess EPJ, Stefanovic D. 1999. Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis biopesticide formulations, and a soyabean trypsin inhibitor on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) survival and food consumption. Apidologie 30: 465–473.

  • Maruthi Prasanna BV. 2003. Studies on local Bacillus thuringiensis for control of pigeon pea pod borer and development of transgenic pigeon pea (Cajanus cajana L. Millsp) with Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac genes. M.Sc. Thesis. UAS, Bangalore. 61 pp.

  • Mc Killinup, Brown DG. 1991. Evaluation of formulation of Bacillus thurengiensis against greater wax moth in stored honey combs. Aus J Exp Agri. 31(5): 709–711.

  • Ninfa M, Rosas-Garcia. 2009. Biopesticide production from Bacillus thuringiensis: An environmentally friendly alternative. Recent Patents on Biotechnology. 3: 28–36.

  • Singh S. 1962. Beekeeping in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi. 164 pp. Smith FG. 1960. Beekeeping in the Tropics. Longmans, Green, London.

  • Taredhalli N, Bhat NS, Kumar ARV. 2011. Diversity of Bacillus spp. in soil environment and their toxicity against greater wax moth Galleria mellonella L. pp. 167–172, Dunston P. Ambrose. (Ed.) Insect Pest Management, A Current Scenario. Entomology Research Unit, St. Xavier’s College, Palayamkottai, India.


Abstract Views: 245

PDF Views: 133




  • A Biological Approach for Management of Greater Wax Moth, Galleria mellonella L. Using Bacillus thuringiensis

Abstract Views: 245  |  PDF Views: 133

Authors

Nayimabanu Taredahalli
Department of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra (GKVK), Bangalore 560 065, Karnataka, India
N. S. Bhat
Department of Apiculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore 560 065, India
A. R. V. Kumar
Department of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra (GKVK), Bangalore 560 065, Karnataka, India
M. S. Jakhar
Bureau of Indian Standards, Parwanoo, Solan 173 220, India

Abstract


Bee keeping has taken a shape of promising enterprise and also becoming popular as one of the components in mixed farming systems. Galleria mellonella L. damage is the major biological constraint in the beekeeping industry. Microbial agent Bacillus thuringiensis and its products have been tried widely against G. mellonella. Our previous study has detected six potential bacterial isolates viz., C7, A3, A7, N12, F2 and M2 active against G. mellonella. The effectiveness of these isolates on the stored honey combs against the G. mellonella was evaluated and the safety of these potential bacterial isolates was tested against honey bees and silk worms. The protection range provided by the isolates varied from 89.5-44.3 per cent and the isolate M2 (89.52%) and standard HD-1 (88.89%) rendered very good protection to the combs from wax moth damage. All the six isolates tested were found safe to honey bee adults and also to larvae indicating that the isolates can be safely deployed under field conditions. Two of the six isolates tested viz., M2 and N12 were toxic to silk worms. The study demonstrated the potentiality of Bt isolates against G. mellonella and their safety to the honey bees and silkworms.

Keywords


Galleria Mellonella, Bacillus thuringiensis, Silk Worms, Honey Bees.

References