Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Lalitha, C.
- Isolation, Identification, Bioassay and Field Evaluation of Native Bacillus thuringiensis Strains against Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) in Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea)
Abstract Views :258 |
PDF Views:122
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupati 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, IN
1 Department of Entomology, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupati 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 26, No 1 (2012), Pagination: 34-42Abstract
A field experiment in a randomized block design was conducted to evaluate 28 Bacillus thuringiensis isolates along with a reference strain HD1 and untreated control against Spodoptera litura in groundnut. Larval population of S. litura per meter row at 3 days after spray (DAS) was lowest (9.0) in plot treated with Bt strain 341. Mean per cent reduction of larval population over pretreatment was maximum (56.83%) in HD1 reference strain and it was followed by the Bt strain 375 (51.45%). Minimum larval population of S. litura (7.0) was observed at 5DAS in HD1 and 375 Bt strains. Mean per cent reduction of larvae over pretreatment was maximum (68.32%) in HD1 reference strain followed by Bt strain 21 (57.27%). Minimum larval population of S. litura (5.0) was recorded at 7DAS in plot treated with Bt strains HD1, 375 and 416. Mean per cent reduction of larvae over pretreatment was highest (77.02%) in HD1 reference strain followed by Bt strain 375 (74.47%). Per cent leaf damage due to S. litura was minimum (12.83%) in plots treated with HD1 reference strain followed by strain 375 (14.06%). Maximum pod yield (3900 kg/ha) was recorded in the plots treated with HD1 reference strain followed by Bt strain 375 (3870.0kg/ha).Keywords
Native Bacillus thuringiensis Strains Spray, Spodoptera litura and Groundnut.References
- Behle RW, Guire MC. Shasha BS. 1996. Extending the residual toxicity of Bt with casein based formulations. J Econ Entomol. 89(6): 1399–1405.
- Bernhard K, Utz R. 1995. Production of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticides for experimental and commercial uses. Bacillusthuringiensis an environmental biopesticide: Theory and practice p. 255–267.
- Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. 1992. Microscopy: a laboratory manual. Third edition. The Benjamin publishing company, Inc. Newyork, USA. p 521.
- Jacobs J.L, Sundin GW. 2001. Effect of UV B radiation on a phyllosphere bacterial community. Appl Environ Microbiol. 67:5488–5496.
- Jayanthi PD, Padmavathamma K. 1996. Cross infectivity and safety of Nuclear polyhedrosis virus, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Berliner and Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuille to pests of groundnut (Arachis hypogea Linn.) and their natural enemies. J Entomol Res. 20(3):211–215.
- Lambert B, Peferoen M. 1992. Insecticidal promise of Bacillus thuringiensis facts and mysteries about a successful biopesticide. Bioscience. 42: 112–122.
- Loganathan M, Babu PCS, Balasubramanian G, Kailasam C. 2002. Crop pest damage model for groundnut infested with Spodoptera litura under field conditions. Ind J Entomol. 64: 484–492.
- Obulapathi K, Rao PK, Padmavatamma K, Reddy KS. 2000. Efficacy of certain botanical and biopesticides in the control of Spodoptera litura (Fab.) on groundnut. Ind J Plant Prot. 28: 165–168.
- Rao SM , Raman GV, Srimannarayana , Venkateswarlu B. 1999. Efficacy of botanicals against gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera. Pestology 23: 18–22.
- Sharif FA, Alaeddinoglu NG. 1988. A rapid and simple method for staining of the crystal protein of Bacillus thuringiensis. J Indust Microbiol. 3: 227–229.
- Shelton AM, Robertson JL, Tang JD, Perez C, Eigenbrode SD, Preister HK, Wilsey WK, Cooley RJ. 1993. Resistance of Diamond back moth to (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) Bacillus thuringiensis sub species in the field. J Econ Entomol.86:697–705.
- Srivastava CN, Maurya P, Sharma P, Mohan L. 2009. A review on futuristic domain approach for efficient Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) applications. J Entomol Res. 33: 0974–4576.
- Travers RS, Martin PAW, Reicneldorfer CF. 1987. Selective process for efficient isolation of soil Bacillus sps. Appl Environ Microbiol. 53:1263–1265.
- Vimaladevi PS, Ravinder T, Jaidev C. 2005. Barley based medium for the cost effective production of Bacillus thuringiensis. World J Microbiol Biotech. 21: 173–178.