Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
RADHIKA, N. S.
- Antagonistic Efficacy of Trichoderma Isolates Against Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens, Pythium Aphanidermatum and Rhizoctonia Solani
Abstract Views :197 |
PDF Views:113
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvanathapuarm – 695522, Kerala, IN
2 Regional Agricultural Research Station, Kumarakom, Kottayam – 686563, Kerala, IN
3 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Padannakkad, Kasaragod – 671 314, Kerala, IN
1 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvanathapuarm – 695522, Kerala, IN
2 Regional Agricultural Research Station, Kumarakom, Kottayam – 686563, Kerala, IN
3 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Padannakkad, Kasaragod – 671 314, Kerala, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 35, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 48-56Abstract
Trichoderma spp. are long been recognized as efficient fungal biocontrol agents for the control of plant disease and for their ability to increase plant growth and development. Management of soil borne diseases has become very much important since it causes high crop yield losses. The present study was carried out to isolate Trichoderma spp. from soil samples collected from different locations of Kerala and to test their in vitro efficacy against soil borne pathogens viz., Pythium aphanidermatum and Rhizoctonia solani. The Trichoderma spp. was isolated on Trichoderma Selective Medium (TSM) and observed that the isolates differed in radial growth and colony characters such as colony colour, texture and sporulation. In vitro studies revealed the potential of Trichoderma isolates against soil borne pathogens. Isolates TRPN3 and TRPN7 exhibited no sporulation and white mycelial colour. Isolates which completed their growth at four days after inoculation include TRKR1, TRPN3, TRPN7, TRPN10 and TRPN18. Biocontrol activities against different pathogens resulted in inhibition of pathogens. Maximum inhibition percentage was observed by the isolates TRPN7, TRPN15 and TRKR2 against both the pathogens. The maximum inhibition exhibited against both the pathogens is due to the antagonistic property displayed by the isolates.Keywords
Antagonistic Activity, Inhibition, Soil Borne Pathogens, Trichoderma Spp.Full Text
References
- Aluko MO, Hering TF. 1970. The mechanisms associated with the antagonistic relationship between Corticium solani and Gliocladium virens. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 55(2):173–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007- 1536(70)80001-8.
- Amin F, Razdan VK, Mohiddin FA, Bhat KA, Sheikh PA. 2010. Effect of volatile metabolites of Trichoderma species against seven fungal plant pathogens in-vitro. J Phytol. 2:34–7.
- Bastakoti S, Belbase S, Manandhar S, Arjyal C. 2017. Trichoderma species as biocontrol agent against soil borne fungal pathogens. Nepal J Biotechnol. 5(1):39–45. https://doi.org/10.3126/njb.v5i1.18492
- Bhat KA, Anwar A, Wani AH. 2009. Evaluation of bio control agents against Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn and sheath blight disease of rice under temperate ecology. Plant Disease Res. 24(1):15–8.
- Delgado-Jarana J, Pintor-Toro JA, Benítez T. 2000. Overproduction of β-1, 6-glucanase in Trichoderma harzianum is controlled by extracellular acidic proteases and pH. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1481(2):289–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4838(00)00172-2.
- Dennis C, Webster J. 1971. Antagonistic properties of species groups of Trichoderma: I. Production of non-volatile antibiotics. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 57(1):25–39. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(71)80077-3
- Devi YR, Sinha B. 2014. Cultural and anamorphic characterization of Trichoderma isolates isolated from rhizosphere of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) growing areas of manipur. The Bioscan 9(3):1217–20.
- Elad Y, Chet I, Henis Y. 1981. A selective medium for improving quantitative isolation of Trichoderma spp. from soil. Phytoparasitica. 9(1):59–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03158330
- Fatima K, Noureddine K, Henni JE, Mabrouk K. 2015. Antagonistic effect of Trichoderma harzianum against Phytophthora infestans in the North-west of Algeria. Int J Agron Agric Res. 6(4):44–53.
- Garcia-Nunez HG, Romero-Gamez SDJ, Nava-Bernal EG, Campos ARM. 2012. Isolation of native strains of Trichoderma spp, from horticultural soils of then Valley. of Toluca, for potential biocontrol of Sclerotinia. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosystems. 15(2):357–65.
- Gil SV, Pastor S, March GJ. 2009. Quantitative isolation of biocontrol agents Trichoderma spp., Gliocladium spp. and actinomycetes from soil with culture media. Microbiol. Res. 164(2):196–205. PMid: 17459686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.11.022
- Gupta M, Dohroo NP, Gangta V, Shanmugam V. 2010. Effect of microbial inoculants on rhizome disease and growth parameters of ginger. Indian Phytopathol. 63(4):438–41.
- Harman GE. 2006. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathol. 96(2):90–194. PMid: 18943924. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0190.
- Heydari A, Pessarakli M. 2010. A review on biological control of fungal plant pathogens using microbial antagonists. J Biol. Sci. 10(4):273–90. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2010.273.290.
- Hima VM. 2017. Enhancing bio-efficacy of Trichoderma spp. for the management of soil borne fungal pathogens. [PhD. Thesis]. Thrissur: Kerala Agricultural University; p. 186.
- Howell CR.1998. The role of antibiosis in biocontrol. Trichoderma and Gliocladium. 2:173–84.
- Johnson LF, Curl EA. 1972. Methods for research on the ecology of soil-borne plant pathogens. Burgess Publishing Company: 426 So. Sixth St., Minneapolis, MN 55415:247.
- Kamala T, Indira S. 2011. Evaluation of indigenous Trichoderma isolates from Manipur as biocontrol agent against Pythium aphanidermatum on common beans. J Biotech. 1(4):217–25. PMid: 22558540 PMCid: PMC3339598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-011- 0027-3.
- Khattabi N, Ezzahiri B, Louali L, Oihabi A. 2004. Antagonistic activity of Trichoderma isolates against Sclerotium rolfsii: Screening of efficient isolates from Morocco soils for biological control. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 43(3):332–40.
- Kredics L, Antal Z, Manczinger L, Szekeres A, Kevei F, Nagy E. 2003. Influence of environmental parameters on Trichoderma strains with biocontrol potential. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 41(1):37–42.
- Kubicek CP, Herrera-Estrella A, Seidl-Seiboth V, Martinez DA, Druzhinina IS, Thon M, Zeilinger S, Casas-Flores S, Horwitz BA, Mukherjee PK, Mukherjee M. 2011. Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma. Genome Biol. 12(4):R40. PMid: 21501500 PMCid: PMC3218866. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-4-r40.
- Lunge AG, Patil AS. 2012. Characterization of efficient chitinolytic enzyme producing Trichoderma species: A tool for better antagonistic approach. Int J Sci Environ Technol. 1(5):377–85.
- Manandhar S, Pant B, Manandhar C, Baidya S. 2019. In vitro evaluation of bio-control agents against soil borne plant pathogens. J Nepal Agric. Res. Counc. 5:68–72. https:// doi.org/10.3126/jnarc.v5i1.23810.
- Mendoza JLH, Perez MIS, Prieto JMG, Velásquez JDQ, Olivares JGG, Langarica HRG. 2015. Antibiosis of Trichoderma spp strains native to northeastern Mexico against the pathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina. Braz. J Microbiol. 46(4):1093–101. PMid: 26691467 PMCid: PMC4704620. https://doi. org/10.1590/S1517-838246420120177.
- Mishra VK. 2010. In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma species against Pythium aphanidermatum. J. Phytol. 2(9): 28-35.
- Pan S, Das A. 2011. Control of cowpea (Vigna sinensis) root and collar rot (Rhizoctonia solani) with some organic formulations of Trichoderma harzianum under field condition. J Plant Prot Sci. 3(2):20–5.
- Patil A, Laddha A, Lunge A, Paikrao H, Mahure S. 2012. In vitro antagonistic properties of selected Trichoderma species against tomato root rot causing Pythium species. Int J Sci Environ Technol. 1(4):302–15.
- Ridout CJ, Coley-Smith JR, Lynch JM. 1986. Enzyme activity and electrophoretic profile of extracellular protein induced in Trichoderma spp. by cell walls of Rhizoctonia solani. Microbiol. 132(8):2345–52. https:// doi.org/10.1099/00221287-132-8-2345.
- Seema M, Devaki NS. 2012. In vitro evaluation of biological control agents against Rhizoctonia solani. J of Agric Technol. 8(1):233–40.
- Sekhar YC, Ahammed SK, Prasad TNVKV, Devi RSJ. 2017. Identification of Trichoderma species based on morphological characters isolated from rhizosphere of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). Int J Sci Environ Technol. 6:2056–63.
- Shalini S, Kotasthane AS. 2007. Parasitism of Rhizoctonia solani by strains of Trichoderma spp. EJEAF Chem. 6:2272–81.
- Sharma KK, Singh US. 2014. Cultural and morphological characterization of rhizospheric isolates of fungal antagonist Trichoderma. J Appl. Nat. Sci. 6(2):451–6. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v6i2.481.
- Skidmore AM, Dickinson CH. 1976. Colony interactions and hyphal interference between Septoria nodorum and phylloplane fungi. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 66(1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(76)80092-7.
- Vincent JM. 1927. Distortion of fungal hyphae in the presence of certain inhibitors. Nature. 59:850.
- Weindling R. 1932. Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other soil fungi. Phytopathol. 22(8):837–45.
- Characterization of novel strains of Trichoderma spp. and their utilization in management of damping off disease in tomato
Abstract Views :100 |
PDF Views:83
Authors
ATHIRA NAIR
1,
G. V. SIBLE
2,
ANIT CYRIAC
1,
SUSHA S. THARA
1,
JOY MICHAL JOHNSON
3,
N. S. RADHIKA
4,
K. B. SONI
5
Affiliations
1 Department of Plant Pathology,, IN
2 Regional Agricultural Research Station, Kumarakom, Kottayam - 686563, Kerala, India., IN
3 arming Systems Research Station, Sadanandapuram, Kollam - 691531, Kerala, India ., IN
4 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Padannakkad, Kasaragod - 671314, Kerala, India ., IN
5 Department of Plant Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram - 695522, Kerala, India ., IN
1 Department of Plant Pathology,, IN
2 Regional Agricultural Research Station, Kumarakom, Kottayam - 686563, Kerala, India., IN
3 arming Systems Research Station, Sadanandapuram, Kollam - 691531, Kerala, India ., IN
4 Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, Padannakkad, Kasaragod - 671314, Kerala, India ., IN
5 Department of Plant Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Thiruvananthapuram - 695522, Kerala, India ., IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 36, No 1 (2022), Pagination: 31 - 46Abstract
Chemical fungicides used in plant disease management may have deteriorative effects on humans, animals, and the environment. The use of native strains of Trichoderma spp. against plant diseases may help to reduce the dependence on chemical fungicides. In this study, eleven novel isolates of Trichoderma spp. from virgin forest soils of different agro-climatic zones of Kerala were characterized and evaluated for their efficacy against damping off disease of tomato caused by Pythium aphanidermatum under in vitro and in vivo; and also, against wilt pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum under in vitro conditions. Dual culture assay showed that all the Trichoderma isolates were found to inhibit the growth of P. aphanidermatum and F. oxysporum under in vitro conditions with multiple modes of action. The mycelial colour, texture, and conidial characters varied among all the isolates. The volatile metabolites by isolates of Trichoderma spp. also showed in vitro inhibition of the pathogens. Seed treatment (20 g kg-1) and potting medium addition @ 2 % (w/w) of isolates TRMW-2, TRKR-2, TRPN-3, TRPN-11 and TRPN-17 could effectively reduce pre- and post-emergence damping off of tomato. Among them, isolates TRMW-2, TRKR-2, and TRPN-11 were the most effective ones in reducing pre- and post-emergence damping off to about 72 and 90 percent respectively. Molecular identification of the isolates of Trichoderma spp. using ITS universal primers revealed similarity with certain reference strains of the NCBI Genbank database.Keywords
Biocontrol, damping off, Fusarium oxysporum, Pythium aphanidermatum, Trichoderma, wiltFull Text
References
- Agrios GN. 2005. Plant Pathology. Academic Press, London.
- Bhattacharjee R, Dey U. 2014. An overview of fungal and bacterial biopesticides to control plant pathogens/ diseases. Afr J Microbiol Res, 8:1749-1762. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2013.6356
- Campanile G, Ruscelli A, Luisi N. 2007. Antagonistic activity of endophytic fungi towards Diplodia corticola assessed by in vitro and in planta tests. Eur J Plant Pathol, 117(3):237-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-0069089-1
- Chakraborty BN, Chakraborty U, Saha A, Dey PL, Sunar K. 2010. Molecular characterization of Trichoderma viride and Trichoderma harzianum isolated from soils of North Bengal based on rDNA markers and analysis of their PCR-RADP profiles. Global J Biotechnol Biochem, 5:55-61.
- Chao Wang, Zhuang WY. 2019. Evaluating effective Trichoderma isolates for biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani causing root rot of Vigna unguiculata. J Integr Agric, 18(9):2072-2079. https://doi.org/10.1016/S20953119(19)62593-1
- Chet I, Baker R. 1981. Isolation and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma hamatum from soil naturally suppressive to Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathol, 71:286-290. https:// doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-71-286
- Cyriac A, Sible GV, Johnson JM, Radhika NS, Krishnan AG. 2021. Antagonistic efficacy of Trichoderma isolates against soil-borne plant pathogens, Pythium aphanidermatum and Rhizoctonia solani. J Biol Control, 35(2): 48-56. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2021/26283
- Das M, Haridas, M, Sabu A. 2018. Biological control of black pepper and ginger pathogens, Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani and Phytophthora capsici, using Trichoderma spp. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol, 17:177183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.021
- Dennis C, Webster J. 1971a. Antagonistic properties of species-group of Trichoderma. III. Hyphal interactions. Trans Br Mycol Soc, 57:363-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(71)80050-5
- Dennis C, Webster J. 1971b. Antagonistic properties of species groups of Trichoderma: II. Production of nonvolatile antibiotics. Trans Br Mycol Soc, 57:41-47.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(71)80078-5
- Drummond AJ, Suchard MA. 2010. Bayesian random local clocks, or one rate to rule them all. BMC Biol, 8(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-8-114 PMid:20807414 PMCid:PMC2949620
- Elad Y. 2000. Biological control of foliar pathogens by means of Trichoderma harzianum and potential modes of action. Crop Prot, 19:709-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0261-2194(00)00094-6
- Elad Y, Chet I, Henis Y. 1981. Biological control of Rhizoctonia solani in strawberry fields by Trichoderma harzianum. Plant Soil, 60:245-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374109
- Elshahawy, IE, El-Mohamedy RS. 2019. Biological control of Pythium damping-off and root-rot diseases of tomato using Trichoderma isolates employed alone or in combination. J Plant Pathol, 101(3):597-608. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s42161-019-00248-z
- Eziashi EI, Uma NU, Adekunle AA, Airede CE. 2006.Effect of metabolites produced by Trichoderma species against Ceratocystis paradoxa in culture medium. Afr J Biotechnol, 5(9):703-706. https://doi.org/10.3923/ pjbs.2006.1987.1990
- Hajieghrari B, Torabi-Giglou M, Mohammadi MR, Davari M.2008. Biological potential of some Iranian Trichoderma isolates in the control of soil borne plant pathogenic fungi. Afr J Biotechnol, 7:967-972.
- Harman GE, Chet I, Baker R. 1980. Trichoderma hamatum on seedling disease induced in radish and pea by Pythium spp. or Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathol, 70:1107-1172.https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-70-1167
- Harman GE. 2000. Myths and dogmas of biocontrol: changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Dis, 84:377-393. https://doi. org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.4.377 PMid:30841158
- Hassan MM, Gaber A, El-Hallous EI. 2014. Molecular and morphological characterization of Trichoderma harzianum from different Egyptian soils. Wulfenia J, 21:80-96.
- Hassan MM, Farid MA, Gaber A. 2019. Rapid identification of Trichoderma koningiopsis and Trichoderma longibrachiatum using sequence characterized amplified region markers. Egyptian J Biol Pest Cont, 29:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-019-0113-0
- Inbar J, Abramsky M, Cohen D. 1994. Plant growth enhancement and disease control by T. harzianum in vegetable seedlings grown under commercial conditions. Eur J Plant Pathol, 100:337-346. https://doi.
- org/10.1007/BF01876444
- Jaisani P, Pandey RN. 2017. Morphological and molecular characterization for identification of isolates of Trichoderma spp. from rhizosphere soils of crops in middle Gujarat. Indian Phytopathol, 70(2):238-245.
- https://doi.org/10.24838/ip.2017.v70.i2.71652
- Kamala T, Indira S. 2011. Evaluation of indigenous Trichoderma isolates from Manipur as biocontrol agent against Pythium aphanidermatum on common beans. Biotechnol, 1:217-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205011-0027-3 PMid:22558540 PMCid:PMC3339598
- Karmel RA, Muthukumar A. 2019. Occurrence, virulence and pathogenicity of Pythium aphanidermatum causing tomato damping-off. Pl Arch. 19(2):2476-2480
- Karpagavalli S, Ramabadran R. 2001. Effect of fungicides and Trichoderma species on cellulolytic enzyme production, damping-off incidence and seedling vigour of tomato. Pl Dis Res, 16:179-185.
- Kucuk C, Kivanc M. 2004. In vitro antifungal activity of strains of Trichoderma harzianum. Turk J Biol. 28:111 - 115.
- Kullnig-Gradinger CM, Szakacs G, Kubicek CP. 2002. Phylogeny and evolution of the genus Trichoderma: A multigene approach. Mycol Res, 106:757 -767. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0953756202006172
- MacHardy, WE, Beckman, CH. 1981. Vascular wilt Fusaria: Infections and pathogenesis. In: Nelson PE, Toussoun TA, Cook RJ, editors. Fusarium: Diseases, biology and taxonomy. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania.
- Mazrou YSA, Makhlouf AH, Elseehy MM, Awad MF, Hassan MM. 2020. Antagonistic activity and molecular characterisation of biological control agent Trichoderma harzianum from Saudi Arabia. Egyptian J Biol Pest Control, 30:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-0200207-8
- Mbarga JB, Ten Hoopen GM, Kuaté J, Adiobo A, Ngonkeu MEL, Ambang Z, Begoude BAD. 2012. Trichoderma asperellum: A potential biocontrol agent for Pythium myriotylum, causal agent of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) root rot disease in Cameroon. Crop Prot, 36:18-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.02.004
- Mendoza JLH, Perez MIS, Prieto JMG, Velasquez JDQ, Olivares JGG, Langarica HRG. 2015. Antibiosis of Trichoderma spp. strains native to north eastern Mexico against the pathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina. Braz J Microbiol, 46(4):1093-1101. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838246420120177 PMid:26691467 PMCid:PMC4704620
- Mishra VK. 2010. In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma species against Pythium aphanidermatum. J Phytol, 2:28-35.
- Pakora GA, Mpika J, Kone J, Daouda DM, Kebe I, Nay B, Buisson D. 2017. Inhibition of Phytophthora species, agents of cocoa black pod disease, by secondary metabolites of Trichoderma species. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 25:29901-29909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356017-0283-9 PMid:28965291
- Pandya JR, Sabalpara AN, Chawda SK. 2011. Trichoderma: a particular weapon for biological control of phytopathogens. J Agric Sci Technol, 7(5):1187-1191.
- Ray K, Sen K, Ghosh PP, Barman AR, Mandal R, De Roy M, Dutta S. 2017. Dynamics of Sclerotium rolfsii as influenced by different crop rhizosphere and microbial community. J Appl Nat Sci, 9(3):1544-1550. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v9i3.1399
- Riddel RW. 1950. Slide cultures. Mycologica, 42:265-270.https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1950.12017830
- Sathiyavathi M, Parvatham R. 2011. Identification and molecular characterization of laccase and xylanase producing fungus isolated from paper mill effluent. Int J Pharma Biosci, 2(4): 54-66.
- Segarra G, Aviles M, Casanova E, Borrero C, Trillas I. 2013. Effectiveness of biological control of Phytophthora capsici in pepper by Trichoderma asperellum strain T34. Phytopathol Mediterr, 1(52):77-83.
- Sekhar YC, Ahammed SK, Prasad TNVKV, Devi RSJ. 2017. Identification of Trichoderma species based on morphological characters isolated from rhizosphere of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea, L.). Int J Sci Environ Technol, 6:2056-2063.
- Shahid M, Srivastava M, Sharma A, Kumar V, Pandey S, Singh A. 2013. Morphological, molecular identification and SSR marker analysis of a potential strain of Trichoderma/ Hypocrea for production of a bioformulation. J Plant Pathol Microbiol, 4:1-7 https://doi.org/10.4172/21577471.1000204
- Shalini S, Kotasthane AS. 2007. Parasitism of Rhizoctonia solani by strains of Trichoderma spp. EJEAF Chem, 6:2272-81.
- Singh P, Kumar A, Singh Y, Mishra SK, Kumar B. 2020. Assessment of morphological and molecular
- variability among different isolates of Trichoderma.J Experimental Biol Agric Sci, 8(1):41-47. https://doi.
- org/10.18006/2020.8(1).41.47
- Sivan A, Chet I. 1993. Integrated control of media on growth and interactions between a range of soil borne glasshouse pathogens and antagonistic fungi. Phytopathol, 10:127- 142.
- Skidmore AM, Dickinson CH. 1976. Colony interaction and hyphal interference between Septoria nodorum
- and phylloplane fungi. Trans Br Mycol Soc, 66:57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(76)80092-7
- Spadaro D, Gullino ML. 2005. Improving the efficacy of biocontrol agents against soil-borne pathogens.
- Crop Prot. 24:601-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cropro.2004.11.003
- Tchameni SN, Cotârleț M, Ghinea IO, Bedine MAB, Sameza ML, Borda D, Bahrim G, Dinic RM. 2019. Involvement of lytic enzymes and secondary metabolites produced by Trichoderma spp. in the biological control of Pythium myriotylum. Int Microbiol, 23(2): 179-188. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10123-019-00089-x PMid:31267375
- White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ,White TJ, editors. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press Inc., New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 PMid:1696192
- Wright JM. 1956. Biological control of soil-borne Pythium infection by seed inoculation. Plant Soil, 8:132-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01398815 .