Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance of Farms Based on the Relationship of Farm Size and Efficiency


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor of Accountancy, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Adarsha Mahavidyalaya, Tulungia, Bongaigaon, Assam, India
2 Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Tezpur University, Assam, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study attempts to provide a comparison of performance of farms based on their relationship of farm size and efficiency indicators. A series of SLRM have been conducted by taking farm size as predictor variable over a sample size of 120 paddy farms of Assam, India. Majority of absolute measures, irrespective of financial and physical in nature, show positive relation with the farm size. However, the physical ratio measures such as yield per hectare, production efficiency, man day per hectare, machine day per hectare are reversely related to the same. Yet, financial ratio measures like profit per hectare, overhead charge ratio, operating ratio, etc., indicate better performance towards the higher farm size categories. This study concludes by suggesting that on maintaining a proper liquidity position, a medium farm can be the most efficient category of farm size in Assam

Keywords

Farm Size, Farm Size Categories, Farm Performance, Measures of Performance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bhatt, M. S., & Bhat, S. A. (2014). Technical efficiency and farm size productivity: Micro level evidence from Jammu & Kashmir. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 2(4), 27-49.

  • Burja, V. (2011). Regional disparities of agricultural performance in Romania. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 13(1), 115-121.

  • CAPI. (2009). Measuring farm profitability and financial performance, Farm Profitability Report, Canadian Agri-Food Policy Institute, Ottawa.

  • Colie, T. J., Rao, D. S., O’Donnell, C., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Crane, L. M. (1998). Measuring financial performance: A critical key to managing risk. Overland Park: National Crop Insurance Services.

  • Dhungana, B., Nuthall, P., & Nartea, G. (2004), Measuring the economic inefficiency of nepalese rice farms using data envelopment analysis. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48, 347-369.

  • Eastwood, R., Lipton, M., & Newell, A. (2010). Farm Size. In P. L. Pingali & R. E. Evenson (Eds.), Handbook of agricultural economics. North Holand.

  • Escalante, C. L., & Barry, P. J. (2002), Business growth strategies of Illinois grain farms. Agricultural Finance Review, 62(1), 69-79. doi:10.1108/00214890280001130

  • Feder, G. (1983). The Relation between Farm Size and Farm Productivity: The Role of Family Labor, Supervision and Credit Constraints (Discussion Paper), Agriculture and Rural Development Department, World Bank, ARU 18.

  • Fechete, F., & Nedekcu, A. (2014). Analysis of the Economic Performance of a Organization using Multiple Regression, Paper presented in International Conference of Scientific papers AFASES, 22-24 May, 2014.

  • FICCI. (2015). Labour in Indian Agriculture: A Growing Challenge, FICCI, India.

  • Gupta, M., Roy, A. T., Deb, U., & Mazumder, R. (2013). Determinants of technical efficiency of paddy cultivators: A study of hailakandi district of Assam. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1), 19-28.

  • Happe, K., Balmann, A., Kellermann, K., & Sahrbacher, C. (2008). Does structure matter? The impact of switching the agricultural policy regime on farm structures. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67(2), 431-444.

  • Islam, K. M., Backman, S., & Sumelius, J. (2011). Technical, economic and allocative efficiency of microfinance borrowers and non-borrowers: Evidence from peasant farming in Bangladesh. European Journal of Social Sciences, 18(3), 361-377.

  • Johl, S. S., & Kapur, T. R. (2000). Fundamentals of farm business management. NOIDA, New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers.

  • Kulawik, J. (2012). Financial efficiency in agriculture: The essence, measurement and perspectives. Institute of Escalante, C. L., & Barry, P. J. (2002), Business growth strategies of Illinois grain farms. Agricultural Finance Review, 62(1), 69-79. doi:10.1108/00214890280001130

  • Feder, G. (1983). The Relation between Farm Size and Farm Productivity: The Role of Family Labor, Supervision and Credit Constraints (Discussion Paper), Agriculture and Rural Development Department, World Bank, ARU 18.

  • Fechete, F., & Nedekcu, A. (2014). Analysis of the Economic Performance of a Organization using Multiple Regression, Paper presented in International Conference of Scientific papers AFASES, 22-24 May, 2014.

  • FICCI. (2015). Labour in Indian Agriculture: A Growing Challenge, FICCI, India.

  • Gupta, M., Roy, A. T., Deb, U., & Mazumder, R. (2013). Determinants of technical efficiency of paddy cultivators: A study of hailakandi district of Assam. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(1), 19-28.

  • Happe, K., Balmann, A., Kellermann, K., & Sahrbacher, C. (2008). Does structure matter? The impact of switching the agricultural policy regime on farm structures. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67(2), 431-444.

  • Islam, K. M., Backman, S., & Sumelius, J. (2011). Technical, economic and allocative efficiency of microfinance borrowers and non-borrowers: Evidence from peasant farming in Bangladesh. European Journal of Social Sciences, 18(3), 361-377.

  • Johl, S. S., & Kapur, T. R. (2000). Fundamentals of farm business management. NOIDA, New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers.

  • Kulawik, J. (2012). Financial efficiency in agriculture: The essence, measurement and perspectives. Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, National Research Institute, Waesaw.

  • Rudra, A. (1968). Farm size and yield per acre. Economic and Political Weekly, 3(26-28), 1041-1044.

  • Saini, G. R. (1971). Holding size, productivity, and some related aspects of Indian agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly, 6(26), A79-A85.

  • Savastano, S., & Scadizzo, P. L. (2017). Farm size and productivity: A “direct-inverse-direct” relationship, Policy Research Working Paper Series 8127, The World Bank.

  • Sen, A. K. (1962). An aspect of Indian agriculture. The Economic and Political Weekly, 24(4), 243-226.

  • Sureshkumar, A., Patel, K., Asodiya, P., & Parmar, V. (2014). Input use, cost structure, return and resource use efficiency analysis of Wheat Crop in South Gujrat, India. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 2(1), 5-12.

  • Taylor, G. T., & Shonkwiler, J. S. (1986). Alternative stochastic specialization of the frontier production function in the analysis of agricultural credit programmes and technical efficiency. Journal of Development Economics, 21, 149-160.

  • Toma, E., Dobre, C., Dona, I., & Cofas, E. (2015). DEA applicability in assessment of agriculture efficiency on areas with similar geographical pattern. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 6, 704-711.

  • USDN (2007). Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: Family Farm Report, 2007 Edition/EIB-24, Economic Research Service/USDA.

  • Wadsworth, J. J., & Brav-Ureta, B. E. (1992). Financial performance of New England dairy farms. Agribusiness, 8(1), 47-56.


Abstract Views: 235

PDF Views: 0




  • Performance of Farms Based on the Relationship of Farm Size and Efficiency

Abstract Views: 235  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Haripriya Dutta
Assistant Professor of Accountancy, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Adarsha Mahavidyalaya, Tulungia, Bongaigaon, Assam, India
Anjan Bhuyan
Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Tezpur University, Assam, India

Abstract


This study attempts to provide a comparison of performance of farms based on their relationship of farm size and efficiency indicators. A series of SLRM have been conducted by taking farm size as predictor variable over a sample size of 120 paddy farms of Assam, India. Majority of absolute measures, irrespective of financial and physical in nature, show positive relation with the farm size. However, the physical ratio measures such as yield per hectare, production efficiency, man day per hectare, machine day per hectare are reversely related to the same. Yet, financial ratio measures like profit per hectare, overhead charge ratio, operating ratio, etc., indicate better performance towards the higher farm size categories. This study concludes by suggesting that on maintaining a proper liquidity position, a medium farm can be the most efficient category of farm size in Assam

Keywords


Farm Size, Farm Size Categories, Farm Performance, Measures of Performance.

References