Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Mutual Fund Flow Scale: A Multi-item Scale for Measuring Perception of Mutual Fund Investors


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Apeejay School of Management, Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


With an ever-increasing amount of information related to the stock market or various investment avenues, misperception or no perception regarding mutual funds is becoming a norm for investors and marketers. To date no perception measuring scale has been developed for mutual fund investors, to assist investors, marketers, and promoters to focus on the most crucial factors for mutual fund market application. This paper discovers the dimensions of investor perception and its relevance for investment practitioners. A five-factor conceptual model of mutual fund flow is developed, operationalised and validated, using a sample of 3,738 investors. Using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis techniques, results of this study support all the five dimensions of risk, return, fund characteristics, fund manager, and fund family, and confirms that they have a significant impact on investor perception regarding mutual fund investment decision. This work makes an equivalent influence on academic, as well as practical, domains

Keywords

Fund Characteristics, Fund Family, Fund Manager, Investor Behaviour, Investor Perception, Mutual Funds, Return, Risk
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alekhya, P. (2012). A study on performance evaluation of public & private sector mutual funds in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review, 1(2), 147-168.

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

  • Baker, H. K., Hargrove, M. B., & Haslem, J. A. (1977). An empirical analysis of the risk return preferences of individual investors. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12(3), 377-389.

  • Balaji, I. S., & Kumar, B. R. (2002). Investor’s psychology: A study of investor behaviour in the Indian capital market. Finance India, 16(4), 1357-1375.

  • Blake, D., & Timmermann, A. (1998). Mutual fund performance: Evidence from the UK. European Finance Review, 2(1), 55-77.

  • Brinson, P., Hood R., & Beebower, L. (1991). Determinants of portfolio performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 42, 39-48.

  • Capon, N., Fitzsimons, G., & Prince, R. (1996). An individual level analysis of the mutual fund investment decision. Journal of Financial Services Research, 10(1), 59-82.

  • Chakrabarti, A., & Rungta, H. (2000). Mutual fund industry in India: An in-depth look in to the problems of credibility, risk and brand. The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 6(2), 27-45.

  • Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1997). Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 105(6), 1167-1200.

  • Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for emerging better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.

  • Connor, G., & Korajczyk, R. A. (1988). Risk and return in equilibrium apt: Application of a new test methodology. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(2), 255-289.

  • Das, S., & Sundaram, R. (1998a). Fee speech: Adverse selection and the regulation of mutual fund fees. NBER Working Paper 6644.

  • Das, S., & Sundaram, R. (1998b). On the regulation of fee structures in mutual funds. NBER Working Paper 6639.

  • Das, S., & Sundaram, R. (2002). Fee speech: Signaling, risk-sharing and the impact of fee structures on investor welfare. Review of Financial Studies, 15(5), 1465-1497.

  • Del G. D., & Tkac, P. A. (2002a). The determinants of the row of funds of managed portfolios: Mutual funds versus pension funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 523-557.

  • Edward, F., & Zhang, X. (1998). Mutual funds and stock and bond market stability. Journal of Financial Services Research, 13(3), 257-282.

  • Ferson, W. E., & Kim, M. S (2012). The factor structure of mutual fund flows. International Journal of Portfolio Analysis and Management, 1(2), 112-143.

  • Fischhoff, B., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1983). Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psychological Review, 90, 239-260.

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

  • Geoffrey, F. C., & Sapp, R. A. (2007). Mutual fund flows and investor returns: An empirical examination of fund investor timing ability. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 2796-2816.

  • Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

  • Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186-192.

  • Giambona, E., & Golec, J. (2007). Incentive fees and mutual fund volatility timing. SSRN Electronic Journal.

  • Goetzmann, W., & Peles, N. (1997). Cognitive dissonance and mutual fund investors. Journal of Financial Research, 20(2), 145-158.

  • Golec, H. J. (1996). The effects of mutual fund managers’ characteristics on their portfolio performance, risk and fees. Financial Services Review, 5(2), 133-147.

  • Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1989). Portfolio performance evaluation: Old issues and new insights. Review of Financial Studies, 2, 393-421.

  • Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1994). A study of monthly mutual fund returns and performance evaluation techniques. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29(3), 419-444.

  • Gruber, M. J. (1996). Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutual funds. Journal of Finance, 51(3), 783-810.

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Macmillan.

  • Hussein, A. T. (2006). Factors influencing individual investor behaviour: An empirical study of the UAE financial markets. The Business Review, 5(2), 225-232.

  • Ippolito, R. A. (1992). Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality: Evidence from the mutual fund industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 35(1), 45-70.

  • Jagongo, A., & Mutswenje, V. S. (2014). A survey of the factors influencing investment decisions: The case of individual investors at the NSE. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4, 92-102.

  • Jones, M. A., Vance P. L. & Thomas I. S. (2005). Financial advisors and mutual fund selection. Journal of Financial Planning, 18(3), 64-70.

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 294-316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Judith, C., & Ellison, G. (1997). Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 105(6), 1167-1199.

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.

  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundation and extensions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Kaur, K. (2021). Evaluation of mutual fund schemes in India – Does prolonged existence rewards performance. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 10(2), 23-29.

  • Kempf, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2004). Family matters: The performance flow relationship in the mutual fund industry. Econ WPA, Finance. 10.2139/ssrn.549121.

  • Khorana, A., & Servaes, H. (1999). The determinants of mutual fund starts. Review of Financial Studies, 12(5), 1043-1074.

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Methodology in the social sciences). Guilford Press.

  • Kopsch, F., Song, H., & Wilhelmsson, M. (2015). Determinants of mutual fund flows. Managerial Finance, 41(1), 10-25.

  • Koski, J., & Pontiff, J. (1996). How are derivatives used? Evidence from the mutual fund industry. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 791-816.

  • Lehman, B., & Modest, D. (1988). The empirical foundations of the arbitrage pricing theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(2), 213-254.

  • Li, C., & Tiwari, A. (2009). Incentive contracts in delegated portfolio management. Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4681-4714.

  • March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587-608.

  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.

  • Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya B, 35, 115-128.

  • Nelson, J. C., & Quick, D. L. (1997). Organizational behavior: Foundations, realities, and challenges (1st ed.). New York: West Publishing Company.

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures - Issues and applications (1st ed.). New Delhi: Sage Publications.

  • Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychol. Rev., 65, 151-166.

  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1990). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

  • Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53, 1775-1798.

  • Pollet, J. M., & Wilson, M. (2008). How does size affect mutual fund behavior? The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2941-2969.

  • Prabhu, G., & Vechalekar, N. M. (2012). Perception of Indian investor towards investment in mutual funds with special reference to MIP Funds. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 66-74.

  • Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. (2003). Evaluating mutual funds in an emerging market: Factors that matter to financial advisors. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(3), 122-136.

  • Roll, R. (1992). A mean/variance analysis of tracking error. Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(4), 13-22.

  • Sankaran, S. (2012). Indian mutual funds handbook (3rd ed.). Vision Book.

  • Santhi, N., & Gurunathan, B. (2012). Risk and return analysis of equity linked savings schemes of mutual funds in India. BVIMR’s Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 70-81.

  • Sharma, C. P. (2021). Factors affecting investment decision of working women of emerging nations: Special reference to Indian metro cities. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 10(1), 58-66.

  • Sharma, C. P. (2019). Identification of factors influencing investor perception towards investment in mutual funds. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 8(3), 18-24.

  • Shefrin, H., & Statmen, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long. The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 777-790.

  • Shukla, R., & Singh, S. (1994). Are CFA charter holders better equity fund managers? Financial Analysts Journal, 50, 68-74.

  • Shukla, R. K., & Inwegen, G. B. (1995). Do locals perform better than foreigners?: An analysis of UK and US mutual fund managers. Journal of Economics and Business, 47(3), 241-254.

  • Sikidar, S., & Singh, A. P. (1996). Financial services: Investment in equity and mutual funds – A behavioural study. In B. S. Bhatia & G. S. Batra (Eds.), Management of Financial Services (Chapter 10, pp. 136-145). New Delhi: Deep and Deep Publications.

  • Sirri, E., & Tufano, P. (1998). Costly search and mutual fund flows. Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1589-1622.

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124-1131.

  • Volkman, D. (1999). Determinants of persistence in relative performance of mutual funds. Journal of Financial Research, 18(4), 415-430.

  • Warther, V. A. (1995). Aggregate mutual fund flows and security returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 39(2), 209-235.

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications (pp. 56-75). CA: Sage.

  • www. mutualfundsindia.com

  • www.amfi.com

  • www.cii.in/publications.aspx

  • Zadra, R. J., & Clore L. G. (2011). Emotion and perception: The role of affective information. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci., 2(6), 676-685.


Abstract Views: 160

PDF Views: 0




  • Mutual Fund Flow Scale: A Multi-item Scale for Measuring Perception of Mutual Fund Investors

Abstract Views: 160  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pooja Chaturvedi Sharma
Assistant Professor, Apeejay School of Management, Delhi, India

Abstract


With an ever-increasing amount of information related to the stock market or various investment avenues, misperception or no perception regarding mutual funds is becoming a norm for investors and marketers. To date no perception measuring scale has been developed for mutual fund investors, to assist investors, marketers, and promoters to focus on the most crucial factors for mutual fund market application. This paper discovers the dimensions of investor perception and its relevance for investment practitioners. A five-factor conceptual model of mutual fund flow is developed, operationalised and validated, using a sample of 3,738 investors. Using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis techniques, results of this study support all the five dimensions of risk, return, fund characteristics, fund manager, and fund family, and confirms that they have a significant impact on investor perception regarding mutual fund investment decision. This work makes an equivalent influence on academic, as well as practical, domains

Keywords


Fund Characteristics, Fund Family, Fund Manager, Investor Behaviour, Investor Perception, Mutual Funds, Return, Risk

References