Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Readability of Standardised Reports by the International Federation of Accountants


Affiliations
1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3018., Tunisia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The International Federation of Accountants has revised several standards that standardize audit reports. The objective of these revised standards is to improve financial reporting. So the purpose of this paper is to examine the readability of reports which have been standardised by three International Standards on Auditing (ISA 700, ISA 705 and ISA 706). The Measurement of the understandability of reports is achieved in terms of the linguistic characteristics of standardised reports wording. The results show that the standardised audit reports are not fully readable. These reports do not fulfill their informative function for all users of financial statements. Our investigation discusses the information value of reports published by ISA and the implications for the Stakeholders.

Keywords

IFAC, ISA, Audit Reports, Readability, Determinants of Understandability
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Archer, S., Mcleay, S. & Dufour, J. (1989). Audit Report on Financial Statements of European Multinational Companies: A Comparative Study. London, England: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

  • Barnett, A. & Leoffler, K. (1979). Readability of Accounting and Auditing Messages. Journal of Business Communication, 16(3), pp. 49-59.

  • Bychkova, S. & Lebedeva, N. (2001). Comparing the Russian Auditing Regulation against Western Standards. Accounting Report (ICAR), January/February, pp. 24-28.

  • Courtis, J. K. (1986). An Investigation into Annual Report Readability and Corporate Risk Return Relationship. Accounting and Business Research, 16(64), pp. 285-294.

  • Courtis, J. K. (1995). Readability of Annual Reports: Western versus Asian Evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8, pp. 4-17.

  • DuBay, W. H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. Costa Mesa, CA. Retrieved from http://www.impactinformation. com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf.

  • Gangolly, J. S., Hussein, M. E., Seow, G. S. & Tam, K. (2002). Harmonisation of the Auditor’s Report. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(3), pp. 327-346.

  • Gray, W. S. & Leary, B. W. (1935). What Makes a BookReadable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Hargis, G., Hernandez, A. K., Hughes, P., Ramaker, J., Rouiller, S. & Wilde, E. (1998). Developing Quality Technical Information: A Handbook for Writers and Editors. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Hay, D. (1998). Communication in Auditors’ Reports: Variations in Readability and the Effect of Audit Firm Structure. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting, 5(2), pp. 179-197.

  • International Federation of Accountants. (2009). International Standard on Auditing No. 700: Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements. New York: IFAC Handbook.

  • International Federation of Accountants. (2009). International Standard on Auditing No. 705: Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report. New York: IFAC Handbook.

  • International Federation of Accountants. (2009). International Standard on Auditing No. 706: Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditor’s Report. New York: IFAC Handbook.

  • Jones, M. J. (1988). A Longitudinal Study of the Readability of the Chairman’s Narratives in the Corporate Reports of a UK Company. Accounting and Business Research, 18(72), pp. 297-305.

  • Kaplan, S. E., Menon, K. & Williams, D. D. (1990). The Effect of Audit Structure on the Audit Market. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9(4), pp. 197-215.

  • Klare, G. R. (1963). The Measurement of Readability. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

  • Li, F. (2008). Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2-3), pp. 221-247.

  • Lin, K. Z. & Chan, K. H. (2000). Auditing Standards in China-A Comparative Analysis with Relevant International Standards and Guidelines. The International Journal of Accounting, 35(4), pp. 559-577.

  • Lively, B. A. & Pressey, S. L. (1923). A Method for Measuring the Vocabulary Burden of Textbooks. Educational Administration and Supervision.

  • McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG Grading-A New Readability Formula. Journal of Reading, 22, pp. 639-646.

  • Pashalian, S. & Crissy, J. (1950). How Readable Are Corporate Annual Reports. Journal of Applied Psychology, August, 34(4), pp. 244-248.

  • Pound, G. D. (1981). A Note on Audit Report Readability. Accounting and Finance, 21(1), pp. 45-55.

  • Roussey, R. S. (1996). New Focus for The International Standards on Auditing. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 5, pp. 143-147.

  • Schroder, N. & Gibson, C. (1990). Readability of Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Accounting Horizons, 4(4), pp. 78-87.

  • Soper, F. & Dolphin, R. (1964). Readability and Corporate Annual Reports. The Accounting Review, 39(2), pp. 358-362.

  • Taylor, W. C. (1953). Cloze Procedures: A New Tool for Measuring Readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30(4), pp. 415-433.

  • Washburne, C. W. & Vogel, M. (1926). Winnetka Graded Book List. Chicago: American Library Association.

  • Zeghal, D., Maingot, M. & Tassé, M. (1999). An Examination of the Length and Organisation of the Auditor’s Report-An International Comparison. Working Paper. Canada: University of Ottawa.

  • Zeghal, D., Maingot, M. & Tassé, M. (2000). Readability of The Auditor’s Report-An International Comparison. European Accounting Association Annual Conference.

  • Zorio, A., Garcia-Benau, M. A. & Civera, J. N. (2011). Readability of Clarified ISAs and Explanatory Factors. The 6th European Auditing Research Network Symposium. Bergen, Norway: Norwegian School of Economics (NHH).


Abstract Views: 436

PDF Views: 0




  • The Readability of Standardised Reports by the International Federation of Accountants

Abstract Views: 436  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Mondher Fakhfakh
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3018., Tunisia

Abstract


The International Federation of Accountants has revised several standards that standardize audit reports. The objective of these revised standards is to improve financial reporting. So the purpose of this paper is to examine the readability of reports which have been standardised by three International Standards on Auditing (ISA 700, ISA 705 and ISA 706). The Measurement of the understandability of reports is achieved in terms of the linguistic characteristics of standardised reports wording. The results show that the standardised audit reports are not fully readable. These reports do not fulfill their informative function for all users of financial statements. Our investigation discusses the information value of reports published by ISA and the implications for the Stakeholders.

Keywords


IFAC, ISA, Audit Reports, Readability, Determinants of Understandability

References