Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Carbon Monoxide Absorption with Iron and Alcohol Solutions Via Design Expert Method


Affiliations
1 Yildiz Technical University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Davutpasa St., N.127, Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey
 

In this study, effective parameters on CO absorption using ethyl alcohol and iron solutions [time (15-75 min), temperature (36-40°C), concentration (0-40% v/v, of ethyl alcohol, 0-8%w/v, of iron solution), stirring rate (0-400 rpm)] and interactions of parameters with each other have been examined as the optimization method by using Design Expert method, 4 parameters and 5 levels. Mathematical optimization results are evaluated by finding the optimum points. As a result, the effects of parameters on CO absorption are comparatively investigated. It is observed that the parameters could interact binary and also influence CO absorption (R1). According to ANOVA analysis, the value of the quadratic model (p<0.0001) is found to be less than 0.05 and indicates that the model is meaningful for ethyl alcohol solution. The experimental data of the model is well represented for ethyl alcohol solution (R2=0.9426)and iron solution (R2=0.9384) as can be seen from correlation coefficients. The data are furnished via FT-IR spectra.

Keywords

Absorption, Carbon monoxide, Design Expert, Optimization
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Johansson E, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A & Thunman H, Chem Eng Res Design, 84 (2006) 819.
  • Stoıca C, Dınu l, Lucacıu I, Nıta-lazar M & Oncu V, Rev Chım, 71 (2020) 67.
  • Patrylak L K, Okhrimenko M V, Levterov A M, Konovalov S V, Yakovenko A V & Zubenko S O, Chem Papers, 73 (2019) 1823.
  • Remli M A, Mohamad M S, Deris S, Samah A A, Omatu S & Corchado J M, Exp Syst Appl, 116 (2019) 131.
  • Amarnath A K S, Suresh C A & Rakshit A, Indian J Chem Technol, 28 (2021) 47.
  • Singh K, Shakya H K, Singh A & Biswas B, Exp Syst, 35 (2018) 1.
  • Tirosh E & Schnell I, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 23 (2016) 21157.
  • Jain K K, Hyperb Med, 111 (2004) 133.
  • Hampson N B, Scott K & Zmaeff J L, J Emerg Med, 31 (2006) 13.
  • Tintinalli J E, Kelen G D & Stapczynski J S, Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, Emergency Medicine, edited by G Maloney, (2011) 555.
  • Saratwat M & Chauhan N R, J Sci Indust Res, 78 (2019) 382.
  • Motterlini R & Otterbein L E, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 9 (2010) 728.
  • Mayr F B, Spiel A, Leitner J, Marsik C, Germann P, Ullrich R, Wagner & Jilma B, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 171 (2005) 354.
  • Neto J S, Nakao A, Kimizuka K, Romanosky A J, Stolz D B, Uchiyama T, Nalesnik M A, Otterbein L E & Murase N, Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 28 (2004) F979.
  • Nakao A, Neto J S, Kanno S, Stolz D B, Kimizuka K, Liu F, Bach F H, Billiar T, Choi A M K, Otterbein L & Murase N, Am J Trans, 5 (2005) 282.
  • Bathoorn E, Slebos D J, Postma D S, Koeter G H, van Oosterhout A J, van der Toorn M, Boezen H M & Kerstjens H A, Europ Respir J, 30 (2007) 1131.
  • Vreman H J, Wong R J, Stevenson D K, Smialek J E, Fowler D R, Li L, Vigorito R D & Zielke H R, J Forensic Sci, 51 (2006) 1182.
  • Zeynalov E & Dore S, Neurotox Res, 15 (2009) 133.
  • Nakao A, Kimizuka K, Stolz D B, Neto J S, Kaizu T, Choi A M, Uchiyama T, Zuckerbraun B S, Bauer A J, Nalesnik N A, Otterbein L E, Geller D A & Murase N, Surgery, 134 (2003) 285.
  • Venditti C C, Casselman R & Smith G N, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 11 (2011) 101.
  • Romao C C, Blattler W A, Seixas J D & Bernardes G J, Chem Soc Rev, 41 (2012) 3571.
  • Knauert M, Vangala S, Haslip M & Lee P J, Oxid Med Cell Longev, 3 (2013) 608.
  • Wilson M R, O’Dea K P, Dorr A D, Yamamoto H, Goddard M & Takata M, PloS One, 5 (2010) e11565.
  • US National library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov., Carbon monoxide therapy for severe arterial hypertension (CO in PAH), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01523548 , August (2022).
  • Singh B & Ahuja N, Drug Dev Indust Pharm, 28 (2002) 431.
  • Vandervoort J & Ludwig A, Pharmazie, 56 (2001) 484.
  • Kincl M, Turk S & Vrecer F, Int J Pharmt, 291 (2005) 39.
  • Mehta A K, Yadav K S & Sawant K K, Curr Drug Deliv, 4 (2007) 185.
  • Patil S B & Sawant K K, J Microencapsul, 26 (2009) 432.
  • Elibol M & Ozer D, Proc Biochem, 38 (2002) 367.
  • Verma D, Thakur P S, Padhi S, Khuroo T, Talegaonkar S & Iqbal Z, J Mol Liq, 242 (2017) 382.
  • Borgerding M F, Bodnar J A, Chung H L, Mangan P P, Morrison, Risner C H, Rogers J C, Simmons D F, Uhrig M S, Wendelbof F N, Wingate D E & Winkler L S, Food Chem Toxicol, 36 (1997) 169.
  • Ehiro T, Chem Pharm Bull, 69 (2021) 693.

Abstract Views: 116

PDF Views: 70




  • Carbon Monoxide Absorption with Iron and Alcohol Solutions Via Design Expert Method

Abstract Views: 116  |  PDF Views: 70

Authors

Hava Gizem Kandilci
Yildiz Technical University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Davutpasa St., N.127, Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey
Hediye İrem Özgündüz
Yildiz Technical University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Davutpasa St., N.127, Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey
Nil Acaralı
Yildiz Technical University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Davutpasa St., N.127, Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey
Jale Gülen
Yildiz Technical University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Davutpasa St., N.127, Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract


In this study, effective parameters on CO absorption using ethyl alcohol and iron solutions [time (15-75 min), temperature (36-40°C), concentration (0-40% v/v, of ethyl alcohol, 0-8%w/v, of iron solution), stirring rate (0-400 rpm)] and interactions of parameters with each other have been examined as the optimization method by using Design Expert method, 4 parameters and 5 levels. Mathematical optimization results are evaluated by finding the optimum points. As a result, the effects of parameters on CO absorption are comparatively investigated. It is observed that the parameters could interact binary and also influence CO absorption (R1). According to ANOVA analysis, the value of the quadratic model (p<0.0001) is found to be less than 0.05 and indicates that the model is meaningful for ethyl alcohol solution. The experimental data of the model is well represented for ethyl alcohol solution (R2=0.9426)and iron solution (R2=0.9384) as can be seen from correlation coefficients. The data are furnished via FT-IR spectra.

Keywords


Absorption, Carbon monoxide, Design Expert, Optimization

References