Indian Journal of Chemical Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Titania Phase Structure and Surface Reactivity on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Various Dyes and Textile Wastewater


Affiliations
1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey
2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey
 

Titania (TiO<sub>2</sub>) powders have been prepared by precipitation method in different precipitation media which contain sulfate, nitrate or organic species. Photocatalytic degradation of different dyes and a real textile wastewater have been conducted with these powders along with commercial powder Degussa P25 for comparison. Ethyl alcohol (organic medium), sulfuric acid (sulfate medium) and nitric acid (nitrate medium) have been used to dissolve titanium precursor for the precipitation of TiO<sub>2</sub> in ammonia solution. UV-Vis DRS and XPS results indicate that S doping in sulfate medium precipitated powder and N doping in nitrate medium precipitated powder has been occurred and the presence of S or N containing impurities on the grain boundaries have been improved light absorption of TiO<sub>2</sub> significantly. However, these powders have exhibited low surface reactivities. The highest surface reactivity has been obtained with the powder precipitated in organic medium which also has the highest crystallite sizes (76 nm rutile and 34 nm anatase crystallites) with relatively low rutile weight percentage (10.0%). The surface-normalized rate constants of this powder are 0.02038 min<sup>-1</sup>.m<sup>-2</sup> in real textile wastewater degradation and 0.0161 min<sup>-1</sup>.m<sup>-2</sup> in methyl orange degradation, which are 0.01563 and 0.0091 min<sup>-1</sup>.m<sup>-2</sup>, respectively, for Degussa P25. Results have shown that this powder show 30-70% higher surface reactivities compared to Degussa P25. The main structural difference of organic medium precipitated powder and Degussa P25 has been found to be the anatase-rutile weight ratio and crystallite size of rutile phase whereas band gap energy of Degussa P25 is lower and other properties are not significantly different.

Keywords

Crystal structure, Photocatalysis, Surface properties, Textile wastewater, Titania.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Factorovich M, Guz L & Candal R, Adv Phys Chem, 2011 (2011) 821204.

  • Zaleska A, Rec Pat Eng, 2 (2008) 157.

  • Pozan G S & Kambur A, Chemosphere, 105 (2014) 152.

  • Dugandzic I, Jovanovic D, Mancic L, Zheng N, Ahrenkiel S, Miloševic O, Saponjic Z & Nedeljkovic J, J Nanopart Res, 14 (2012) 1.

  • Akpan U G & Hameed B H, J Hazard Mater, 170 (2009) 520.

  • Watson S S, Beydoun D, Scott J A & Amal R, Chem Eng J, 95 (2003) 213.

  • Xiao J, Xie Y & Cao H, Chemosphere, 121 (2015) 1.

  • Matos J, Ocares-Riquelme J, Poon P S, Montana R, Garcia X, Campos K, Hernandez-Garrido J C & Titirici M M, J Colloid Interface Sci, 547 (2019) 14.

  • Zhou F, Song H, Wang H, Komarneni S & Yan C, Appl Clay Sci, 166 (2018) 9.

  • Yan J, Zhao J, Hao L, Hu Y, Liu T, Guan S, Zhao Q, Zhu Z & Lu Y, Mater Res Bull, 120 (2019) 1.

  • Yi C, Liao Q, Deng W, Huang Y, Mao J, Zhang B & Wu G, Sci Total Environ, 684 (2019) 527.

  • Wahyuni E T, Mahira N S, Lestari N D & Natsir T A, Indian J Chem Technol, 29 (2022) 519.

  • Khan M A M, Nain P, Ahmed J, Ahamed M & Kumar S, Opt Mater, 133 (2022) 112983.

  • Mishra S, Chakinala N, Chakinala A G & Surolia P K, Catal Commun, 171 (2022) 106518.

  • Anisha R & Kirupa V E K, Indian J Chem Technol, 29 (2022) 547.

  • Umadevi P, Ramya Devi K T, Sridevi D V, Perumal S & Ramesh V, Mater Sci Eng B, 286 (2022) 116018.

  • Xing M, Zhang J & Chen F, Appl Catal B, 89 (2009) 563.

  • Xu P, Xu T, Lu J, Gao S, Hosmane N S, Huang B, Dai Y & Wang Y, Energy Environ Sci, 3 (2010) 1128.

  • Bansal P & Sud D, Desalination, 267 (2011) 244.

  • Chun H & Yizhong W, Chemosphere, 39 (1999) 2107.

  • Gumus D & Akbal F, Water Air Soil Pollut, 216 (2011) 117.

  • Gomes de Moraes S, Sanches Freire R & Duran N, Chemosphere, 40 (2000) 369.

  • Pekakis P A, Xekoukoulotakis N P & Mantzavinos D, Water Res, 40 (2006) 1276.

  • Chen C Y, Yen S H & Chung Y C, Chemosphere, 117 (2014) 494.

  • Giwa A, Nkeonye P O, Bello K A & Kolawole K A, J Environ Prot, 3 (2012) 1063.

  • Hachem C, Bocquillon F, Zahraa O & Bouchy M, Dyes Pigm, 49 (2001) 117.

  • Mahmoodi N M & Arami M, J Photochem Photobiol B: Biol, 94 (2009) 20.

  • Mahvi A H, Ghanbarian M, Nasseri S & Khairi A, Desalination, 239 (2009) 309.

  • Wachs I E, Phivilay S P & Roberts C A, ACS Catal, 3 (2013) 2606.

  • Braslavsky S E, Braun A M, Cassano A E, Emeline A V, Litter M I, Palmisano L, Parmon V N & Serpone N, Pure Appl Chem, 83 (2011) 931.

  • Yurtsever H A & Çiftçioğlu M, Int J Hydrog Energy, 43 (2018) 20162.

  • Vajda K, Saszet K, Kedves E Z, Kasa Z, Danciu V, Baia L, Magyari K, Hernadi K, Kovacs G & Pap Z, Ceram Int, 42 (2016) 3077.

  • Shah A H & Rather M A, Mater Today: Proc, 44 (2021) 482.

  • Di Valentin C, Finazzi E, Pacchioni G, Selloni A, Livraghi S, Paganini M C & Giamello E, Chem Phys, 339 (2007) 44.

  • Zhang M, Wu J, Lu D & Yang J, Int J Photoenergy, 2013 (2013) 1.

  • Nishikiori H, Hayashibe M & Fujii T, Catalysts, 3 (2013) 363.

  • Xiao Q, Si Z, Yu Z & Qiu G, Mater Sci Eng B, 137 (2007) 189.

  • Nithyaa N & Victor Jaya N, Appl Phys A, 127 (2021) 1.

  • Wang Y, Zou Y, Shang Q, Tan X, Yu T, Huang X, Shi W, Xie Y, Yan G & Wang X, Trans Tianjin Univ, 24 (2017) 326.

  • Sun B, Zhou G, Shao C, Jiang B, Pang J & Zhang Y, Powder Technol, 256 (2014) 118.

  • Yan G, Zhang M, Hou J & Yang J, Mater Chem Phys, 129 (2011) 553.

  • Yu J C, Ho W, Yu J, Yip H, Wong P K & Zhao J, Environ Sci Technol, 39 (2005) 1175.

  • Zhang K, Wang X, He T, Guo X & Feng Y, Powder Technol, 253 (2014) 608.

  • Peng F, Cai L, Yu H, Wang H & Yang J, J, Solid State Chem, 181 (2008) 130.

  • Sayılkan F, Asilturk M, Şener Ş & Erdemoğlu S, Turk J Chem, 31 (2007) 211.

  • Hwang K J, Lee J W, Shim W G, Jang H D, Lee S I & Yoo S J, Adv Powder Technol, 23 (2012) 414.

  • Luttrell T, Halpegamage S, Tao J, Kramer A, Sutter E & Batzill M, Sci Rep, 4 (2014) 1.

  • Zhang J, Zhou P, Liu J & Yu J, Phys Chem Chem Phys J, 16 (2014) 20382.

  • Chen W T, Chan A, Jovic V, Sun-Waterhouse D, Murai K, Idriss H & Waterhouse G I N, Top Catal, 58 (2015) 85.

  • Tan H, Zhao Z, Zhu W-b, Coker E N, Li B, Zheng M, Yu W, Fan H & Sun Z, ACS Appl Mater Interf, 6 (2014) 19184.


Abstract Views: 80

PDF Views: 69




  • Impact of Titania Phase Structure and Surface Reactivity on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Various Dyes and Textile Wastewater

Abstract Views: 80  |  PDF Views: 69

Authors

Husnu Arda Yurtsever
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey
Onur Iloglu
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey
Muhsin Ciftcioglu
Department of Chemical Engineering, Izmir Institute of Technology, Izmir, Turkey

Abstract


Titania (TiO<sub>2</sub>) powders have been prepared by precipitation method in different precipitation media which contain sulfate, nitrate or organic species. Photocatalytic degradation of different dyes and a real textile wastewater have been conducted with these powders along with commercial powder Degussa P25 for comparison. Ethyl alcohol (organic medium), sulfuric acid (sulfate medium) and nitric acid (nitrate medium) have been used to dissolve titanium precursor for the precipitation of TiO<sub>2</sub> in ammonia solution. UV-Vis DRS and XPS results indicate that S doping in sulfate medium precipitated powder and N doping in nitrate medium precipitated powder has been occurred and the presence of S or N containing impurities on the grain boundaries have been improved light absorption of TiO<sub>2</sub> significantly. However, these powders have exhibited low surface reactivities. The highest surface reactivity has been obtained with the powder precipitated in organic medium which also has the highest crystallite sizes (76 nm rutile and 34 nm anatase crystallites) with relatively low rutile weight percentage (10.0%). The surface-normalized rate constants of this powder are 0.02038 min<sup>-1</sup>.m<sup>-2</sup> in real textile wastewater degradation and 0.0161 min<sup>-1</sup>.m<sup>-2</sup> in methyl orange degradation, which are 0.01563 and 0.0091 min<sup>-1</sup>.m<sup>-2</sup>, respectively, for Degussa P25. Results have shown that this powder show 30-70% higher surface reactivities compared to Degussa P25. The main structural difference of organic medium precipitated powder and Degussa P25 has been found to be the anatase-rutile weight ratio and crystallite size of rutile phase whereas band gap energy of Degussa P25 is lower and other properties are not significantly different.

Keywords


Crystal structure, Photocatalysis, Surface properties, Textile wastewater, Titania.

References