Indian Journal of Chemical Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Designing Efficient Metal Complex Catalysts for Acylation: A Comparative Study With Soluble and Insoluble Catalysts Systems


Affiliations
1 Department of Physical Chemistry, School of Chemical Science, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India
 

New soluble and insoluble Nb, Ta, Mo, and Sb complex catalysts have been developed using pyridine and polymersupported cross-linked (poly-4-vinyl pyridine) bead (PSCPVP), and characterized using FT-IR, SEM, EDAX, elemental analysis (CHN), and TGA. Their ability to catalyze the acylation of ethanol with acetic anhydride at 303K has been proven. Both soluble and insoluble chemicals have the same order of activity: MoCl5, TaCl5, NbCl5, and SbCl5. The insoluble catalyst outperformed in terms of activity by complex catalysts, although they have significant limitations in terms of solubility and recyclability and soluble homogeneous catalysts in terms of lowest cost and recyclability, whereas all soluble Py-MCl5 catalysts exhibit better activity than insoluble PSCPVP-MCl5 catalysts according to the computed kobs values. Insoluble catalysts are preferable than soluble homogeneous catalysts in terms of recyclability, although all the soluble catalysts of Py-MCl5, M= Nb, Ta, Mo, and Sb have exhibited better activity than insoluble PSCPVP-MCl5 (kobs= 6.51, 6.98, 7.48 & 1.73 x103 min-1) based on the computed kobs values. For acylation process, it has been found that the soluble Py- NbCl5, Py-TaCl5, Py-MoCl5, and Py-SbCl5 catalysts whereas 1.47, 1.63, 1.59, and 1.67 folds more active than PSCPVPNbCl5, PSCPVP-TaCl5, PSCPVP-MoCl5, and PSCPVP-SbCl5 correspondingly

Keywords

Antimony pentachloride, Insoluble catalysts, Molybdenum pentachloride, Niobium pentachloride, Tantalum pentachloride
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Murugan E, Arunachalam P & Jebaranjitham N, Indian J Chem-Sec A, 59 (2020) 1327.

  • Hayashi H, Yasukochi S, Sakamoto T, Hatano M & Ishihara K, J Org Chem, 86 (2021) 5197.

  • Roberts M W, Cataly Lett, 67 (2000) 1.

  • KimT H & Rase H F, Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev, 15 (1976) 249.

  • Murugan E & Rangasamy R, J Biomed Nanotechnol, 7 (2011) 225.

  • Siva A, J Mol Catal A: Chem, 241 (2005) 111.

  • Balakrishnan T & Murugan E, J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem, 41,2, (2003) 347.

  • Siva A & Murugan E, Synthesis, 17 (2005) 2927.

  • Murugan E & Shanmugam P, J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 16 (2016) 426.

  • Zarmora M, Strumia M & Bertorello H E, Eur Polym J, 32 (1996) 195.

  • Bailely D C & Langer S H, Chem Rev, 81 (1981) 108.

  • Phillips D J & Tyree S Y, J Am Chem Soc, 83 (1961) 1806.

  • Procopiou P A, Baugh S P D, Flack S S & Ingliss G G A, J Org Chem, 63 (1998) 2342.

  • Vedejs E & Daugulis O, J Org Chem, 61 (1996) 5702.

  • Liu W T & Tan C S, Liquid-Phase Ind Eng Chem Res, 40,15 (2001) 3281.

  • Yadav G D & Thathagar M B, React Funct Polym, 52 (2002) 99.

  • Bart H J, Kaltenbrunner W & Landschuetzer H, Int J Chem Kinet, 28 (1996) 649.

  • Shambhu B & Digenis G A, Tetrahedron Lett, 14, 18(1973) 1627.

  • Mazzotti M, Neri B, Gelosa D, Kruglov A & Morbidelli M, Ind Eng Chem Res, 36 (1997) 3 .

  • Balakrishnan T & Rajendran V, J Macromol Scipart A, Pure Appl Chem 33(1996) 103.

  • Murugan E, Santhosh Kumar S & Reshna K M, J Mater Sci, 54 (2019) 5294.

  • Murugan E & Santhosh Kumar, Electrochim Acta, 10 (2021) 138973.

  • Santhoshkumar S & Murugan E, Dalton Trans, 50 (2021) 17988.

  • Balakrishnan T & Murugan E, J Appl Polym Sci, 76 (2000) 408.

  • Murugan E, Rubavathy, Jaya Priya A, Janaki Raman K & Kalpana K, J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 19 (2019) 7596.

  • Murugan E, Ariraman M, Rajendran S, Kathirvel J, Akshata C R & Kumar K, ACS Omega, 3 (2018) 13685.

  • Murugan E, Yogaraj V, Rani D P G & Sinha A K, RSC Adv, 129 (2015) 106461.

  • Shanmugam P, Rajakumar K, Boddula R, Ngullie R C, Wei W & Xie J, Mater Sci Energ Technol, 2 (2019) 532.

  • Murugan E & Tamizharasu G, J Mol Catal A: Chem, 363 (2012) 81.

  • Murugan E & Arunachalam P, Indian J Chem Technol, 28 (2021) 495.

  • Murugan E & Gopinath P, J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 47 (2008) 771.

  • Liu W T & Tan C S, Liquid-Phase Ind Eng Chem Res, 40 (2001) 3281 .

  • Leyes C E & Othmer D F, Ind Eng Chem, 37 (1945) 968.

  • Murugan E & Shanmugam P, Bull Mater Sci, 38 (2015) 629.

  • Murugan E & Gopinath P, J Mol Catal A: Chem, 294 (2008) 68.

  • Michalska Z M, Ostaszewski B, Zientarska J & Sobezak J W, J Mol Catal, (1998) 129.

  • Mathew J P & Srinivasani M, Eur Polym J, 31 (1995) 835.

  • Biswas M & Mukherjee A, J Appl Polym Sci, 56 (1995) 501.

  • Gangne R, Org Lett, 2 (2000) 1781.

  • Belfiore L A, McCurdie M P & Udea E, Macromolecules, 26 (1993) 6908.

  • Neckers D C, Tetrahedron Lett, 14 (1973) 1823. 42 Romero D, J Biotechnol, 127 (2007) 269.

  • Sanggi Leeetal, J Mol Catal A: Chem, 194 (2003) 49.

  • Nissari M S, Journal Mol Catal A Chem, 235 (2005) 150.


Abstract Views: 125

PDF Views: 99




  • Designing Efficient Metal Complex Catalysts for Acylation: A Comparative Study With Soluble and Insoluble Catalysts Systems

Abstract Views: 125  |  PDF Views: 99

Authors

P Arunachalam
Department of Physical Chemistry, School of Chemical Science, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India
E Murugan
Department of Physical Chemistry, School of Chemical Science, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


New soluble and insoluble Nb, Ta, Mo, and Sb complex catalysts have been developed using pyridine and polymersupported cross-linked (poly-4-vinyl pyridine) bead (PSCPVP), and characterized using FT-IR, SEM, EDAX, elemental analysis (CHN), and TGA. Their ability to catalyze the acylation of ethanol with acetic anhydride at 303K has been proven. Both soluble and insoluble chemicals have the same order of activity: MoCl5, TaCl5, NbCl5, and SbCl5. The insoluble catalyst outperformed in terms of activity by complex catalysts, although they have significant limitations in terms of solubility and recyclability and soluble homogeneous catalysts in terms of lowest cost and recyclability, whereas all soluble Py-MCl5 catalysts exhibit better activity than insoluble PSCPVP-MCl5 catalysts according to the computed kobs values. Insoluble catalysts are preferable than soluble homogeneous catalysts in terms of recyclability, although all the soluble catalysts of Py-MCl5, M= Nb, Ta, Mo, and Sb have exhibited better activity than insoluble PSCPVP-MCl5 (kobs= 6.51, 6.98, 7.48 & 1.73 x103 min-1) based on the computed kobs values. For acylation process, it has been found that the soluble Py- NbCl5, Py-TaCl5, Py-MoCl5, and Py-SbCl5 catalysts whereas 1.47, 1.63, 1.59, and 1.67 folds more active than PSCPVPNbCl5, PSCPVP-TaCl5, PSCPVP-MoCl5, and PSCPVP-SbCl5 correspondingly

Keywords


Antimony pentachloride, Insoluble catalysts, Molybdenum pentachloride, Niobium pentachloride, Tantalum pentachloride

References