Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Triangle Relationship among Firm Size, Capital Structure Choice and Financial Performance


Affiliations
1 Yildiz Technical University School of Vocational Studies Istanbul - 34300, Turkey
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper is prepared to examine and test the relationships among firm size, capital structure, and financial performance providing evidence from Turkey. It is also aimed to argue the validity of three major capital structure theories - Irrelevance Theorem, Static Trade-Off Theory, and Pecking Order Theory - on a comparative basis. A data set of the financial statements for at least five years between 1994 - 2003, of 114 firms listed at the Istanbul Stock Exchange is used in modeling insolvency risk based on specific financial ratios through a binary logistic regression analysis. The results present some robust evidence suggesting that the effect of firm size on financial performance and sustainability may differ according to the way how size expansion is financed. Any asset expansion financed with debt has proved to increase risk exposure especially during economic downturns, which favors the Static Trade- Off Theory over the others.

Keywords

Capital Structure Decision, Firm Value, Binary Logistic Regression, Turkey
User
Notifications

  • Altman, Edward I. (1968), Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis, and Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy, Journal of Finance, 23(4): 589-609.
  • Altman, Edward I. (1984), A Further Empirical Investigation of the Bankruptcy Cost Question, Journal of Finance, 39(4): 1067- 1089.
  • Beaver, William H. (1966), Financial Ratios as Predictors of Failures, Journal of Accounting Research, 4(3): 71-111.
  • Berger, Philip C., Ofer, Eli and Yermack, David I. (1997), Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions, Journal of Finance, 52(4): 1411-1438.
  • Brealey, Richard A., Myers, Stewart C. and Marcus, Alan J. (2001), Fundamentals of Corporate Finance (3rd Ed), McGraw Hill-Irwin, New York.
  • Chen, Yinghong and Hammes, Klaus (2003), Capital Structure, Working Paper, Gothenburg University.
  • Coeurderoy, Regis (2000), Are There Legal Determinants of Capital Structure?: A European Comparison, ISNIE 2000 Conference.
  • Graham, John R. and Rogers, Daniel A. (2002), Do Firms Hedge in Response to Tax Incentives?, Journal of Finance, 57(2): 815-839.
  • Korajczyk, Robert A. and Levy, Amnon (2002), Capital Structure Choice: Macroeconomic Conditions and Financial Constraints, Working Paper No: 279. Available at http://search.epnet.com.
  • Leland, Hyne E. (1998), Agency Costs, Risk Management, and Capital Structure, Journal of Finance, 53(4): 1213-1243.
  • Maddala, G. S. (2004), Introduction to Econometrics (3rd Ed), John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex.
  • Masulis, Ronald W. (1988), The Debt and Equity Choice (1st Ed), Ballinger Pub. Co., New York.
  • McClave, James T., Benson, P. George and Sincich, Terry (2001), Statistics for Business and Economics (8th Ed), Prentice-Hall, Upple Saddle River.
  • Modigliani, F. and Miller, Merton, H. (1963), Corporate Income Taxes and The Cost of Capital, American Economic Review, 53(3): 433-443.
  • Muzir, Erol and Caglar, Nazan (2009), The Accuracy of Financial Distress Prediction Models in Turkey: A Comparative Investigation with Simple Model Proposals, Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2): 15-48.
  • Opler, T. and Titman, S. (1994), Financial Distress and Corporate Performance, Journal of Finance, 49(3): 1015-1040.
  • Paton, W. A. (1922), Accounting Theory, The Roland Press, New York.
  • Ross, S. A. (1977), The Determination of Financial Structure: The Intensive Signaling Approach, The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(1): 23-40.
  • Sekely, William S. and Collins, J. Markham (1987), Cultural Influences on International Capital Structure, Working Paper. Available at http://search.epnet.com.

Abstract Views: 553

PDF Views: 7




  • Triangle Relationship among Firm Size, Capital Structure Choice and Financial Performance

Abstract Views: 553  |  PDF Views: 7

Authors

Erol Muzir
Yildiz Technical University School of Vocational Studies Istanbul - 34300, Turkey

Abstract


This paper is prepared to examine and test the relationships among firm size, capital structure, and financial performance providing evidence from Turkey. It is also aimed to argue the validity of three major capital structure theories - Irrelevance Theorem, Static Trade-Off Theory, and Pecking Order Theory - on a comparative basis. A data set of the financial statements for at least five years between 1994 - 2003, of 114 firms listed at the Istanbul Stock Exchange is used in modeling insolvency risk based on specific financial ratios through a binary logistic regression analysis. The results present some robust evidence suggesting that the effect of firm size on financial performance and sustainability may differ according to the way how size expansion is financed. Any asset expansion financed with debt has proved to increase risk exposure especially during economic downturns, which favors the Static Trade- Off Theory over the others.

Keywords


Capital Structure Decision, Firm Value, Binary Logistic Regression, Turkey

References