Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Use of Organizational Design Features in Purchasing


Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics and Business Management Faculty of Agriculture University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
2 Department of Agricultural Economics and Business Management Faculty of Agriculture University of Peradeniya
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Due to abolition of the Multi Fiber Agreements, supply chain management has become a crucial issue in the garment industry in which purchasing plays a major role. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the extent of the use of organizational design features in purchasing and their influence on the purchasing performance of 40 garment manufacturing firms. Twenty-three organizational design features in 3 broad categories were used to group the firms. Purchasing performance was measured by using 5 factors. Analysis revealed 2 significantly different groups in terms of 19 organizational design features. Group One consisted of small firms whereas the other consisted of larger firms. The extent of use of all categories of organizational design features was greater in Group Two compared to Group One. Firms that used greater extent of organizational design features achieved better performance in purchasing.

Keywords

Garment Manufacturing, Organizational Design Features and Purchase Performance
User
Notifications

  • Baily, P., Jossop, D. and Jones, D. (1994), Purchasing Principles and Management (7th Ed.), Pitman Publishing, London.

  • Carter, J. R. and Narasimhan, R. (1996), Purchasing and Supply Management: Future Directions and Trends, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32(4): 2-12.

  • Cavinato, J. L. (1992), Evolving Procurement Organizations: Logistics Implications, Journal of Business Logistics, 13(1): 27-35.

  • Central Bank of Sri Lanka (2005), Annual Report, Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Colombo.

  • Chao, C., Scheuing, E. E. and Ruch, W. A. (1993), Purchasing Performance Evaluation: An Investigation of Different Perspectives, National Association of Purchasing Management.

  • Germain, R. and DrÖge. C. (1998), The Context, Organizational Design and Performance of JIT Buying versus Non-JIT Buying Firms, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Spring: 12-18.

  • Giunipero, L.C. and Monczka, R.M. (1990), Organizational Approaches to Managing International Sourcing, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 20(4): 3-12.

  • Fearon, H.E. (1988), Purchasing Organizational Relationships, Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies, Tempe, AZ, Hamel, G. and Pralahad, C. K. (1994), Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Leenders M. R. and Fearon, H. E. (1997), Purchasing and Supply Management (11th Ed.), Irwin, Chicago, London.

  • Lysons, K. (1996), Purchasing (7th Ed.), Pearson Education, Delhi.

  • Monczka R. M. and Trent, R. J. (1998), Purchasing and Supply Management: Trends and Changes throughout the 1990s, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(4): 2-11.

  • Pearson, J. N., Ellram, L. M. and Carter, C. R. (1996), Status and Recognition of the Purchasing Function in the Electronic Industry, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32(2): 30-36.

  • Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.

  • Robbins, S. R. and Coulter, M. (2003), Management (7th Ed.), Pearson Education, New Delhi.

  • Silvestri, G. T. (1997), Occupational Employment Projections to 2006, Monthly Labor Review, 120: 39-57.

  • Trent, R. J. (2004), The Use of Organizational Design Features in Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40(3): 4-18.

  • Tennakoon, R. (1999), Apparel Industry: The Future Scenario, Economic Review, 25(3/4): 8-10.

  • Weerahewa, J. and Ariyawardana, A. (2003), Impact of the WTO on Woman Workers in Sri Lanka, unpublished report, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.


Abstract Views: 354

PDF Views: 1




  • Use of Organizational Design Features in Purchasing

Abstract Views: 354  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

D. N. Tirimanne
Department of Agricultural Economics and Business Management Faculty of Agriculture University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
A. Ariyawardana
Department of Agricultural Economics and Business Management Faculty of Agriculture University of Peradeniya

Abstract


Due to abolition of the Multi Fiber Agreements, supply chain management has become a crucial issue in the garment industry in which purchasing plays a major role. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the extent of the use of organizational design features in purchasing and their influence on the purchasing performance of 40 garment manufacturing firms. Twenty-three organizational design features in 3 broad categories were used to group the firms. Purchasing performance was measured by using 5 factors. Analysis revealed 2 significantly different groups in terms of 19 organizational design features. Group One consisted of small firms whereas the other consisted of larger firms. The extent of use of all categories of organizational design features was greater in Group Two compared to Group One. Firms that used greater extent of organizational design features achieved better performance in purchasing.

Keywords


Garment Manufacturing, Organizational Design Features and Purchase Performance

References