Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Psychological Capital as a Predictor of Workplace Behavior: An Empirical Investigation


Affiliations
1 University Institute of Applied Management Sc. Panjab University Chandigarh 160014, India
2 University Business School (UBS) Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the era of economic slowdown, human resource and its perfect utilization can act as a source of sustainability and growth for an organization, thereby making it vital for an organization to focus on building people's strengths which is the blood and soul of recently emerged field of Positive Organizational Behavior (POB). Psychological Capital (PsyCap), an offshoot of POB has emerged out of the growing importance of human centric approaches in an organization. PsyCap represents how hopeful, resilient, confident and optimistic an employee is. Appreciating the growing importance of PsyCap in understanding human Behavior, this research aims at investigating the relationship among Psychological Capital, Organizational citizenship Behavior and Counterproductive workplace Behavior. An empirical research was conducted on 107 employees of 11 Information technology firms located in Chandigarh tricity region. Results revealed that PsyCap has significant positive relationship with Organizational citizenship Behavior directed towards individuals (OCBI), Organizational Citizenship Behavior directed towards Organization (OCBO) and significant negative relationship with Counterproductive workplace Behavior (CWB). The results suggested that organizations should invest in developing and managing the psychological capital of organizational leaders and human resources which can act as a protective shield in meeting the growing challenges, adversities for today and certainly in the future. The study suggests that HR managers should design the short interventions to enhance the components of self efficacy, Hope, Optimism and Resilience. The study concludes by suggesting some significant strategies to boost the same.

Keywords

Psychological Capital, Self Efficacy, Hope, Optimism, Resilience, Organizational Citizenship Behavior Directed Towards Individuals (OCBI), Organizational Citizenship Behavior Directed Towards Organizations (OCBO), Counterproductive Workplace Behavior (CWB).
User
Notifications

  • Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S. and Luthans, F. (2008), Can Positive Employees Help Positive Organizational Change? Impact of Psychological Capital and Emotions on Relevant Attitudes and Behaviours, Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 44(1): 48-70.
  • Avey, J. B., Luthans, F. and Youssef, C. M. (2010), The Additive Value of Positive Psychological Capital in Predicting Work Attitudes and Behaviours, Journal of Management, 36: 430-52.
  • Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F. and Mhatre, K. H. (2011), Meta-analysis of the Impact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Attitudes, Behaviours, and Performance, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22: 127-152.
  • Bandura, A. and Locke, E. A. (2003), Negative Self-efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1): 87-99.
  • Bennett, R. J. and Robinson, S. L. (2000), Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3): 349.
  • Deloitte (2013), Technology, Media & Telecommunications India Predictions. Accessed on 18th January, 2014, on http://www.dloitte.com/assets/DcomIndia/Local Assets/Documents/TMT predictions 2013/TMT_India_Predictions_2013.pdf.
  • Fox, S. and Spector, P. E. (1999), A Model of Work Frustration-Aggression, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 20: 915-931.
  • Fox, S., Spector, P. E. and Miles, D. (2001), Counterproductive Work Behaviour (CWB) in Response to Job Stressors and Organizational Justice: Some Mediator and Moderator Tests for Autonomy and Emotions, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 59: 291-309.
  • Fritz, Heider (1958), The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, pp. 79, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Gruys, M. L. and Sackett, P. R. (2003), Investigating the Dimensionality of Counterproductive Work Behaviour, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1): 30-42.
  • IBEF (2013), Indian IT and ITes Industry Analysis. Accessed on 15th January, 2014, on http://www.ibef.org/industry/Information-Technology-India.Aspx.
  • Lee, K. and Allen, N. J. (2002), Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and Workplace Deviance: The Role of Affect and Cognitions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1): 131-42.
  • Joireman, J., Daniels, D., Falvy, J. and Kamdar, D. (2006), Organizational Citizenship Behaviour as Function Of Empathy Consideration of Future Consequences, And Employee Time Horizon: An Initial Exploration Using An In-Basket Simulation of OCBs, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(9): 2266-92.
  • Luthans, F. (2002), Positive Organizational Behaviour: Developing and Managing Psychological Strengths, Academy of Management Executive, 16(1): 57-72.
  • Luthans, F. (2002a), The Need for and Meaning of Positive Organizational Behaviour, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 23: 695-706.
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M. and Avolio, B. J. (2007), Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • NASSCOM (2013), Indian IT-BPO Industry Report. Accessed on 22nd January, 2014, on http://www.nasscom.org/indian-itbpoindustry.
  • NASSCOM (2014), Member Directory. Accessed on 22nd January, 2014, on: http://memberdirectory.nasscom.in/ MemberCompanyFreeSearch.
  • Organ, D. W. (1988), Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
  • Peterson, Christopher and Seligman, M. E. (2004), Character Strengths and Virtues A Handbook and Classification, APA Press and Oxford University Press, Washington, DC.
  • Pillay, K. (2012), Happiness, Psychological Capital and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour of Employees in a Financial Institution in Durban, South Africa, doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, Available on http://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10413/9379/Pillay_Kreshona_2012.pdf ?sequence=1
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. and Bachrach, D. G. (2000), Organizational Citizenship Behaviours: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research, Journal of Management, 26(3): 513-563.
  • Sackett, P. R., Berry, C. M., Wiemann, S. A. and Laczo, R. M. (2006), Citizenship and Counterproductive Behaviour: Clarifying Relations Between the Two Domains, Human Performance, 19(4): 441-64.
  • Shahnawaz, M.G. and Jafri, M.H. (2009), Psychological Capital as Predictors of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35: 78-84.
  • Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Yoshinobu, L., Gibb, J., Langelle, C. and Harney, P. (1991), The Will and the Ways: Development and Validation of an Individual-Differences Measure of Hope, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 570-585.
  • Vardi, Y. and Weitz, E. (2004), Misbehaviour in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
  • Williams, L. J. and Anderson, S. E. (1991), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-role Behaviours, Journal of Management, 17: 601-617.

Abstract Views: 626

PDF Views: 9




  • Psychological Capital as a Predictor of Workplace Behavior: An Empirical Investigation

Abstract Views: 626  |  PDF Views: 9

Authors

Sanjeev K. Sharma
University Institute of Applied Management Sc. Panjab University Chandigarh 160014, India
Shikha Sharma
University Business School (UBS) Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India

Abstract


In the era of economic slowdown, human resource and its perfect utilization can act as a source of sustainability and growth for an organization, thereby making it vital for an organization to focus on building people's strengths which is the blood and soul of recently emerged field of Positive Organizational Behavior (POB). Psychological Capital (PsyCap), an offshoot of POB has emerged out of the growing importance of human centric approaches in an organization. PsyCap represents how hopeful, resilient, confident and optimistic an employee is. Appreciating the growing importance of PsyCap in understanding human Behavior, this research aims at investigating the relationship among Psychological Capital, Organizational citizenship Behavior and Counterproductive workplace Behavior. An empirical research was conducted on 107 employees of 11 Information technology firms located in Chandigarh tricity region. Results revealed that PsyCap has significant positive relationship with Organizational citizenship Behavior directed towards individuals (OCBI), Organizational Citizenship Behavior directed towards Organization (OCBO) and significant negative relationship with Counterproductive workplace Behavior (CWB). The results suggested that organizations should invest in developing and managing the psychological capital of organizational leaders and human resources which can act as a protective shield in meeting the growing challenges, adversities for today and certainly in the future. The study suggests that HR managers should design the short interventions to enhance the components of self efficacy, Hope, Optimism and Resilience. The study concludes by suggesting some significant strategies to boost the same.

Keywords


Psychological Capital, Self Efficacy, Hope, Optimism, Resilience, Organizational Citizenship Behavior Directed Towards Individuals (OCBI), Organizational Citizenship Behavior Directed Towards Organizations (OCBO), Counterproductive Workplace Behavior (CWB).

References