Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Moderating Role of Workplace Bullying in the Embeddedness-Turnover Intention Relationship


Affiliations
1 Department of Management Studies, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Trinidad, West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Organizational embeddedness has been considered a predictor of a number of desirable work outcomes. Little work has however explored whether embedded employees would still respond positively in unfavourable work conditions. This gap is addressed in the current study. More specifically, this study replicates existing embeddedness research by proposing that organizational embeddedness can negatively predict voluntary turnover intention. However, it goes on to suggest that unfavourable work conditions consistent with workplace bullying moderates the embeddedness-turnover intention relationship, such that when bullying is higher, the negative relationship between embeddedness and turnover intentions becomes weaker.

Employee data was collected from 689 employees across three Caribbean countries to test these propositions. The findings provided support for the propositions that embeddedness negatively predicted turnover intention and that workplace bullying moderated the embeddedness-turnover intention relationship. Implications, limitations and future research directions offered by these findings are discussed.


Keywords

Organizational Embeddedness, Turnover Intentions, Unfavourable Work Conditions, Workplace Bullying, Caribbean.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Allen, D., Peltokorpi, V., & Rubenstein, A. (2016). When “embedded” means “stuck”: Moderating effects of job embeddedness in adverse work environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(12), 1670–1686.

  • Allen, D. G. (2006). Do organizational socialization tactics influence newcomer embeddedness and turnover? Journal of Management, 32(2), 237–256.

  • Bambacas, M., & Kulik, T. C. (2013). Job embeddedness in China: How HR practices impact turnover intentions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(10), 1933–1952.

  • Bergiel, E. B., Nguyen, V. Q., Clenney, B. F., & Taylor, G. S. (2009). Human resource practices, job embeddedness and intention to quit. Management Research News, 32(3), 205–219.

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.

  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2008). The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work & Stress, 22, 242–256.

  • Central Statistical Office. (2010). Central Statistical Office, Trinidad and Tobago, Classification of Business Establishments. Retrieved August 21, 2017 from http://www.cso.gov.tt/

  • Clinton, M., Knight, T., & Guest, D. E. (2012). Job embeddedness: A new attitudinal measure. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 20(1), 111–117.

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for behavioural sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Crossley, C. D., Bennett, R. J., Jex, S. M., & Burnfield, J. L. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1031–1042.

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). The concept of bullying at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 3–30). London: Taylor & Francis.

  • Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment in the workplace and the victimisation of men. Violence and Victims, 12, 247–263.

  • Greene, J., Mero, N., & Werner, S. (2018). The negative effects of job embeddedness on performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(4). doi:10.1108/JMP-02-2017-0074

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. (2000). The cost of turnover: Putting a price on the learning curve. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 14–21.

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community and the nested self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 337–421.

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.

  • Holtom, B. C., & Inderrieden, E. J. (2006). Integrating the unfolding model and job embeddedness model to better understand voluntary turnover. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(4), 435−452.

  • Hom, P. W., Griffeth, R. W., & Sellaro, C. L. (1984). The validity of Mobley’s 1977 model of employee turnover. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(2), 141–174.

  • Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 711–722.

  • Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using organizational embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121.

  • Nielsen, M. B., Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 149–174). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group, 33487-2742.

  • Sagie, A., Birati, A., & Tziner, A. (2002). Assessing the costs of behavioural and psychological withdrawal: A new model and an empirical illustration. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(1), 67–89.

  • Singh, R. (2016). Predicting organisational embeddedness through employee personality and their community embeddedness. International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management, 16(3/4), 176–195.

  • Singh, R. (2017). Developing organisational embeddedness: Employee personality and social networking. International Journal of Human Resource Management. Published online. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1326396. ISSN 1466-4399.

  • Yang, C., Ma, Q., & Hu, L. (2011). Job embeddedness: A new perspective to predict voluntary turnover. Nankai Business Review International, 2(4), 418–446.


Abstract Views: 228

PDF Views: 0




  • The Moderating Role of Workplace Bullying in the Embeddedness-Turnover Intention Relationship

Abstract Views: 228  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Riann Singh
Department of Management Studies, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Trinidad, West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago

Abstract


Organizational embeddedness has been considered a predictor of a number of desirable work outcomes. Little work has however explored whether embedded employees would still respond positively in unfavourable work conditions. This gap is addressed in the current study. More specifically, this study replicates existing embeddedness research by proposing that organizational embeddedness can negatively predict voluntary turnover intention. However, it goes on to suggest that unfavourable work conditions consistent with workplace bullying moderates the embeddedness-turnover intention relationship, such that when bullying is higher, the negative relationship between embeddedness and turnover intentions becomes weaker.

Employee data was collected from 689 employees across three Caribbean countries to test these propositions. The findings provided support for the propositions that embeddedness negatively predicted turnover intention and that workplace bullying moderated the embeddedness-turnover intention relationship. Implications, limitations and future research directions offered by these findings are discussed.


Keywords


Organizational Embeddedness, Turnover Intentions, Unfavourable Work Conditions, Workplace Bullying, Caribbean.

References