Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Does Perceived Insincerity Influence Managerial Ratings of Performance and Promotability?


Affiliations
1 Elon University, United States
2 Department of Management, Texas State University, United States
3 Cameron School of Business, University of North Carolina Wilmington, United States
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the moderating effect of the supervisor's perceived insincerity of their subordinate's influence attempts on the relationship between supervisor perceptions of supervisor-subordinate similarity, liking, and influence, and the outcomes of performance and promotability. Data on 203 subordinates from 59 managers of a state agency were used to test the study hypotheses. The results indicate that the relationships between promotability and similarity and liking, and between performance and liking were attenuated by supervisor perceptions that the subordinates were insincere in their influence attempts. Implications for the importance of sincerity in interactions with others and directions for future research are offered.

Keywords

Insincerity, Influence, Career Success.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., & Daniels, D. (2014).The impact of impression management over time. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(3), 266-284.

  • Breland, J. W., Treadway, D. C., Duke, A. B., & Adams, G. L. (2007). The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and political skill on subjective career success. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13, 1-14.

  • Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic.

  • Carlson, J. R., Carlson, D. S., & Ferguson, M. (2011). Deceptive impression management: Does deception pay in established workplace relationships? Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 497-514.

  • Chen, Y. (2014). Determinants of biased subjective performance evaluations: evidence from a Taiwanese public sector organ ization. Accounting & Business Research (Taylor & Francis), 44(6), 656-675.

  • Chang, D., Rosen, C. C., Siemieniec, G. M., & Johnson, R. E. (2012. Perceptions of organizational politics and employee citizenship behaviors: Conscientiousness and self-monitoring as moderators. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 395-406.

  • Chopin, S. M., Danish, S. J., Seers, A., & Hook, J. N. (2012). Effects of mentoring on the development of leadership self-efficacy and political skill. Journal of Leadership Studies, 6, 17-32.

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325-334.

  • Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1-19.

  • Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634.

  • Dirk, V. D., & Eline van, d. G. (2013). Goal orientation, academic competences and early career success. Career Development International, 18(7), 694-711.

  • Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. 1992. Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 638-652.

  • Farmer, S., & Maslyn, J. (1999). Why are styles of upward influence neglected? Making the case for a configurational approach to influences.Journal of Management, 25, 653-682.

  • Ferris, G. R., Davidson, S. L., & Perrewé, P. L. (2005). Political Skill at Work. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.

  • Ferris, G. R., Frink, D. D., Gilmore, D. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (1994). Understanding politics: Antidote for the dysfunctional consequences of organizational politics as a stressor. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1204-1220.

  • Ferris, G. R., & Judge, T. A. (1991). Personnel/Human Resources Management: A political influence perspective. Journal of Management, 17, 447-488.

  • Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewe, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33, 290-320.

  • Feruzan, I. W., Campbell, C., McCartney, W., & Gooding, C. (2013). Leader derailment: The impact of self-defeating behaviors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34, 85-97.

  • Harris, K. J., Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (2007).The moderating effects of justice on the relationship between organizational politics and workplace attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 135-144.

  • Higgins, C., & Judge, T.A. (2004). The effect of applicant influence tactics on recruiter perceptions of fit and hiring recommendations: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 622-632.

  • Higgins, C., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 89-106.

  • Huang, G., Zhao, H. H., Niu, X., Ashford, S. J., & Lee, C. (2013). Reducing job insecurity and increasing performance ratings: Does impression management matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 852-862.

  • Judge, T. A. & Bretz, R. D. (1994). Political influence behavior and career success. Journal of Management, 20(1), 43-65

  • Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993).Social context of performance evaluation decisions. The Academy of Management Journal, 36, 80-105.

  • Kacmar, K. M., Delery, J. E., & Ferris, G. R. (1992). Differential effectiveness of applicant impression management tactics on employment interview decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(16-31), 1250-1272.

  • Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440-452.

  • Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34.

  • Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1988). Ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings.Academy of Management Review, 13(4), 572-587.

  • Miller, B. K., Rutherford, M. A., &Kolodinsky;, R. W. (2008). Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analysis of outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 209-222.

  • Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408.

  • Oh, I., Le, H., Whitman, D. S., Kim, K., Yoo, T., Hwang, J., & Kim, C. (2014). The incremental validity of honestyhumility over cognitive ability and the big five personality traits. Human Performance, 27(3), 206-224.

  • Podolny, J., & Baron, J. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62,673-693.

  • Pulakos, E. D., & Wexley, K. N. (1983).The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 129-139.

  • Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., & duToit, M. (2011). HLM 7. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

  • Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The selfconcept, social identity, and interpersonal relations (pp. 21-43). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

  • Schlenker, B.R. (2012). Self-presentation.InM.R. Leary and J. Price Tangney (eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity, 3rd edition,(pp. 542-570).Guilford Press, New York.

  • Schriesheim, C.A., & Hinkin, T.R. (1990). Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 246-257.

  • Shaughnessy, B. A., Treadway, D. C., Breland, J. A., Williams, L. V., & Brouer, R. L. (2011). Influence and promotability: The importance of female political skill. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(7), 584-603.

  • Singh, V., Kumra, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2002). Gender and impression management: Playing the promotion game. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 77-89.

  • Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications.

  • Snyder, M. (1987).Public appearances/Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring. New York: Freeman.

  • Strauss, J. P., Barrick, M. R., &Connerley;, M. L. (2001).An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 74(5), 637-657.

  • Tedeschi, J. T., & Melburg, V. (1984). Impression management and influence in the organization. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 3, 31-58.

  • Thacker, R.,& Wayne, S.J. (1995). An examination of the relationship between upward influence strategies and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management, 21, 739-756.

  • Todd, S. Y., Harris, K. J., Harris, R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2009).Career success implications of political skill. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149,179-304.

  • Turban, D. B., & Jones, A. P., (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effects and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228-234.

  • Vilela, B. B., Gonzalez, J. V., Ferrin, P. F., & del Río Araujo, M. L. (2007). Impression management tactics and affective context: influence on sales performance appraisal. European Journal of Marketing, 41(5/6), 624-639.

  • Wang, K. L., & Groth, M. (2014). Buffering the negative effects of employee surface acting: The moderating role of employee–customer relationship strength and personalized services. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 341-350.

  • Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-499.

  • Wayne, S. J., & Graen, G.B. (1993). The effects of leadermember exchange on employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human Relations, 46, 1431-1440.

  • Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R.C. (1995). A longitudinal study of the effects of impression management on performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 232-260.

  • Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Graf, I. K., & Ferris, G. R. (1997). The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 979-1006.

  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R.C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader member-exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111.

  • Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., & Lee, K. (2014). Honestyhumility and perceptions of organizational politics in predicting workplace outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 235-251.

  • Yin, X., & Tuttle, B. M. (2005). The role of social influences in using accounting performance information to evaluate subordinates: a causal attribution approach. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 17,191-210.


Abstract Views: 294

PDF Views: 0




  • Does Perceived Insincerity Influence Managerial Ratings of Performance and Promotability?

Abstract Views: 294  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Matthew Valle
Elon University, United States
K. Michele Kacmar
Department of Management, Texas State University, United States
Martha C. Andrews
Cameron School of Business, University of North Carolina Wilmington, United States

Abstract


The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the moderating effect of the supervisor's perceived insincerity of their subordinate's influence attempts on the relationship between supervisor perceptions of supervisor-subordinate similarity, liking, and influence, and the outcomes of performance and promotability. Data on 203 subordinates from 59 managers of a state agency were used to test the study hypotheses. The results indicate that the relationships between promotability and similarity and liking, and between performance and liking were attenuated by supervisor perceptions that the subordinates were insincere in their influence attempts. Implications for the importance of sincerity in interactions with others and directions for future research are offered.

Keywords


Insincerity, Influence, Career Success.

References