Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Structural, DC Conductivity and Electric Modulus Studies of Polypyrrole Praseodymium Manganite Nanocomposites


Affiliations
1 Department of Physics, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bengaluru 560 056, India
2 Centre of Excellence in Advanced Materials Research, Department of Physics, BMS College of Engineering, Bengaluru 560 019, India
 

Praseodymium Calcium Manganite (PCM) nanoparticles were synthesized by sol-gel method. Polypyrrole (PPy) and polypyrrole–praseodymium manganite nanocomposites (PPy/PCM) were synthesized by in-situ chemical polymerization method. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) confirmed good crystallinity with 42-63 nm average particle size. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) exhibited well-defined core structure of PPy and the PPy/PCM nanocomposites. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of PPy showed amorphous nature and those of composites showed semicrystalline nature. UV-Vis spectroscopy was used to study the energy band gap for all the nanocomposites and hence they may find a place in wide band gap applications. The UV (231nm) and visible (363 nm and 377 nm) emissions were observed from the spectrum. DC conductivity was studied from 473 to 303 K for all the nanocomposites and found that conduction is of semiconductor type. Analysis of electric modulus confirmed the contribution from grain and grain boundary, non-Debye type relaxation and dc conductivity obeyed Correlated Barrier Hopping (CBH) model.

Keywords

Polypyrrole/Praseodymium Manganite, Nanocomposites, DC Conductivity, Electric Modulus.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Worledge D C, Jeffrey S G , Beasley M R & Geballe T H, J Appl Phys, 80 (1996) 5158.

  • Coey J M D, Viret M &Von M S, Adv Phys, 48 (1999) 167.

  • Borchert Y, Sonstrom P, Wilhelm M, Borchert H & Baumer M, J Phys Chem C, 112 (2008) 3054.

  • Pollert E, Krupicka S & Kuzwicova E, J Phys Chem Solids, 43 (1982) 1137.

  • Yan J, Wei T, Shao B, Fan Z Q, Qian W Z , Zhang M L & Wei F, Carbon, 48 (2010) 487.

  • Romero A J F, Cascales J J L & Otero T F, J Phys Chem B, 109 (2005) 907.

  • Yang C & Liu P, Ind Eng Chem Res, 48 (2009) 9498.

  • Wang L X, Li X G &Yang Y L, React Funct Polym, 47 (2001) 125.

  • Scott C L, Zhao G J & Pumera M, Electrochem Commun, 12 (2010) 1788.

  • Zhao H B, Li L, Yang J & Zhang Y M, J Power Sources, 184 (2008) 375.

  • Yang C, Liu P & Zhao Y Q, Electrochim Acta, 55 (2010) 6857.

  • Wang Y, Sotzing A G &Weiss A R, Chem. Mater. 20 (2008) 2574.

  • Thangadurai V, Huggins R A & Weppner W, J Solid State Electrochem, 5 (2001) 531.

  • Zhang J, Manis E &Wilkie C A, J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 8 (2008) 1597.

  • Sutar R A & Murugendrappa M V, J Macromol Sci, 59 (2020) 821.

  • Kassim A, Sagadavan M, Adzmi F & Mahmud E H N H, Mater Sci, 10 (2004) 255.

  • Das B, Kumar S, Chakraborty S, Chakraborty D & Gangopadhyay S , J Appl Polym Sci, 69 (1998) 841.

  • Conducting polymers, fundamentals, and applications A Practical Approach, Chandrasekhar P & Ushas A, Corp, Inc, New York, 1st Edn, 1999.

  • Bharathi M, Anuradha K N & Murugendrappa M V, Elsevier: Mater Today Proc, 5 (2018) 2818.

  • Chaluvaraju B V, Sangappa K G & Murugendrappa M V, Polym Sci Ser A, 57 (2015) 467.

  • Pant H C, Pata M K, Negi S C, Bhatiya A, Vadera S R & Kumar N, Bull Mater Sci, 29 (2006) 379.

  • Choudhary M, Islam R Ul, Witcomb M J & Mallick K, Dalton Trans, 43 (2014) 6396.

  • Abeles F, North-Holland, Amster-dam, the Netherlands, (1970).

  • Mitchell G R, Davis F J & Legge C H, Synth Met, 26 (1988) 247.

  • Kashyap J & Riaz U, RSC Adv, 8 (2018) 13218.

  • Patil A O, Heeger A J & Wudl, Chem Rev, 88 (1988) 183.

  • Xiao H M & Fu S Y, Cryst Eng Commun, 16 (2014) 2097.

  • Achour M E , Droussi A , Medine D, Oueriagli A , Outzourhit A, Belhadj Mohamed A & Zangar H, Int J Phys Sci, 6 (2011) 5075.

  • Huang Z, Wang S, Li H, Zhang S & Tan Z, J Therm Anal Calorim, 115 (2014) 259.

  • Macedo P B , Moynihan C T & Bose R, Phys Chem Glass, 13 (1972) 171.

  • Aaditya V B, Bharathesh B M, Harshitha R, Chaluvaraju B V, Raghavendra U P & Murugendrappa M V, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron, 29 (2018) 2848.

  • Naveen K, Bastola N, Kumar S & Ranjan R, J Mater Sci, 28 (2017) 10420.

  • Dutta A & Sinha T P, J Phys Chem Solids, 67 (2006) 1484.

  • Costa M, Pires G F M, Terezo A J, Grac M P F & Sombra, J Appl Phys, 110 (2011) 034107.

  • Sen S, Pramanik P & Choudhary R N P, Ceram Int, 33 (2007) 579.

  • Sen S, Choudhary R N P & Pramanik P, Phys B Condens Matter, 387 (2007) 56.


Abstract Views: 125

PDF Views: 102




  • Structural, DC Conductivity and Electric Modulus Studies of Polypyrrole Praseodymium Manganite Nanocomposites

Abstract Views: 125  |  PDF Views: 102

Authors

Meti Bharathi
Department of Physics, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bengaluru 560 056, India
K N Anuradha
Department of Physics, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bengaluru 560 056, India
M V Murugendrappa
Centre of Excellence in Advanced Materials Research, Department of Physics, BMS College of Engineering, Bengaluru 560 019, India

Abstract


Praseodymium Calcium Manganite (PCM) nanoparticles were synthesized by sol-gel method. Polypyrrole (PPy) and polypyrrole–praseodymium manganite nanocomposites (PPy/PCM) were synthesized by in-situ chemical polymerization method. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) confirmed good crystallinity with 42-63 nm average particle size. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) exhibited well-defined core structure of PPy and the PPy/PCM nanocomposites. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of PPy showed amorphous nature and those of composites showed semicrystalline nature. UV-Vis spectroscopy was used to study the energy band gap for all the nanocomposites and hence they may find a place in wide band gap applications. The UV (231nm) and visible (363 nm and 377 nm) emissions were observed from the spectrum. DC conductivity was studied from 473 to 303 K for all the nanocomposites and found that conduction is of semiconductor type. Analysis of electric modulus confirmed the contribution from grain and grain boundary, non-Debye type relaxation and dc conductivity obeyed Correlated Barrier Hopping (CBH) model.

Keywords


Polypyrrole/Praseodymium Manganite, Nanocomposites, DC Conductivity, Electric Modulus.

References