Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Assessment of Age-Dependent Radiation Dose and Toxicological Risk of Uranium in Ground Water around Uranium Mines in Sikar, Rajasthan


Affiliations
1 Centre of Radio Ecology & Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana 125 001, India
2 Centre of Radio Ecology & Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana 125 001
3 Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, J.C. Bose University of Science and Technology, YMCA Faridabad, Haryana 21 006, India
4 Department of Physics, Kirori Mal College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
 

Uranium concentration in forty-six groundwater samples collected from the region near the uranium deposits in the Royal village of Sikar district, Rajasthan, is determined using the LED fluorimetry technique. Age-dependent annual effective dose, radiological, and chemical toxicity risks are calculated to assess health risks associated with the groundwater for the people living in the nearby area. Uranium concentrations of different samples vary from 4.79–266.28 μg/L with an average value of 74.36 μg/L Overall 69% and 43% of samples exhibit uranium concentrations greater than recommended limits of WHO and AERB, respectively. Excess cancer risk values lie in the range from 1.36 × 10-5-7.54 × 10-4 and 2.10 × 10-5-1.17 × 10-3 with mean values of 2.11 × 10-4 and 3.26 × 10-4 for mortality and morbidity, respectively. LADD value lies in the range of 0.35 μg/kg/day to 19.51 μg/kg/day with a mean value of 5.44 μg/kg/day. The hazard quotient value for 43.4% and 84.7% of samples is greater than unity according to AERB and WHO standards, respectively. The uranium retention and effective radiological dose to various body organs are estimated using biokinetic modelling. Physico-chemical parameters and their correlation with uranium concentration are also evaluated. A positive correlation is found between TDS and uranium concentration.

Keywords

Groundwater; LED Fluorimetry; Mining zone; Radiation; Uranium Concentration
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Panghal A, Kumar A, Kumar S, Singh J, Sharma S, Singh P, Mehra R & Bajwa B S, Radiat Eff Defects Sol, 172 (2017) 441.
  • Singh B, Kataria N, Garg V K, et. al., Toxicol Environ Chem, 96 (2015) 1571.
  • Lounsbury M, Can J Chem, 34 (1956) 259.
  • Rani A & Singh S, Health Phys, 91 (2006) 101.
  • WHO, “Guidelines for drinking – water quality”, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 4 (2011) 1.
  • AERB, Drinking water specifications in India, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, (2004).
  • Cothern C R & Lappenbusch W L, Health Phys, 45 (1983) 89.
  • Mittal S, Rani A, Mehra R, Balaram V, Stayanarayan M & Sawant S S, J Geolog Soc India, 90 (2017) 233.
  • ATSDR, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for uranium, Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, (2013).
  • Rani A, Mehra R, Duggal V & Balaram V, Health Phys, 104 (2013) 251.
  • Duggal V, Rani A & Balaram V, Radiat Protect Dosim, 171 (2016) 257.
  • Kaur S, Mehra R, Chand S, et al., J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 330 (2021) 1605.
  • ICRP, Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 3, ICRP Publication - 137, Ann ICRP 46(3/4), (2017).
  • Bangotra P, Sharma M, Mehra R, Jakhu R, Singh A, Gautam A S & Gautm S, Environ Technol Innovat, 21, (2021) 101360.
  • Kumar A, Rout S, Narayanan U, et. al., J Geol Min Res, 3 (2011) 137.
  • Central Groundwater Board, Ministry of water resources, Govt of India, Groundwater Scenario Sikar District Rajasthan, 2013.
  • Rout D, Krishnamurthi R & Sinha D K, Ore Geol Rev, 151 (2022) 105204.
  • Uranium Corporation of India Limited (UCIL), “54th Annual Report”, 2020-2021, https://ucil.gov.in/pdf/report/Final%20AR%20English.pdf.
  • UCIL, “Pre-feasibility report of Rohil Uranium Project of UCIL”,https://environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/On line/TOR/18_Nov_2017_185020967R3597Z9LPFR.pdf
  • Virk H S, Jakhu R & Bangotra P, Glob J Hum – Soc Sci B, 16 (2016) 13.
  • UNSCEAR, Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, United Nations scientific committee on the effect of Atomic Radiation, New York, 1993.
  • USEPA, National primary drinking water regulations, radionuclides, Final Rule, Washington DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, (2000).
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Cancer risk coefficients for Environmental exposure to radionuclides, United State Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Guidance Report No -13, EPA. 402 R-99-001, (1999).
  • Mehra R, Gupta D & Jakhu R, J Radiat Nucl Appl, 2 (2017) 67.
  • HDR, Human development report. Mumbai, India: National Resource Centre for Urban Poverty and All India Institute of Local Self Government, (2009).
  • USEPA, Guidance for Data Quality Assessment, EPA QA/G-9, section 4.7, U S Environmental Protection (2000).
  • United State Environment Protection Agency, Radionuclides Notice of Data Availability Technical Support Document, 2000.
  • Dang H S, Jaiswal D D, Parameswaran M & Krishnamony S, Physical, anatomical, physiological and metabolic data for reference Indian Man—a proposal. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, (1994).
  • ICRP, Age- Dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides: Part 3. ICRP publication- 69, Ann ICRP, 25 (1995).
  • Leggett R W, Eckerman K F & Williams L R, Health Phys, 64 (1993) 260.
  • Li W B, Karpas Z, Salonen L, Kurttio P, Muikku M, Wahl W, Hollriegl V, Hoeschen C & Oeh U, Health Phys, 96 (2009) 636.
  • Kaur S, Mehra R & Kumar R, Int J Environ Sci Technol, 19 (2022) 3201.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories, EPA 820-R-11-002, Office of Water, USEPA, (2011).
  • ICRP, Protection against Radon – 222 at home and work. ICRP publication 65, Pergamon Press Oxford, (1993).
  • UNSCEAR, Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation, New York, United States, (2011).
  • Bureau of Indian Standards, Indian standard drinking water – specification (second revision). New Delhi, India, (2012).
  • WHO, Guidelines for drinking – water quality, 2nd Edn, World Health Organization, Geneva, (1993).
  • Act, Water, 1956, The Water Act (Act 54 of 1956) and its Requirements in Terms of Water Supplies for Drinking Water and for Waste Water Treatment and Discharge into the Environment.
  • Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Dietary Reference intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulphate. Panel on Dietary Reference Intakes for Electrolytes and Water. Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary References Intake. Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, (2005).
  • Kaur S & Mehra R, Environ Geochem Health, 41 (2019) 681.
  • Archana & Singh J, J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 330 (2021) 1445.
  • WHO, Guidelines for drinking water quality, World Health Organization (3rd Edn,), Geneva, 1 (2004).
  • Singh B, Garg V K, Yadav P, Kishore N & Pulhani V, J Radioanal Nucl Chem, 301 (2013) 427.
  • United State Environment Protection Agency, Guidance for Data Quality Assessment. EPA QA/G-9, Section 4.7; U.S. Environmental Protection, 2000.

Abstract Views: 47

PDF Views: 32




  • Assessment of Age-Dependent Radiation Dose and Toxicological Risk of Uranium in Ground Water around Uranium Mines in Sikar, Rajasthan

Abstract Views: 47  |  PDF Views: 32

Authors

Bhupesh Khyalia
Centre of Radio Ecology & Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana 125 001, India
Naresh Kumar
Centre of Radio Ecology & Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana 125 001
Rajesh Beniwal
Centre of Radio Ecology & Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana 125 001
Shakuntala
Centre of Radio Ecology & Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana 125 001
Amanjeet Panghal
Centre of Radio Ecology & Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana 125 001
Navish Kataria
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, J.C. Bose University of Science and Technology, YMCA Faridabad, Haryana 21 006, India
Prikshit Gautam
Department of Physics, Kirori Mal College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
Ranjeet Dalal
Centre of Radio Ecology & Department of Physics, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana 125 001, India

Abstract


Uranium concentration in forty-six groundwater samples collected from the region near the uranium deposits in the Royal village of Sikar district, Rajasthan, is determined using the LED fluorimetry technique. Age-dependent annual effective dose, radiological, and chemical toxicity risks are calculated to assess health risks associated with the groundwater for the people living in the nearby area. Uranium concentrations of different samples vary from 4.79–266.28 μg/L with an average value of 74.36 μg/L Overall 69% and 43% of samples exhibit uranium concentrations greater than recommended limits of WHO and AERB, respectively. Excess cancer risk values lie in the range from 1.36 × 10-5-7.54 × 10-4 and 2.10 × 10-5-1.17 × 10-3 with mean values of 2.11 × 10-4 and 3.26 × 10-4 for mortality and morbidity, respectively. LADD value lies in the range of 0.35 μg/kg/day to 19.51 μg/kg/day with a mean value of 5.44 μg/kg/day. The hazard quotient value for 43.4% and 84.7% of samples is greater than unity according to AERB and WHO standards, respectively. The uranium retention and effective radiological dose to various body organs are estimated using biokinetic modelling. Physico-chemical parameters and their correlation with uranium concentration are also evaluated. A positive correlation is found between TDS and uranium concentration.

Keywords


Groundwater; LED Fluorimetry; Mining zone; Radiation; Uranium Concentration

References