Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of Peri-implant Bone Level Changes in Immediate Implant with Functional versus Non- Functional Loading in Mandibular Posterior Region


Affiliations
1 Medical Officer (Dental), CHC Bhinai, Ajmer – 305622, India
2 2Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Jaipur – 302016, India
3 Professor and HOD (Retired), Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Jaipur – 302016, India
4 Professor and HOD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Jaipur – 302016, India
5 Medical Officer (Dental), CHC Nawa, Nagaur – 341509, India
6 Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology, Burdwan Dental College and Hospital, Burdwan – 713101, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Introduction: Traditionally, teeth that are absent are substituted by partial dentures or by complete dentures. Many prefer a dental implant as it tries to imitate the natural tooth. Though the notion of immediate loading reduced the time of prosthetic treatment, debate arose whether the loading should be functional or non-functional. The objective of this study was to compare the Peri-implant Bone Level (PIBL) deviations in immediate implant placement with instantaneous functional versus non-functional loading in the mandibular posterior region. Material and Methods: Fifty patients were incorporated in the study and distributed by random sampling into two groups of equal members each. Group A had patients in whom implant was placed followed by immediate functional loading. Group B were those who had non-functional loading. After bone implant integration, temporary crowns were replaced with metal ceramic prosthesis. PIBL change (in mm) of each implant was assessed by periapical radiograph which were taken at immediate post op, after one month and then on three and six months follow up. Statistical analysis was done using software SPSS v 21.0. Comparison between the groups (Mann Whitney U test), intragroup (Friedman’s) and Wilcoxon Signed rank test for pairwise comparison were done. Results: There was PIBL gain mesially and distally of the implants in both the groups in all time intervals of one, three and six months follow up. Conclusions: To conclude immediate implants restored instantly yielded affirmative result as far as survival of the implants, bone level changes and aesthetics of the soft tissues are concerned irrespective of the type of loading.

Keywords

Denture, Edentulousness, Implant, Occlusion, Osseo-Integration
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Raes F, Eccellente T, Lenzi C, Ortolani M, Luongo G, Mangano C. Immediate functional loading of single implants: A multicentre study with 4 years of follow up. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect. 2018; 12(1):26–37. PMid: 29732018 PMCid: PMC5928471. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.005

  • Refaie A, Zohdy M, Aboelfadl A, Wahsh M. Effect of different immediate implant loading protocols on peri-implant soft tissue health. Braz Dent Sci. 2020; 23(4):1–7. https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2020.v23i4.1998

  • Ragucci GM, Elnayef B, Criado-Camara E, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2020; 6:40–51. PMid: 32770283 PMCid: PMC7413966. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5

  • Rishi R, Monika M, Harish Y, Manu R, Reshu M, Charu R. Immediate placement and immediate loading of dental implant in mandibular posterior region through precise implant size parameters selection: A case report. Annals of Dental Specialty. 2017; 5(4):193–7.

  • George J, Paulose A, Devassy JP, George J. Immediate loading in implant Dentistry: A review. The Journal of Prosthetic and Implant Dentistry. 2021; 4(3):118–22.

  • Lang NP, Lui P, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MCM. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2012; 23(Suppl. 5):39–66. PMid: 22211305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600- 0501.2011.02372.x

  • Anand SG, Mohammed M, Kumar MN, Vaaka HDP, Palla S. Effectiveness of immediate loading protocol over conventional loading protocol in mandibular posterior region - A comparative prospective clinical study. Journal of Advanced Clinical and Research Insights. 2021; 7:48–52. https://doi. org/10.15713/ins.jcri.298

  • Mantena SR, Sivagami G, Sruthima NVS Gottumukkala. Evaluation of crestal bone loss and stability of immediate functional loading versus immediate non-functional loading of single-mandibular posterior implants: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Dental Res J. 2014; 11(5):585–91.

  • Nair V, Bandyopadhyay P, Kundu D, Das S. Estimation of interleukin-18 in the gingival crevicular fluid and serum of Bengali population with periodontal health and disease. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016; 20(3):260–4. PMid: 27563198 PMCid: PMC4976545. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.183098

  • Moraschini V, Porto E. Immediate versus conventional loaded single implants in the posterior mandible: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 201545(1):85–92. PMid: 26259980. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.014

  • Sawail Al-Aziz A, Hussein L. Success of immediate loading implants compared to conventionally-loaded implants: A literature review. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry. 2016; 7:217–24. PMid: 25976172. https://doi. org/10.1111/jicd.12152

  • Penarrocha-Oltra D, Soto-Penaloza D, Penarrocha-Diago M. Immediate loading in implantology. Clinical Dentistry Reviewed. 2020; 4:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41894-020- 00079-7

  • Chen J, Cai M, Yang J, Aldhohrah T, Wang Y. Immediate versus early or conventional loading dental implants with fixed prostheses: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019; 122(6):516-36. PMid: 31421892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.013

  • Guncu MB, Aslan Y, Tumer C, Guncu GN, Uysal S. In-patient comparison of immediate and conventional loaded implants in mandibular molar sites within 12 months. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2008; 19:335–41. PMid: 18294232. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01471.x

  • De Bruyn H, Raes F, Cooper LF, Reside G, Garriga JS, Tarrida LG, et al. 3-years clinical outcome of immediate provisionalization of single Osseospeed TM implants in extraction sockets and healed ridges. Clin Oral Implants Res. 201324:217–23. PMid: 22469026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02449.x

  • Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2010; 21:22–9. PMid: 19912273. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01825.x

  • Botticelli D, Renzi A, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Implants in fresh extraction sockets: A prospective 5-year followup clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2008; 19:1226–32. PMid: 19040437. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1600-0501.2008.01620.x

  • Barone A, Rispoli L, Vozza I, Quaranta A, Covani U. Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. J Periodontol. 2006; 77:1914–20. PMid: 17076619. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060072

  • Singh JP, Col Gupta AK, Col Dhiman RK, Col Roy Chowdhury SK. Comparative study of immediate functional loading and immediate non-functional loading of monocortical implants. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2015; 71:S333–9. PMid: 26843748 PMCid: PMC4705149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.11.009

  • Shibly O, Kutkut A, Patel A, Albandar JM. Immediate implants with immediate loading vs. conventional loading: 1-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14(5):663–71. PMid: 20977611. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00310.x

  • Prosper L, Crespi R, Valenti E, Cappare P, Gherlone E. Fiveyear follow-up of wide-diameter implants placed in fresh molar extraction sockets in the mandible: Immediate versus delayed loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25:607–12.

  • Kumar S, Singh K, Shill M. A solution to regain bone loss around immediately loaded short implant: A clinical report. Journal of Orofacial Rehabilitation. 2021; 1(2):140–4.

  • Wang J, Lerman G, Bittner N, Fan W, Lalla E, Papapanou PN. Immediate versus delayed temporization at posterior single implant sites: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47:1281–91. PMid: 32757387. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13354

  • Vogl S, Stopper M, Hof M, Theisen K, Wegscheider WA, Lorenzoni M. Immediate occlusal vs. nonocclusal loading of implants: A randomized prospective clinical pilot study and patient centered outcome after 36 months. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21(4):766–74. PMid: 31062517 PMCid: PMC6767417. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12770


Abstract Views: 129

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparison of Peri-implant Bone Level Changes in Immediate Implant with Functional versus Non- Functional Loading in Mandibular Posterior Region

Abstract Views: 129  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Gajendra Bagri
Medical Officer (Dental), CHC Bhinai, Ajmer – 305622, India
Sankalp Mittal
2Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Jaipur – 302016, India
Anjali D Tiwari
Professor and HOD (Retired), Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Jaipur – 302016, India
Vinay Kumar
Professor and HOD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College, Jaipur – 302016, India
Saurabh Jain
Medical Officer (Dental), CHC Nawa, Nagaur – 341509, India
Vineet Nair
Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology, Burdwan Dental College and Hospital, Burdwan – 713101, India

Abstract


Introduction: Traditionally, teeth that are absent are substituted by partial dentures or by complete dentures. Many prefer a dental implant as it tries to imitate the natural tooth. Though the notion of immediate loading reduced the time of prosthetic treatment, debate arose whether the loading should be functional or non-functional. The objective of this study was to compare the Peri-implant Bone Level (PIBL) deviations in immediate implant placement with instantaneous functional versus non-functional loading in the mandibular posterior region. Material and Methods: Fifty patients were incorporated in the study and distributed by random sampling into two groups of equal members each. Group A had patients in whom implant was placed followed by immediate functional loading. Group B were those who had non-functional loading. After bone implant integration, temporary crowns were replaced with metal ceramic prosthesis. PIBL change (in mm) of each implant was assessed by periapical radiograph which were taken at immediate post op, after one month and then on three and six months follow up. Statistical analysis was done using software SPSS v 21.0. Comparison between the groups (Mann Whitney U test), intragroup (Friedman’s) and Wilcoxon Signed rank test for pairwise comparison were done. Results: There was PIBL gain mesially and distally of the implants in both the groups in all time intervals of one, three and six months follow up. Conclusions: To conclude immediate implants restored instantly yielded affirmative result as far as survival of the implants, bone level changes and aesthetics of the soft tissues are concerned irrespective of the type of loading.

Keywords


Denture, Edentulousness, Implant, Occlusion, Osseo-Integration

References