Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Ranking of ISCM Benchmarking Factors using VIKOR Methodology


Affiliations
1 PhD Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, J. C. Bose University of Science & Technology, YMCA, Faridabad, Haryana, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, J. C. Bose University of Science & Technology, YMCA, Faridabad, Haryana, India
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, J. C. Bose University of Science & Technology, YMCA, Faridabad, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In a competitive environment, balancing of demand and supply is a typical challenge for an entrepreneur. The continuous internal supply chain benchmarking practice would be helpful in establishing a balance between demand and supply. In this research paper, authors have come across variable factors of internal supply chain management benchmarking through literature review. The identified factors are: Human Resources Orientation, Inbound logistics, Operational logistics, Outbound logistics, Economies of scale, Flexibility, Logistics strategies, New Product development system, Material follow up and Procurement, Production Operation Process, Production Programming, Quality System, Products delivery, Foreign trade and service management and Transport-Reception-Custom decision. The opinions of industrial experts are collected through 15 questionnaire surveys with rating point scales from 1 to 5. VIKOR methodology is used to distinguish factors’ performance gap and stimulate the scope of improvement. The main objective of authors is to establish factors’ ranking using VIKOR methodology, including the calculated weight of factors through the analytical hierarchy process technique.

Keywords

Internal Supply Chain Management (ISCM), VIKOR Methodology, Factors Ranking, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Technique.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdullah, H. (2009). Major challenges to the effective management of human resource training and development activities. Journal of International Social Research, 2(8), 11-25.
  • Adis, A. A. A., & Jublee, E. (2010). Market orientation and new product performance: The mediating role of product advantage. African Journal of Marketing Management, 2(5), 91-100.
  • Agboyi, M. R., & Obiri-Yeboah, D. A. (2015). The impact of sourcing on the delivery of raw material. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 5(8), 108-122.
  • Agrawal, J., Richardson, P. S., & Grimm, P. E. (1996). The relationship between warranty and product reliability. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 30(2), 421-443.
  • Alad, A. H., & Deshpande, V. A. (2014). A review of various tools and techniques for lead time reduction. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, 2(1), 1159-1164.
  • Al-Kuhali, K., Zain, Z. M., & Hussein, M. I. (2012). Production planning of LCDS: Optimal linear programming and sensitivity analysis. Industrial Engineering Letters, 2(9) 1-10.
  • Ambe, I. M., & Badenhorst-Weiss, J. A. (2011). An automotive supply chain model for a demand-driven environment. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 5(1), 1-22.
  • Anwar, R. S., & Ali, S. (2015). Economies of scale. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scholarly Research, 1(1), 51-57.
  • Balogun, O. S., Jolayemi, E. T., Akingbade, T. J., & Muazu, H. G. (2012). Use of linear programming for optimal production in a production line in coca-cola bottling company, Ilorin. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(5), 2004-2007.
  • Banar, M., Kose, B. M., Ozkan, A., & Acar, I. P. (2007). Choosing a municipal landfill site by analytic network process. Environmental Geology, 52(4), 747-751.
  • Batson, R. G., & McGough, K. D. (2007). A new direction in quality engineering: Supply chain quality modelling. International Journal of Production Research, 45(23), 5455-5464.
  • Beach, R., Muhlemann, A. P., Price, D. H., Paterson, A., & Sharp, J. A. (2000). A review of manufacturing flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 122(1), 41-57.
  • Bettayeb, B., Bassetto, S. J., & Sahnoun, M. (2014). Quality control planning to prevent excessive scrap production. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(3), 400-411.
  • Bhargava, M. G., & Chaitanya Kumar, J. D. (2015). State of art of usage of alternative materials in concrete. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Management Research, 2(12), 32-37.
  • Bhuiyan, N. (2011). A framework for successful new product development. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(4), 746-770.
  • Bil, M., Vodak, R., Kubecek, J., Bilova, M., & Sedonik, J. (2015). Evaluating road network damage caused by natural disasters in the Czech Republic between 1997 and 2010. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 80, 90-103.
  • Blanquart, C., & Burmeister, A. (2009). Evaluating the performance of freight transport: A service approach. European Transport Research Review, 1(3), 135-145.
  • Celli, M. (2013). Determinants of economies of scale in large businesses - A survey on UE listed firms. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(3), 255-261.
  • Cetinkaya, S., Uster, H., Easwaran, G., & Keskin, B. B. (2009). An integrated outbound logistics model for Frito-Lay: Coordinating aggregate-level production and distribution decisions. Interfaces, 39(5), 460-475.
  • Charnsirisakskul, K., Griffin, P. M., & Keskinocak, P. (2004). Order selection and scheduling with lead time flexibility. IIE Transactions, 36(7), 697-707.
  • Charnsirisakskul, K., Griffin, P. M., & Keskinocak, P. (2006). Pricing and scheduling decisions with lead time flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1), 153-169.
  • Chen, C. W., & Wong, V. (2012). Design and delivery of new product preannouncement messages. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 20(2), 203-222.
  • Chen, T. (2013). A systematic cycle time reduction procedure for enhancing the competitiveness and sustainability of a semiconductor manufacturer. Sustainability, 5(11), 4637-4652.
  • Chod, J., Rudi, N., & Van Mieghem, J. A. (2012). Mix, time and volume flexibility: Valuation and corporate diversification. Review of Business and Economic Literature, 57(3), 262-282.
  • Colledani, M., & Tolio, T. (2011). Integrated analysis of quality and production logistics performance in manufacturing lines. International Journal of Production Research, 49(2), 485-518.
  • Chen, X. (2010). Suggestions on effective corporate new employee orientation program for human resource specialists. Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development, 4(3), 1-11.
  • Cowling, P., & Johansson, M. (2002). Using real-time information for effective dynamic scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 139(2), 230-244.
  • De Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7(2), 75-89.
  • Delarue, A., Van Hootegem, G., Procter, S., & Burridge, M. (2008). Teamworking and organizational performance: A review of survey-based research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(2), 127-148.
  • Deng, H., Yeh, C. H., & Willis, R. J. (2000). Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research, 27(10), 963-973.
  • Deshmukh, A. J., & Chaudhari, A. A. (2011). A review for supplier selection criteria and methods. In Technology Systems and Management (pp. 283-291). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Dornhofer, M., Schroder, F., & Gunthner, W. A. (2016). Logistics performance measurement system for the automotive industry. Logistics Research, 9(1), 11-26.
  • De Koster, R., Le-Duc, T., & Roodbergen, K. J. (2007). Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2), 481-501.
  • Dubey, R., & Gunasekaran, A. (2016). The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: Agility, adaptability and alignment. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(1), 62-82.
  • Dubey, R., Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J. (2018a). Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: Empirical evidence from the Indian auto components industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 129-148.
  • Ertogral, K., & Wu, S. D. (2000). Auction-theoretic coordination of production planning in the supply chain. IIE Transactions, 32(10), 931-940.
  • Forslund, H., & Jonsson, P. (2010). Integrating the performance management process of on-time delivery with suppliers. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 13(3), 225-241.
  • Gram, M. (2013). A systematic methodology to reduce losses in production with the balanced scorecard approach. Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(1), 12-22.
  • Grigore, S. D. (2007). Supply chain flexibility. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 2(1), 66-70.
  • Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tirtiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 71-87.
  • Guo, J., & Zhang, W. (2008, December). Selection of suppliers based on rough set theory and VIKOR algorithm. In International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application Workshops (pp. 49-52). IEEE.
  • Hallgren, M., & Olhager, J. (2009). Flexibility configurations: Empirical analysis of volume and product mix flexibility. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 37(4), 746-756.
  • Hanson, O., Ackah, D., & Agboyi, M. (2015). Assessing the impact of efficient inventory management in on organization. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 5(8), 86-103.
  • He, Y. T., & Down, D. G. (2009). On accommodating customer flexibility in service systems. INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research, 47(4), 289-295.
  • Hicks, D. A. (1997). Manager’s guide to supply chain and logistics problem-solving tools and techniques Part III: End user experiences. IIE Solutions, 29(11), 340-38.
  • Jabnoun, N. (2002). Control processes for total quality management and quality assurance. Work Study, 51(4), 182-190.
  • Jayant, A., & Ghagra, H. S. (2013). Supply chain flexibility configurations: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 21-29.
  • Jovanovic, J. R., Milanovic, D. D., & Djukic, R. D. (2014). Manufacturing cycle time analysis and scheduling to optimise its duration. Strojniski Vestnik/Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 60(7-8), 512-524.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2015). Integrity of supplier and distributor with manufacturing company in supply chain management. Invertis Journal of Science & Technology, 8(2), 95-100. ISSN: 0973-8940.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017a). Systematic literature review of classification and categorisation of benchmarking in supply chain management. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 7(2), 183-205.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017b). Benchmarking practice for identification of internal supply chain management performance factors gap. Journal of Supply Chain Management System, 6(4), 33-38.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017c). Performance indicators for benchmarking of internal supply chain management, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index 127. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(7), 1940-1944.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017d). Scope of internal supply chain management benchmarking in Indian manufacturing industries, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index 126. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(6), 1638-1641.
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2017e). Benchmarking model to analyse ISCM performance of selected Indian manufacturing industries using Fuzzy AHP Technique. International Journal of Industrial & System Engineering, (in press).
  • Kailash, Saha, R. K., & Goyal, S. (2018). Benchmarking framework for internal supply chain management: A
  • case study for comparative analysis. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 32(4-5), 412-429.
  • Kannan, V. R., & Choon Tan, K. (2003). Attitudes of US and European managers to supplier selection and assessment and implications for business performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10(5), 472-489.
  • Kesavan, S., Staats, B. R., & Gilland, W. (2014). Volume flexibility in services: The costs and benefits of flexible labor resources. Management Science, 60(8), 1884-1906.
  • Kim, S. (2009). The toll plaza optimization problem: Design, operations, and strategies. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(1), 125-137.
  • Krajewska, M. A., & Kopfer, H. (2009). Transportation planning in freight forwarding companies: Tabu search algorithm for the integrated operational transportation planning problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 741-751.
  • Kristensen, T., Olsen, K. R., Kilsmark, J., & Pedersen, K. M. (2008). Economies of scale and optimal size of hospitals: Empirical results for Danish public hospitals. Syddansk Universitet.
  • Kumar, S., & Raj, T. (2016). Selection of material handling equipment for flexible manufacturing system using FAHP. International Journal of Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 5(1), 25-45.
  • Kumar, S., Parashar, N., & Haleem, A. (2009). Analytical hierarchy process applied to vendor selection problem: Small scale, medium scale and large scale industries. Business Intelligence Journal, 2(2), 355-362.
  • Kwateng, K. O., Manso, J. F., & Osei-Mensah, R. (2014). Outbound logistics management in manufacturing companies in Ghana. Review of Business & Finance Studies, 5(1), 83.
  • Leachman, R. C., Kang, J., & Lin, V. (2002). SLIM: Short cycle time and low inventory in manufacturing at Samsung Electronics. Interfaces, 32(1), 61-77.
  • Lenin, K. (2015). A study on the air cargo logistics operations in Dubai. Management, 4(5), 313-315.
  • Lin, J. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Jen, W. (2005). Utilizing VIKOR to make ERP system supplier selection decision. Agriculture and Economics, 34(11), 69-90.
  • Liu, X., & Sun, Y. (2011). Information flow management of vendor managed inventory system in automobile parts inbound logistics based on internet of things. Journal of Software, 6(7), 1374-1380.
  • Lonn, S., & Stuart, J. A. (2003). Increasing service through aggressive dealer inventory return policies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(6), 519-530.
  • Maleki, R. A., & Reimche, J. (2011). Managing returnable containers logistics - A case study part I - Physical and information flow analysis. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 3(2), 1-8.
  • McKay, K. N., & Wiers, V. C. (2003). Integrated decision support for planning, scheduling, and dispatching tasks in a focus factory. Computers in Industry, 50(1), 5-14.
  • Mehta, N., & Sharma, L. (2013). A modification over ratio estimator using empirical data. Statistics, 2(1), 65-67.
  • Min, H. (2009). The best practice supplier diversity program at Caterpillar. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 167-170.
  • Mogre, R., Wong, C. Y., & Lalwani, C. S. (2014). Mitigating supply and production uncertainties with dynamic scheduling using real-time transport information. International Journal of Production Research, 52(17), 5223-5235.
  • Montoya-Torres, J. R., Franco, J. L., Isaza, S. N., Jiménez, H. F., & Herazo-Padilla, N. (2015). A literature review on the vehicle routing problem with multiple depots. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 79, 115-129.
  • Mukherjee, A., & Goyal, T. M. (2013). FDI in services sector in India. Foreign Trade Review, 48(3), 413-430.
  • Mulang, A. (2015). The importance of training for human resource development in organization. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 5(1), 190-197.
  • Murthy, D. N. P. (2007). Product reliability and warranty: An overview and future research. Production, 17(3). 426-434.
  • Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of
  • VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
  • Pekgun, P., Griffin, P. M., & Keskinocak, P. (2008). Coordination of marketing and production for price and lead time decisions. IIE Transactions, 40(1), 12-30.
  • Ramaa, A., Subramanya, K. N., & Rangaswamy, T. M. (2012). Impact of warehouse management system in a supply chain. International Journal of Computer Applications, 54(1), 14-20.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 841-855.
  • Sahay, B. S., Cavale, V., & Mohan, R. (2003). The “Indian” supply chain architecture. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8(2), 93-106.
  • Schlosser, F. K., Templer, A., & Ghanam, D. (2006). An integrated agenda for understanding the impact of HR outsourcing on organisational learning orientation. Journal of Labor Research, Special Issue on Outsourcing Management, 27(3), 291-303.
  • Senk, M., Metlikovic, P., Maletic, M., & Gomiscek, B. (2010). Development of new product/process development procedure for SMEs. Organizacija, 43(2), 76-86.
  • Shahadat, K. (2003). Supplier choice criteria of executing agencies in developing countries. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(4), 261-285.
  • Sheu, J. B. (2007). Challenges of emergency logistics management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(6), 655-659.
  • Shih, H. S., Shyur, H. J., & Lee, E. S. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7-8), 801-813.
  • Sodhi, M. S. (2003). How to do strategic supply-chain planning. Fall Magazine.
  • Song, D. P., & Carter, J. (2009). Empty container repositioning in liner shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 36(4), 291-307.
  • Stawowy, A., & Duda, J. (2012). Models and algorithms for production planning and scheduling in foundries -Current state and development perspectives. Archives of Foundry Engineering, 12(2), 69-74.
  • Subramani, J., & Kumarap, G. (2012). Modified ratio estimators for population mean using function of quartiles of auxiliary variable. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 2(2), 19-23.
  • Swain, A. K. P. C., & Das, M. (2015). Some classes of modified ratio type estimators in sample surveys. Statistics in Transition New Series, 16(1), 37-52.
  • Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., Simchi-Levi, E., & Shankar, R. (2008). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies and case studies. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Tan, X. C., Wang, Y. Y., Gu, B. H., Mu, Z. K., & Yang, C. (2011). Improved methods for production manufacturing processes in environmentally benign manufacturing. Energies, 4(9), 1391-1409.
  • Tracey, M., & Leng Tan, C. (2001). Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(4), 174-188.
  • Vinesh, A. (2014). Role of training & development in an organizational development. International Journal of Management and International Business Studies, 4(2), 213-220.
  • Wang, Y. C. (2008). Evaluating flexibility on order quantity and delivery lead time for a supply chain system. International Journal of Systems Science, 39(12), 1193-1202.
  • Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Liu, Q., Shen, F., & Lee, L. H. (2016). Towards enhancing the last-mile delivery: An effective crowd-tasking model with scalable solutions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 93, 279-293.
  • Wijaya, J. (2013). The relationship between price, lead time, and delay toward the order quantity in steel manufacturer. Universal Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 1(1), 1-7.
  • Wu, D., & Olson, D. L. (2008). Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2). 646-655.
  • Yadav, S. K, Gupta, S., Mishra, S. S., & Shukla, A. K. (2016). Modified ratio and product estimators for estimating population mean in two-phase sampling. American Journal of Operational Research, 6(3), 61-68.
  • Yang, J. L., Chiu, H. N., Tzeng, G. H., & Yeh, R. H. (2008). Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships. Information Sciences, 178(21), 4166-4183.
  • Yu, B., Wang, K., Wang, C., & Yao, B. (2017). Ship scheduling problems in tramp shipping considering static and spot cargoes. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 9(4), 391-416.

Abstract Views: 284

PDF Views: 1




  • Ranking of ISCM Benchmarking Factors using VIKOR Methodology

Abstract Views: 284  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Kailash
PhD Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, J. C. Bose University of Science & Technology, YMCA, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Rajeev Kumar Saha
Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, J. C. Bose University of Science & Technology, YMCA, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Sanjeev Goyal
Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, J. C. Bose University of Science & Technology, YMCA, Faridabad, Haryana, India

Abstract


In a competitive environment, balancing of demand and supply is a typical challenge for an entrepreneur. The continuous internal supply chain benchmarking practice would be helpful in establishing a balance between demand and supply. In this research paper, authors have come across variable factors of internal supply chain management benchmarking through literature review. The identified factors are: Human Resources Orientation, Inbound logistics, Operational logistics, Outbound logistics, Economies of scale, Flexibility, Logistics strategies, New Product development system, Material follow up and Procurement, Production Operation Process, Production Programming, Quality System, Products delivery, Foreign trade and service management and Transport-Reception-Custom decision. The opinions of industrial experts are collected through 15 questionnaire surveys with rating point scales from 1 to 5. VIKOR methodology is used to distinguish factors’ performance gap and stimulate the scope of improvement. The main objective of authors is to establish factors’ ranking using VIKOR methodology, including the calculated weight of factors through the analytical hierarchy process technique.

Keywords


Internal Supply Chain Management (ISCM), VIKOR Methodology, Factors Ranking, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Technique.

References