Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Achieving Cost Efficiency through SCM Practices: A Study of Indian Paint Industry


Affiliations
1 M. A. National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Nowaday many organizations become a part of at least one supply chain. They have to perform equally well, in order to achieve better performance. The present work attempts to find the gap between agreement level and adoption level of various supply chain management (SCM) practices in paint companies who are operating in India. An empirical study was carried out with paint companies. Paired samples t-test was used to find out the difference in agreement and adoption level of various SCM practices and multiple regression analysis was used to check the relationship between dependent and independent variables. A significant difference was found between the agreement level of SCM practices and adoption level of such practices in the responses of Indian paint companies. A significant correlation was found between the operational performance of companies and SCM practices. The study was limited to Indian paint industry which needs to be generalized.

Keywords

Supply Chain Management, Performance, Paint Industry, ICT Practices, CRM Practices
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alvarado, U. Y., & Kotzab, H., (2001). Supply chain management: the integration of logistics in marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(2), 183-198.

  • Attaran, M. (2007). RFID: an enabler of supply chain operations. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 249-257.

  • Cassivi, L. (2006). Collaboration planning in a supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(3), 249-258.

  • Center for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) (2010), CMIE: Economic Overview 2010, CMIE, New Delhi.

  • Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2006). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning & Operations. New Delhi: Pearson Education.

  • Chen, I., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 119-150.

  • Chen, C. C., & Yang, C. C. (2002). Cost-effectiveness based performance evaluation for suppliers and operations. Quality Management Journal, 9(4), 59-73.

  • Corsten, D., & Kumar, N. (2005). Do suppliers benefit from collaborative relationships with large retailers? an empirical investigation of efficient consumer response adoption. Journal of Marketing, 69, 80-94.

  • Croom, S., Romano, P., & Giannakis, M. (2000). Supply Chain Management: an analytical framework for critical literature review. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), 67-83.

  • Crosby, L., & Lemay, S. A. (1998). Empirical determination of shipper requirements for motor carrier services: SERVQUAL, direct questioning and policy capturing methods. Journal of Business Logistics, 19(1), 139-153.

  • Dainty, A. R. J., Millett, S. J., & Briscoe, G. H. (2001). New perspectives on construction supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(3/4), 163-73.

  • Defee, C. C., & Fugate, B. S. (2010). Changing perspective of capabilities in the dynamic supply chain era. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(2), 180-206.

  • Elmuti, D. (2002). The perceived impact of supply chain management on organizational effectiveness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(3), 49-57.

  • Forker, L., Ruch, W., & Hershauer, J. C. (1999). Examining supplier improvement efforts from both sides. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(3), 40-50.

  • Ferdows, K., Lewis, M.A., & Machuca, J. A. D. (2004). Rapid-fire fulfillment. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 104-110.

  • Jones, R. M., & Towill, D. R. (1997). Information enrichment: designing the supply chain for competitive advantage. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2, 2137-2148.

  • Korgaonker, M.G. (1999). Integrated supply chain management - part I. MM - The Industry Magazine, February, 73-82.

  • Krause, D. R. (1997). Supplier development: current practices and outcomes. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(2), 12-9.

  • Kristal, M. M., Huang, X., & Roth, A. V. (2010). The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities & business performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 415-429.

  • Kuei, C. H., Madu, C. N., & Lin, C. (2001). The relationship between supply chain quality management practices and organizational performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(8/9), 864-872.

  • Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102-112.

  • Lee, C. W., & Kwon, I. W. G. (2007). Relationship between supply chain performance and degree of linkage among supplier, internal integration, and customer. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(6), 444-452.

  • Liker, J. K., & Choi, T. Y. (2004). Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 104-113.

  • Malek, L. A., Kullpattaranirun, T., & Nanthavanij, S. (2005), A framework for comparing outsourcing strategies in multi-layered supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 97, 318-328.

  • Mehra, S., & Inman, R. A. (2004). Purchasing management and business competitiveness in the coming decade. Production Planning & Control, 15(7), 710-718.

  • McGinnis, M. A., & Vallopra, R. M. (1999). Purchasing and supplier innovation in process improvement: a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(4), 42-50.

  • Mentzer, J. T., Dewitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G., 2001. Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22, 1-25.

  • Meredith, J., & Roth, A. (1998). Operations management in the USA. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(7), 668-683.

  • Mowat, A., & Collins, R. (2000). Consumer behaviour & fruit quality: supply chain management in an emerging industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(1), 45-54.

  • Poulymenakou, A. & Tsironis, L., (2003) Quality and electronic commerce: a partnership for growth. The TQM Magazine, 15(3): 137-151.

  • Sahay, B.S. (2000). Supply Chain Management for Twenty First Century. New Delhi: Macmillan India.

  • Stavrulaki, E., & Davis, M. (2010). Aligning products with supply chain processes & strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(1), 127-151.

  • Tan, K. C., Kannan, V. R., & Handfield, R. B. (1998). Supply chain management: supplier performance and firm performance. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34, 2-9.

  • Taylor, D. (1997). Global Cases in Logistics and Supply Chain Management. London: International Thompson Business Press.

  • Tracey, M., Lim, J. S., & Vonderembse, M. A. (2005). The impact of supply chain management capabilities on organization performance. Supply Chain Management, 10, 179-191.

  • Trent, R. J., & Monczka, R. M. (1999). Achieving worldclass supplier quality. Total Quality Management, 10(6), 927-938.

  • Walters, D., & Lancaster, G. (2000). Implementing value strategy through the value chain. Management Decision, 38(3), 160-78.

  • Zsidisin, G., Jun, M., & Adams, L. (2000). The relationship between information technology & service quality in the dual-direction supply chain. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11(4), 312-28.


Abstract Views: 526

PDF Views: 1




  • Achieving Cost Efficiency through SCM Practices: A Study of Indian Paint Industry

Abstract Views: 526  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Gyaneshwar Singh Kushwaha
M. A. National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India

Abstract


Nowaday many organizations become a part of at least one supply chain. They have to perform equally well, in order to achieve better performance. The present work attempts to find the gap between agreement level and adoption level of various supply chain management (SCM) practices in paint companies who are operating in India. An empirical study was carried out with paint companies. Paired samples t-test was used to find out the difference in agreement and adoption level of various SCM practices and multiple regression analysis was used to check the relationship between dependent and independent variables. A significant difference was found between the agreement level of SCM practices and adoption level of such practices in the responses of Indian paint companies. A significant correlation was found between the operational performance of companies and SCM practices. The study was limited to Indian paint industry which needs to be generalized.

Keywords


Supply Chain Management, Performance, Paint Industry, ICT Practices, CRM Practices

References