Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effects of the Supplier Selection Process on Post-Contract Supplier Performance


Affiliations
1 Northumbria University, United Kingdom
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This research investigates the supplier selection processes of an automotive production supplier in the automotive industry. The investigation analyzes frameworks from the literature related to the supplier selection process and relates them to the methods of supplier selection in the analyzed case. This method identifies how a successful supplier can be chosen. Recommendations on how the company might be able to improve their processes are discussed and suggestions are given as to how a buyer can help a supplier in being successful upon commencing business.

Keywords

Supplier Selection, Post-Contract Supplier Performance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Agarwal, P., Sahai, M., Mishra, V., Bag, M., & Singh, V. (2011).A review of multi-criteria decision making techniques for supplier evaluation and selection. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2, 801-810.

  • Aksoy, A., & Ozturk, N. (2011). Supplier selection and performance evaluation in just-in-time production environments. Expert Systems With Applications, 38(5), 6351-6359.

  • Arsan, A., & Shank, A. (2011). Performance measurements and metrics: An analysis of supplier evaluation. The SCRC Articles Library. Retrieved from the supply chain research Cooperative database.

  • Bag, S (2012).Review of supplier selection models: Key success factors and blueprint of supply chain excellence. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 1(1), 56-62

  • Beil, D. (2009). Supplier Selection. Stephen M. Ross School of Business,1-21.

  • Benton, W., & Maloni, M. (2005).The infl uence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), 1-22.

  • Boer, L. D., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7, 75-89.

  • Effects of the Supplier Selection Process on Post-Contract Supplier Performance 13 Certifi cation - ISO.(n.d.). ISO - International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved from http://www.iso. org/iso/home/standards/certifi cation.htm

  • Chang, S., Wang, R., & Wang, S. (2007). Applying a direct multigranularity linguistics and strategy-oriented aggregation approach on the assessment of supply performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1013-1025.

  • Chatterjee, P., & Chatterjee, R. (2012). Supplier evaluation in manufacturing environment using compromise ranking method with grey interval numbers. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 3, 393-402.

  • CIPS Intelligence.(n.d.).Essential Procurement and Management Resources | CIPS Intelligence. Retrieved from http://cipsintelligence.cips.org/opencontent/ cips-purchasing-supply-management-incentivisation Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (1996). Theory building for management research: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.

  • Farughi, H., Azar, S., Sadeghi, H., Naseri, F., & Hajebi, S. (2011). Using multi criteria decision making models to evaluate suppliers in outsourcing process of supply chain management. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1999-2009.

  • Fazlollahtabar, H., Mahdavi, I., Ashoori, M.T., Kaviani, S., & Mahdavi-Amir, N. (2011). A Multi-objective Decision-making process of supplier selection and order allocation for multi-period scheduling in an electronic market. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 59(9-12), 1039-1052

  • Ferreira, L., &Borenstein, D. (2012).A fuzzy-Bayesian model for supplier selection. Expert Systems With Applications, 39(9), 7834-7844.

  • Gardenal, F. (2013). A model to measure e-procurement impacts on organizational performance. Journal of Public Procurement, 13(2), 215-242.

  • Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2009). Information systems outsourcing reasons and risks: an empirical study. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 180-190.

  • Gordon, S. (2005). Seven steps to measure supplier performance. Quality Progress, 20-25.

  • Gulen, K. (2007). Supplier selection and outsourcing strategies in supply chain management. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 3(2), 1-6.

  • Gunasekaran, A., & Patel, C., Tirtirolu, E. (2002). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21 (1/2), 71-88.

  • Johansson, R. (2003). Case Study Methodology. Lecture conducted from Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.

  • Khorramshahgol, R. (2012). An integrated strategic approach to supplier evaluation and selection. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11, 55-76.

  • Kumar, R., Singh, R.K., & Shankar, R. (2012).Supply chain management issues in an Indian SME: A Sap-Lap analysis.Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 1(2), 34-44

  • Ng, E. (2010). Understanding B2B supplier selection relationships: The case of taiwan agribusinesses. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 17(2), 149-172.

  • Nydick, R., & Hill, R. (1992).Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(2), 31-36.

  • Perdue, B., & Summers, J. (1991). Purchasing agents' use of negotiation strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 175-189.

  • Reed, A. (2010). Vendor Selection in the real world. Pragnalysis. Retrieved from http://www.pragnalysis. com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&i d=89:vendorselection&catid=38&Itemid=79

  • Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the analytic hierarchy process? Mathematical Models for Decision Support, 48, 110-118.

  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods For Business Students (5th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

  • Shin, H., Collier, D., & Wilson, D. (2000). Supply management orientation and supplier buyer performance. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 317-333.

  • Tafl inger, R. (1996). Introduction to Research.Washington State University - Pullman, Washington. Retrieved from http://public.wsu.edu/~tafl inge/research.html

  • Thompson, K. (1990). Vendor profi le analysis. Journal of Purchasing & Materials Management, 26, 1. U.S. Census Bureau, (2006).l Statistics for industry groups and industries: 2005. U.S. Census Bureau- Annual Survey of Manufactures, 33.

  • Weaver, K., & Olson, J. (2006). Understanding paradigms used for nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(4), 459-469.

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.


Abstract Views: 280

PDF Views: 2




  • Effects of the Supplier Selection Process on Post-Contract Supplier Performance

Abstract Views: 280  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Dimitra Skoumpopoulou
Northumbria University, United Kingdom
Domenic Dewaele
, Canada
Ilias Vlachos
, United Kingdom

Abstract


This research investigates the supplier selection processes of an automotive production supplier in the automotive industry. The investigation analyzes frameworks from the literature related to the supplier selection process and relates them to the methods of supplier selection in the analyzed case. This method identifies how a successful supplier can be chosen. Recommendations on how the company might be able to improve their processes are discussed and suggestions are given as to how a buyer can help a supplier in being successful upon commencing business.

Keywords


Supplier Selection, Post-Contract Supplier Performance.

References