Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Employee Engagement: The Impact of Organisational Justice, Perceived Support, and Person Fit


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, GDC Boys Udhampur, Jammu & Kashmir, India
2 Assistant Professor, Central University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In this competitive era, organisations are concentrating on engaging their employees, and this has become a competitive differentiator for the organisations. Most of the organisations today are becoming a powerful source of competitive advantage. Hence, engagement is seen as a capable wellspring of a game changer in these tumultuous times. This paper focuses on constructs like perceived organisational support, person-organisation fit, and organisational justice, and their influence on employees, which can help the organisations know and develop measures to engage employees and retain talent. This study was conducted on telecom employees working in telecom organisations. Responses from 255 employees were received, out of the 455 questionnaires distributed. The hypotheses focused on the relationships between perceived organisational support, person-organisation fit, and organisational justice, and employee engagement. The findings of the study suggest the impact of the antecedents on employee engagement and how these antecedents can help engage the employees in their work places. The results confirm that perceived organisational support, person-organisation fit, and organisational justice actually lead to employee engagement, ultimately retaining the employees and negatively impacting their ‘intention to quit’. This inculcates in employees a sense of belonging with the organisation, resulting in long-term relationships. This in turn keeps the organisation economically sound.

Keywords

Employee Engagement, Organisational Justice, Perceived Organisational Support
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adekola, B. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of work engagement among managers and professionals in Nigeria. British Journal of Management and Economics, 1(2), 83-99.
  • Ahmadi, S. A., Tavakoli, S., & Heidary, P. P. (2014). Perceived organizational support and employee engagement. International Journal of Information Technology and Management Studies, 1(1).
  • Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29(1), 99-118.
  • Annual Report 2013-2014, Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Government of India, New Delhi. Retrieved May 9, 2016, from http://www.dot.gov.in/sites/default/files/AR%202013-14%20English%20 (2)_1.pdf
  • Bakker, A., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Dev Int., 13(3), 209-223. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
  • Bakker, A., & Leiter, M. (2010). Work engagement. Hove [England]: Psychology Press.
  • Bhatnagar, J., & Biswas, S. (2010). Predictors & outcomes of employee engagement: Implications for the resourcebased view perspective. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(2), 273-286.
  • Biswas, S., & Bhatnagar, J. (2013). Mediator analysis of employee engagement: Role of perceived organizational support, P-O fit, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Vikalpa, 38(1).
  • Biswas, S., Varma, A., & Ramaswami, A. (2013). Linking distributive and procedural justice to employee engagement through social exchange: A field study in India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(8), 1570-1587.
  • Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294-311.
  • Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 459-483.
  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
  • Ghosh, P., Rai, A., & Sinha, A. (2014). Organizational justice and employee engagement. Personnel Review, 43(4), 628-652.
  • Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Personorganization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 254-275.
  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399432. doi:10.1177/014920639001600208
  • Hanif, F., Naqvi, S., & Hussain, K. (2015). The role of employee engagement in work-related outcomes. Advances in Economics and Business, 3(6), 204-214. doi:10.13189/ aeb.2015.030602
  • IBEF. (2016). Telecommunications. India Brand Equity Foundation. Retrieved October 17, 2016, from http:// www.ibef.org/industry/telecommunications.aspx
  • ISR. (2004). International survey research. Retrieved from www.isrsurveys.com Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. doi:10.2307/256287
  • Kristof-Brown, A. I. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement and implication. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
  • Kumar, V., & Pansari, A. (2015). Measuring the benefits of employee engagement. MIT Sloan Management Review, 56(4), 67.
  • Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job and personorganization fit. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 59, 454-470. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1807
  • Loi, R., Hang-yue, N. & Foley, S. (2006). Linking employees’ justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intention to leave: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 101-120.
  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30.
  • Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Maslach, C., Schaufelli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.
  • Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Baharom, M. N. R., & Harun, H. (2014). Person-organization fit and turnover intention: The mediating role of employee engagement. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 6(3), 205-209.
  • Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., & Baharom, M. N. R. (2015). Linking person-job fit, person-organization fit, employee engagement and turnover intention: A three-step conceptual model. Asian Social Science, 11(2).
  • Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.
  • Patrick, H. A., & Bhat, V. A. (2014). Moderating influence of critical psychological states on work engagement and personal outcomes in the telecom sector. SAGE Open, 4(2).
  • Ram, P., & Prabhakar, G. V. (2011). The role of employee engagement in work-related outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(3), 47-61.
  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619. doi:10.1108/02683940610690169
  • Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116-131.
  • Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.248
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4).
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
  • Swarnalatha, C., & Prasanna, T. S. (2013). Employee engagement and fairness in the workplace. International Journal of Exclusive Management Research, 3(1).
  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A Psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Associates. TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (2016, August 5). Government of India, Indian Telecom Services Performance Indicator Report for the Quarter ending.
  • Ünal, Z. M., & Turgut, T. (2015). The buzzword: Employee engagement. Does person-organization fit contribute to employee engagement? Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 8(2), 157.
  • Veerabramham, B., & Kolla, N. (2014). Antecedents of employee engagement: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 5(3), 21-27.
  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
  • Wollard, K. K., & Shuck, B. (2011). Antecedents to employee engagement a structured review of the literature. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(4), 429-446.

Abstract Views: 126

PDF Views: 0




  • Employee Engagement: The Impact of Organisational Justice, Perceived Support, and Person Fit

Abstract Views: 126  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pallavi Bhagat
Assistant Professor, GDC Boys Udhampur, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Neelika Arora
Assistant Professor, Central University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India

Abstract


In this competitive era, organisations are concentrating on engaging their employees, and this has become a competitive differentiator for the organisations. Most of the organisations today are becoming a powerful source of competitive advantage. Hence, engagement is seen as a capable wellspring of a game changer in these tumultuous times. This paper focuses on constructs like perceived organisational support, person-organisation fit, and organisational justice, and their influence on employees, which can help the organisations know and develop measures to engage employees and retain talent. This study was conducted on telecom employees working in telecom organisations. Responses from 255 employees were received, out of the 455 questionnaires distributed. The hypotheses focused on the relationships between perceived organisational support, person-organisation fit, and organisational justice, and employee engagement. The findings of the study suggest the impact of the antecedents on employee engagement and how these antecedents can help engage the employees in their work places. The results confirm that perceived organisational support, person-organisation fit, and organisational justice actually lead to employee engagement, ultimately retaining the employees and negatively impacting their ‘intention to quit’. This inculcates in employees a sense of belonging with the organisation, resulting in long-term relationships. This in turn keeps the organisation economically sound.

Keywords


Employee Engagement, Organisational Justice, Perceived Organisational Support

References