Mody University International Journal of Computing and Engineering Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Semantic Web, Ontologies and E- Government:A Review


Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan-332311, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


E-government is considered as the efficient way of Information &Communication Technology (ICT) to improve the system of government that is in place, and with a aim to provide better and useful services to the Citizens. Ontologies plays an important role in the deployment of various e-government projects and services as they enable matching, mapping and merging of various services of e-government and it also enables to facilitate the semantic integration and interoperability of various e-government services. This paper reviews the various methods and tools to implement the ontologies and how to test them using various reasoners.

Keywords

E-Government, ICT, Ontologies, Semantic.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • E. Brynjolfsson, H. Mendelson. “Information systems and the organization of modern enterprise” Journal of Organizational Computing, vol. 3, 1993, pp. 245-255.

  • S. M. Huff, R. A. Rocha, B. E. Bray, H. R. Warner, P. J. Haug. “An event model of medical information representation” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 2, pp. 116-134.

  • P. B. Bhat, C. S. Raghavendra, and V. K. Prasanna, “Efficient collective communication in distributed heterogeneous systems” 19th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Proceedings, 1999, pp. 15-24.

  • T. A. Halpin. “Information modelling and relational databases: from conceptual analysis to logical design” Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco, 2001.

  • R. Wasserman. “The problem of change” Philosophy Compass, vol. 1, 2006, pp. 1- 10.

  • Nelia Lasierra, Alvaro Alesanco, Jose Garcia. “Designing an architecture for monitoring patients at home: Ontologies and Web Services for Clinical and Technical Management Integration” Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 18(3), 2014, IEEE, pp. 896-906.

  • R. Studer, V. R. Benjamins, D. Fensel. “Knowledge engineering: principles and methods” Data Knowledge Engineering, vol. 25(1-2), 1998, pp. 161-197.

  • Tanni Mittra, Muhammad Masroor Ali. “Parallelized and distributed task based ontology matching in clustering environment with semantic verification” CSI Transaction on ICT, vol. 5, 2017, pp. 265-279.

  • Euzenat J, Shvaiko. “Ontology Matching” Springer, Berlin, 2013.

  • Maedche A. “Ontology learning for the semantic web” Springer, Berlin, 2002.

  • Staab S, Studer R (eds). “Handbook on ontologies” International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer, Berlin, 2004.

  • Antoniou G, Groth P, van Harmelen F, Hoekstra R. “A semantic web primer” 3rd edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2012.

  • Yu L. “A developer’s guide to the semantic web” Springer, Berlin, 2011.

  • Asad Masood Khattak, Rabia Batool, Zeeshan Pervez, Adil Mehmood Khan, Sungyoung Lee. “Ontology evolution and challenges” Journal of Information Science and Engineering, vol. 29, 2013, pp. 851-871.

  • https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/

  • Paul Warren, Rudi Studer, John Davies. (eds). “Introduction in semantic web technologies: trends and research in ontology-based systems” John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2006 pp. 1-8.

  • Davies J, Fensel D, Van Harmelen F. (eds). “Introduction in towards the semantic web: ontology-driven knowledge management” John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2003, pp.1-8.

  • https://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/

  • https://www.w3.org/RDF/

  • Marko GrobeInik, Dunja Mladenic. “Knowledge discovery for ontology construction” Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, John Davies, Rudi Studer, Paul Warren (eds), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2006, pp. 9-25.

  • Fayyad U, Piatetski-Shapiro G, Smith P, Uthurusamy R (eds). “Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining” MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996.

  • Kalina Bontcheva, Hamish Cunningham, Atanas Kiryakov, Valentin Tablan. “Semantic annotation and human language technology” Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, John Davies, Rudi Studer, Paul Warren (eds), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2006, pp. 29-49.

  • Domingue J, Dzbor M, Motta E. “Mapgie: Supporting Browsing and Navigation on the Semantic Web” Nunes N, Rich C, (eds). Proceedings, Conference on intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 2004, ACM, pp. 191-197.

  • Cimiano P, Handschuh S, Staab S. 2004. “Towards the self – annotating web” Proceedings of 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2004, pp. 462-471.

  • Dill S, et al. “Semtag and seeker: bootstrapping the semantic web via automated semantic annotation” Proceedings of World Wide Web, 2003, ACM.

  • Jos de Brujin, et al. “Ontology mediation, merging, and aligning” Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, John Davies, Rudi Studer, Paul Warren (eds), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2006, pp. 95-112.

  • Noy NF, Musen, MA. “PROMPT: algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment” Proceedings, 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2000, Austin, Texas, USA.

  • Dou D, McDermott D, Qi P. “Ontology translation by ontology merging and automated reasoning” Proceedings, Workshop on Ontologies for Multi-Agent Systems, 2002, pp. 3-18.

  • York Sure, Christoph Tempic, Denny Vrandecic. “Ontology engineering methodologies” in Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, John Davies, Rudi Studer, Paul Warren (eds), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2006, pp. 95-112.

  • N. Noy, R. Fergerson, M. Musen. “The knowledge model of Protégé - 2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility” Proceedings, 12th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Methods, Models, and Tools, 2000, pp. 17-32.

  • Sunitha Abburu. “A Survey on Ontology Reasoners and Comparison” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 57(17), 2012, pp. 33-39

  • T. Gabel, Y. Sure, J. Voelker. “KAON – ontology management infrastructure” D 3.1.1.a, SEKT Project: Semantically Enabled Knowledge Technologies, 2004.

  • Arpirez J. C., Corcho O., Fernandez-Lopez M., Gomez-Perez A. “Web ODE: a scalable workbench for ontological engineering” Proceedings, First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, 2001, pp. 6-13.

  • Y. Sure, J. Angele, S. Staab. “OntoEdit: multifaceted inferencing for ontology engineering” Journal on Data Semantics, vol. 1, 2003, pp. 128-152.

  • Jean Vincent Fonou-Dombeu, Magda Huisman. “Semantic-driven e-government: application of uschold and king ontology building methodology for semantic ontology models development” International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, vol. 2(4), 2011, pp. 1-20.

  • Fathia Bettahar, Claude Moulin, Jean-Paul Barthès. “Towards a semantic interoperability in an e-government application” Journal of e-Government, vol. 7(3), 2009, pp. 209-226.


Abstract Views: 256

PDF Views: 121




  • Semantic Web, Ontologies and E- Government:A Review

Abstract Views: 256  |  PDF Views: 121

Authors

Somil Jain
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan-332311, India
Puneet Kumar
Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan-332311, India

Abstract


E-government is considered as the efficient way of Information &Communication Technology (ICT) to improve the system of government that is in place, and with a aim to provide better and useful services to the Citizens. Ontologies plays an important role in the deployment of various e-government projects and services as they enable matching, mapping and merging of various services of e-government and it also enables to facilitate the semantic integration and interoperability of various e-government services. This paper reviews the various methods and tools to implement the ontologies and how to test them using various reasoners.

Keywords


E-Government, ICT, Ontologies, Semantic.

References