OPUS: HR Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Self Efficacy among Working Women in Relation to their Demographic Characteristics


Affiliations
1 Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Acropolis Technical Campus, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The primary purpose of the study was to examine the self efficacy of working women in Indore city. An attempt was also made to analyze the association between the levels of self efficacy among the working women in relation to their demographic status. A total of 100 respondents (50 married and 50 unmarried working women) were administered the General Self efficacy Questionnaire. The marriage duration was between 5-35 years and minimum age was 25 years (for both). The age range was divided into three age-group: Between 25-34 years, Between 35-44 years and Above 45 years. Snowball sampling method was used to collect data. Women who possessed degrees of Graduation, Post Graduation and any other professional degree were considered as highly educated and below Under Graduate degree were considered as less educated. The results revealed that the marital status does not affect the generalized levels of self efficacy of working women in Indore city. However self efficacy of old unmarried working women was found to be high. Also working married women seek more economic independence as compared to unmarried working women who thrive for status; self efficacy being the same in both the cases. The study was conducted on working women in Indore city using General Self efficacy Scale. Specific scales may be used in future research in different domains to get information on possible means of intervention with large sample size.

Keywords

Self Efficacy, General Versus Specific Self Efficacy, Low Versus High Self Efficacy, Sources of Self Efficacy, Married-Unmarried Women.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive analysis of substance abuse: An agentic perspective. Journal of Psychological Science, 3(10), 214-217.

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.) Encyclopedia of human behaviour (Vol.4, pp.71-81). New York: Academic Press.

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Self-efficacy belief of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

  • Betz, N. E., & Schifano, R. S. (1999). Evaluation of an intervention to increase realistic self-efficacy and interests in college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 35-52.

  • Bickel, C. E. (2004). Young women and older sexual partners in Zimbabwe: Psychosocial and behavioral risk factors for HIV infection. Emory University, Atlanta.

  • Clark, R. E. (2001). Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence. Charlotte, NC: Information. Age Publishing.

  • Courneya, K. S., & McAuley, E. (1993). Efficacy, Attributional, and affective responses of older adults following an acute bout of exercise. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 729-742.

  • Furnham, A., & Cheng, H. (2000). Personality and happiness. Psychological Reports.

  • Hackett, G. (1995). Self-efficacy in career choice and development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 2327258). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339.

  • Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 347-382.

  • Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., Brown, S. D., & Gore, P. A. (1996). Latent structure of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 292-308.

  • Marsh, H. W., Relich, J. D., & Smith , I. D. (1992). Self-concept: The constructs validity of interpretations based upon the SDQ. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173-187.

  • Markman, G. D., Balkin, D. B., & Baron, R. A. (2002). Inventors and new venture formation: the effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Winter, 149-165.

  • Meece, J. L. (1991). Child and adolescent development for educators. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.

  • Moradi, A., Amiri, S. H., Malakpor, M., Molavi, H., & Nori, A.(2010). Effectiveness of instructionof efficacy on women’s quality of life. Women investigation, 7(3), 71-98.

  • Murphy, C. A., Coover, D., & Owen, S. V. (1989). Development and validation of the computer self efficacy scale. Education and Psychological Measurement, 49, 893-899.

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Postsecondary education. In Digest of Education Statistics, 1999. Washington, DC.

  • Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Educational psychology: Developing learners (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

  • Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of writing self-efficacy beliefs on the writing performance of upper elementary students. Journal of Educational Research, 90.

  • Pajares, F. (1995). Self-efficacy, self- concept and academic achievement. In J. Aronson, & D. Cordova (Eds.), Psychology of Education: Personal and interpersonal forces. NewYork: Academic Press. Research Journal.

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1995). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Schunk, H. D. (1996). Self-efficacy for learning and performance. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.

  • Stone, D. N. (1994). Overconfidence in initial self-efficacy judgments: Effects on decision processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 452-474.

  • Wulfert, E., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Self Efficacy: Cause or effect of relapse? Abstract published in Proceedings of the 29th Annual AABT Convention.

  • Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215-246.

  • Cherry, K. (2016). Self Efficacy: Why Believing in Yourself Matters. Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/theoriesofpersonality /a/self_efficacy.htm

  • Lou. J. EDS103 Theories of Learning. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.in/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=SELF+EFFICACY+#hl=en&tbm=bks&q=http:%2F%2Fpsychology.about.com%2Fod%2Ftheoriesofpersonality%2Fa%2Fself_efficacy.htm


Abstract Views: 349

PDF Views: 0




  • Self Efficacy among Working Women in Relation to their Demographic Characteristics

Abstract Views: 349  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rajeshwari Gwal
Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
Anant Gwal
Acropolis Technical Campus, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract


The primary purpose of the study was to examine the self efficacy of working women in Indore city. An attempt was also made to analyze the association between the levels of self efficacy among the working women in relation to their demographic status. A total of 100 respondents (50 married and 50 unmarried working women) were administered the General Self efficacy Questionnaire. The marriage duration was between 5-35 years and minimum age was 25 years (for both). The age range was divided into three age-group: Between 25-34 years, Between 35-44 years and Above 45 years. Snowball sampling method was used to collect data. Women who possessed degrees of Graduation, Post Graduation and any other professional degree were considered as highly educated and below Under Graduate degree were considered as less educated. The results revealed that the marital status does not affect the generalized levels of self efficacy of working women in Indore city. However self efficacy of old unmarried working women was found to be high. Also working married women seek more economic independence as compared to unmarried working women who thrive for status; self efficacy being the same in both the cases. The study was conducted on working women in Indore city using General Self efficacy Scale. Specific scales may be used in future research in different domains to get information on possible means of intervention with large sample size.

Keywords


Self Efficacy, General Versus Specific Self Efficacy, Low Versus High Self Efficacy, Sources of Self Efficacy, Married-Unmarried Women.

References